Hello Paul E Condon,
Am 2011-04-24 14:13:26, hacktest Du folgendes herunter:
> ## 'unreadable' mail
> :0:
> * 1^0
> ^\/Subject:.*=\?(.*big5|iso-2022-jp|ISO-2022-KR|euc-kr|gb2312|ks_c_5601-1987|windows-1251|windows-1256)\?
> * 1^0
> ^\/Content-Type:.*charset="(.*big5|iso-2022-jp|ISO-2022-KR|euc-k
The following procmail recipe was copied form a blog about how to set
up Debian/Exim/Procmail/Mutt to use Bogofilter. It is intended to do a
first cut at getting rid of junk that confuses Bogofilter, and appears
just before the recipe that pipes incoming mail through Bogofilter.
But I can't figure
Hi all,
I've got a bit of a strange question in relation to IMAP, POP3, and Procmail.
My mail server here at home currently running Debian Sarge uses a combination of
fetchmail, sendmail, and procmail to deliver email to my local accounts.
I have done nothing with procmail, so everything gets d
>
> So tell you what: show us the rule that you've created to try to perform
> the above filtering and tell us how you know it's not working. Then
> maybe we can tell you the flaw in your approach.
>
> "Teach a man to fish ..."
> --
> monique
>
Since I'm learning procmail, my first procmail rules
On Sun, 28 Sep 2003 23:31:21 +0200, LeVA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> penned:
> Hello!
>
> Here is a bit harder question :).
> I have a few email addresses, and I want to ensure that I get just those
> messages which were posted to me.
> So I want a rule (or more, I don't know) which filters all mails, if
leva,
On Sun, 2003-09-28 at 23:31, LeVA wrote:
> I have a few email addresses, and I want to ensure that I get just those
> messages which were posted to me.
> So I want a rule (or more, I don't know) which filters all mails, if
> they has a To or Cc or Bcc line in the header, which is followed
Hello!
Here is a bit harder question :).
I have a few email addresses, and I want to ensure that I get just those
messages which were posted to me.
So I want a rule (or more, I don't know) which filters all mails, if
they has a To or Cc or Bcc line in the header, which is followed by one
of my
On Sun, 2003-09-28 at 20:31, Monique Y. Herman wrote:
> Just to clarify (because I read it as syntax at first)
>
> In the case of deletion, FILENAME would be /dev/null
> In the case of wanting to send it somewhere other than your normal
> mailbox, FILENAME would be ~/mail/mysupercoolfilterbox or
On Sun, 28 Sep 2003 20:26:40 +0200, Michael Schulz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> penned:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, 2003-09-28 at 20:00, LeVA wrote:
>> Hello!
>>
>> How can I make this with procmail (what should I write to the
>> ~/.procmailrc file):
>>
>> If an email has a given text in it's subject, delete the
Hi,
On Sun, 2003-09-28 at 20:00, LeVA wrote:
> Hello!
>
> How can I make this with procmail (what should I write to the
> ~/.procmailrc file):
>
> If an email has a given text in it's subject, delete the mail,
> if another email has aonther given text in its subject write it to
> another file
Hello!
How can I make this with procmail (what should I write to the
~/.procmailrc file):
If an email has a given text in it's subject, delete the mail,
if another email has aonther given text in its subject write it to
another file than the user's mail spool file.
Thanks!
Daniel
--
LeVA
--
On Mon, 02 Dec 2002, Oliver Fuchs wrote:
> On Sun, 01 Dec 2002, Paul Johnson wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 05:46:19AM +0100, Oliver Fuchs wrote:
> > > Using mutt adding this macro to your .muttrc answers your question:
> > > macro index q " ~d>3d"
> >
> > Ok, this is definately a start.
Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What would be a good example procmail rule to automatically delete
> messages 72 hours old or more?
Don't know how to do it in procmail - the link below points to a perl
script which might help
http://www.rosat.mpe-garching.mpg.de/cgi-bin/w3glimpse2htm
On Sun, 01 Dec 2002, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 05:46:19AM +0100, Oliver Fuchs wrote:
> > Using mutt adding this macro to your .muttrc answers your question:
> > macro index q " ~d>3d"
>
> Ok, this is definately a start. Now, how to go about limiting it to
> just one folder?
>
On Sun, 01 Dec 2002, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 05:46:19AM +0100, Oliver Fuchs wrote:
> > Using mutt adding this macro to your .muttrc answers your question:
> > macro index q " ~d>3d"
>
> Ok, this is definately a start. Now, how to go about limiting it to
> just one folder?
