On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 12:47:31PM +1000, Daniel Rose wrote:
Osama Bin Laden Take Over List!
It looks like the young man who started all this was at least partly
successful!!
People who don't like off-topic threads need a thread-aware email
reader, then the problem goes away
No, the
Steve Lamb wrote:
Paul Johnson wrote:
The impression of impropriety in politics is as bad as impropriety itself.
I'm not going to go into detail, since if you weren't following the news for
the last six years, going over it again won't help you.
Oddly enough, Paul, I have
On Sat, 26 Aug 2006 16:45, Paul Johnson wrote:
On Friday 25 August 2006 21:14, Hal Vaughan wrote:
On Friday 25 August 2006 03:30, Paul Johnson wrote:
On Friday 25 August 2006 00:07, Mailbox wrote:
I think at this point were all hoping for the silence of the Lamb
I ate his liver
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hal Vaughan wrote:
On Friday 25 August 2006 00:25, Ron Johnson wrote:
Paul Johnson wrote:
On Thursday 24 August 2006 19:55, Ron Johnson wrote:
Something similar to this happened due to pilot error in
Florida in 2000
Don't be stupid. The Florida
On Thursday 24 August 2006 21:45, Steve Lamb wrote:
I'm betting in your world view Joseph Lieberman was the first.
I'm not convinced Joe Lieberman could be that original on his own.
Still gonna say I don't keep up with current world events, Paul?
No, I just don't know history as well as
On Thursday 24 August 2006 21:40, Steve Lamb wrote:
The UN is insignificant. For if *you* were watching the news in the
past 6 years you would know that the UN has done nothing to curb the tide
of terrorism, it has been implicated in a massive money laundering scandal
that goes up to
On Friday 25 August 2006 02:40, Ron Johnson wrote:
Hal Vaughan wrote:
On Friday 25 August 2006 00:25, Ron Johnson wrote:
Paul Johnson wrote:
On Thursday 24 August 2006 19:55, Ron Johnson wrote:
Something similar to this happened due to pilot error in
Florida in 2000
Don't be stupid.
I think at this point were all hoping for the silence of the Lamb
- Original Message -
From: Paul Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Sent: Friday, August 25, 2006 8:38 AM
Subject: Re: Hey, Steve! (WAS: Re: Pumping Gas in Oregon)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
On Thursday 24 August 2006 22:08, Steve Lamb wrote:
Paul Johnson wrote:
And what is the member status of those states again? Do they matter?
Does anybody on the UN give them more than token attention? NO! Why?
Because the UN realizes they're as nutty as they really are, too!
On Friday 25 August 2006 00:07, Mailbox wrote:
I think at this point were all hoping for the silence of the Lamb
I ate his liver with some fava beans. :o)
--
Paul Johnson
Email and IM (XMPP Google Talk): [EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgpcJUhQ4kqA7.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Friday 25 August 2006 00:05, Hal Vaughan wrote:
You try it and I'll close the pod bay doors.
And the emergency airlock hatch too, just in case.
Explosive bolts, manual overrides and remembering to exhale entirely instead
of holding breath before getting launched into a vaccuum still gives
Steve Lamb wrote:
Katipo wrote:
Steve Lamb wrote:
Yes, because Government has nothing better to do than fritter it's
citizens money on something that probably nets them no gain. Sorry, that's a
huge negative in my book.
That would seem to be somewhat inconsistent,
On Friday 25 August 2006 03:29, Paul Johnson wrote:
On Friday 25 August 2006 00:05, Hal Vaughan wrote:
You try it and I'll close the pod bay doors.
And the emergency airlock hatch too, just in case.
Explosive bolts, manual overrides and remembering to exhale entirely
instead of holding
On Friday 25 August 2006 03:30, Paul Johnson wrote:
On Friday 25 August 2006 00:07, Mailbox wrote:
I think at this point were all hoping for the silence of the Lamb
I ate his liver with some fava beans. :o)
That was in bad taste. Really bad taste.
