ture: source
> Version: 3.2.2+dfsg-36
> Distribution: unstable
> Urgency: medium
> Maintainer: Pascal Packaging Team
> Changed-By: Abou Al Montacir
> Changes:
> fpc (3.2.2+dfsg-36) unstable; urgency=medium
> .
> * Fixed default value of FPCDIR for ppc64el.
>
Ahoj,
Dňa Fri, 17 Aug 2012 16:07:59 + (UTC) Camaleón
napísal:
> > The lazarus metapackage loads the gtk2 variant of the ide. Any thoughts
> > about the qt4 variant? (I'm inclined to go with the metapackage if I do
> > this, QT has never been anything but opaque to me, so far.)
>
> Can't c
On Fri, 17 Aug 2012 09:27:46 +0900, Joel Rees wrote:
> On 8/15/12, Camaleón wrote:
>> How about Free Pascal and the Lazarus IDE? As I have understood, it's
>> the linux counterpart for Turbo Pascal :-?
>
> Hmm.
>
> Breaking out synaptic, I see that there
teach him by
> >> rote.
> >>
> >> heh.
> >>
> >> Anyway, what I'm looking for is something that will allow him to loop
> >> through the equations and watch the results. Numbers are easy, of
> >> course. Perl (his only language so far) get
the results. Numbers are easy, of
>> course. Perl (his only language so far) gets us that far.
>
> (...)
>
> How about Free Pascal and the Lazarus IDE? As I have understood, it's the
> linux counterpart for Turbo Pascal :-?
Hmm.
Breaking out synaptic, I see that there a
so far) gets us that far.
(...)
How about Free Pascal and the Lazarus IDE? As I have understood, it's the
linux counterpart for Turbo Pascal :-?
Greetings,
--
Camaleón
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Conta
ation solver on the old Mac.
Maybe it spoiled him. But he would get a lot more motivated, I think,
if he could plot the numbers, watch the equation step through and plot
the numbers in 2D on a window on the screen like you could do with the
old BASIC+graphics commands or Turbo Pascal.
Logo
d Mac.
Maybe it spoiled him. But he would get a lot more motivated, I think,
if he could plot the numbers, watch the equation step through and plot
the numbers in 2D on a window on the screen like you could do with the
old BASIC+graphics commands or Turbo Pascal.
Logo is too abstract.
Sugar's
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 11:18 PM, John Hasler wrote:
> Joel Rees writes:
>> Any other suggestions?
>
> Look at qtoctave and maxima.
Yeah, nice stuff, but more of the dog that bit him.
I think he's spoiled, in a sense. It's as if he thinks he knows that
the computer will figure all that hard stuf
uation solver on the old Mac.
> Maybe it spoiled him. But he would get a lot more motivated, I think,
> if he could plot the numbers, watch the equation step through and plot
> the numbers in 2D on a window on the screen like you could do with the
> old BASIC+graphics commands o
Joel Rees writes:
> Any other suggestions?
Look at qtoctave and maxima.
--
John Hasler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87lihi6fjr@thumper.dhh.gt.
ed him. But he would get a lot more motivated, I think,
if he could plot the numbers, watch the equation step through and plot
the numbers in 2D on a window on the screen like you could do with the
old BASIC+graphics commands or Turbo Pascal.
Logo is too abstract.
Sugar's Pippy activity loo
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I just want to fold some (very) large for-loops to see the code
> clearerly.
Try: http://www.emacswiki.org/cgi-bin/wiki/CategoryHideStuff
--
,''`.
: :' :Romain Francoise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
`. `' http://people.debian.org/~rfrancoise/
`-
--
Hi.
I have searched in the Emacs manual (I really use Emacs since two
weeks ago), and then I also searched in google, but I haven't found
any way to fold code in Emacs (I am using the pascal-mode, although I
don't know wether folding code depends on the mode that one is using
or not
Hi
It's nice of Borland to be so nice, but I must agree with Dale. Although
both may be included in the package, I don't believe that you can mix
languages. I know that Kylix/Delphi can do cross compiling between C and
delphi(new name for pascal) for its object file, but the languages
Actually, Kylix comes with both a Pascal compiler and a C++ compiler. It's
shipped in the same bundle, but the uses different startup scripts (startbcb
for a "C++ Builder" like environment and "startdelphi" for a Pascal like
environment).
- Original Message -
F
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'm trying to install Free Pascal on my Debian i386 laptop. However,
I want to install the latest version (unstable = 1.0.6-1) and
realized that the package fp-units-api is not yet available(the
latest version of fp-units-api available is 1.
