guess all the files were already there for me.
>
> Can someone PLEASE just give the step-by-step instructions for downloading
> and preparing the kernel source? Go ahead and treat me like a
> five-year-old, I need to get this done right away. I can take over from
> the "ma
ep-by-step instructions for downloading
and preparing the kernel source? Go ahead and treat me like a
five-year-old, I need to get this done right away. I can take over from
the "make xconfig" part - I've done that much before.
I am running potato, and would like to use the 2.2.17 kern
On Sun, Aug 13, 2000 at 04:54:03AM -0500, John Reinke wrote:
> I've tried several ways to get the kernel source, but I've been
> unsuccessful so far. I've tried using apt-get for a few of the
> kernel-source packages, and also ftping from kernel.org, and every
> time
I've tried several ways to get the kernel source, but I've been
unsuccessful so far. I've tried using apt-get for a few of the
kernel-source packages, and also ftping from kernel.org, and every time I
untar them (or bzip2), it quits early, saying there are around 300 bytes
of gar
On Mon, Jul 31, 2000 at 05:51:08PM -0500, Nate Bargmann wrote:
> any longer? I'm really quite hesitant to install a pre* kernel
> on a nearly stable system. Anyone using .17pre6 who can assure
> me it's stable enough?
.17pre (latest is '14) is much more stable than .16.
moritz
--
/* Mo
Nate Bargmann wrote:
>
> I'm curious as to why the latest "dot release" kernel in Potato is
> 2.2.15 and not 2.2.16. The latest package update shows 2.2.17pre6
> to be available, but .16 is skipped. I don't read -devel so I'm
> in the dark as to why. Also, why is .14 not available as a package
On Mon, Jul 31, 2000 at 05:51:08PM -0500, Nate Bargmann wrote:
> I'm curious as to why the latest "dot release" kernel in Potato is
> 2.2.15 and not 2.2.16. The latest package update shows 2.2.17pre6
> to be available, but .16 is skipped. I don't read -devel so I'm
> in the dark as to why. Also,
I'm curious as to why the latest "dot release" kernel in Potato is
2.2.15 and not 2.2.16. The latest package update shows 2.2.17pre6
to be available, but .16 is skipped. I don't read -devel so I'm
in the dark as to why. Also, why is .14 not available as a package
any longer? I'm really quite he
On Jul 04 2000, Jeronimo Pellegrini wrote:
> :: On Tue, 4 Jul 2000 15:18:33 -0300, Rogerio Brito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> Hi Roger.
Hi, Jeronimo.
> > Don't use that site. Use ftp://ftp.xx.kernel.org/ instead
> > (where xx is your country code) to let the community mirror it
On Jul 05 2000, Corey Popelier wrote:
> Umm, yes and no. Kernel 2.2.15-3 is patched against those
> vulnerabilities. 2.2.15-2 and previous are not.
Humm... Sorry... I wasn't refering to kernels from Debian
(and, to be honest, I don't use them), so I really don't know
(I onl
Umm, yes and no. Kernel 2.2.15-3 is patched against those
vulnerabilities. 2.2.15-2 and previous are not.
>From what I've read, 2.2.16 was kinda rushed, and 2.2.17 (once out of
Pre) will be considered the better way to go.
Cheers,
Corey Popelier
http://members.dingoblue.net.au/~pancreas
Work E
:: On Tue, 4 Jul 2000 15:18:33 -0300, Rogerio Brito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Hi Roger.
> Don't use that site. Use ftp://ftp.xx.kernel.org/ instead
> (where xx is your country code) to let the community mirror it
> faster.
> In the same way, don't use ftp.debian.org. Use s
On Jul 04 2000, ktb wrote:
> I'm guessing the source is on your disk but you can get kernels from --
> http://www.kernel.org/
Don't use that site. Use ftp://ftp.xx.kernel.org/ instead
(where xx is your country code) to let the community mirror it
faster.
