Re: No xterm (or equivalents) immediately accessible in default etch

2006-11-09 Thread Steve Lamb
Michelle Konzack wrote: > And why do Debian need three similar programs which do the same thing? > But unfortiunatly it is... since those which want to be individual and > use only fvwm are cuted to older apps which are "not more supported" > and deprecated since GNOME and KDE exist!

Re: No xterm (or equivalents) immediately accessible in default etch

2006-11-09 Thread Michelle Konzack
Hi John, Am 2006-10-24 12:05:29, schrieb John C: > You're absolutely correct. The xterm should be "IN MY FACE" every > time I log on. (it does on my box) Unfortunately the linux > community is sliding down the "commercially" driven "one desktop > fits all" slope, so that once all the desktops

Re: No xterm (or equivalents) immediately accessible in default etch

2006-10-25 Thread José Alburquerque
Jameson C. Burt wrote: THANK YOU -- nautilus-open-terminal does just what I would hope for. --Jim Burt Anytime. :-) On Tue, Oct 24, 2006 at 11:44:14AM -0400, José Alburquerque wrote: If you install the 'nautilus-open-terminal' package, you can open up a terminal on demand right off

Re: No xterm (or equivalents) immediately accessible in default etch

2006-10-24 Thread Gregory Seidman
On Tue, Oct 24, 2006 at 12:05:29PM -0500, John C wrote: } [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: } >We in Linux heavily use the command-line. } >So, I was dismayed when my new Debian etch version displayed a Gnome } >interface WITHOUT ANY XTERM (or GNOME-TERMINAL or KONSOLE) } >and not even any immediate panel

PD: Re: No xterm (or equivalents) immediately accessible in default etch

2006-10-24 Thread Zbigniew Wiech
> > THE XTERM (or its equivalent) SHOULD BE IN MY FACE > > THE VERY FIRST TIME I LOGIN, > > requiring at most a single obvious mouse click. > > Why are you screaming? > > The correct thing to do, I believe, is to file a wishlist bug against > debian-installer. Hi, why don't you just add xterm or

Re: No xterm (or equivalents) immediately accessible in default etch

2006-10-24 Thread Matthew Krauss
John C wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We in Linux heavily use the command-line. So, I was dismayed when my new Debian etch version displayed a Gnome interface WITHOUT ANY XTERM (or GNOME-TERMINAL or KONSOLE) and not even any immediate panel options for these terminals. Gnome's "Add to Pane

Re: No xterm (or equivalents) immediately accessible in default etch

2006-10-24 Thread José Alburquerque
John C wrote: One of the greatest features of linux *was* that each individuals desktop was as different as that individual. The box looked, operated, and sounded the way that user wanted it too. Now it seems that individuality is out-of-style and every useful tool/program that is not part o

Re: No xterm (or equivalents) immediately accessible in default etch

2006-10-24 Thread Vincent Lefevre
On 2006-10-23 09:58:22 -0500, John Hasler wrote: > Vincent Lefevre writes: ^^ Bad attribution. I didn't write the following. > > That said, those types of people likely don't know about the command > > line. If they do, they are likely frightened by it. > > Only if what the

Re: No xterm (or equivalents) immediately accessible in default etch

2006-10-24 Thread John C
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We in Linux heavily use the command-line. So, I was dismayed when my new Debian etch version displayed a Gnome interface WITHOUT ANY XTERM (or GNOME-TERMINAL or KONSOLE) and not even any immediate panel options for these terminals. Gnome's "Add to Panel" includes a t

Re: No xterm (or equivalents) immediately accessible in default etch

2006-10-24 Thread José Alburquerque
Jameson C. Burt wrote: I'll also accept your solution to start gnome-terminal from a command-line using alt-F2 Luckily, when done once, Gnome usually saves even that effort, since Gnome remembers the previous gnome-terminal application between boots. If you install the 'nautilus-open-t

Re: No xterm (or equivalents) immediately accessible in default etch

2006-10-24 Thread Liam O'Toole
On Mon, 23 Oct 2006 17:23:58 -0400 "Jameson C. Burt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > But you folks have affirmed that this was by design, > so I'll quit being shrill. That's a relief :-) > > I'll also accept your solution to start gnome-terminal > from a command-line using >alt-F2 > Luckily,

