One other thing I like about Debian, a non-technical thing, is
that development is open. Sure, Redhat is all free, but there's
still a vendor. With Debian, you can be part of the vendor.
On Sun, Jan 04, 1998 at 10:02:54PM +, Timothy Hospedales wrote:
> One thing mentioned in the article
Incase any of ya'll care, in my inexperienced opinion. Debian is
definitely the best distribution. :). I tried Slackware, which as
mentioned, was very difficult to maintain and upgrade, eventually I gave
up. I tried RedHat which was easier, but wasn't quite as configurable. Then
I tried Deb
On Sun, Jan 04, 1998 at 04:48:54PM -0800, George Bonser wrote:
> On Mon, 5 Jan 1998, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> > Nice, although the "Linux is not Solaris" theme came through a bit strong.
> > Also, I don't remember there being a Pentium _II_ bug, as the article
> > mentioned. Caldera, Redhat and (ugh
On Sun, Jan 04, 1998 at 02:40:12PM -0800, George Bonser wrote:
> A pretty nice article in Sunworld:
> http://www.sun.com/sunworldonline/swol-01-1998/swol-01-linux.html
Nice, although the "Linux is not Solaris" theme came through a bit strong.
Also, I don't remember there being a Pentium _II_ bug,
4 matches
Mail list logo