>
Or you can try archivemail + cron.
Edwin Lau
On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 05:46:19AM +0100, Oliver Fuchs wrote:
> On Sat, 30 Nov 2002, Paul Johnson wrote:
>
> > What would be a good example procmail rule to automatically delete
> > messages 72 hours old or more?
> >
>
> Using mutt adding this macro
On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 05:46:19AM +0100, Oliver Fuchs wrote:
> Using mutt adding this macro to your .muttrc answers your question:
> macro index q " ~d>3d"
Ok, this is definately a start. Now, how to go about limiting it to
just one folder?
--
.''`. Baloo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :' :pr
On Sat, 30 Nov 2002, Paul Johnson wrote:
> What would be a good example procmail rule to automatically delete
> messages 72 hours old or more?
>
Using mutt adding this macro to your .muttrc answers your question:
macro index q " ~d>3d"
Oliver
--
... don't touch the bang bang fruit
--
To U
What would be a good example procmail rule to automatically delete
messages 72 hours old or more?
--
.''`. Baloo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :' :proud Debian admin and user
`. `'`
`- Debian - when you have better things to do than to fix a system
msg16315/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP s
On Mon, 2002-02-25 at 10:51, Corey Halpin wrote:
> Does anybody have a procmail script to trim html out of email?
> such that all the email I get is only text-plain?
> :0
* ^Content-Type: text/html
{
:0 bfW:
| (echo "[html stripped]"; lynx -dump -force_html -stdin)
:0 ahfw:
Does anybody have a procmail script to trim html out of email?
such that all the email I get is only text-plain?
thanks,
crh
--
Corey R. Halpin (http://www.cae.wisc.edu/~halpin/ )
Student of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences
University of Wisconsin - Madison
Nevermind.
I found formail -i.
In case anyone's interested, here's a recipe that I find handy for
debian-user:
:0
* ^x-mailing-list.*debian-user
| formail -i "reply-to: debian-user@lists.debian.org" \
| rcvstore +lists/debian/user
> Does anyone know of a way in procmail
Does anyone know of a way in procmail to to replace one header with another?
(ie, replace the contents of the From header with the contents of the List-ID
header?)
thanks,
crh
--
Corey R. Halpin (http://www.cae.wisc.edu/~halpin/ )
Student of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences
Unive
Richard Cobbe wrote:
> I understood all of the rules that were posted except for one thing.
> Just out of curiosity, what does the 1^0 above do? The procmail
> manpages weren't much help.
Try "man procmailsc" and read up on scoring.
Craig
Lo, on Thursday, November 22, Linda Laubenheimer did write:
> Craig Dickson wrote:
>
> > * 1^0 ^From:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > * 1^0 ^From:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > /dev/null
>
> Add
>* 1^0 ^From:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> to that last one...
>
I understood all of the rules that were posted except for o
On Sat, Nov 10, 2001 at 01:48:29PM -0600, John Patton wrote:
| On Sat, Nov 10, 2001 at 07:48:00PM +0530, Jijo Jose A wrote:
...
| 'mutt -f my_mbox ', my_mbox is not a mailbox
...
| > how can i solve this ?
...
| then fix your procmail action accordingly.
Once the mailbox is fixed, I recommend
On Sat, Nov 10, 2001 at 07:48:00PM +0530, Jijo Jose A wrote:
> hi all
> still i used procmail 3.21.20010831.3.22pre-1 for mail processing and mutt
> 1.3.22-1 as MUA, to remove the unwanted headers i wrote '|cat | formail -k -X
> From:
> -X Return-Path: -X Date:.. >>my_mbox' in .procmailrc as t
hi all
still i used procmail 3.21.20010831.3.22pre-1 for mail processing and mutt
1.3.22-1 as MUA, to remove the unwanted headers i wrote '|cat | formail -k -X
From:
-X Return-Path: -X Date:.. >>my_mbox' in .procmailrc as the action line
for a condition. but i started 'mutt -f my_mbox ', my_m
On Mon, 8 May 2000, brian moore wrote:
>
> true. procmail ain't ideal for this, but it's the best tool around
> without loading perl on every MIME'd mail.
