On Lu, 12 nov 12, 16:24:04, David Guntner wrote:
>
> Ok, try this just for grins. Edit your /etc/mtab file, and add the
> following line:
>
> /dev/ad6s1 /mnt/ad6s1 ext2fs ro 0 0
Just for the archives: this might be dangerous (if at all possible) on
recent Debian GNU/Linux:
$ ls -l /etc/mtab
l
William A. Mahaffey III grabbed a keyboard and wrote:
> On 11/12/12 18:24, David Guntner wrote:
>> Ok, try this just for grins. Edit your /etc/mtab file, and add the
>> following line:
>>
>> /dev/ad6s1 /mnt/ad6s1 ext2fs ro 0 0
>>
>> (I'm following your example from ad4s1; ordinarily with a Linux k
On 11/13/12 00:36, Tom Furie wrote:
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 12:34:36AM -0600, William A. Mahaffey III wrote:
*Acck* So it's a typo ?!?!?! I was using
ext2/3/4, not ext2/3/4*fs* I just tried& it mounted &
when I try ext3fs, it is *nogo* Sooo ext3/4
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 12:34:36AM -0600, William A. Mahaffey III wrote:
>
> *Acck* So it's a typo ?!?!?! I was using
> ext2/3/4, not ext2/3/4*fs* I just tried & it mounted &
> when I try ext3fs, it is *nogo* Sooo ext3/4 apparently
> *not* supported
On 11/12/12 21:50, Tom Furie wrote:
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 02:17:19PM -0600, William A. Mahaffey III wrote:
On 11/12/12 11:10, Tom Furie wrote:
Are you able to mount those filesystems as ext2? Any ext3 filesystem
should be mountable as ext2.
Tried it:
[root@opty165a:/etc, Mon Nov 12, 02:12 P
On 11/12/12 18:24, David Guntner wrote:
William A. Mahaffey III grabbed a keyboard and wrote:
On 11/12/12 16:27, David Guntner wrote:
William A. Mahaffey III grabbed a keyboard and wrote:
ad[0,6]s1 are the 2 offending partitions. Also, in the interlude, I went
ahead& e2fsck'ed both partitions
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 02:17:19PM -0600, William A. Mahaffey III wrote:
> On 11/12/12 11:10, Tom Furie wrote:
> >Are you able to mount those filesystems as ext2? Any ext3 filesystem
> >should be mountable as ext2.
>
> Tried it:
>
> [root@opty165a:/etc, Mon Nov 12, 02:12 PM] 802 # mount -t ext3
William A. Mahaffey III grabbed a keyboard and wrote:
> On 11/12/12 16:27, David Guntner wrote:
>> William A. Mahaffey III grabbed a keyboard and wrote:
>>>
>>> ad[0,6]s1 are the 2 offending partitions. Also, in the interlude, I went
>>> ahead & e2fsck'ed both partitions, both came back w/ '*
On 11/12/12 16:27, David Guntner wrote:
William A. Mahaffey III grabbed a keyboard and wrote:
On 11/12/12 11:10, Tom Furie wrote:
On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 11:50:20AM -0600, William A. Mahaffey III wrote:
[root@opty165a:/etc, Sun Nov 11, 11:44 AM] 593 # mount -t ext3
/dev/ad0s1 /mnt
mount:
William A. Mahaffey III grabbed a keyboard and wrote:
> On 11/12/12 11:10, Tom Furie wrote:
>> On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 11:50:20AM -0600, William A. Mahaffey III wrote:
>>
>>> [root@opty165a:/etc, Sun Nov 11, 11:44 AM] 593 # mount -t ext3
>>> /dev/ad0s1 /mnt
>>> mount: /dev/ad0s1 : No such device
>
On 11/12/12 11:10, Tom Furie wrote:
On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 11:50:20AM -0600, William A. Mahaffey III wrote:
[root@opty165a:/etc, Sun Nov 11, 11:44 AM] 593 # mount -t ext3
/dev/ad0s1 /mnt
