Hello,
an upgrade from Debian 8 Jessie to Debian 9 Stretch caused a similar
problem as described by Tony Stoneley in
https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2017/03/msg01272.html
The solution of working with xserver-xorg-video-vesa was not
satisfying as I was not able to configure the display cor
Użytkownik Jonas Meurer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> napisał:
>Hello,
>
>I use a Matrox G400 DH as graphics controller, and i run debian/unstable
>on an amd64 system.
>
>Unfortunately this leads to system freezes when i try to use 3d
>rendering (GLX).
>
>Some examples whi
Hello,
I use a Matrox G400 DH as graphics controller, and i run debian/unstable
on an amd64 system.
Unfortunately this leads to system freezes when i try to use 3d
rendering (GLX).
Some examples which do always freeze my system are xmms visualisations,
tuxkart and mixxx.
Do you have any
Greetings,
I was enjoying fullscreen Xawtv until the recent X11R7 switch, it
seems. (xawtv is the only application I found to be able to display
the composite input from my v4l2-ccapable DC10 card). The fullscreen
mode was previously used XVideo, output on a Matrox G400 with DRI
enabled.
Snce
On Tuesday 18 November 2003 12:01, Tom Allison wrote:
> I was trying to get my x-window-server installed last night and ran
> into a seemingly dumb problem.
>
> I have a minimalist installation with sources.list have both stable
> and testing entries.
>
> I used tasksel to select X-Window system an
I was trying to get my x-window-server installed last night and ran into
a seemingly dumb problem.
I have a minimalist installation with sources.list have both stable and
testing entries.
I used tasksel to select X-Window system and nothing else (no Desktop).
Answered all the questions.
se
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 30 Mar 2003 20:22:12 -0800,
Paul Mackinney wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] declaimed:
"Paul" == Paul Mackinney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Paul> I don't have a device /dev/dri/card0. Am I supposed to be
Paul> running devfs? Kernel config shows
Paul> $ grep DEVFS conf
On Sun, 30 Mar 2003 20:22:12 -0800,
Paul Mackinney wrote:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] declaimed:
> > > "Paul" == Paul Mackinney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > Paul> I don't have a device /dev/dri/card0. Am I supposed to be
> > Paul> running devfs? Kernel config shows
> >
> > Paul> $ gr
t; quite adequate.
>
> ---
> Arlen Carlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
Very encouraging. What can I tweak?
CPU: K6-III/450
MB: ASUS P5A
RAM: 512 MB PC100/133 (2 x 256 MB DIMM)
Kernel: kernel-package-2.4.20-k6
Debian/GNU Linux: Sarge
DVD player: 16x generic
Video card 1
On 31-Mar-2003 Paul Mackinney wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] declaimed:
>> > "Paul" == Paul Mackinney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> Paul> I don't have a device /dev/dri/card0. Am I supposed to be
>> Paul> running devfs? Kernel config shows
>>
>> Paul> $ grep DEVFS config-2.4.20-k6 CON
[EMAIL PROTECTED] declaimed:
> > "Paul" == Paul Mackinney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Paul> I don't have a device /dev/dri/card0. Am I supposed to be
> Paul> running devfs? Kernel config shows
>
> Paul> $ grep DEVFS config-2.4.20-k6 CONFIG_DEVFS_FS=y #
> Paul> CONFIG_DEVFS_MOUNT
> "Paul" == Paul Mackinney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Paul> I don't have a device /dev/dri/card0. Am I supposed to be
Paul> running devfs? Kernel config shows
Paul> $ grep DEVFS config-2.4.20-k6 CONFIG_DEVFS_FS=y #
Paul> CONFIG_DEVFS_MOUNT is not set # CONFIG_DEVFS_DEBUG is not set
Mark Zimmerman declaimed:
> On Sun, Mar 30, 2003 at 12:08:56PM -0800, Slava ZHdanobvich wrote:
> > On Fri, 28 Mar 2003 19:23:03 -0800
> > Paul Mackinney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > I've got a Matrox Millenium G400, and recently installed a DVDROM drive.
