Re: kernel-source-2.0.33

Well I thought this was itor am I mistaken, I just didn't understand why dselect couldn't "track it down": http://cgi.debian.org/www-master/debian.org/Packages/unstable/devel/kernel-source-2.0.33.html Package: kernel-so

Re: kernel-source-2.0.33

/hamm/hamm/binary-m68k/devel/ (the latter two are symbolic links to the copy in 'binary-all'. Henry Hollenberg wrote: > > I found the kernel source package for 2.0.33 on the debian web page search > engine but can't seem to find it with dselect. Anybody know how? >

kernel-source-2.0.33

I found the kernel source package for 2.0.33 on the debian web page search engine but can't seem to find it with dselect. Anybody know how? Henry Hollenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to [

macro expansion error in firewall.c when compiling kernel-source-2.0.30

Package: kernel-source-2.0.30 Version: 2.0.30-7 Has anyone else come across the following error condition while compiling IP masquerading support in kernel-source-2.0.30: ---Error message--- make[5]: Entering directory `/usr/src/kernel-source-2.0.30/net/core' gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/src/k

Re: HAMM kernel-source OK with libc5 BO?

Just today I installed that source package on a Bo system and compiled a kernel "the Debian way". No error messages and everything seems to be working fine. Best, Curt Rick Macdonald wrote: > > Is it OK to install the unstable (HAMM) kernel source (2.0.32) > with my s

Re: HAMM kernel-source OK with libc5 BO?

Rick Macdonald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Is it OK to install the unstable (HAMM) kernel source (2.0.32) > with my stable (BO) 1.3.1.r6 system, It should work just fine. > or should I just get the > original source tar file and use that? I would recommend this opti

HAMM kernel-source OK with libc5 BO?

Is it OK to install the unstable (HAMM) kernel source (2.0.32) with my stable (BO) 1.3.1.r6 system, or should I just get the original source tar file and use that? ...RickM... -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble?

Re: kernel-source-2.0.32...?

Hi Martin Stromberg; unless Mutt is confused, you wrote: > > I haven't seen the kernel-source-2.0.32... package yet. Does anybody know > where it is? > Any particular reasoning against picking up 'virgin' kernel source from any of the sites that carry it ( for example

kernel-source-2.0.32...?

Hi. I haven't seen the kernel-source-2.0.32... package yet. Does anybody know where it is? Thanks, MartinS -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e

Re: 2.0.31 kernel source

On Sat, 8 Nov 1997, G. Kapetanios wrote: > Does anyone know when the kernel-source-2.0.31 package will be ready ? > Or is it exactly the same as the tar.gz source files available from, say, > www.kernel.org in which case getting that would do the job ? Fetching the source from www.k

2.0.31 kernel source

Does anyone know when the kernel-source-2.0.31 package will be ready ? Or is it exactly the same as the tar.gz source files available from, say, www.kernel.org in which case getting that would do the job ? Thanks George

Re: kernel source?

On Sun, 31 Aug 1997, Mark A. Bialik wrote: > everything's been going well. Here's my one problem. I selected to install > the kernel-source for 2.0.29 and 2.0.30 from my new 1.3.1 cd using dselect. > Afterwards, it shows that it was installed, but my /usr/src directory is >

Re: kernel source?

a Debian package for installing the kernel. > #3 If I just pull the kernel source via ftp, can I compile like before > (slackware) or do I risk damaging any of Debian's package management features? You can, but read the make-kpkg man page first. There are parameters to give to make-kpkg to &q

Re: kernel source?

> kernel with my eyes closed. I've decided to give Debian a try, and > everything's been going well. Here's my one problem. I selected to install > the kernel-source for 2.0.29 and 2.0.30 from my new 1.3.1 cd using dselect. well.. I only installed kernel-source for 2.0.3

kernel source?