mount: /dev/ad0s1 : No such device
[root@opty165a:/etc, Sun Nov 11, 11:44 AM] 594 # mount -t ext3
/dev/ad6
On 11/12/12 11:10, Tom Furie wrote:
On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 11:50:20AM -0600, William A. Mahaffey III wrote:
[root@opty165a:/etc, Sun Nov 11, 11:44 AM] 593 # mount -t ext3
/dev/ad0s1 /mnt
mount: /dev/ad0s1 : No such device
[root@opty165a:/etc, Sun Nov 11, 11:44 AM] 594 # mount -t ext3
/dev
On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 11:50:20AM -0600, William A. Mahaffey III wrote:
> [root@opty165a:/etc, Sun Nov 11, 11:44 AM] 593 # mount -t ext3
> /dev/ad0s1 /mnt
> mount: /dev/ad0s1 : No such device
> [root@opty165a:/etc, Sun Nov 11, 11:44 AM] 594 # mount -t ext3
> /dev/ad6s1 /mnt
> mount: /dev/ad6s1
On Sunday, November 11, 2012 04:08:47 PM David Christensen wrote:
> On 11/11/12 12:54, William A. Mahaffey III wrote:
> > Does Debian-kfreeBSD in fact have ext3fs support ?
>
> I dunno -- perhaps that's the problem. (I use Debian Squeeze i386 and
> Debian Wheezy amd64.)
>
>
> A console-only ins
Hello David,
David Christensen wrote:
> On 11/11/12 09:50, William A. Mahaffey III wrote:
> > crw-rw 1 root disk 0, 89 Nov 10 08:34 /dev/ad6s1
> > [root@opty165a:/etc, Sun Nov 11, 11:44 AM] 594 # mount -t ext3
> > /dev/ad6s1 /mnt
> > mount: /dev/ad6s1 : No such device
> > [root@opty165a:/etc
On 11/11/12 12:54, William A. Mahaffey III wrote:
Does Debian-kfreeBSD in fact have ext3fs support ?
I dunno -- perhaps that's the problem. (I use Debian Squeeze i386 and
Debian Wheezy amd64.)
A console-only install of Debian Squeeze i386 can have a fairly small
memory footprint (my CVS s
On 11/11/12 13:05, Jude DaShiell wrote:
Slackware 14.0 is available and it also has a small footprint. If you
choose not to install all the bloatware no g.u.i. you can probably end up
with a full command line installation except for emacs in a little under a
hundred meg. If you decide to ins
On 11/11/12 13:13, David Christensen wrote:
On 11/11/12 09:50, William A. Mahaffey III wrote:
[root@opty165a:/etc, Sun Nov 11, 10:49 AM] 592 # ll /dev/ad*
crw-rw 1 root disk 0, 78 Nov 10 08:34 /dev/ad0
crw-rw 1 root disk 0, 79 Nov 10 08:34 /dev/ad0s1
crw-rw 1 root disk 0, 82 Nov 10 0
On 11/11/12 09:50, William A. Mahaffey III wrote:
[root@opty165a:/etc, Sun Nov 11, 10:49 AM] 592 # ll /dev/ad*
crw-rw 1 root disk 0, 78 Nov 10 08:34 /dev/ad0
crw-rw 1 root disk 0, 79 Nov 10 08:34 /dev/ad0s1
crw-rw 1 root disk 0, 82 Nov 10 08:34 /dev/ad4
crw-rw 1 root disk 0, 83 No
Slackware 14.0 is available and it also has a small footprint. If you
choose not to install all the bloatware no g.u.i. you can probably end up
with a full command line installation except for emacs in a little under a
hundred meg. If you decide to install emacs, I suggest you do it using
sla
I am brand new to Debian, have used RH's for about 10 years, SGI &
SuSE before that, Mandrake before that, ConvexOS before that. I
installed Squeeze-kfreeBSD on a Socket 939 Opteron server that I
recently replaced the root drive (which had croaked) on. I like the
small memory footprint
Am 2007-04-15 06:57:16, schrieb Freddy Freeloader:
> Michael Pobega wrote:
> >>I have one recurring problem with aptitude. It keeps trying to remove
> >>gnome and everything related to it and a bunch of other stuff.