Dixit "Frank Homann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Versuch's mal unter www.dokuwelt.de
>
>
> Frank
> www.fhworld.de
>
>> Hallo Leute,
Lern bitte quoten und pack Deine Werbung in eine Signatur.
--
"The fact that he relies on facts - says things that are not factual -
are going to undermine his campaign."
marco frattola wrote:
>
> > I feel your pain. Not only is is not open source, it's *quite*
> > expensive, much more so than Windows Delphi. We're talking $1K here,
> > for the *less* expensive version.
>
> there's a rumored free download edition coming out around june (they say).
> without db s
> I feel your pain. Not only is is not open source, it's *quite*
> expensive, much more so than Windows Delphi. We're talking $1K here,
> for the *less* expensive version.
there's a rumored free download edition coming out around june (they say).
without db support (i fear) and something else t
Have a look at the GPC web site. It has an implementation of the
crt unit that is compatible with most Borland Pascal 7 code, and
has X extentions also. Should just be a matter of using crt to
get it to work. There is also a GPC mailing list, just
send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the
> Sent: Friday, April 06, 2001 11:15 AM
> > To: Debian List
> > Subject: Re: Pascal
> >
> >
> > Ales Jerman wrote:
> > >
> > > Does anybody know any good pascal compilers? Maybe also for X.
> > > Thanks!
> >
> > If you are l
This one looks interesting.
http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/
-Ryan
On Fri, Apr 06, 2001 at 02:45:02PM +0200, Ales Jerman wrote:
> Does anybody know any good pascal compilers? Maybe also for X.
> Thanks!
> Bye,
>
> Ales
>
>
On Fri, Apr 06, 2001 at 01:56:50PM +0200, Sebastiaan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> a seach with: apt-cache search pascal gave me the following interesting
> packets:
>
> gpc - The GNU Pascal compiler.
> and there is more interesting. I guess you need at least gpc.
>
Kylyx is not Free... that is the problem.
anyway... www.borland.com
Regards,
Martin.
> -Original Message-
> From: Keith G. Murphy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, April 06, 2001 11:15 AM
> To: Debian List
> Subject: Re: Pascal
>
>
> Ales Jerman wrot
Ales Jerman wrote:
>
> Does anybody know any good pascal compilers? Maybe also for X.
> Thanks!
If you are looking for something extremely powerful, but not "classic"
Pascal, you *do* know about Borland's Kylix project, right?
Ales>
I use fp-compiledr and it's dependencies and it works ok!
Best Regards,
--
Martin Marconcini
| Unix, MS-DOS, Windows.
| Also known as The Good, The Bad
| And the Ugly...
--
Hi,
a seach with: apt-cache search pascal gave me the following interesting
packets:
gpc-doc - Documentation for the GNU Pascal compiler (gpc).
gpc - The GNU Pascal compiler.
fp-extra - Free Pascal Extra Packages
fp-gtk - Free Pascal GTK Bindings
fp-compiler - Free Pascal
Does anybody know any good pascal compilers? Maybe also for X.
Thanks!
Bye,
Ales
bian package long ago.
Thanks for the lead. After a quick AltaVista search, I found Knizhnik's
home page at the address below. If you scroll most of the way down,
there's a "ANSI/Turbo Pascal to C/C++ converter" section with links to the
source in .tar.gz
http://www.ispra
On Wed, 1 Sep 1999, Patrick Olson wrote:
>
> On Wed, 1 Sep 1999, Kenneth Scharf wrote:
>
> > I was looking at porting a pascal program from dos to linux. Besides
> > having to write a device driver (as it twiddles the printer port
> > directly) I would have to fix al
On Wed, 1 Sep 1999, Kenneth Scharf wrote:
> I was looking at porting a pascal program from dos to linux. Besides
> having to write a device driver (as it twiddles the printer port
> directly) I would have to fix all references to the Borland runtime lib
> stuff. I don't think
Wednesday, September 01, 1999, 12:42:19 PM, Kenneth wrote:
> I was looking at porting a pascal program from dos to linux. Besides
> having to write a device driver (as it twiddles the printer port
> directly) I would have to fix all references to the Borland runtime lib
> stuff.
>> I have Pascal for Dos, but my OS (Sistema >>Operacional) is Linux,
and
>>I
>> like how install in linux.
>Debian has a Pascal compiler. Look for the package >gpc (and gpc-doc
>for
>the doc's).
>
>Alternatively, if you really want to run your DOS
Wednesday, September 01, 1999, 10:19:35 AM, Patrick wrote:
> Debian has a Pascal compiler. Look for the package gpc (and gpc-doc for
> the doc's).