I selected to install the kernel-source for 2.0.29 and 2.0.30 from my new 1.3.1 cd using dselect. Afterwards, it shows that it was installed, but my /usr/src directory is still empty. #1 Where is this source? #2 Do I still compile using the make config like before? #3 If I just pull the ker

install Kernel source

Hi Which one of kernel source file do I need? thats why, I gonna build the new kernel with network card added I found in the /usr/src directory there isnt Kernel source files. the one is currently Linux kernel 2.0.29. i read debian installation document, it say to install the kernel source first

Re: libc5-dev and kernel-source

Hi, >>"Thomas" == Thomas Gebhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Thomas> Hello, How do the include files in /usr/include/linux relate Thomas> to the files in /usr/src/kernel-source-/include/linux ? Thomas> Most of the include files are identical, others are

libc5-dev and kernel-source

Hello, How do the include files in /usr/include/linux relate to the files in /usr/src/kernel-source-/include/linux ? Most of the include files are identical, others are different. Isn't this a possible source of confusion? Cheers, Thomas -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e

Re: I can't build kernel; cpp 2.7.2.1-5, gcc 2.7.2.1-5, libc 5.4.20-1, kernel-source-2.0.27-2

Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Pardon what maybe a silly question, but do you have libc5-dev > and ncurses-dev installed? > > manoj Sure. $ dpkg -s ncurses3.0-dev Package: ncurses3.0-dev Status: install ok installed [skip] $ dpkg -s libc5-dev Package: libc5-dev S

Re: I can't build kernel; cpp 2.7.2.1-5, gcc 2.7.2.1-5, libc 5.4.20-1, kernel-source-2.0.27-2

sn't work. E.g. >> cd /usr/src/linux/ make menuconfig Alexey> rm -f include/asm ( cd include ; ln -sf asm-i386 asm) make -C Alexey> scripts/lxdialog all make[1]: Entering directory Alexey> `/usr/src/kernel-source-2.0.27/scripts/lxdialog' gcc -I Alexey> /usr/include/lin

I can't build kernel; cpp 2.7.2.1-5, gcc 2.7.2.1-5, libc 5.4.20-1, kernel-source-2.0.27-2

I've just installed new cpp&gcc from unstable, and it seems doesn't work. E.g. # cd /usr/src/linux/ # make menuconfig rm -f include/asm ( cd include ; ln -sf asm-i386 asm) make -C scripts/lxdialog all make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/kernel-source-2.0.27/scripts/lxdialo

Kernel source won't build

I'm having trouble with the kernel source. I put kernel-source 2.0.27 on the other day, and I get this output when I try to do a make mainly "make dep" to start things off... Here's what happens: dst:/usr/src/linux# make dep gcc -I/usr/src/kernel-source-2.0.27/include -O2

Kernel Source

I've always "rolled my own" kernels from the source off of sunsite.unc.edu and never from the Debian source. My problem now is, I decided to wipe out my own kernel source and replace it with the Debian kernel source. I configured everything up to how it was before, and tried t

/boot and kernel-source*.deb

What should my /boot directory look like? I've been compiling kernels without benefit of the Debian kernel-source packages, and am now switching to it. I've made changes in /boot, and do not have a symlink in / to /boot/vmlinux-x.x.x (I've yet to RTFM, I am just abou

Re: kernel-source-2.0.23_0.deb corrupted?

There should be a 2.0.25 in "frozen". Bruce -- Bruce Perens K6BP [EMAIL PROTECTED] Finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] for PGP public key. PGP fingerprint = 88 6A 15 D0 65 D4 A3 A6 1F 89 6A 76 95 24 87 B3 -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTE

kernel-source-2.0.23_0.deb corrupted?

It seems that Debian-1.1-fixed/binary-i386/base/kernel-source-2.0.23_0.deb was copied without errors, but was corrupted. Have others been successful? The same thing happened when I first tried a week ago. Connecting to ftp.debian.org... Login as anonymous... Setting transfer mode to

Re: kernel-source-2.0.23_0.deb corrupted

That is a known bug in kernel-source-2.0.23. -- Stephen Pitts [EMAIL PROTECTED] Proudly running Debian GNU/Linux 1.1 on an Intel Pentium 150 Send a message with "Send PGP Key" in the subject to get my PGP key. Visit http://www.onekey.com for OneKey:

kernel-source-2.0.23_0.deb corrupted

Hi, I just retrieved kernel-source-2.0.23_0.deb from a mirror in Sweden and from a mirror in Finland. Both were corrupted. I got it from subdirectory 'bo' and transfer went OK. The places are not mirrors of each other, the problem is likely in master. The error is: Unpacking ker

Re: Corrupt kernel-source package?

