Re: New testing install; no /boot/grub/menu.lst exists.

2010-01-15 Thread consul tores
2010/1/9 s. keeling : > Tom H : >> >>  What is your 40... entry? > > Generic chainloader +1 stuff: > >   # OpenBSD 4.6 on /dev/hda1 >   title         OpenBSD 4.6 >   root          (hd0,0) >   savedefault >   makeactive >   chainloader +1 > This is on menu.lst: title OpenBSD rootnoveri

Re: New testing install; no /boot/grub/menu.lst exists.

2010-01-12 Thread s. keeling
Tom H : >  What is your 40... entry? > > >>> Generic chainloader +1 stuff: > > >>  (1a) There is no (hd0,0) in grub2. sda = (hd0,1), etc > > > Ah!  This is a most informative/educational reply, thanks. > > You're welcome. > > > > I've a few leads to track down now: > > >    sed '%s/hda

Re: New testing install; no /boot/grub/menu.lst exists.

2010-01-11 Thread Tom H
 What is your 40... entry? >>> Generic chainloader +1 stuff: >>  (1a) There is no (hd0,0) in grub2. sda = (hd0,1), etc > Ah!  This is a most informative/educational reply, thanks. You're welcome. > I've a few leads to track down now: >    sed '%s/hda/sda/g' /boot/grub/menu.lst      # or

Re: New testing install; no /boot/grub/menu.lst exists.

2010-01-11 Thread s. keeling
Tom H : > >>  What is your 40... entry? > > > Generic chainloader +1 stuff: > > (1a) There is no (hd0,0) in grub2. sda = (hd0,1), etc Ah! This is a most informative/educational reply, thanks. I really am out of the loop I see. I'm beginning to understand what all the bleeding-edge noobs comp

Re: New testing install; no /boot/grub/menu.lst exists.

2010-01-09 Thread Tom H
>>  What is your 40... entry? > Generic chainloader +1 stuff: >   # OpenBSD 4.6 on /dev/hda1 >   title         OpenBSD 4.6 >   root          (hd0,0) >   savedefault >   makeactive >   chainloader +1 >>  Are you loading the ufs module(s)? > Never heard of 'em. Will research, thanks. (1a) There i

Re: New testing install; no /boot/grub/menu.lst exists.

2010-01-09 Thread s. keeling
Klistvud : > Dne, 08. 01. 2010 01:32:32 je s. keeling napisal(a): > > > > Thanks. That's looking very tempting at the moment. So far, I've not > > solved it. > > It would not be unwise to switch to Grub 2 (the new Grub that's slowly > becoming the default in many distros). It stores its co

Re: New testing install; no /boot/grub/menu.lst exists.

2010-01-09 Thread s. keeling
Tom H : > > What is your 40... entry? Generic chainloader +1 stuff: # OpenBSD 4.6 on /dev/hda1 title OpenBSD 4.6 root (hd0,0) savedefault makeactive chainloader +1 > Are you loading the ufs module(s)? Never heard of 'em. Will research, thanks. -- Any te

Re: New testing install; no /boot/grub/menu.lst exists.

2010-01-09 Thread s. keeling
Freeman : > On Wed, Jan 06, 2010 at 03:30:32AM +, s. keeling wrote: > > I'm new to testing. I've been running stable on primary box and (eg.) > > sid on sandbox for years. This is testing is on my sandbox for the > > first time. I just installed both squeeze(?)/testing and OpenBSD 4.6. > >

Re: New testing install; no /boot/grub/menu.lst exists.

2010-01-08 Thread Klistvud
Dne, 08. 01. 2010 01:32:32 je s. keeling napisal(a): Thanks. That's looking very tempting at the moment. So far, I've not solved it. It would not be unwise to switch to Grub 2 (the new Grub that's slowly becoming the default in many distros). It stores its configuration in /boot/grub/gr

Re: New testing install; no /boot/grub/menu.lst exists.