In the sam
On Tue, 04 Jul 2000, Shel Johnson wrote:
> I'm attempting to recompile the kernel for my NIC.. For me to do that, I
> need to make sure that "the kernel source code" is included.. I'm running
> Storm Linux 2000.. Can anyone tell me where I'm supposed to look f
ing to recompile the kernel for my NIC.. For me to do that, I
> need to make sure that "the kernel source code" is included.. I'm running
> Storm Linux 2000.. Can anyone tell me where I'm supposed to look for
> it??.. THX...
>
> =
> Shel
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ICQ- 23454126
> AIM- CacheMonet
>
I'm attempting to recompile the kernel for my NIC.. For me to do that, I
need to make sure that "the kernel source code" is included.. I'm running
Storm Linux 2000.. Can anyone tell me where I'm supposed to look for
it??.. THX...
=
Shel
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ICQ-
On Thu, 15 Jun 2000, Chuan-kai Lin wrote:
> Henrique M Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > As for Debian, we're in the second test cicle. Maybe if there is a third
> > cycle for some reason, a kernel update to 2.2.17-pre1 might be considered...
>
> Now it looks likely that we will need a third
Henrique M Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As for Debian, we're in the second test cicle. Maybe if there is a third
> cycle for some reason, a kernel update to 2.2.17-pre1 might be considered...
Now it looks likely that we will need a third cycle, because the package
postgresql-6.5.3-22 is s
> Didn't 2.2.16 appear to solve some security bugs of 2.2.15? If this is the
> case, even if the patches applied to 2.2.15 actually close those security
> bugs, wouldn't 2.2.15 give an impression of lack of security?
This is what I was thinking if/when potato ships with 2.2.15. Potential
new u
On Wed, 14 Jun 2000, Paulo J. da Silva e Silva wrote:
> Didn't 2.2.16 appear to solve some security bugs of 2.2.15? If this is the
> case, even if the patches applied to 2.2.15 actually close those security
> bugs, wouldn't 2.2.15 give an impression of lack of security?
The real problem with 2.2.1
Hey,
Didn't 2.2.16 appear to solve some security bugs of 2.2.15? If this is the
case, even if the patches applied to 2.2.15 actually close those security
bugs, wouldn't 2.2.15 give an impression of lack of security?
I can imagine someone who read the security alert (and didn't read carefully
that
On Tue, 13 Jun 2000, Charles Lewis wrote:
> Or do they intend to "ship" potato with 2.2.16?
Potato will probably ship with a patched 2.2.15 (i386 anyways), the
changelog should say if you have the version you want.
later,
Bruce
Or do they intend to "ship" potato with 2.2.16?
Charles Lewis
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 12 Jun 2000 16:02:05 BST, Colin Watson writes:
>Ron Rademaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>On Mon, 12 Jun 2000, Marvin Stodolsky wrote:
>>> winmodem binary, which doesn't (yet work) with 2.2.15. Does
>>> anyone have a kernel-source-2.2.14.deb that
Ron Rademaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Mon, 12 Jun 2000, Marvin Stodolsky wrote:
>> For reasons not yet explained, kernel-source-2.2.14.deb is
>> not at the DEB respositories though its Package WWW page is
>> still up at www.debian.org. I need to do a compil
arvin Stodolsky wrote:
> For reasons not yet explained, kernel-source-2.2.14.deb is
> not at the DEB respositories though its Package WWW page is
> still up at www.debian.org. I need to do a compile with
> 2.2.14 source, to support both OSS sound and the ltmodem.o
> winmodem binary, whi
For reasons not yet explained, kernel-source-2.2.14.deb is
not at the DEB respositories though its Package WWW page is
still up at www.debian.org. I need to do a compile with
2.2.14 source, to support both OSS sound and the ltmodem.o
winmodem binary, which doesn't (yet work) with 2.2.15.
On 02-Jun-2000 Antonio Rodriguez wrote:
> What's the difference between kernel-source and the linux-2.*.tar.gz?
> To compile your own kernel, if you use the linux* one, you use make-kpkg
> after unpacking.
> If you use kernel-source, do you unpack it? If yes, how? And then,
What's the difference between kernel-source and the linux-2.*.tar.gz?
