Joost Kooij <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 23 Jan 1998, Martin Bialasinski wrote:
>
> > So despite turning of this feature, smail *does* check the DNS. I'll have
> > another look at this and will probably file a bugreport.
>
> Yes, please do. Do so on my behalf as well. I'm behind a firewall
>
On 23 Jan 1998, Martin Bialasinski wrote:
> So despite turning of this feature, smail *does* check the DNS. I'll have
> another look at this and will probably file a bugreport.
Yes, please do. Do so on my behalf as well. I'm behind a firewall
and without external DNS, so smail won't accept anymor
"Marcelo E. Magallon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 23 Jan 1998, Martin Bialasinski wrote:
>
> > So despite turning of this feature, smail *does* check the DNS. I'll
> > have another look at this and will probably file a bugreport.
> I don't recall if you said it's a dial-up connection, but
On 23 Jan 1998, Martin Bialasinski wrote:
> Time to revert to smail from bo and do further tests on a spare machine.
This happened to me, too. I lost mail from mailing lists, so for me it
wasn't that bad. Anyway, I (almost) removed smail from the equation. I
have:
. smail: queues mail and del
Martin Bialasinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I noticed that fetchmail got slow, but I didn't associate this with smail.
> But xconsole shows, that during fetchmail my local caching only nameserver
> learns hostnames.
>
> So despite turning of this feature, smail *does* check the DNS. I'll hav
On 23 Jan 1998, Martin Bialasinski wrote:
> So despite turning of this feature, smail *does* check the DNS. I'll
> have another look at this and will probably file a bugreport.
>
> BTW: which package has libpcap ? This one is missing in tcpdump's
> "Depends:" line. Another bugreport I guess.
Martin Bialasinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Other thing is that it seems to do a DNS lookup on every from address,
> > and since my from contains [EMAIL PROTECTED], this can't be done when
> > I'm offline. So if I can get this fixed I think I can use the newest
> > smail again... Any sugg
On Thu, Jan 22, 1998 at 11:12:07PM +0100, Martin Bialasinski wrote:
> Neilen Marais <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Basically, it seems to do a reverse lookup on the system connecting to
> > it, but I think I sorted that out by putting allow_broken_hello, or
> > something similar for localhost.
Neilen Marais <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Basically, it seems to do a reverse lookup on the system connecting to
> it, but I think I sorted that out by putting allow_broken_hello, or
> something similar for localhost.
This should only be neccessary if the mailreader does a broken HELO. Pine is
Hi
The newest smail seems to have a number of features well suited to
fighting spam, but most of these things cause problems when trying to
run your typical offline/fetchmail with pop config, so I have reverted
to using the smail from my trusty bo CD till I can find out how to
configure the newest
10 matches
Mail list logo