> > > Unfortunately, Xine drops too
On Fri, Mar 28, 2003 at 07:23:03PM -0800, Paul Mackinney wrote:
> I've got a Matrox Millenium G400, and recently installed a DVDROM drive.
> Unfortunately, Xine drops too many frames to really watch anything
> (mpeg & avi files play fine).
>
> I've been trying to tweak my video performance, and no
On Sun, Mar 30, 2003 at 12:08:56PM -0800, Slava ZHdanobvich wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Mar 2003 19:23:03 -0800
> Paul Mackinney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I've got a Matrox Millenium G400, and recently installed a DVDROM drive.
> > Unfortunately, Xine drops too many frames to really watch anything
Concerning G400 config files, could someone send my some X11 config
files.
I have dual head setup working and would like to see what other
options I could use to configure it better. (E.g. I can't run
tuxracer etc)
Thanks in advance,
--
Rudy Gevaert[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web page
On Fri, 28 Mar 2003 19:23:03 -0800
Paul Mackinney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've got a Matrox Millenium G400, and recently installed a DVDROM drive.
> Unfortunately, Xine drops too many frames to really watch anything
> (mpeg & avi files play fine).
>
> I've been trying to tweak my video perfo
I've got a Matrox Millenium G400, and recently installed a DVDROM drive.
Unfortunately, Xine drops too many frames to really watch anything
(mpeg & avi files play fine).
I've been trying to tweak my video performance, and notice the following
errors in my X log:
(==) MGA(1): Write-combining range
Sean 'Shaleh' Perry declaimed:
> >>
> >> I use a dual head matrox card every day.
> >>
> > I use a Matrox G400 AGP, works great with the blackbox window manager
> > which I have to plug with Sean on the thread. I run the CVS build of
> &
Michael J. Madden wrote:
Has anyone gotten hardware acceleration for the Matrox G400 working
under Woody. I am using XFree86 4.1.0-14 with kernel 2.4.18.
I keep getting the following message in XFree86.0.log and glxinfo
reports direct rendering is disabled.
(==) MGA(0): Direct rendering
As soon as I mailed this I figured it out. I needed to compile in the
Matrox driver into my 2.4.18 kernel. I had the AGP support but no
Matrox support.
Thanks,
Mike
On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 09:29:10AM -0500, Michael J. Madden wrote:
> Has anyone gotten hardware acceleration for the Matrox G
Has anyone gotten hardware acceleration for the Matrox G400 working
under Woody. I am using XFree86 4.1.0-14 with kernel 2.4.18.
I keep getting the following message in XFree86.0.log and glxinfo
reports direct rendering is disabled.
(==) MGA(0): Direct rendering disabled
Here is my
On 24 Mar 2002, Randolph S. Kahle wrote:
> I have just installed Woody from the network install CDROMs.
>
> When I try to start X, I am told the mga_hal module can not be found.
>
> Is this an X configuration problem, compilation problem, or a kernel
> problem?
Dear Randolph,
Your message is n
Randolph S. Kahle wrote:
> When I try to start X, I am told the mga_hal module can not be found.
You need to get the linux drivers from the matrox support site if you want
this lib.
You might like this:
apt-cache show mgapdesk
Simon Hepburn.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
w
I have just installed Woody from the network install CDROMs.
When I try to start X, I am told the mga_hal module can not be found.
Is this an X configuration problem, compilation problem, or a kernel
problem?
Thanks -- Randy
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "
this was the right thing
this led me to read throught he xinerama howto and now things are better than
they were before as i now have proper xinerama support
thanks
on Thu, 21 Mar 2002 Simon Hepburn typed
> You are trying to use Xinerama and 3D accel together. They are incompatible.
>
> Simon
You are trying to use Xinerama and 3D accel together. They are incompatible.
Simon Hepburn.
hello
here is what i have
Enlightenment was installed using apt-get
X was installed using apt-get
I have a matrox g400 32 meg dual head card.
A manually configured the XF86Config-4 file to support dual monitors
so i did an apt-get upgrade on my potato box with kernel 2.4.17
when i logged in via
On Tue, 2001-11-20 at 20:16, Oki DZ wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have the following in my XFree86.0.log:
> (EE) MGA(0): [dri] MGADRIScreenInit failed because of a version mismatch.