^^
> >>Fortunately it takes up enough real esta
On Sun, 15 Apr 2007 11:57:19 -0400
Kamaraju S Kusumanchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Celejar wrote:
> >
> > But we did find this for 'build-dep':
> >
> > http://p12n.org/hacks/aptitude-build-dep
> >
>
> When people say aptitude, they usually refer to the one supplied by Debian.
> The above is
On 14 Apr 2007, Michael Pobega wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 14, 2007 at 05:50:26PM -0400, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 14, 2007 at 02:36:40PM -0700, Adam Frank wrote:
> > > For beginners I'd definitely recommend apt-get, or even one of its GUI
> > > fronteds like Synaptic.
> >
> > The only p
Kamaraju S Kusumanchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 14, 2007 at 06:00:02PM -0400, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote:
[...]
> >> sudo apt-get build-dep texmacs
> >> sudo apt-get source texmacs
[...]
> >
> > Are those things a newbie cares about? I've never used them i
On Sun, Apr 15, 2007 at 06:57:16AM -0700, Freddy Freeloader wrote:
> >>I have one recurring problem with aptitude. It keeps trying to remove
> >>gnome and everything related to it and a bunch of other stuff.
> >>Fortunately it takes up enough real estate on the screen that it is
> >>hard to miss an
On Sat, 14 Apr 2007 16:50:59 -0500
"Russell L. Harris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070414 16:28]:
> > I've been using Debian for about a month, and just upgraded to Etch.
> ...
> > I am wondering about the best way to install software. I have used
> > th
Michael Pobega wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, Apr 15, 2007 at 07:13:07AM -0500, Dennis G. Wicks wrote:
Michael Pobega wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
On Sat, Apr 14, 2007 at 05:50:26PM -0400, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
On Sa
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070414 16:28]:
> I've been using Debian for about a month, and just upgraded to Etch.
...
> I am wondering about the best way to install software. I have used
> the "apt-get" method, which is pretty simple, and have also
> downloaded and compiled from sour
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, Apr 15, 2007 at 07:13:07AM -0500, Dennis G. Wicks wrote:
> Michael Pobega wrote:
> >-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
> >
> >On Sat, Apr 14, 2007 at 05:50:26PM -0400, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
> >
> >>On Sat, Apr 14, 2007 at 02:3
On Sat, 14 Apr 2007 18:00:02 -0400
Kamaraju S Kusumanchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
>
> > Curious: what does apt-get do that aptitude non-interactive do; how
> > does the user's experience of each differ? I thought that aptitude for
> > simple stuff a drop-in replac
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, Apr 14, 2007 at 05:50:26PM -0400, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 14, 2007 at 02:36:40PM -0700, Adam Frank wrote:
> > For beginners I'd definitely recommend apt-get, or even one of its GUI
> > fronteds like Synaptic.
>
> The only prob
Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 14, 2007 at 06:00:02PM -0400, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote:
>> Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
>>
>> > Curious: what does apt-get do that aptitude non-interactive do; how
>> > does the user's experience of each differ? I thought that aptitude for
>> > simple s
On Sat, Apr 14, 2007 at 06:00:02PM -0400, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote:
> Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
>
> > Curious: what does apt-get do that aptitude non-interactive do; how
> > does the user's experience of each differ? I thought that aptitude for
> > simple stuff a drop-in replacement for apt-
Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
> Curious: what does apt-get do that aptitude non-interactive do; how
> does the user's experience of each differ? I thought that aptitude for
> simple stuff a drop-in replacement for apt-get.
>
sudo apt-get build-dep texmacs
sudo apt-get source texmacs
Replace texm
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I've been using Debian for about a month, and just upgraded to Etch. I'm
> very happy with it so far - my compliments to the people who create this
> great piece of work.