Unless you add a nice chianti.
Hal
--
Steve Lamb wrote:
Paul Johnson wrote:
Something similar to this happened due to pilot error in Florida in 2000 and
by probable act of sabotage on Diebold's part in Ohio in 2004. Candidate B
becomes president, people have no say.
And where, exactly, is the proof? I mean the real
Paul Johnson wrote:
On Thursday 24 August 2006 14:29, Katipo wrote:
You're in the States, and therefore classified as American market source.
I'm in Australia, and it's all China and Korea here.
Very little from South America or EU.
I used to get a *lot* from Korea, almost all of it
Paul Johnson wrote:
Like the US is any better, then. So far, the only weapons Iraq's been able
to
use to inflict any real damage on US life is with IEDs.
You mean Syria, Iran and Lebanon?
All of those were looked at and in pretty much every case refuted.
I'm not so sure about
Paul Johnson wrote:
On Thursday 24 August 2006 22:08, Steve Lamb wrote:
You know, if Iraq invaded us, and called us terrorists for defending
ourselves, you'd be pretty pissed off, too. The UN isn't so shortsighted as
to say you aren't allowed to ream an occupying force a new one.
Paul Johnson wrote:
No, I just don't know history as well as you, and the 1970s were in that
too-old-for-current-events, too-new-for-US-History gap when I was in school
save for the order of the presidents, the gas crisis, Vietnam and Korean
Wars.
Ah yes, ignore the fact I had already
Katipo wrote:
Perhaps your experience of government is, but Brazillian government
doesn't answer to the description of coercive.
Government, by definition, is coercive. That is why it should be limited
in scope.
They're not giving away money.
They simply don't have it to give away.
Katipo wrote:
But in many cases, they're not knock-offs.
They're simply 'Black and Gold', or 'Home Brand' wrappings of the same
product, while corporates disguise the act with screams of 'Patent theft'.
Cites?
--
Steve C. Lamb | But who decides what they dream?
Steve Lamb wrote:
Paul Johnson wrote:
Blah blah blah.
Please note the change of the subject line to include OT.
Thanks.
--
Kent
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Friday 25 August 2006 00:44, Hal Vaughan wrote:
On Friday 25 August 2006 03:30, Paul Johnson wrote:
On Friday 25 August 2006 00:07, Mailbox wrote:
I think at this point were all hoping for the silence of the Lamb
I ate his liver with some fava beans. :o)
That was in bad taste.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Paul Johnson wrote:
On Friday 25 August 2006 00:05, Hal Vaughan wrote:
You try it and I'll close the pod bay doors.
And the emergency airlock hatch too, just in case.
Explosive bolts, manual overrides and remembering to exhale
entirely
Paul Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 25 August 2006 00:44, Hal Vaughan wrote:
On Friday 25 August 2006 03:30, Paul Johnson wrote:
On Friday 25 August 2006 00:07, Mailbox wrote:
I think at this point were all hoping for the silence of the Lamb
I ate his liver with some
On Friday 25 August 2006 18:58, Hex Star wrote:
ewww...who eats a liver? it looks sooo nasty...how can you even look
at it much less eat it?
Top posters. Ugh!
It's a joke and movie reference. Guess that plane took off without you.
On 8/25/06, Hal Vaughan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hex Star wrote:
ewww...who eats a liver? it looks sooo nasty...how can you even
Guess you've never been hunting or fishing. Too bad. Dressing a
freshly killed deer is a learning experience.
look at it much less eat it?
The look isn't bad. It's
On Friday 25 August 2006 19:07, Ron Johnson wrote:
Hex Star wrote:
ewww...who eats a liver? it looks sooo nasty...how can you even
Guess you've never been hunting or fishing. Too bad. Dressing a
freshly killed deer is a learning experience.
That's more or less why I have only ever gone
Top posting is considered harmful.