> [dri] mga.o kernel module version is 2.0.1 but version 3.0.x is needed.
> [dri] Disabling DRI.
>
> How can I fix it?
> Where
Hi,
I have the following in my XFree86.0.log:
(EE) MGA(0): [dri] MGADRIScreenInit failed because of a version mismatch.
[dri] mga.o kernel module version is 2.0.1 but version 3.0.x is needed.
[dri] Disabling DRI.
How can I fix it?
Where can I get the newer mga.o? I use kernel version 2.4.5; shoul
eem to directly support this. But is a feature I used frequently on my windows box.
Anyhow, I will let you know if any answers are found.
Matt
On Tue, 2001-11-20 at 14:49, Oleksandr Moskalenko wrote:
* Matthew Reath ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I installed Debian potato on a system
* Matthew Reath ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I installed Debian potato on a system with a Matrox G400 DualHead.
>
> I was wondering if anybody has worked with the Matrox Power Desk and
> drivers for XFree86.
>
> I want to setup a TV on the secondary display that I can use Xi
I installed Debian potato on a
system with a Matrox G400 DualHead.
I was wondering if anybody has worked with the Matrox Power Desk and drivers for XFree86.
I want to setup a TV on the secondary display that I can use
Xine/Xawtv on full screen and use the primary display
has my
On Wed, 10 Oct 2001, R. Alexander wrote:
> Simon you are a genius !!!
>
> We are getting closer.
>
> I have enlightement window manager installed but maybe the /etc/X11/Xsession
> is not invoking it ...
>
> When I launch xinit (not startx) as a matter of fact I see the X desktop
> with just a w
On Wed, 10 Oct 2001, Simon Law wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Oct 2001, R. Alexander wrote:
>
> > Dear friends,
> > I have desperately searched some appends but really cannot understand if
> > they apply to my case.
> >
> > With XFree 3.x I had a perfect XF86Con
On Wed, 10 Oct 2001, R. Alexander wrote:
> Dear friends,
> I have desperately searched some appends but really cannot understand if
> they apply to my case.
>
> With XFree 3.x I had a perfect XF86Config for my Matrox G400 driving my 16"
> TFT display.
>
> Upgraded
Dear friends,
I have desperately searched some appends but really cannot understand if
they apply to my case.
With XFree 3.x I had a perfect XF86Config for my Matrox G400 driving my 16"
TFT display.
Upgraded to 4.1.10 (on a 2.4.10 kernel) and am not able to get the
XF86Config-4 to work
--- Nuhn Yobiznez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2001 02:26:32 -0700 (PDT)
> From: Nuhn Yobiznez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: Matrox G400 dri woes
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> --- Oleksandr Moskalenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
&
Oleksandr Moskalenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If I try to run X with the mga_drv.o that comes with XFree86 or the one
> from Matrox website I get this error:
The driver from matrox is for XFree86 4.0.2/4.0.3.
> [dri] mga.o kernel module version is 2.0.1 but version 3.0.x is needed.
Compile a
/lib/modules/...
6. make sure you have X4.1.0
you should have dri acceleration now
On Fri, Aug 03, 2001 at 01:28:43AM -0500, Oleksandr Moskalenko wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm having no end of trouble trying to get dri work on my dual-head
> Matrox G400 32Mb. The xfree86 in question is n
Hi,
I'm having no end of trouble trying to get dri work on my dual-head
Matrox G400 32Mb. The xfree86 in question is newly appearing in unstable
4.1.0.
If I try to run X with the mga_drv.o that comes with XFree86 or the one
from Matrox website I get this error:
[dri] mga.o kernel m
I'm following up on my own post of a day or two ago, because a Google
search suggests that the problem I asked about is quite a common one.
It was this: under X 4.0.3 (debian testing) I couldn't get hardware
acceleration enabled for my Matrox G400. The problem was that the
kernel modul
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
You need to change things in two places :
1) In XF86Config-4, section "Module", add a line :
Load "dri"
and in section "DRI" add a line :
Mode 0666
2) In /etc/modules, you must load two modules so add two lines :
agpgart
Dominique Deleris wrote:
>
> Hello...