Re: No xterm (or equivalents) immediately accessible in default etch

2006-10-23 Thread Kevin Mark
On Mon, Oct 23, 2006 at 05:23:58PM -0400, Jameson C. Burt wrote: > I DIDN'T MIND SO MUCH THAT I DIDN'T IMMEDIATELY SEE A GNOME-TERMINAL > OR A TERMINAL ICON, > BUT WHEN THE PANEL OPTIONS OFFERED NO GNOME-TERMINAL > AND GNOME MENUS OFFERED NO TERMINAL AT MENU'S FIRST LEVEL, > I FELT SOMETHING WAS A

Re: No xterm (or equivalents) immediately accessible in default etch

2006-10-23 Thread John Hasler
Vincent Lefevre writes: > That said, those types of people likely don't know about the command > line. If they do, they are likely frightened by it. Only if what they know isn't true (the usual case, unfortunately). -- John Hasler -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject

Re: No xterm (or equivalents) immediately accessible in default etch

2006-10-23 Thread Jameson C. Burt
On Sun, Oct 22, 2006 at 01:26:40AM -0400, Carl Fink wrote: > On Sun, Oct 22, 2006 at 01:12:48AM -0400, Jameson C. Burt wrote: > > > We in Linux heavily use the command-line. > > So, I was dismayed when my new Debian etch version displayed a Gnome > > interface WITHOUT ANY XTERM (or GNOME-TERMINA

Re: No xterm (or equivalents) immediately accessible in default etch

2006-10-23 Thread Vincent Lefevre
On 2006-10-22 01:31:53 -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: > Well, it is well known that the target audience of GNOME is end user > newbies or windows transplants. That said, those types of people likely > don't know about the command line. If they do, they are likely > frightened by it. And Apple

Re: No xterm (or equivalents) immediately accessible in default etch

2006-10-22 Thread Roberto C. Sanchez
On Sun, Oct 22, 2006 at 04:14:03PM -0800, Greg Madden wrote: > On Sun, 22 Oct 2006 17:23:09 -0400 > "Roberto C. Sanchez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Sun, Oct 22, 2006 at 12:14:53PM -0800, Greg Madden wrote: > > > > > > since this seems a nit pick session , I believe to bring up the run >

Re: No xterm (or equivalents) immediately accessible in default etch

2006-10-22 Thread Ron Johnson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/22/06 19:14, Greg Madden wrote: > On Sun, 22 Oct 2006 17:23:09 -0400 > "Roberto C. Sanchez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On Sun, Oct 22, 2006 at 12:14:53PM -0800, Greg Madden wrote: [snip] > the meubar on > the top of the screen bin Gnome is

Re: No xterm (or equivalents) immediately accessible in default etch

2006-10-22 Thread Roberto C. Sanchez
On Sun, Oct 22, 2006 at 12:14:53PM -0800, Greg Madden wrote: > > since this seems a nit pick session , I believe to bring up the run > dialog box is . Also imho Debian is not for a newbie or even > less so a windows convert, hence Ubuntu. > Good catch on the Alt-F2. I hardly use GNOME, so I tend

Re: No xterm (or equivalents) immediately accessible in default etch

2006-10-22 Thread Greg Madden
On Sun, 22 Oct 2006 01:31:53 -0400 "Roberto C. Sanchez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, Oct 22, 2006 at 01:12:48AM -0400, Jameson C. Burt wrote: > > > > We in Linux heavily use the command-line. > > So, I was dismayed when my new Debian etch version displayed a Gnome > > interface WITHOUT A

Re: No xterm (or equivalents) immediately accessible in default etch

2006-10-22 Thread Greg Madden
On Sun, 22 Oct 2006 17:23:09 -0400 "Roberto C. Sanchez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, Oct 22, 2006 at 12:14:53PM -0800, Greg Madden wrote: > > > > since this seems a nit pick session , I believe to bring up the run > > dialog box is . Also imho Debian is not for a newbie or even > > less s

Re: No xterm (or equivalents) immediately accessible in default etch

2006-10-22 Thread Ron Johnson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/22/06 08:34, Kevin Mark wrote: > On Sun, Oct 22, 2006 at 01:12:48AM -0400, Jameson C. Burt wrote: >> We in Linux heavily use the command-line. > > Hi Jameson, this is not entirely true today. Linux is moving > towards the desktop, so when that f