To compile your own kernel, if you use the linux* one, you use make-kpkg
after unpacking.
If you use kernel-source, do you unpack it? If yes, how? And then, what
next?
Thanks,
antonio.
s indicated before in an earlier thread, but there aren't
> any make rules. Is there any way of unpacking them from the *_all.deb?
When you've got a kernel-source-xxx.deb package, you really *have* got
a kernelxxx.tar.{g|b}z one. It's sitting in /usr/src/ and is waiting
for y
No, what I meant was that I had apt-got (past tense on purpose) installed
kernel-source*, but make-kpkg was complaining that it didn't have make rules.
So,
after reading a little more, I just got the original kernerl 2.2.14, unpacked
it and
all then worked, except for my scssi emulation m
I'm not entirely sure what your trying to say here. Are you saying that
you have compiled the kernel-source with kpkg and now are at the point
where you have something like --
kernel-image-2.0.36_custom.2.0.36.1_i386.deb ?
If so then just --
dpkg -i kernel-image-.deb
If that isn'
The directions to install a kernel using make-kpkg are more or less
clear to me if doing it with a kernel*tar.gz one, because it unpacks the
make instructions. Now, what to do when it is a .deb one? I tried make
menuconfig as indicated before in an earlier thread, but there aren't
any make rules. I
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Paul J. Keenan) wrote:
>> On Thu, 3 Feb 2000, Colin Watson wrote:
>> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Shaul Karl) wrote:
>> > >It is my understanding that each kernel-source package provides
>> > >kernel-headers. Yet kernel-source-2.2.14 does not men
> On Thu, 3 Feb 2000, Colin Watson wrote:
>
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Shaul Karl) wrote:
> > >It is my understanding that each kernel-source package provides
> > >kernel-headers. Yet kernel-source-2.2.14 does not mention it.
> > >
> > >What am I mis
On Thu, 3 Feb 2000, Colin Watson wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Shaul Karl) wrote:
> >It is my understanding that each kernel-source package provides
> >kernel-headers. Yet kernel-source-2.2.14 does not mention it.
> >
> >What am I missing?
>
> No, kernel-sour
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Shaul Karl) wrote:
>It is my understanding that each kernel-source package provides
>kernel-headers. Yet kernel-source-2.2.14 does not mention it.
>
>What am I missing?
No, kernel-source doesn't provide kernel headers. However, if you
install kernel-package
It is my understanding that each kernel-source package provides kernel-headers.
Yet kernel-source-2.2.14 does not mention it.
What am I missing?
--
Shaul Karl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
An elephant is a mouse with an operating system.
On Sun, Oct 24, 1999 at 09:18:18AM +0200, Shaul Karl wrote:
> I have no such problems with linux-2.2.13.tar.bz2 (not debinaized).
>
> I wonder if there is a problem with kernel-source-2.2.12 ?
No: I use a pure slink, not any PB with 2.2.12.
JY
--
Jean-Yves F. Barbier <[EMA
> > Package: kernel-source
> > Version: N/A
> > Severity: normal
> >
> > [13:57:06 kernel-source-2.2.12]# make menuconfig
> > rm -f include/asm
> > ( cd include ; ln -sf asm-i386 asm)
> > make -C scripts/lxdialog all
> > make[1]: Entering dir
> > Package: kernel-source
> > Version: N/A
> > Severity: normal
> >
> > [13:57:06 kernel-source-2.2.12]# make menuconfig
> > rm -f include/asm
> > ( cd include ; ln -sf asm-i386 asm)
> > make -C scripts/lxdialog all
> > make[1]: Entering dir
On Fri, Oct 22, 1999 at 02:24:58PM +0200, Shaul Karl wrote:
> Package: kernel-source
> Version: N/A
> Severity: normal
>
> [13:57:06 kernel-source-2.2.12]# make menuconfig
> rm -f include/asm
> ( cd include ; ln -sf asm-i386 asm)
> make -C scripts/lxdialog all
> make[1
Package: kernel-source
Version: N/A
Severity: normal
[13:57:06 kernel-source-2.2.12]# make menuconfig
rm -f include/asm
( cd include ; ln -sf asm-i386 asm)
make -C scripts/lxdialog all
make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/kernel-source-2.2.12/scripts/lxdialog'
make[1]: Leaving directory
I know this is documented somewhere. I've seen it. Unfortunately, I
can't figure out where I've seen it.