Please read http://ursine.ca/Top_Posting before sending another email.
On Friday 25 August 2006 15:58, Hex Star wrote:
ewww...who eats a liver? it looks sooo nasty...how can you even look at it
much less eat it?
It's a quote from The Silence of the Lambs¹,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Paul Johnson wrote:
On Friday 25 August 2006 19:07, Ron Johnson wrote:
Hex Star wrote:
[snip]
walking vegetable. :o) Now if the USDA would get over their
hangups with irradiated beef, I could safely eat that raw again
But, but, but, it's
On Friday 25 August 2006 03:30, Paul Johnson wrote:
On Friday 25 August 2006 00:07, Mailbox wrote:
I think at this point were all hoping for the silence of the Lamb
I ate his liver with some fava beans. :o)
You know, I never did ask you: did you eat his liver before, or after it
was run
On Friday 25 August 2006 21:14, Hal Vaughan wrote:
On Friday 25 August 2006 03:30, Paul Johnson wrote:
On Friday 25 August 2006 00:07, Mailbox wrote:
I think at this point were all hoping for the silence of the Lamb
I ate his liver with some fava beans. :o)
You know, I never did ask
Ron Johnson wrote:
Technically, yes. That's how the Constitution designed it.
Practically, though, no.
Citizens, dead people, and illegal immigrants vote for Electors who
are pledged to vote for a specific candidate.
So if the Electors suddenly decide to vote for candidate A while being
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mihira Fernando wrote:
Ron Johnson wrote:
Technically, yes. That's how the Constitution designed it.
Practically, though, no.
Citizens, dead people, and illegal immigrants vote for Electors
who are pledged to vote for a specific
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Cybe R. Wizard wrote:
Hal Vaughan [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
There's also the case of the Libranet help list that had a number of
quite knowledgeable people on it, but when Libranet started censoring
them (I won't go into the entire story, I'll
* Paul Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006 Aug 23 22:55 -0500]:
On Wednesday 23 August 2006 19:35, Mihira Fernando wrote:
Paul Johnson wrote:
¹ For those not of US origin, the US has had an electoral college to
decide it's soverign since it's inception, the popular vote for president
is
On Wednesday 23 August 2006 23:13, Mihira Fernando wrote:
Ron Johnson wrote:
Technically, yes. That's how the Constitution designed it.
Practically, though, no.
Citizens, dead people, and illegal immigrants vote for Electors who
are pledged to vote for a specific candidate.
So if
On Wednesday 23 August 2006 22:26, Steve Lamb wrote:
Uh, gas prices ring a bell? Of course you didn't reply to that, you
blindly skipped over it. Just like you go amazingly silent any time
someone nails you with cold hard facts.
s/cold hard facts/rock-stupid morons/ and you would have a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Paul Johnson wrote:
On Wednesday 23 August 2006 23:13, Mihira Fernando wrote:
Ron Johnson wrote:
Technically, yes. That's how the Constitution designed it.
Practically, though, no.
Citizens, dead people, and illegal immigrants vote for
On Thursday 24 August 2006 04:24, Paul Johnson wrote:
On Wednesday 23 August 2006 22:26, Steve Lamb wrote:
Uh, gas prices ring a bell? Of course you didn't reply to
that, you blindly skipped over it. Just like you go amazingly
silent any time someone nails you with cold hard facts.