>
> I am wondering about the best way to install software. I have used the
> "apt-get" method, wh
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>
> I am wondering about the best way to install software. I have used
> the "apt-get" method, which is pretty simple, and have also downloaded
> and compiled from source "tarballs" which is a little more complicated
> but doesn't seem to be a big deal. Are there significant ad
On Sat, Apr 14, 2007 at 02:36:40PM -0700, Adam Frank wrote:
> For beginners I'd definitely recommend apt-get, or even one of its GUI
> fronteds like Synaptic.
The only problem for a beginner using Synaptic is that if it is all she
knows, and X crashes, they have no experience to fall back on.
Its
On Sat, Apr 14, 2007 at 09:22:56PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I've been using Debian for about a month, and just upgraded to Etch.
> I'm very happy with it so far - my compliments to the people who
> create this great piece of work.
>
> I am wondering about the best way to install software.
On Sat, Apr 14, 2007 at 09:22:56PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> I've been using Debian for about a month, and just upgraded to Etch.
> I'm very happy with it so far - my compliments to the people who
> create this great piece of work.
>
> I am wondering about the best way to install software.
For beginners I'd definitely recommend apt-get, or even one of its GUI
fronteds like Synaptic.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've been using Debian for about a month, and just upgraded to Etch. I'm very
happy with it so far - my compliments to the people who create this great piece
of work.
I am wondering about the best way to install software. I have used the
"apt-get" method, which is pretty simple, and have also
On Fri, Feb 16, 2007 at 06:34:21PM +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 22:37:02 +0100
> "Nick Demou" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > [...]Further down the
> > > release cycle, testing gets naturally more and more stable and
> > > easier and easier to administer and less likely to
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 08:16:47PM +0100, Nigel Henry wrote:
> Personally, if you have sufficient harddrive space, I'd keep your current
> Etch
> install pointing to Etch in /etc/apt/sources.list. then I would install
> another instance of Etch. I'd keep this pointing to Etch, then when Etch goe
On Sat, 17 Feb 2007 07:56:18 +0100
Joe Hart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm sure a cp would work just as well, but I like the "Auto Skip" that
> Konqueror does, not to mention I can track the progress.
Have a look at mc (Midnight Commander). It is text mode (so it also
runs from a console), but
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andrei Popescu wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Feb 2007 22:52:07 +0100
> Joe Hart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I have a feeling this is likely to start a debate. Be that as it
>> may, I set my KDE to select on one click and activate on two.
>> However, if I
On Fri, 16 Feb 2007 22:52:07 +0100
Joe Hart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have a feeling this is likely to start a debate. Be that as it
> may, I set my KDE to select on one click and activate on two.
> However, if I run konqueror as root, then I get the single click
> activation again. Oh wel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chris Lale wrote:
> Chris Lale wrote:
>> Nigel Henry wrote:
>>> On Wednesday 14 February 2007 17:36, Michael S. Peek wrote:
>>> [...]
>>> Personally, if you have sufficient harddrive space, I'd keep your
>>> current Etch install pointing to Etch in /
Chris Lale wrote:
Nigel Henry wrote:
On Wednesday 14 February 2007 17:36, Michael S. Peek wrote:
[...]
Personally, if you have sufficient harddrive space, I'd keep your
current Etch install pointing to Etch in /etc/apt/sources.list. then
I would install another instance of Etch. I'd keep thi
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 22:37:02 +0100
"Nick Demou" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > [...]Further down the
> > release cycle, testing gets naturally more and more stable and
> > easier and easier to administer and less likely to break as the new
> > versions get massaged into their final release conditi
Nigel Henry wrote:
On Wednesday 14 February 2007 17:36, Michael S. Peek wrote:
[...]