What patches are applied to the pristine kernel source to make the
distributed Debian kernel-source packages? And where do they come
from? And where is this documented?
--
I
*- On 13 Sep, John Davis wrote about "make-kpkg doesn't make different kernel
source revs."
> Hello
>
> Why is that when I build a new kernel via make-kpkg, it doesn't make a
> new kernel rev.
>
> Scenario:
> Previously, I built a new kernel
Hello
Why is that when I build a new kernel via make-kpkg, it doesn't make a
new kernel rev.
Scenario:
Previously, I built a new kernel using:
make-kpkg --rev Custom.1.0 kernel_image
This command built my kernel and put an file in my /usr/src
directory called. kernel-image
Hey Y'all :)
Thanks for the help. It worked!! I don't know what happened--I had the
source code installed perfectly before, and then it just went crazy on
me... Oh, well--I'm back in business. Thanks!
TAL [Thanks A Lot!],
Brant
Do you have ncurses-dev installed? That output looks like what happened
to me when I forgot to install ncurses-dev before building my kernel with
menuconfig :(
On Mon, 3 May 1999, Brant Wells wrote:
> Howdy All:
>
> How are ya?
>
> Last night, I was working on installing the Kernel 2.2.3 Sour
Brant Wells wrote:
>
> Howdy All:
>
> How are ya?
>
> Last night, I was working on installing the Kernel 2.2.3 Sources. I
> unpack them and then run 'make menuconfig' and this is what I get...
>
> rm -f include/asm
> ( cd include ; ln -sf asm-i386 asm)
> make -C scripts/lxdialog all
> make[1]:
Howdy All:
How are ya?
Last night, I was working on installing the Kernel 2.2.3 Sources. I
unpack them and then run 'make menuconfig' and this is what I get...
rm -f include/asm
( cd include ; ln -sf asm-i386 asm)
make -C scripts/lxdialog all
make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/linux/scripts/
On Fri, Apr 16, 1999 at 21:17:32 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I just sent a message to debian-user@lists.debian.org, and it made it
> through to the list straight away, but I also go this reply from somewhere
> else.
>
> I SENT the message to and only to debian-user, it was not a reply or els
PROTECTED] -
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 1999 20:56:45 +0200
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bcc:
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Hiba: error installing kernel source
Rem: _eZT_a_lEVELET_lATTAM_mAR
~
Uzenetet nem tudtuk tovabbitani!
Az On altal a
Hi,
I tried to unpack/install kernel 2.0.35 source tarball in /usr/src, and it gave
me the following error (with `tar zxvf linux-2.0.35.tar.gz'):
gzip: stdin: invalid compressed data--crc error
tar: Child returned status 1
tar: Error exit delayed from previous errors
though it has created linux/
Hello,
ktb:
> > My Slink had no /usr/src/linux. /usr/src contained
> > 'kernel-headers-2.0.36/' and 'kernel-source-2.0.36/'
Marlon Urias wrote:
> My /usr/src/ only contains kernel-headers-2.0.36, this isn't the weird
> thing about my installation
Marlon Urias writes:
> After going through pppconfig (after a fresh install of Debian 2.1) I
> tried pon and got a error message about my kernel not supporting ppp.
Don't believe it. The distributed kernel does support ppp. This is a bug
in pppd: it often jumps to the conclusion that the kernel
ances? Do I need to download the source? Am
> > > I looking in the right place? Help. Thank you. marlon
> >
> > My Slink had no /usr/src/linux. /usr/src contained
> > 'kernel-headers-2.0.36/' and 'kernel-source-2.0.36/'
>
> My /usr/src/ only cont
t place? Help. Thank you. marlon
>
> My Slink had no /usr/src/linux. /usr/src contained
> 'kernel-headers-2.0.36/' and 'kernel-source-2.0.36/'
My /usr/src/ only contains kernel-headers-2.0.36, this isn't the weird
thing about my installation either. I gu
ontained
'kernel-headers-2.0.36/' and 'kernel-source-2.0.36/' I just moved to
the "kernel-source-2.0.36/" directory and compiled the kernel. I later
unpacked the 2.2.1 kernel expecting it to create a 'linux' directory
with link like in Hamm. It didn't.