2010-01-07 Thread Tom H
>> > first time.  I just installed both squeeze(?)/testing and OpenBSD 4.6. >> > How do I add the latter to testing's grub?  /boot/grub/menu.lst >> > doesn't exist, and /boot/grub contains stuff I've never seen before. >>  Testing uses grub2 by default. >>  # update-grub >>  creates a new grub.

Re: New testing install; no /boot/grub/menu.lst exists.

2010-01-07 Thread s. keeling
Paul E Condon : > On 20100106_033032, s. keeling wrote: > > > > first time. I just installed both squeeze(?)/testing and OpenBSD 4.6. > > > > How do I add the latter to testing's grub? /boot/grub/menu.lst > > doesn't exist, and /boot/grub contains stuff I've never seen before. > > Testing us

Re: New testing install; no /boot/grub/menu.lst exists.

2010-01-07 Thread s. keeling
Wayne : > s. keeling wrote: > > I'm new to testing. I've been running stable on primary box and (eg.) > > sid on sandbox for years. This is testing is on my sandbox for the > > first time. I just installed both squeeze(?)/testing and OpenBSD 4.6. > > > > How do I add the latter to testing's g

Re: New testing install; no /boot/grub/menu.lst exists.

2010-01-05 Thread Freeman
On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 09:17:40PM -0800, Alan Ianson wrote: > On Tue, 2010-01-05 at 20:52 -0800, Freeman wrote: > > Grub2 is the recommended default but still considered under development. So > > was legacy I guess, it never reached V 1.0 . However, legacy still gives me > > control over the look

Re: New testing install; no /boot/grub/menu.lst exists.

2010-01-05 Thread Paul E Condon
On 20100106_033032, s. keeling wrote: > I'm new to testing. I've been running stable on primary box and (eg.) > sid on sandbox for years. This is testing is on my sandbox for the > first time. I just installed both squeeze(?)/testing and OpenBSD 4.6. > > How do I add the latter to testing's gru

Re: New testing install; no /boot/grub/menu.lst exists.

2010-01-05 Thread Freeman
On Wed, Jan 06, 2010 at 03:30:32AM +, s. keeling wrote: > I'm new to testing. I've been running stable on primary box and (eg.) > sid on sandbox for years. This is testing is on my sandbox for the > first time. I just installed both squeeze(?)/testing and OpenBSD 4.6. > > How do I add the l

Re: New testing install; no /boot/grub/menu.lst exists.

2010-01-05 Thread Alan Ianson
On Tue, 2010-01-05 at 20:52 -0800, Freeman wrote: > On Wed, Jan 06, 2010 at 03:30:32AM +, s. keeling wrote: > > I'm new to testing. I've been running stable on primary box and (eg.) > > sid on sandbox for years. This is testing is on my sandbox for the > > first time. I just installed both s

Re: New testing install; no /boot/grub/menu.lst exists.

2010-01-05 Thread Freeman
On Wed, Jan 06, 2010 at 03:30:32AM +, s. keeling wrote: > I'm new to testing. I've been running stable on primary box and (eg.) > sid on sandbox for years. This is testing is on my sandbox for the > first time. I just installed both squeeze(?)/testing and OpenBSD 4.6. > > How do I add the l

Re: New testing install; no /boot/grub/menu.lst exists.

2010-01-05 Thread Wayne
s. keeling wrote: I'm new to testing. I've been running stable on primary box and (eg.) sid on sandbox for years. This is testing is on my sandbox for the first time. I just installed both squeeze(?)/testing and OpenBSD 4.6. How do I add the latter to testing's grub? /boot/grub/menu.lst does

New testing install; no /boot/grub/menu.lst exists.

2010-01-05 Thread s. keeling
I'm new to testing. I've been running stable on primary box and (eg.) sid on sandbox for years. This is testing is on my sandbox for the first time. I just installed both squeeze(?)/testing and OpenBSD 4.6. How do I add the latter to testing's grub? /boot/grub/menu.lst doesn't exist, and /boot