>
how do you put this in a exim.conf file?
do you use it as your .procmailrc or a system-wide one?
thanks,
> > :0
> > * < 5
> > {
On Mon, May 08, 2000 at 02:39:47PM -0800, Adam Shand wrote:
>
> > Well there is a problem with this rule, it searches the entire email for
> > VBS. All i want it to search for is the attachment of a file name with
> > the extension of .vbs Okay can this be done? Im sure it can, just i can
> > no
> Well there is a problem with this rule, it searches the entire email for
> VBS. All i want it to search for is the attachment of a file name with
> the extension of .vbs Okay can this be done? Im sure it can, just i can
> not find any info on how to make it do this. Can someone purdy please
>
> Well there is a problem with this rule, it searches the entire email for
> VBS. All i want it to search for is the attachment of a file name with the
> extension of .vbs Okay can this be done? Im sure it can, just i can not
> find any info on how to make it do this. Can someone purdy please
yes i know procmail has its own list, but i cant get there system to respond
to my request to subscribe. here is my question:
Right now i have the following rule in my procmailrc:
:0 BD:
* VBS
/this/directory
Well there is a problem with this rule, it searches the entire
okay yes i know procmail has its own list, but i cant get there system to
respond to my request to subscribe. here is my question:
Right now i have the following rule in my procmailrc:
:0 BD:
* VBS
/this/directory
Well there is a problem with this rule, it searches the en
On Tue, May 02, 2000 at 16:47:38 -0400, Lee Bradshaw wrote:
> I can view pdf attachments from mutt if they have mime headers like
>
> Content-Type: application/pdf; name="file.pdf"
>
> However I get quite a few emails with
>
> Content-Type: application/octet-stream
>
> Does anyone have a reli
I can view pdf attachments from mutt if they have mime headers like
Content-Type: application/pdf; name="file.pdf"
However I get quite a few emails with
Content-Type: application/octet-stream
Does anyone have a reliable way for modifying the Content-Type and
changing octet-stream to a useable
Sorry, I can't quote since I've deleted the original posting.
All I used to do when I used Procmail was add a line to my .fetchmailrc
so it looked like this:
poll pop.ukgateway.net
protocol pop3
username gsmh
password
mda "/usr/bin/procmail -d gsmh"
The last line specifies the Mail Delivery
On Mon, Aug 09, 1999 at 10:31:51PM +0200, Peter Palfrader aka Weasel wrote:
> I thank everybody for their great help.
> Is it possible to have it run automatically when new mail arrives
> without the need for every user to have his .forward set to
> |/usr/bin/procmail so only having a .procmailrc
On Mon, Aug 09, 1999 at 10:31:51PM +0200, Peter Palfrader aka Weasel wrote:
>
> Is it possible to have it run automatically when new mail arrives
> without the need for every user to have his .forward set to
> |/usr/bin/procmail so only having a .procmailrc fur users that want it?
>
Of course, yo
On Mon, Aug 09, 1999 at 10:31:51PM +0200, Peter Palfrader aka Weasel wrote:
> I think I will go for mutt since the PGP stuff works really fine now.
> However, I have some questions regarding procmail.
You have chosen wisely. I switched recently and can't imagine using
anything else.
> Is it poss
I thank everybody for their great help.
I think I will go for mutt since the PGP stuff works really fine now.
However, I have some questions regarding procmail.
Is it possible to have it run automatically when new mail arrives
without the need for every user to have his .forward set to
|/usr/bin/
On Tue, 14 Apr 1998, Art Lemasters wrote:
> > Hi all there!
> > I just set-up my .procmailrc (Many thanks to Oliver Elphick). But I have
> > big mailbox (/var/spool/mail/) I want to process w. procmail. Can anybody
> > tell me how?
>
> Try the procmail and procmailex (examples) man or info
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Wed, 15 Apr 1998, Vaclav Hula wrote:
> I just set-up my .procmailrc (Many thanks to Oliver Elphick). But I
> have big mailbox (/var/spool/mail/) I want to process w. procmail. Can
> anybody tell me how?
What you need is probably:
cat mbox | formail -s procm
Art Lemasters wrote:
> Try the procmail and procmailex (examples) man or info (better yet)
> pages. They are some of the better-written documents I've seen! Oh...
> and read the /usr/doc/procmail directory (.gz files with the "zless"
> command) first! The examples in the procmailex page sho
> Hi all there!
> I just set-up my .procmailrc (Many thanks to Oliver Elphick). But I have big
> mailbox (/var/spool/mail/) I want to process w. procmail. Can anybody tell me
> how?
Try the procmail and procmailex (examples) man or info (better yet)
pages. They are some of the better-writt
Hi all there!
I just set-up my .procmailrc (Many thanks to Oliver Elphick). But I have big
mailbox (/var/spool/mail/) I want to process w. procmail. Can anybody tell me
how?
Thanks.
Ax
--
Vaclav Hula
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~ax
--
To UNSUBSCRI
46 matches
Mail list logo