Personally, if you have sufficient harddrive space, I'd keep your current Etch
install pointing to Etch in /etc/apt/sources.list. then I would install
another instance of Etch. I'd keep this pointing to Etch
Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 10:15:25AM -0500, Grok Mogger wrote:
Wait, so stable only gets security updates? What if there's a
bug in a package, will it get a fix? And I guess just to finish
off my questionnaire, do packages in stable ever get upgrades
for additional fu
On Thu, 2007-02-15 at 10:15 -0500, Grok Mogger wrote:
> Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
>
> > So, if you leave your sources.list with "testing" then after the
> > release, you will continue to see package upgrades as things move from
> > unstable to testing. If you use "etch" then when Etch becomes sta
2007/2/14, Andrew Sackville-West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 12:17:56PM -0500, Michael S. Peek wrote:
[...]
I personally think that if you want the latest greatest
stuff one should run sid instead of testing. If something breaks in
sid, it tends to fix itself pretty quickly. som
On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 10:15:25AM -0500, Grok Mogger wrote:
>
> If stable only gets security updates, then I find it rather
> funny that I know someone running a Debian system with a custom
> perl script designed to get only security updates via apt-get.
> Was this script a total waste of his
On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 10:15:25AM -0500, Grok Mogger wrote:
>
> Wait, so stable only gets security updates? What if there's a
> bug in a package, will it get a fix? And I guess just to finish
> off my questionnaire, do packages in stable ever get upgrades
> for additional functionality?
>
S
Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
So, if you leave your sources.list with "testing" then after the
release, you will continue to see package upgrades as things move from
unstable to testing. If you use "etch" then when Etch becomes stable,
you will only see security updates.
Regards,
-Roberto
Wait
On Wed, 2007-02-14 at 11:36 -0500, Michael S. Peek wrote:
> Hi Debian gurus,
>
> I jumped aboard the Debian bandwagon mid-Sarge, and so that's the
> version of Debian that our machines are currently running. As Etch
> nears it's completion I've been preparing for the upgrade from Sarge to
> Et
Joe Hart wrote:
According to the documentation, when Etch is made stable, a new testing
will be made (in this case called Lenny), which is a direct clone of
Etch. Packages will migrate from Sid to Lenny at the same pace as usual
for the testing distro.
However, since Etch has been frozen, there
On Wednesday 14 February 2007 17:36, Michael S. Peek wrote:
> Hi Debian gurus,
>
> I jumped aboard the Debian bandwagon mid-Sarge, and so that's the
> version of Debian that our machines are currently running. As Etch
> nears it's completion I've been preparing for the upgrade from Sarge to
> Etch
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 12:17:56PM -0500, Michael S. Peek wrote:
> Andy Hawkins wrote:
> >That would be just fine. As I understand it, stuff doesn't make it from
> >unstable to testing until it's been working in unstable for a while, so
> >the
> >chances of testing breaking horribly are reduced.
>
Joe writes:
> However, since Etch has been frozen, there are a lot of packages from Sid
> that are ready for Testing, but can't go there. Lenny will catch them
> when it is created, thus it is possible that the large number of packages
> flowing in could cause some stability problems.
Don't forge
> I've seen several warnings now about making sure to change "testing" to
> "etch" in /etc/apt/sources.lst once Etch goes stable. (For testing
> purposes I've just always left it "etch".) But what if what I want is
> to keep our machines at "testing"? It seems to have the latest and
> groovi
Hi,
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Michael S. Peek<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Okay, so, just to make sure that I understand completely. Once Etch
> becomes the new stable release, does the unstable release replace the
> testing release? I.e. if I leave my systems at "testing", wi
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 12:17:56PM -0500, Michael S. Peek wrote:
> >
> Okay, so, just to make sure that I understand completely. Once Etch
> becomes the new stable release, does the unstable release replace the
> testing release? I.e. if I leave my systems at "testing", will I come
> in one
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Michael S. Peek wrote:
> Okay, so, just to make sure that I understand completely. Once Etch
> becomes the new stable release, does the unstable release replace the
> testing release? I.e. if I leave my systems at "testing", will I come
> in one day
Andy Hawkins wrote:
That would be just fine. As I understand it, stuff doesn't make it from
unstable to testing until it's been working in unstable for a while, so the
chances of testing breaking horribly are reduced.