After going through pppconfig (after a fresh install of Debian 2.1) I
tried pon and got a error message about my kernel not supporting ppp.
So I head on over to /usr/src/linux to run make xconfig but alas, /usr/src
only has a dir named linux-x.y.z.headers (or something close). I was under
the impre
>
> Question 1.. How do I unpack the source code so that everything
> falls down to the appropriate directories??
Grab a kernel tarball, untar it in /tmp, then move the created linux
dir to /usr/src/kernel-source-.
Then make a symlink in /usr/src called linux and point it to the
s
With the distribution that I used to install Linux (Linux
Press 2.1) after the installation was complete I realized
that the source code had not been downloaded !
Question 1.. How do I unpack the source code so that everything
falls down to the appropriate directories??
Question 2.. I am curren
On Mon, 22 Mar 1999, Bob Nielsen wrote:
> > I can't get any midi players to work with by SB AWE-32 (not PnP) and
> > 2.2.3.
> > Of course, I really haven't tried all that hard.
> Timidity works for me (SB16, not PnP, not as module).
I'll give it a shot. awedrv (which is what I was using with
On Mon, 22 Mar 1999, Jonathan Guthrie wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Mar 1999, Ed Cogburn wrote:
>
> > P.S. Some programs I've tried since going to the 2.2 kernel no
> > longer have working sound. Sound in the mirrormagic game is now
> > broken, for example, but things like GNOME and emusic still work.
On Mon, 22 Mar 1999, Ed Cogburn wrote:
> P.S. Some programs I've tried since going to the 2.2 kernel no
> longer have working sound. Sound in the mirrormagic game is now
> broken, for example, but things like GNOME and emusic still work.
I can't get any midi players to work with by SB AWE-
"Guido A.J. Stevens" wrote:
>
> To follow up on this thread: how do I configure sound? When running
> make menuconfig for the kernel, I'm not being asked for irq or dma
> settings. Trying to pass command line arguments, I must be doing
> something wrong:
>
> wiz:~# modprobe sound irq=10
> /lib/mo
To follow up on this thread: how do I configure sound? When running
make menuconfig for the kernel, I'm not being asked for irq or dma
settings. Trying to pass command line arguments, I must be doing
something wrong:
wiz:~# modprobe sound irq=10
/lib/modules/2.2.3/misc/sound.o: invalid parameter i
Geoffrey Deasey KD4WVF wrote:
>
> and building a new kernel with sound
> do I have to do mknod on all the sound devices ?
> I noticed that they are missing, or is there a debian package
> that accomplishes this ?
Hmmm, as root:
cd /dev
./MAKEDEV audio
At least I
and building a new kernel with sound
do I have to do mknod on all the sound devices ?
I noticed that they are missing, or is there a debian package
that accomplishes this ?
__
Geoffrey Deasey/ /__ __
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ /
John Maheu wrote:
>
> On Mon, 15 Mar 1999, Tony Schonfeld wrote:
>
> > i've just upgrade one server to slink at work and i'm confuse
> > when i've see that kernel-source are in the tgz form after
> > the installation.
> >
> > I think
On Mon, 15 Mar 1999, Tony Schonfeld wrote:
> i've just upgrade one server to slink at work and i'm confuse
> when i've see that kernel-source are in the tgz form after
> the installation.
>
> I think it's necessary to use the 'old method' without pr
i've just upgrade one server to slink at work and i'm confuse
when i've see that kernel-source are in the tgz form after
the installation.
I think it's necessary to use the 'old method' without problem :
* unpack the package
* create a symlink from kernel-sou
Recently I upgraded most of my machines from the version of
kernel-package that came with hamm to 6.05.