* Damon L. Chesser [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006 Aug 23 23:00 -0500]:
Steve Lamb wrote:
Steve Lamb wrote:
Nevermind that he was impeached for lying under oath in an
investigation
Er, sorry, Faced Impeachment is what I meant.
point of fact, like him or not he WAS
* Paul Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006 Aug 23 22:55 -0500]:
On Wednesday 23 August 2006 19:58, Steve Lamb wrote:
¹ For those not of US origin,
Ignore Paul as he slants his posts to cast the most negative light on
any non-socialist administration. Given this is a Capitalist society
Paul Johnson wrote:
¹ For those not of US origin, the US has had an electoral college to decide it's soverign since it's
inception, the popular vote for president is legally nonbinding in nearly all states: the electoral
college can and does vote for whoever it wants. Out of a quarter
Paul Johnson wrote:
On Wednesday 23 August 2006 03:22, Matt Johnson wrote:
- Original Message
From: Paul Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Sent: Wednesday, 23 August, 2006 1:32:52 AM
Subject: Re: Pumping Gas in Oregon (WAS: Re: Osama Bin Laden Take Over
List
Steve Lamb wrote:
Katipo wrote:
Nothing, even remotely close to the volumes generated by Americans and
their contracted bodies in Korea and China.
They hire out entire ISPs for the purpose.
Which would be China and Korea's problems respectively and does not excuse
Brazil's ills.
Steve Lamb wrote:
Paul Johnson wrote:
That's not true. The UN has a similarly negative view of our electoral
college.
So? Any non-elected group which caters to terrorism, has been proven
corrupt time and again and is against free speech is a group I should care
about how
: Re: Pumping
Gas in Oregon (WAS: Re: Osama Bin Laden Take Over List!)
Steve Lamb wrote:
[snip]
Corporates employ off-shore spammers because they have the cheap
labour resources ( a lot of the ISPs clients get free online in
return for spamming), act as an identity buffer for public image
Katipo wrote:
Steve Lamb wrote:
Yes, because Government has nothing better to do than fritter it's
citizens money on something that probably nets them no gain. Sorry, that's a
huge negative in my book.
That would seem to be somewhat inconsistent, coming from somebody that
supposedly
Paul Johnson wrote:
Something similar to this happened due to pilot error in Florida in 2000 and
by probable act of sabotage on Diebold's part in Ohio in 2004. Candidate B
becomes president, people have no say.
And where, exactly, is the proof? I mean the real proof, not Paul's made
up
Paul Johnson wrote:
s/cold hard facts/rock-stupid morons/ and you would have a pretty good
summation of that thread. I quit because I got tired of the refusal for
others, like you, to see the bloody obvious. Just because you're sore you
pay more for less doesn't mean my logic is flawed,
On Thursday 24 August 2006 07:59, Ron Johnson wrote:
Paul Johnson wrote:
On Wednesday 23 August 2006 23:13, Mihira Fernando wrote:
Ron Johnson wrote:
Technically, yes. That's how the Constitution designed it.
Practically, though, no.
Citizens, dead people, and illegal immigrants
On Thursday 24 August 2006 17:19, Steve Lamb wrote:
Paul Johnson wrote:
Something similar to this happened due to pilot error in Florida in 2000
and by probable act of sabotage on Diebold's part in Ohio in 2004.
Candidate B becomes president, people have no say.
And where, exactly,
On Thursday 24 August 2006 05:06, Nate Bargmann wrote:
With illegal immigration and with attempts to allow illegal immigrants
to vote, this trend may well be reversing.
It may be, but as far as I am concerned they're not people. They become
people again around the time they go back to where
On Thursday 24 August 2006 10:23, Nate Bargmann wrote:
* Damon L. Chesser [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006 Aug 23 23:00 -0500]:
Steve Lamb wrote:
Steve Lamb wrote:
Nevermind that he was impeached for lying under oath in an
investigation
Er, sorry, Faced Impeachment is what I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Paul Johnson wrote:
On Thursday 24 August 2006 07:59, Ron Johnson wrote:
Paul Johnson wrote:
On Wednesday 23 August 2006 23:13, Mihira Fernando wrote:
Ron Johnson wrote:
Technically, yes. That's how the Constitution designed it.
Practically,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Paul Johnson wrote:
On Thursday 24 August 2006 05:06, Nate Bargmann wrote:
With illegal immigration and with attempts to allow illegal
immigrants to vote, this trend may well be reversing.
