Re: No libforms0.89 -> no Lyx

2001-02-05 Thread Peter S Galbraith
Sorry for all the trouble. I uploaded a new libforms0.89 that conforms to policy wrt the xpm4g transition to libxpm4 on Sep 14th 2000, to unstable. The problem is that packages aren't moved into testing (woody) untill they are built for all architectures. Since the autobuilders don't handle non

RE: No libforms0.89 -> no Lyx

2001-02-02 Thread Carlo U. Segre
I ran into the same problem and I ended up installing the package (and other required ones) from unstable. Cheers, Carlo > I also noticed that Lyx was removed during a recent upgrade in > "testing". I tried to reinstall it but found that it requires > libforms0.89 Since Lyx is (in my opinion)

Re: No libforms0.89 -> no Lyx

2001-02-01 Thread Syrus Nemat-Nasser
On Thu, 1 Feb 2001, Glen Snyder wrote: > Thanks to Mike for the tip that got the X4 upgrade in testing working > for me. I'm a happy camper again. > > I also noticed that Lyx was removed during a recent upgrade in > "testing". I tried to reinstall it but found that it requires > libforms0.89 Sin

No libforms0.89 -> no Lyx

2001-02-01 Thread Glen Snyder
Thanks to Mike for the tip that got the X4 upgrade in testing working for me. I'm a happy camper again. I also noticed that Lyx was removed during a recent upgrade in "testing". I tried to reinstall it but found that it requires libforms0.89 Since Lyx is (in my opinion) one of the best document e