There's also fpc which is my preference since it is built from itself
while gpc uses, IIRC, parts of gcc.
> Alternatively, if
> I have Pascal for Dos, but my OS (Sistema Operacional) is Linux, and I
> like how install in linux.
Debian has a Pascal compiler. Look for the package gpc (and gpc-doc for
the doc's).
Alternatively, if you really want to run your DOS Pascal, you might try
dosemu.
Hope this helps,
Patrick
I have Pascal for Dos, but my OS (Sistema Operacional) is Linux, and I
like how install in linux.
Stephen Pitts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Oh, sorry.
Is the source code archive for fpc from Debian 2.0 available somewhere?
> Have you tried gpc, the GNU pascal compiler?
I have now, and it doesn't like my code. Even with the "--borland-pascal"
switch.
of Debian 2.1, and it
> isn't in 2.2 either.
>
Oh, sorry. Have you tried gpc, the GNU pascal compiler?
--
Stephen Pitts
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
webmaster - http://www.mschess.org
> Then run "apt-get source " to grab the source for a package,
> or "apt-get -b source " to grab the source AND recompile it.
Well, it's just that fpc seems to have been dropped as of Debian 2.1, and it
isn't in 2.2 either.
--
\\//
Peter - http://www.softwolves.pp.se/
Please Cc replies to me
> Where can I find the source .deb from Debian 2.0 to recompile (can I get
> dpkg to automatically recompile from a source .deb?)
Add this to your /etc/apt/sources.list:
deb http://http.us.debian.org/debian unstable main contrib non-free
deb-src http://http.us.debian.org/debian unstable main
Run
2.1, but broke now when
I updated to libc2.1, which is strange.
The compiler is a static binary, and compiled Pascal programs are only
linked to the Pascal library:
$ ldd /usr/local/bin/2000
libfpc.so => /usr/lib/libfpc.so (0x40004000)
Where can I find the source .deb from Debian 2
You'll have to recompile the programs to work with glibc2.1. If they're
leftovers from Debian <2.x, you could install libc5 and see what happens.
I'm no expert in this stuff... I'm still a little green myself.
On Sat, 24 Jul 1999, peter karlsson wrote:
> >
On Sat, 24 Jul 1999, peter karlsson wrote:
>> I installed fpc (Free Pascal) before, but now it is listed as "obsolete" in
>> Dselect. Has it been replaced with something else?
No. This means that the original *.deb file is no longer available,
which is quite natural if you
> I installed fpc (Free Pascal) before, but now it is listed as "obsolete" in
> Dselect. Has it been replaced with something else?
And, now that I upgraded to the version of libc6 (2.1) from potato (to be
able to install some other development packages), all my Pascal programs
cau
Hi!
I installed fpc (Free Pascal) before, but now it is listed as "obsolete" in
Dselect. Has it been replaced with something else?
I need to be able to compile Turbo Pascal like programs, that's why I
installed fpc in the first place, because it's good at that.
-
On Wed, Nov 25, 1998 at 07:52:48PM -0600, Alexander Kushnirenko wrote:
> Free Pascal has RPM, but no DEB package I think we may want to have
> it...
By Jeff Shilt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
(223 Days in Creation)
FPK Pascal
--
Steve C. Lamb | Op
Hi,
Thanks for the info. I just tried both. IMHO Free Pascal is better, it knows
Borland procedures from CRT unit for example, GNU does not (well that was
not their goal, as they say). Compatibility with Borland Turbo Pascal is
imprortant to me, so I would prefer Free Pascal.
Free Pascal
On Wed, Nov 25, 1998 at 05:18:54PM -0600, Alexander Kushnirenko wrote:
> Just wondering is there Pascal compiler for Linux? preferable free? close to
> Turbo Pascal 6?
http://gd.tuwien.ac.at/languages/pascal/fpc/www/fpc.html
--
Steve C. Lamb | Opinions expressed
On Wed, Nov 25, 1998 at 05:18:54PM -0600, Alexander Kushnirenko wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just wondering is there Pascal compiler for Linux? preferable free? close to
> Turbo Pascal 6?
Don't know if there are alternatives.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/debian/glibc/libc$ dpkg --print-avail
Hi,
Just wondering is there Pascal compiler for Linux? preferable free? close to
Turbo Pascal 6?
Thanks,
Sasha.
On Mon, 13 Jul 1998 17:13:01 -0400, Michael B. Taylor wrote:
>So that the vi lovers dont flame me too badly, I have to point out that vim
>has "modes" too, but I dont know if it has one for Pascal.