It may be, but as far as I am concerned they're not
On Thursday 24 August 2006 10:36, Nate Bargmann wrote:
A great number of the UN member states have an equally negative
view of such concepts as our Bill of Rights, government of the people,
by the people, for the people, and that all men are endowed by their
Creator with certain unalienable
On Thursday 24 August 2006 14:29, Katipo wrote:
You're in the States, and therefore classified as American market source.
I'm in Australia, and it's all China and Korea here.
Very little from South America or EU.
I used to get a *lot* from Korea, almost all of it from Kornet. I have to
On Thursday 24 August 2006 13:04, Chris Mattern wrote:
No. Paul has no idea what the hell he's talking about. Most electoral
college members are bound by state law to vote for the presidential
candidate they were elected to vote for.
So less than half suddenly constitutes a majority? I'm
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Paul Johnson wrote:
On Thursday 24 August 2006 13:04, Chris Mattern wrote:
No. Paul has no idea what the hell he's talking about. Most electoral
college members are bound by state law to vote for the presidential
candidate they were elected to
On Thursday 24 August 2006 19:55, Ron Johnson wrote:
Something similar to this happened due to pilot error in Florida in
2000
Don't be stupid. The Florida problem was that little old ladies
could not figure our how to use a paper ballot.
Take your own advice: Don't be stupid.
On Thursday 24 August 2006 19:57, Ron Johnson wrote:
Paul Johnson wrote:
On Thursday 24 August 2006 05:06, Nate Bargmann wrote:
With illegal immigration and with attempts to allow illegal
immigrants to vote, this trend may well be reversing.
It may be, but as far as I am concerned
On Thu, 2006-08-24 at 20:13 -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:D
Gak! We agree!!
We usually do, though this summer you seem to have gone temporarily insane.
Any chance the list is dealing with one schizophrenic?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Paul Johnson wrote:
On Thursday 24 August 2006 19:55, Ron Johnson wrote:
Something similar to this happened due to pilot error in Florida in
2000
Don't be stupid. The Florida problem was that little old ladies
could not figure our how to use a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
charles norwood wrote:
On Thu, 2006-08-24 at 20:13 -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:D
Gak! We agree!!
We usually do, though this summer you seem to have gone temporarily insane.
Any chance the list is dealing with one schizophrenic?
No. He lives in
On Friday 25 August 2006 00:25, Ron Johnson wrote:
Paul Johnson wrote:
On Thursday 24 August 2006 19:55, Ron Johnson wrote:
Something similar to this happened due to pilot error in
Florida in 2000
Don't be stupid. The Florida problem was that little old
ladies
could not figure our
Paul Johnson wrote:
The impression of impropriety in politics is as bad as impropriety itself.
I'm not going to go into detail, since if you weren't following the news for
the last six years, going over it again won't help you.
Oddly enough, Paul, I have followed the news. I have
Paul Johnson wrote:
That paragraph contradicts itself because the second sentence assumes third
parties don't exist, whereas in the EC, it doesn't matter how many votes
third parties get, the EC won't vote for them. They haven't voted for a
third party since last time we had a Whig
Paul Johnson wrote:
And what is the member status of those states again? Do they matter? Does
anybody on the UN give them more than token attention? NO! Why? Because
the UN realizes they're as nutty as they really are, too! However, the UN
does allow everybody to have their say. It
On Wed, 23 Aug 2006 15:39, Steve Lamb wrote:
Hal Vaughan wrote:
I tried Mepis for a while. It was fine for the 1st six months or so,
but once the testing and unstable got out of sync, I had more and more
problems adding packages when I had to.
I just got it because it had an easy
- Original Message
From: Paul Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Sent: Wednesday, 23 August, 2006 1:32:52 AM
Subject: Re: Pumping Gas in Oregon (WAS: Re: Osama Bin Laden Take Over List!)
