Re: OT: behaviour (was: Re: ps - complete username)

2004-03-12 Thread Jonathan Schmitt
Also, how many of us have actually donated to Debian? So, the point, about casting a 'bad light' on Debian isn't really valid at all -- at least in my view. If you're not paying, you don't complain. That's the way I was brought up. Wouldn't You think, the time, I spend here on the list

OT: behaviour (was: Re: ps - complete username)

2004-03-11 Thread Jonathan Schmitt
Hallo, although I'm not involved, I was mentally going over the idea of writing back, I would like to share some thoughts. Instead of thinking of it as hostile (I didn't see it that way), think of it as a pointer in the right direction. I.e. the info *is* in the man page, read carefully. Yes,

Re: OT: behaviour (was: Re: ps - complete username)

2004-03-11 Thread CW Harris
On Fri, Mar 12, 2004 at 12:02:06AM +0100, Jonathan Schmitt wrote: Hallo, although I'm not involved, I was mentally going over the idea of writing back, I would like to share some thoughts. Many good points by Jonathan Schmitt One last time, You're not forced to answer any posting, if You do

Re: OT: behaviour (was: Re: ps - complete username)

2004-03-11 Thread S.D.A.
On Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at 04:46:51PM -0700 or thereabouts, CW Harris wrote: On Fri, Mar 12, 2004 at 12:02:06AM +0100, Jonathan Schmitt wrote: Hallo, although I'm not involved, I was mentally going over the idea of writing back, I would like to share some thoughts. Many good points by