JED has modes as well. Perl, C and pascal are the ones I use f
On Mon, 13 Jul 1998, Michael B. Taylor wrote:
> I think there are some IDE's for Linux, but none seem to be as popular
> as Emacs/Xemacs. Emacs is not an integrated development environment per
> se, but it has many of the capabilities of one plus other things.
latest vim has some similar featurs.
I think there are some IDE's for Linux, but none seem to be as popular
as Emacs/Xemacs. Emacs is not an integrated development environment per
se, but it has many of the capabilities of one plus other things.
Emacs has modes for C, C++, LaTeX, shell scripts, Matlab, and yes, even
Pascal.
; -Original Message-
> From: Alexander Gutfraind [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, July 13, 1998 4:47 PM
> To: Debian User lists
> Subject: pascal.+development
>
>
> Hello fellow users!
> It's a weird newbie question I'm about to ask. but what
&g
Hello fellow users!
It's a weird newbie question I'm about to ask. but what
about Pascal?
you all seem to write in C or PERL, but I like pascal.
when I checked the pascal compiler I found it required all
types
of libraries, libc5. but shouldn't it cause some problems to
lib
>
> Hi,
>
> I have installed the pascal package and downgraded my gcc to 2.7.2.1
> for compatibility reasons. In the beginning I got some errors concerning
> files the package could find By linking then I got through that stage
> .Now I am getting the following errors
>
Isn't gpc in the optional development section gnu's pascal compiler?
Martin
>Hi,
>
>Could someone tell me which debian package provides pascal support ?
>
> Thanks very much
>
Hi,
I have installed the pascal package and downgraded my gcc to 2.7.2.1
for compatibility reasons. In the beginning I got some errors concerning
files the package could find By linking then I got through that stage
.Now I am getting the following errors
garfield:/usr/home/guest$ gpc program
Hi,
Thanks to all who replied to my question.
I have juct installed gpc on my system . However, it requires gcc <<
2.7.2.2 So I downgraded gcc to 2.7.2.1 I was wondering whether it would be
possible to have the newest gcc ( 2.7.2.3 ) together with gpc . Does
anyone know if this is possible or w
c>
> Hi,
>
> Could someone tell me which debian package provides pascal support ?
devel/gpc-doc_2.0-3.deb@ devel/gpc_2.0-3.deb@
--
joost witteveen, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
#!/usr/bin/perl -sp0777ihttp://www.dcs.ex.ac.uk/~aba/rsa/
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-m
Hi,
Could someone tell me which debian package provides pascal support ?
Thanks very much
George
---
George Kapetanios
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> I recently attempted to compile a simple Pascal program to make sure
> gpc is working. I was surprised to get the error:
>
> ld: cannot open -lgpc: No such file or directory
>
> I thought I might have missed installing the libraries so I rei
I recently attempted to compile a simple Pascal program to make sure
gpc is working. I was surprised to get the error:
ld: cannot open -lgpc: No such file or directory
I thought I might have missed installing the libraries so I reinstalled
gpc and the library from dselect. I assume I
On Wed, 28 May 1997, Leandro Asnaghi-Nicastro wrote:
> I've been trying to download a PASCAL compiler for Linux and I've been
> unsuccesful. Every site I've gone to either has the wrong link on their
The two major FREE Pascal compilers available are GNU and FPK Pascal.
>You want gpc and gpc-doc, about 1.5 mb total. If you can't get them by ftp
>from ftp.debian.org or a mirror site, tell me what does actually work on a
>WinNT server (http?) and I will see what I can do to help. I absolutely
>hate pascal, but I'm compassionate :)
Thank
On Wed, 28 May 1997, Leandro Asnaghi-Nicastro wrote:
> Sorry for my previous request which apparently was sent to the wrong
> distribution list (many apologies to Pete Templin who kindly pointed it
> out to me).
> I've been trying to download a PASCAL compiler for Li
On Wed, 28 May 1997, Leandro Asnaghi-Nicastro wrote:
> I've been trying to download a PASCAL compiler for Linux and I've been
> unsuccesful.
Um, I'm assuming you're using Debian, since you're asking in
debian-user. (grin) Did you try the p2c package, which is
Sorry for my previous request which apparently was sent to the wrong
distribution list (many apologies to Pete Templin who kindly pointed it
out to me).
I've been trying to download a PASCAL compiler for Linux and I've been
unsuccesful. Every site I've gone to either has th
Hi
==
I have instaled the gpc (GNU Pascal Compiler) with libgpc2 and
all seems ok, dpkg does not report any problem, but...
When I try to compile a program the message all I can get is:
bash$ gpc teste.pas
ld: cannot open -lgpc: No such file or directory
bash$
What is
70 matches
Mail list logo