Steve Lamb wrote:
Furthermore (not to you Hal) I find it mildly Ironic
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Matt Johnson wrote:
- Original Message From: Paul Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Sent: Wednesday, 23 August, 2006
1:32:52 AM Subject: Re: Pumping Gas in Oregon (WAS: Re: Osama Bin
Laden Take Over List
Matt Johnson wrote:
Excuse me? You are joking, right? Relevant opinion from only certain
nationalities on this list? You've lost me here, lads. Perhaps you could
exlain this clearly.
Just as I wrote. It is ironic that someone from Brazil, which is
notorious for it's black-hacker
Katipo wrote:
Nothing, even remotely close to the volumes generated by Americans and
their contracted bodies in Korea and China.
They hire out entire ISPs for the purpose.
Which would be China and Korea's problems respectively and does not excuse
Brazil's ills.
...and to counterbalance
- Original Message
From: Steve Lamb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Sent: Wednesday, 23 August, 2006 2:18:56 PM
Subject: Re: Pumping Gas in Oregon (WAS: Re: Osama Bin Laden Take Over List!)
Matt Johnson wrote:
Excuse me? You are joking, right? Relevant opinion from
On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 07:49:18AM +1200, cr wrote:
On Wed, 23 Aug 2006 15:39, Steve Lamb wrote:
Hal Vaughan wrote:
I tried Mepis for a while. It was fine for the 1st six months or so,
but once the testing and unstable got out of sync, I had more and more
problems adding packages when
Steve Lamb wrote:
Matt Johnson wrote:
Excuse me? You are joking, right? Relevant opinion from only certain
nationalities on this list? You've lost me here, lads. Perhaps you could exlain
this clearly.
Just as I wrote. It is ironic that someone from Brazil, which is
notorious
Hal Vaughan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip nice Start Trek story]
LOL, that just made my day :)))
Andrei
--
If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough.
(Albert Einstein)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
On Wednesday 23 August 2006 03:22, Matt Johnson wrote:
- Original Message
From: Paul Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Sent: Wednesday, 23 August, 2006 1:32:52 AM
Subject: Re: Pumping Gas in Oregon (WAS: Re: Osama Bin Laden Take Over
List!)
Steve Lamb
On Wed, 2006-08-23 at 21:51 +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote:
Hal Vaughan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip nice Start Trek story]
LOL, that just made my day :)))
Andrei
Yeah, that was impressive.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
was rude complaining about recent OT trafic,
which started with the Osama Bin Laden Take Over List! stuff, and
continues with the Pumping Gas in Oregon emails. As I said, it was not
my intention to be rude with these OT's debianners. I am very sorry for
that.
I have nothing to do with the black-hacker
obtain continuosly from this list.
Ditto
I apologize very much if I was rude complaining about recent OT trafic,
which started with the Osama Bin Laden Take Over List! stuff, and
continues with the Pumping Gas in Oregon emails. As I said, it was not
my intention to be rude with these OT's
Marc Shapiro wrote:
But I DO know that blaiming EVERY INDIVIDUAL Brazilian for the mess that
YOU feel exits in their country's networks is just a bunch of BUNK! Are
YOU responsible for everything that U.S. polititians in Washington
(D.C., not state) say? Are YOU responsible for the SPAM that
Angelina Carlton wrote:
Again, Marcelo, please do not feel the need to apologize, you are only
echoing the same thing many of us feel: we want to to keep this list
focused one Debian, simple as that.
Then here's a pop quiz. Why is it in the years that this list has existed
there pretty
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Steve Lamb wrote:
Marc Shapiro wrote:
But I DO know that blaiming EVERY INDIVIDUAL Brazilian for the
mess that YOU feel exits in their country's networks is just a
bunch of BUNK! Are YOU responsible for everything that U.S.
polititians in
On Wednesday 23 August 2006 17:19, Steve Lamb wrote:
Marc Shapiro wrote:
But I DO know that blaiming EVERY INDIVIDUAL Brazilian for the mess that
YOU feel exits in their country's networks is just a bunch of BUNK! Are
YOU responsible for everything that U.S. polititians in Washington
On Wednesday 23 August 2006 17:35, Ron Johnson wrote:
Let's remember people, that the focus of this thread is laughing at
those stupid Oregonians who can't pump their own gas.