Now when I build kernel source packages, instead of the kernel-source
package unrolling to /usr/src/kernel-source-x.x.x it just creates
/usr/src/kernel-source-x.x.x.tar.gz.
The make-kpkg man
Hi Robert,
you wrote on: 28 Jan 99 at 15:06 (received 28.01.99)
about : _kernel source_
>I just installed Debian Linux and can't find the kernel source code anywhere.
>There is no /usr/src directory on my system. What package do I need to
>install? Thanks,
Enter dselect
> > *- On 28 Jan, Robert B Geary wrote about "kernel source"
> > > I just installed Debian Linux and can't find the kernel source
> > > code anywhere. There is no /usr/src directory on my system.
> Accodring to other posts here, 2.2.0 will likely be
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> *- On 28 Jan, Robert B Geary wrote about "kernel source"
> > I just installed Debian Linux and can't find the kernel source
> > code anywhere. There is no /usr/src directory on my system.
> > What package do I need to install
I always grab the source from ftp.kernel.org or one of its mirrors, then
Untar into /usr/src. Always works for me.
On Thu, 28 Jan 1999, Robert B Geary wrote:
> I just installed Debian Linux and can't find the kernel source code anywhere.
> There is no /usr/src directory on my sy
*- On 28 Jan, Robert B Geary wrote about "kernel source"
> I just installed Debian Linux and can't find the kernel source code anywhere.
> There is no /usr/src directory on my system. What package do I need to
> install? Thanks,
>
> Rob
>
>
The kernel-
I just installed Debian Linux and can't find the kernel source code anywhere.
There is no /usr/src directory on my system. What package do I need to
install? Thanks,
Rob
On Sun, Nov 08, 1998 at 10:58:00AM -0800, George Bonser wrote:
[snip]
> Other than that minor change, the 2.1.125 kernel seems to work pretty
> well. Now to patch it up to 2.1.127 :)
What about Alan Cox's 2.1.127ac1 patch?
Adrian
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.poboxes.com/adrian.bridgett
E.L. Meijer (Eric) wrote:
>
> Shaleh wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > 2.0.35 has various updates for non-Intel CPU's. Other little fixes. I
> > would recommend at least going to 2.0.34. Grab the kernel source from
> > ftp.kernel.org and use the debian kernel pack
Shaleh wrote:
[...]
> 2.0.35 has various updates for non-Intel CPU's. Other little fixes. I
> would recommend at least going to 2.0.34. Grab the kernel source from
> ftp.kernel.org and use the debian kernel packager. It makes kernel
> compiling a cinch. I recommend againt
Hi,
>>"Alex" == Alex Kwan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Alex> Dear debian fans,
Alex> My system is hamm, and I have downloaded the
Alex> kernel source (kernel-source-2.0.34-2.0.34-4.deb)
Alex> from ftp.debian.org
Look at /usr/doc/kernel-source-
On Wed, Jul 15, 1998 at 10:16:04AM -0400, Michael B. Taylor wrote:
> >
> > (1) What is the difference between linux-2.0.34.tar.gz
> > and kernel-source-2.0.34_2.034-4.deb.
Try a recursive diff on both source trees, and you'll notice that the debian
kernel tree is pat
ownloaded the
> kernel source (kernel-source-2.0.34-2.0.34-4.deb)
> from ftp.debian.org
>
> (1) What is the difference between linux-2.0.34.tar.gz
> and kernel-source-2.0.34_2.034-4.deb.
>
> (2) How to build a custom kernel with
> kernel-source-2.034_2.0.34-4.deb
&
Dear debian fans,
My system is hamm, and I have downloaded the
kernel source (kernel-source-2.0.34-2.0.34-4.deb)
from ftp.debian.org
(1) What is the difference between linux-2.0.34.tar.gz
and kernel-source-2.0.34_2.034-4.deb.