>
> I'd like to play games with my Woody box : I have a Matrox G400
> card, and I'd really appreciate to get HW 3d acceleration to play
> SOF (soldier of fortune).
>
> When I start the game, it is relly
On Sun, Jun 03, 2001 at 07:41:49PM +0200, Dominique Deleris wrote:
> Hello...
>
> I'd like to play games with my Woody box : I have a Matrox G400
> card, and I'd really appreciate to get HW 3d acceleration to play
> SOF (soldier of fortune).
>
> When I start th
Hello...
I'd like to play games with my Woody box : I have a Matrox G400
card, and I'd really appreciate to get HW 3d acceleration to play
SOF (soldier of fortune).
When I start the game, it is relly slow :(, no
acceleration at all.
Here is my XF86Config-4 file (configured
On Tue, May 15, 2001 at 11:18:43AM -0400, Austin Jones wrote:
> Help!
>
> I'm running Debian potato on a PIII-800EB w/ Tyan Tiger Motherboard.
>
> I have the dual head Matrox G400 card connected to a ViewSonic (monitor 1)
> and Komodo (monitor 2) and I cannot get a
Help!
I'm running Debian potato on a PIII-800EB w/ Tyan Tiger Motherboard.
I have the dual head Matrox G400 card connected to a ViewSonic (monitor 1)
and Komodo (monitor 2) and I cannot get a signal to the
second monitor. During the boot sequence I would expect to get some
indication
I've got the G450 also. I'm running dual-head. I think I read
somewhere that DRI doesn't work under dual-head. Is this true?
> On 20010213.2045, Damon Muller said ...
>
> Quoth Lee Elliott,
> > I'm not able to get hardware rendering/GL running on my G400. Kernel is
> > currently 2.4.0-test11
; > > > G400
> > > > cards and fixes some (if not all ...) known issues, i'd suggest you'd
> > > > take a
> > > > look at this kernel. The 2.4.x kernels really impressed me, if the
> > rest
> > > > of
> > > > linux development would ha
ginal Message-
> From: Chun Kit Edwin Lau [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2001 11:49 AM
> To: Damon Muller
> Cc: User Debian
> Subject: Re: XFree86 4.0.2 and Matrox G400
>
>
> I am using 2.2.18 and have agp, via, dri compiled in the kernel, bu
x27;d suggest you'd
> > > take a
> > > look at this kernel. The 2.4.x kernels really impressed me, if the
> rest
> > > of
> > > linux development would have similar level of quality linux would
> > > definetly
> > > rule the desktop.
> > >
kernel. The 2.4.x kernels really impressed me, if the rest
> > of
> > linux development would have similar level of quality linux would
> > definetly
> > rule the desktop.
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Chun Kit Edwin Lau [mailto:[EMAIL PROT
> rule the desktop.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Chun Kit Edwin Lau [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2001 11:49 AM
> To: Damon Muller
> Cc: User Debian
> Subject: Re: XFree86 4.0.2 and Matrox G400
>
>
> I am using 2.2.18 and have a
nd if that works I'll consider getting a 32MB card,
> assuming that 16MB isn't enough for DRI at 1600x1200. If anyone can
> actually confirm that this is the problem I'd appreciate it.
>
<--snip-->
I have a Matrox G400 32MB card, and run X at 24/32bpp @ 1600x1200, with D
Hello James,
The answer was in there:-)
First of all though, I switched to the 2.4.1 kernel, re-compiled, and it
made no difference - I still got an error about mga_hal missing.
I had a look at matrox.com and found the new drivers that one of the
other posters had mentioned, and on the same page
inux would definetly
rule the desktop.