It can still happen though, so there's a possibility that in the early
stages
Hi,
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Michael S. Peek<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But what if what I want is to keep our machines at "testing"? It seems to
> have the latest and grooviest versions of stuff. So how badly would I be
> shooting myself in the foot if I changed "etch" to "tes
Hi Debian gurus,
I jumped aboard the Debian bandwagon mid-Sarge, and so that's the
version of Debian that our machines are currently running. As Etch
nears it's completion I've been preparing for the upgrade from Sarge to
Etch. Since I'm still pretty new to Debian, I'm a little iffy when it
On Thu, Nov 03, 2005 at 06:44:34AM +, s. keeling wrote:
> Cameron Matheson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > [snip]
> > /etc/aliases. It's unsafe to let root receive mail, so generally
>
> Uh, what? Why's it unsafe to let root receive email?
>
> I agree it's _better_ for root's mail to be aliased
On 2-nov-2005, at 21:37, Thomas wrote:
Mitch Wiedemann wrote:
Thomas wrote:
Hi there.
I would like to setup a mailserver on my debian machine that can
receive email from any host and that can be accessed by imap or pop3
(imap would be nice). I have seen some howtos on the net but they
see
Cameron Matheson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> [snip]
> /etc/aliases. It's unsafe to let root receive mail, so generally
Uh, what? Why's it unsafe to let root receive email?
I agree it's _better_ for root's mail to be aliased to a real user,
but safer too? Why?
--
Any technology distinguisha
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 02, 2005 at 09:37:10PM +0100, Thomas wrote:
> Here my /etc/postfix/main.cf:
>
> smtpd_banner = $myhostname ESMTP $mail_name (Debian/GNU)
> biff = no
>
> # appending .domain is the MUA's job.
> append_dot_mydomain = no
>
> # Uncomment the next line to generate "delayed mail" warn
On 23:49 Wed 02 Nov , Thomas wrote:
>snip<<
> >Is there a logfile or something that can tell me who is actually
> >denying what?
> >
> >Thanks,
> >Thomas
> >
> >
> Aha, i found out:
>
> mail.log
> Nov 2 23:26:50 localhost postfix/smtpd[14343]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT
> from nova[10.
Thomas wrote:
Marco van Putten wrote:
Thomas schreef:
Thomas wrote:
Marco van Putten wrote:
Thomas schreef:
Mitch Wiedemann wrote:
Thomas wrote:
Hi there.
I would like to setup a mailserver on my debian machine that can
receive email from any host and that can be accessed b
Marco van Putten wrote:
Thomas schreef:
Thomas wrote:
Marco van Putten wrote:
Thomas schreef:
Mitch Wiedemann wrote:
Thomas wrote:
Hi there.
I would like to setup a mailserver on my debian machine that can
receive email from any host and that can be accessed by imap or
pop3
Thomas schreef:
Thomas wrote:
Marco van Putten wrote:
Thomas schreef:
Mitch Wiedemann wrote:
Thomas wrote:
Hi there.
I would like to setup a mailserver on my debian machine that can
receive email from any host and that can be accessed by imap or pop3
(imap would be nice). I have
Thomas wrote:
Marco van Putten wrote:
Thomas schreef:
Mitch Wiedemann wrote:
Thomas wrote:
Hi there.
I would like to setup a mailserver on my debian machine that can
receive email from any host and that can be accessed by imap or pop3
(imap would be nice). I have seen some howtos o
Marco van Putten wrote:
Thomas schreef:
Mitch Wiedemann wrote:
Thomas wrote:
Hi there.
I would like to setup a mailserver on my debian machine that can
receive email from any host and that can be accessed by imap or pop3
(imap would be nice). I have seen some howtos on the net but th
Thomas wrote:
> Mitch Wiedemann wrote:
>
>> Thomas wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> Hi there.
>>>
>>> I would like to setup a mailserver on my debian machine that can
>>> receive email from any host and that can be accessed by imap or pop3
>>> (imap would be nice). I have seen some howtos on the net but they
Thomas wrote:
> Mitch Wiedemann wrote:
>
>> Thomas wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> Hi there.