(2) How to build a custom kernel with
kernel-source
*-Ian Stuart ( 2 Jul)
| On Wed, 1 Jul 1998, Christopher Barry wrote:
|
| > I installed the 2.0.34 kernel source package and did a make menuconfig
| > and when it comes time to select the filesystems to include support for,
| > a ton of them appear to be missing, most notably msdos and v
On Wed, 1 Jul 1998, Christopher Barry wrote:
> I installed the 2.0.34 kernel source package and did a make menuconfig
> and when it comes time to select the filesystems to include support for,
> a ton of them appear to be missing, most notably msdos and vfat. When I
> installed hamm,
I installed the 2.0.34 kernel source package and did a make menuconfig
and when it comes time to select the filesystems to include support for,
a ton of them appear to be missing, most notably msdos and vfat. When I
installed hamm, I configured vfat support during the installation and it
worked
Ian Eure wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jun 26, 1998 at 08:58:26AM -0500, Jim Crumley wrote:
> > >
> > > Do you think there is a dependence on bin86 missing for the kernel-source
> > > package?
> > >
> > >I was unable to compile the kernel for some thing and
On Fri, Jun 26, 1998 at 08:58:26AM -0500, Jim Crumley wrote:
> >
> > Do you think there is a dependence on bin86 missing for the kernel-source
> > package?
> >
> >I was unable to compile the kernel for some thing and sent time digging at
> >all
> >
>
> Do you think there is a dependence on bin86 missing for the kernel-source
> package?
>
>I was unable to compile the kernel for some thing and sent time digging at all
> places before I discover I did not install the bin86 package.
>
>Why wan't bin86 instal
Hi,
Do you think there is a dependence on bin86 missing for the kernel-source
package?
I was unable to compile the kernel for some thing and sent time digging at all
places before I discover I did not install the bin86 package.
Why wan't bin86 installed? Well I tried to trim the s
On Wed, Jun 03, 1998 at 10:16:54AM -0400, Lee Bradshaw wrote:
> Can I download kernel-source-2.0.32_2.0.32-5.deb from the frozen
> directory and use it on a bo system? I think I've seen messages that
> 2.0.32 is more stable than 2.0.33 (available in bo).
Well, I'll answer m
Can I download kernel-source-2.0.32_2.0.32-5.deb from the frozen
directory and use it on a bo system? I think I've seen messages that
2.0.32 is more stable than 2.0.33 (available in bo).
Thanks,
--
Lee Bradshaw [EMAIL PROTECTED] (preferred)
Alantro Communications [
Keith wrote:
>
> I am going to upgrade my kernel from 2.0.29 to 2.0.33. I downloaded the
> kernel, a file called linux-2.0.33.tar.gz. Does this file contain the
> kernel source, it seems to small 6.3meg. If this does not contain the
> kernel source where do I get it from? When I
I am going to upgrade my kernel from 2.0.29 to 2.0.33. I downloaded the
kernel, a file called linux-2.0.33.tar.gz. Does this file contain the
kernel source, it seems to small 6.3meg. If this does not contain the
kernel source where do I get it from? When I look at all the ftp servers
that have
> Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> > Subject: Re: kernel-source-2.0.33
> >
> >
> > Yeah, I'm using bo ( that's the stable one right, Debian's so organized it
> > makes me dizzy sometimes :-))
> >
> > I was using ftp.debian.org for
then point dselect to it once I've got it on disk.
Thanks hgh
>
> > I was using ftp.debian.org for the ftp setting on dselect but all it
> > found was 2.0.29 and 2.0.30 kernel-source packages.why didn't it
> > find the 2.0.33 you list above?
>
>
&g
t;Archive-Maintenance' is present. When that file is present
there is a possibility that either a package that is present will not be
listed in the package file or that there will be files listed that are
not in the archive.
> I was using ftp.debian.org for the ftp setting on dselect but a
me dizzy sometimes :-))
I was using ftp.debian.org for the ftp setting on dselect but all it found
was 2.0.29 and 2.0.30 kernel-source packages.why didn't it find the
2.0.33 you list above?
>
> For hamm look in:
> ftp://ftp.debian.org/pub/debian/hamm/hamm/binary-all/devel/
>
601 - 700 of 742 matches
Mail list logo