-Original Message-
From: Chun Kit Edwin Lau [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2001 11:49 AM
To: Damon Muller
Cc: User Debian
Subject: Re: XFree86 4.0.2 and Matrox G400
I am using 2.2.18 and have agp, via, dri compiled in the k
I am using 2.2.18 and have agp, via, dri compiled in the kernel, but
leaving mga as a module and i guess I have the same problem as you. X4.02
crashes my machine at 16 and 32bpp. I guess it has to do will drm. When i
check the XF86 website, it seems to be that they suggested kernel 2.4.x
kernel. I
On Tue, Feb 13, 2001 at 09:59:45PM +, Lee Elliott wrote:
> Hello James,
>
> Something about the tone of your reply makes me think I've missed
> something obvious:-)
>
> Certainly, please do tell me what you did/where I've gone wrong.
Don't read too much into the tone of my reply :) It's jus
Hello James,
Something about the tone of your reply makes me think I've missed
something obvious:-)
Certainly, please do tell me what you did/where I've gone wrong.
TIA,
LeeE
James Dietrich wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 13, 2001 at 08:45:34PM +1100, Damon Muller wrote:
> > Quoth Lee Elliott,
> > >
Hello Damon,
Thanks for replying. I tried a driver from Matrox and it gave me the
same results. It was about twice the size of the mga_drv.o generated
from the kernel source, so it must be different somehow. I remember
having to adjust my monitor quite a bit, but still no h/w acceleration.
I'v
Hello Brian,
Thanks for replying.
Yes, towards the end of the log I get:
...
(==) MGA(0): Write-combining range (0xf200,0x100)
(--) MGA(0): 16 DWORD fifo
(==) MGA(0): Default visual is TrueColor
(II) MGA(0): [drm] bpp: 16 depth: 16
(II) MGA(0): [drm] Sarea 2196+632: 2828
(0): [drm] creat
Quoth Lee Elliott,
> I'm not able to get hardware rendering/GL running on my G400. Kernel is
> currently 2.4.0-test11 (2.4.0 was a bit wobbly for me - haven't d/loaded
> 2.4.1 yet) and I'm getting the follwing error in /var/log/XFre86.0.log
I don't know if this will help for your particular prob
On Mon, Feb 12, 2001 at 11:39:11PM +, Lee Elliott wrote:
> Hello List,
>
> I'm not able to get hardware rendering/GL running on my G400. Kernel is
> currently 2.4.0-test11 (2.4.0 was a bit wobbly for me - haven't d/loaded
> 2.4.1 yet) and I'm getting the follwing error in /var/log/XFre86.0.lo
Hello List,
I'm not able to get hardware rendering/GL running on my G400. Kernel is
currently 2.4.0-test11 (2.4.0 was a bit wobbly for me - haven't d/loaded
2.4.1 yet) and I'm getting the follwing error in /var/log/XFre86.0.log
(II) Setting vga for screen 0.
(II) Loading sub module "vgahw"
(II)
On Fri, Nov 17, 2000 at 07:42:13PM -0200, Rogerio Theodoro de Brito wrote:
>
> I've tried to use both XFree86 3.3.6 and 4.0.1e (Branden's
> packages from Debian) and after working for 2 or 3 *seconds*,
> the whole machine hangs *hard*: no desktop switching, no
> ctrl-alt-fx
> Dear all.
>
> I've just bought a new computer and I've choosen a Matrox
> Millennium G400 AGP card (as they're one of the most open
> source friendly companies out there).
>
[snip]
i'm using one as well, which is working beautifully (dual-head, and all). i
found dri to
I have the same card with a 750 Duron (KT7-RAID m/b) and started having the
similar problems (hard lock, no virtual console, no ctrl-alt-delete, black
screen, etc) but only within the last few days. Everything was working
beautifully under XFree 4, even under high resolutions and medium graphic
int
> I've just bought a new computer and I've choosen a Matrox Millennium G400
> AGP card
I'm using one. Works fine.
> I've got an Asus A7V
I seem to recall a problem with the G400 and a certain motherboard. That
may be it.
--
John Hasler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Hasler)
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwoo
Dear all.
I've just bought a new computer and I've choosen a Matrox
Millennium G400 AGP card (as they're one of the most open
source friendly companies out there).
Everything seems to be working fine with my hardware (I've got
an Asus A7V and a Dur
on 9/10/00 4:03 PM, Philipp Schulte at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> One possible solution is to find somebody with the same mouse and ask
> him hor his config. You could just copy the "pointer" section.