FWIW, I just tried to D/L the kernel-source-2.0.23_0.deb from ftp.debian.org using dpkg-ftp and I got the same problem. There is something wrong with this package. It should, in my opinion, be removed from the ftp site if a replacement can not be made available soonest. In article <[EM

dpkg-ftp problems (dselect and kernel source package)... (longish)

to find out what kind of ref it really was. See perlref. Finally, (sorry for the length of this!), I can't get the .deb of the kernel 2.0.23 to work. dpkg -i returns: # dpkg -i kernel-source-2.0.23_0.deb (Reading database ... 30437 files and directories currently installed.) Unpack

Re: Corrupt kernel-source package?

> > I had the same problem and the md5sum checks so it must be something > else. Here is the result of my attempt: > > bash# dpkg -i kernel-source-2.0.23_0.deb > (Reading database ... 27768 files and directories currently > installed.) > Unpacking kernel-source-2.

Re: Corrupt kernel-source package?

Guy Maor's message dated: 14 Nov 1996 00:56:11 CST >Lamar Folsom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> I downloaded kernel-source-2.0.23_0.deb today and found that dselect/dpkg wa >s >> unable to install it. > >I tried to extract the copy on the master site, an

Re: Corrupt kernel-source package?

Lamar Folsom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I downloaded kernel-source-2.0.23_0.deb today and found that dselect/dpkg was > unable to install it. I tried to extract the copy on the master site, and it's fine. Maybe your download got corrupted? md5sum is: fee75e4ed7841c6

Re: cleaning up kernel source

What I usually delete is all the alpha/spark/m68k etc stuff that is never going to b used on my 486 system. This should cut down a little on the size. However, if you run a patch on the kerenl, some parts might say that some files are missing, you should just tell patch to skip those files,

Re: cleaning up kernel source

een going on. What I've been doing is following the instructions in /usr/src/linux/README and creating pointers in /usr/include to the kernel source tree (right now for 2.0.24). Which way is better? Thanks Paul Serice -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubs

Re: cleaning up kernel source

mpile time environments for programs on debian machines a well known one, easing the process of dealing with problem reports), the few programs that really depend on cutting edge kernel data structures may just use -I/usr/src/linux/include (provided that kernel-headers or kernel-source exists o

Re: cleaning up kernel source

[ Please don't Cc: me when replying to my message on a mailing list. ] "David Morris": > do I want to leave something hanging around /usr/src/linux? Except possibly the documentation, no. Debian distributes the header files as part of the libc5 package. -- Please read

Re: cleaning up kernel source

On Wed, 6 Nov 1996, David Morris wrote: > OK, I downloaded the source for the 2.0.24 kernel and compiled a custom > kernel > yesterday. And now I have the tree leftover taking up 30M on my hard drive. > And I was wondering what I can clean up to free up the space. > > I am tempted to rm -r the

cleaning up kernel source

OK, I downloaded the source for the 2.0.24 kernel and compiled a custom kernel yesterday. And now I have the tree leftover taking up 30M on my hard drive. And I was wondering what I can clean up to free up the space. I know I can run a make clean to remove the *.o files and other compiling file

Kernel source - HELP

I know i've seen the reference before, but I can't remember the answer. Where is the kernel-source.deb located...? -- Dave Power mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL

Re: kernel-source-2.0.0 installation problem

**On 04 Jul, In article "kernel-source-2.0.0 installation problem", ** TE (Tim Egbert) writes: TE> dpkg -i kernel-source-2.0.0-0.deb TE>dpkg (subprocess): unable to execute old post-removal script: No such file or directory TE>dpkg: warning - old post-remo

how does kernel-source link current modules?

I've used the kernel-source package to build a custom kernel, and then installed the result with dpkg --[myflags] kernel-image-2.0.0. Then I copied /boot/vmlinuz-2.0.0 to my dos disk so that I could continue to boot with loadlin. But I notice that /lib/modules/current still points

<    3   4   5   6   7   8