>>>
>>> I would like to setup a mailserver on my debian machine that can
>>> receive email from any host and that can be accessed by imap or pop3
>>> (imap would be nice). I have seen some howtos on the net but they
Mitch Wiedemann wrote:
Thomas wrote:
Hi there.
I would like to setup a mailserver on my debian machine that can
receive email from any host and that can be accessed by imap or pop3
(imap would be nice). I have seen some howtos on the net but they
seemed way too complicated. The howtos i sa
Mitch Wiedemann wrote:
Thomas wrote:
Hi there.
I would like to setup a mailserver on my debian machine that can
receive email from any host and that can be accessed by imap or pop3
(imap would be nice). I have seen some howtos on the net but they
seemed way too complicated. The howtos i sa
On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 12:31:30PM -0600, Miguel Enrique Cobá Martínez wrote:
> Thomas wrote:
> > Hi there.
> >
> > I would like to setup a mailserver on my debian machine that can receive
> > email from any host and that can be accessed by imap or pop3 (imap would
> > be nice). I have seen some h
Thomas wrote:
> Hi there.
>
> I would like to setup a mailserver on my debian machine that can receive
> email from any host and that can be accessed by imap or pop3 (imap would
> be nice). I have seen some howtos on the net but they seemed way too
> complicated. The howtos i saw included spamfilt
Thomas wrote:
> Hi there.
>
> I would like to setup a mailserver on my debian machine that can
> receive email from any host and that can be accessed by imap or pop3
> (imap would be nice). I have seen some howtos on the net but they
> seemed way too complicated. The howtos i saw included spamfilt
Hi there.
I would like to setup a mailserver on my debian machine that can receive
email from any host and that can be accessed by imap or pop3 (imap would
be nice). I have seen some howtos on the net but they seemed way too
complicated. The howtos i saw included spamfilters, anitivr software
On Fri, Jan 02, 2004 at 12:04:04PM -0500, Jim Garvin wrote:
> Colin Watson wrote:
> >The archive servers are up, and have been for weeks. I'm mystified:
> >please go into more detail about the error you're seeing.
>
> See this link: http://packages.debian.org/stable/
>
> it says: packages.debian
Colin Watson wrote:
The archive servers are up, and have been for weeks. I'm mystified:
please go into more detail about the error you're seeing.
See this link: http://packages.debian.org/stable/
it says: packages.debian.org is down at the moment.
However, I found another user's post which answ
On Fri, Jan 02, 2004 at 11:25:24AM -0500, James Garvin wrote:
> I am trying to setup apache + mod_perl, and I need the libperl-dev
> package. However, using aptitude, I get the sweet 404 message.
> I see the security messages on the debian website, about how it was
> compromised (old news now) s
I am trying to setup apache + mod_perl, and I need the libperl-dev
package. However, using aptitude, I get the sweet 404 message.
I see the security messages on the debian website, about how it was
compromised (old news now) so in the meantime: where can I get packages?
Can I point the apt* to
On Fri, Nov 08, 2002 at 11:29:17AM -0600, Dan Gapinski wrote:
> Editing the passwd file worked like a charm! Once I chmod'd permissions for
> the directory, my webmaster account could upload the website like a champ!
>
> I think that it's weird that the new accounts aren't automatically makingn
>
at from NT land), but I found that
it was to my advantage to make the home directories first anyway. Now
everything works fine.
My best,
Dan
- Original Message -
From: "Tim Dijkstra" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 10:24 AM
Sub
On Fri, 8 Nov 2002 09:53:23 -0600
"Dan Gapinski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 1-I made a different top-level directory called ./private. Then I gave
> the command:
> useradd -D -b /private -g groupname
> and then added users this way
> useradd user1
>
> The problem is that although the
Hi -
Before someone RTFMs me, I should probably ask where TFM is for account
administration?
I am relatively new to Debian, and am trying to set up user accounts for an
FTP server. I have 2 questions about making this happen, but here's how I
did it:
1-I made a different top-level directory call
95 matches
Mail list logo