I could reinstall Redhat and look at it's config
looks.. and then, well that would be ti
On Sun, Sep 10, 2000 at 02:13:44PM -0500, William Jensen wrote:
> I've seen this type of mouse behavior before when gdm(?) is being run. If
> you check the archives just a couple weeks ago you will see a fair amount
> of usefull fixes for this situation.
It's called "gpm". It sucks ;)
Phil
On Sun, Sep 10, 2000 at 02:12:08PM -0500, Paul T. McNally wrote:
> I did a reinstall. The first time I installed potato, the mouse was
> all fd up, it sticks to the bottom of the screen and refuses to
> com up. I can see the tip of the pointer on the bottom edge of the
> screen. When that happene
On Sun, Sep 10, 2000 at 02:12:08PM -0500, Paul T. McNally wrote:
> I did a reinstall. The first time I installed potato, the mouse was
> all fd up, it sticks to the bottom of the screen and refuses to
> com up. I can see the tip of the pointer on the bottom edge of the
> screen. When that happened,
I did a reinstall. The first time I installed potato, the mouse was
all fd up, it sticks to the bottom of the screen and refuses to
com up. I can see the tip of the pointer on the bottom edge of the
screen. When that happened, I ran XF86Setup and changed
a couple settings on the mouse and I think t
A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far way, someone said...
> I'm replacing my RedHat system with Potato and want to know what is
> the best XServer to run with my Matrox G400.
XF86_SVGA is the best for any Matrox
On Sun, Aug 27, 2000 at 01:31:43PM -0500, Paul T. McNally wrote:
> I'm replacing my RedHat system with Potato and want to know
> what is the best XServer to run with my Matrox G400.
The same one that you would run on RH: SVGA.
(And, yes, it -is- accelerated. Despite the name, the SVG
I'm replacing my RedHat system with Potato and want to know
what is the best XServer to run with my Matrox G400.
Paul
> "Eric" == Eric G Miller writes:
Eric> Well, I only know that Documentation/fb/matroxfb.txt
Eric> has this to say:
Documentation/fb/vesafb.txt says this:
1. Note: LILO cannot handle hex, for booting directly with
"vga=mode-number" you have to transform the numbers to deci
> > Here is my lilo.conf:
> >
> > boot=/dev/hda
> > root=/dev/hda1
> > compact
> > install=/boot/boot.b
> > map=/boot/map
> > delay=20
> > vga=normal
> >
> > image=/boot/vmlinuz-2.2.16
> > append="video=matrox:vesa:0x192"
>
On Tue, Jul 25, 2000 at 03:25:56PM +1000, Brian May wrote:
> > "Eric" == Eric G Miller writes:
>
> >> image=/boot/vmlinuz-2.2.16 append="video=matrox:vesa:0x192"
> Eric> ^ See
> Eric> /Documentation/fb/matroxfb.txt (that should be a
>
> "Eric" == Eric G Miller writes:
>> image=/boot/vmlinuz-2.2.16 append="video=matrox:vesa:0x192"
Eric> ^ See
Eric> /Documentation/fb/matroxfb.txt (that should be a
Eric> decimal number in lilo.conf, like:
Eric> append="video=matr
On Mon, Jul 24, 2000 at 11:03:01AM -0700, Tom Marshall wrote:
> Here is the console section from "make menuconfig" in my 2.2.16 kernel:
>
> [*] VGA text console
> [*] Video mode selection support
> < > MDA text console (dual-headed) (EXPERIMENTAL)
> [*] Support for frame bu
MTRR's turned on
> > matroxfb: 1152x864x16bpp (virtual: 1152x7280)
> > matroxfb: framebuffer at 0xE200, mapped to 0xd0005000, size 16777216
> > Console: switching to colour frame buffer device 144x54
> > fb0: MATROX VGA frame buffer device
> >
> > On Fri
hing to colour frame buffer device 144x54
> > > fb0: MATROX VGA frame buffer device
> > >
> > > On Fri, 21 Jul 2000, Charles Lewis wrote:
> > >
> > > > Just got a Matrox G400 and I'm trying to set up framebuffer. The
kernel
> > > &
atroxfb: framebuffer at 0xE200, mapped to 0xd0005000, size 16777216
> > Console: switching to colour frame buffer device 144x54
> > fb0: MATROX VGA frame buffer device
> >
> > On Fri, 21 Jul 2000, Charles Lewis wrote:
> >
> > > Just got a Matrox G400 and I'm
00, Charles Lewis wrote:
>
> > Just got a Matrox G400 and I'm trying to set up framebuffer. The kernel
> > supports G100/G200 but not the G400. Anyone else out there have any
success
> > with this card.