Re: No xterm (or equivalents) immediately accessible in default etch

2006-10-22 Thread Kevin Mark
On Sun, Oct 22, 2006 at 01:12:48AM -0400, Jameson C. Burt wrote: > > We in Linux heavily use the command-line. Hi Jameson, this is not entirely true today. Linux is moving towards the desktop, so when that fully happends, it will be expected to be fully gui like MacOS X. > So, I was dismayed wh

Re: No xterm (or equivalents) immediately accessible in default etch

2006-10-22 Thread Liam O'Toole
On Sun, 22 Oct 2006 01:12:48 -0400 "Jameson C. Burt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > We in Linux heavily use the command-line. > So, I was dismayed when my new Debian etch version displayed a Gnome > interface WITHOUT ANY XTERM (or GNOME-TERMINAL or KONSOLE) > and not even any immediate panel op

Re: No xterm (or equivalents) immediately accessible in default etch

2006-10-22 Thread Liam O'Toole
On Sun, 22 Oct 2006 02:55:32 -0400 "Roberto C. Sanchez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] > If you are a newbie, you should not have > terminal popping up in the top level of the menu. If you are a power > user, you will know where to find it. > That sums up the approach of the GNOME project, i

Re: No xterm (or equivalents) immediately accessible in default etch

2006-10-21 Thread Roberto C. Sanchez
On Sun, Oct 22, 2006 at 01:48:14AM -0500, Damon L. Chesser wrote: > > Not to flame, but "well known that the target audience of GNOME is end > user newbies or windows transplants" > > It is? I mean KDE is more windows like then gnome. I never use the Yes, it is wel known. But he was griping

Re: No xterm (or equivalents) immediately accessible in default etch

2006-10-21 Thread Damon L. Chesser
Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: On Sun, Oct 22, 2006 at 01:12:48AM -0400, Jameson C. Burt wrote: We in Linux heavily use the command-line. So, I was dismayed when my new Debian etch version displayed a Gnome interface WITHOUT ANY XTERM (or GNOME-TERMINAL or KONSOLE) and not even any immediate pane

Re: No xterm (or equivalents) immediately accessible in default etch

2006-10-21 Thread Carl Fink
On Sun, Oct 22, 2006 at 01:12:48AM -0400, Jameson C. Burt wrote: > We in Linux heavily use the command-line. > So, I was dismayed when my new Debian etch version displayed a Gnome > interface WITHOUT ANY XTERM (or GNOME-TERMINAL or KONSOLE) > and not even any immediate panel options for these t

Re: No xterm (or equivalents) immediately accessible in default etch

2006-10-21 Thread Ron Johnson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/22/06 00:12, Jameson C. Burt wrote: > We in Linux heavily use the command-line. So, I was dismayed when > my new Debian etch version displayed a Gnome interface WITHOUT > ANY XTERM (or GNOME-TERMINAL or KONSOLE) and not even any > immediate panel

No xterm (or equivalents) immediately accessible in default etch

2006-10-21 Thread jameson__debian
We in Linux heavily use the command-line. So, I was dismayed when my new Debian etch version displayed a Gnome interface WITHOUT ANY XTERM (or GNOME-TERMINAL or KONSOLE) and not even any immediate panel options for these terminals. Gnome's "Add to Panel" includes a trashcan and a file-manager ju

Re: No xterm (or equivalents) immediately accessible in default etch

2006-10-21 Thread Roberto C. Sanchez
On Sun, Oct 22, 2006 at 01:12:48AM -0400, Jameson C. Burt wrote: > > We in Linux heavily use the command-line. > So, I was dismayed when my new Debian etch version displayed a Gnome > interface WITHOUT ANY XTERM (or GNOME-TERMINAL or KONSOLE) > and not even any immediate panel options for these

No xterm (or equivalents) immediately accessible in default etch

2006-10-21 Thread Jameson C. Burt
We in Linux heavily use the command-line. So, I was dismayed when my new Debian etch version displayed a Gnome interface WITHOUT ANY XTERM (or GNOME-TERMINAL or KONSOLE) and not even any immediate panel options for these terminals. Gnome's "Add to Panel" includes a trashcan and a file-manager j