> >
> > Charles Lewis, Director of Adminstrative Computing
uffer device
On Fri, 21 Jul 2000, Charles Lewis wrote:
> Just got a Matrox G400 and I'm trying to set up framebuffer. The kernel
> supports G100/G200 but not the G400. Anyone else out there have any success
> with this card.
>
> Charles Lewis, Director of Adminstrative
Just got a Matrox G400 and I'm trying to set up framebuffer. The kernel
supports G100/G200 but not the G400. Anyone else out there have any success
with this card.
Charles Lewis, Director of Adminstrative Computing
Southwestern Adventist University, Keene, TX 76059
(817) 556-4720 - phone
On Sun, Nov 07, 1999 at 05:04:42PM -0500, Daniel Ferrante wrote:
> I got the disks above and I was able to install my Debian (after
> a while of strugle with NT... removed it... ;) Anyway, now I am getting a
> warning message from LILO saying that my hard drive is not the first
> drive!
>
SCSI and the other
> WIHOUT it (only with the aic7xxx support, once my zip is connected to
> it...)! None of them worked out... Now it won't boot! I mean, LILO is
> able to run and - apparently - install itself in the MBR of /dev/sdb, but
> it gives me this warning message saying t
. Now it won't boot! I mean, LILO is
able to run and - apparently - install itself in the MBR of /dev/sdb, but
it gives me this warning message saying that this is not my first drive! I
have no ideas left... Any help???
Besides that, I also hava a Matrox G400 32Mb and I amm not being
On 21/10/99 Rune Linding Raun wrote:
xfree86 server for matrox g400max does it exist?
The SVGA server supports this card, it is listed in the XF86Config
program so you should have no problems. (if you do upgrade to Xfree
3.3.5)
Best Regards,
Ethan Benson
To obtain my PGP key: http://ww
hile, or get the 16MB card. However,
> > Matrox apparently is very supportive of X so it's sure to be supported
> > in the not too distant future.
>
> If you are interested in the Matrox G400, maybe you'll like one of the
> boards with the TNT2 chipset from Nvid
x27;d like to get a new graphics card and was wondering how well
> the Matrox G400 is supported on Linux.
> If you are interested in the Matrox G400, maybe you'll like one of the
> boards with the TNT2 chipset from Nvidia. One friend of mine just got a
> Diamond Viper V770 Ultra (It costs the same as the Matrox G400), and It runs
> fine in X using the Xserver downloaded from the Nv
ully supported yet in 3.3.4 which was just
> released. There's no mention of the MBs of the card. I'd hazard that you
> might want to hold off a little while, or get the 16MB card. However,
> Matrox apparently is very supportive of X so it's sure to be supported
> in the not too
On Sun, Aug 29, 1999 at 08:02:16PM -0400, B. Szyszka wrote:
| > G200 8MB AGP, works great. I show XFree86 version 3.3.3.1 having
| > support for G400 16MB video. I'd guess it also works well.
| Does the amount of MB part make a difference? I was thinking about
| a G400 32MB.
It wasn't listed i
> G200 8MB AGP, works great. I show XFree86 version 3.3.3.1 having
> support for G400 16MB video. I'd guess it also works well.
Does the amount of MB part make a difference? I was thinking about
a G400 32MB.
--
Bart Szyszka [EMAIL PROTECTED] ICQ:4982727
B Grafyx http://www.bgrafyx.com
L.J.R.
G200 8MB AGP, works great. I show XFree86 version 3.3.3.1 having
support for G400 16MB video. I'd guess it also works well.
1 - 100 of 108 matches
Mail list logo