You can pump your own gas, that's fine, but remember, NJ and BC also have
mini-serve, and in BC, mini-serve competes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Paul Johnson wrote:
On Wednesday 23 August 2006 17:19, Steve Lamb wrote:
Marc Shapiro wrote:
[snip]
I'm of the world opinion, which is more or less why I want out.
You can agree with Jacques Chirac, I'll have the correct opinion.
:o)
- --
Ron
On Wednesday 23 August 2006 20:24, Steve Lamb wrote:
Angelina Carlton wrote:
Again, Marcelo, please do not feel the need to apologize, you are
only echoing the same thing many of us feel: we want to to keep
this list focused one Debian, simple as that.
Then here's a pop quiz. Why is
Steve Lamb wrote:
Marc Shapiro wrote:
But I DO know that blaiming EVERY INDIVIDUAL Brazilian for the mess that
YOU feel exits in their country's networks is just a bunch of BUNK! Are
YOU responsible for everything that U.S. polititians in Washington
(D.C., not state) say? Are YOU
On Wednesday 23 August 2006 18:05, Ron Johnson wrote:
Paul Johnson wrote:
On Wednesday 23 August 2006 17:19, Steve Lamb wrote:
Marc Shapiro wrote:
[snip]
I'm of the world opinion, which is more or less why I want out.
You can agree with Jacques Chirac, I'll have the correct opinion.
I
On Wednesday 23 August 2006 18:35, Marc Shapiro wrote:
I'm not sure what you're trying to say with this post. I never said
that you, or any of the rest of us from the U.S. should be shameful of
our country. I also don't think that Brazilians need to be shameful of
THEIR country. I DO think
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Paul Johnson wrote:
On Wednesday 23 August 2006 18:05, Ron Johnson wrote:
Paul Johnson wrote:
On Wednesday 23 August 2006 17:19, Steve Lamb wrote:
Marc Shapiro wrote:
[snip]
I'm of the world opinion, which is more or less why I want out.
You
Paul Johnson wrote:
¹ For those not of US origin, the US has had an electoral college to decide
it's soverign since it's inception, the popular vote for president is legally
nonbinding in nearly all states: the electoral college can and does vote for
whoever it wants. Out of a quarter
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Paul Johnson wrote:
On Wednesday 23 August 2006 18:35, Marc Shapiro wrote:
I'm not sure what you're trying to say with this post. I never said
that you, or any of the rest of us from the U.S. should be shameful of
our country. I also don't
On Wednesday 23 August 2006 18:13, Hal Vaughan wrote:
I never even knew there were moderators until one showed up a few months
ago (or sometime within the past 6 months or so) and started censoring
posts that were critical of moderators. Other than that one incident,
I thought this was a case
On Wednesday 23 August 2006 19:35, Ron Johnson wrote:
Spammers are a tiny group of people, and the ISPs who allow spam are
also run by a small number of people.
Likewise, many people don't hold harmless anybody in California for the power
crisis, as all of their elected officials unanimously
Osama Bin Laden Take Over List!
It looks like the young man who started all this was at least partly
successful!!
People who don't like off-topic threads need a thread-aware email
reader, then the problem goes away
Paul Johnson wrote:
I don't agree with Jacques Chirac, I disagree with the Republican Party,
So do I, don't see me wanting to slap everyone else down for it, do you?
Certainly don't see me revising history to fit my own illusional worldview.
college crap-shoot, which has resulted in hugely
Steve Lamb wrote:
Nevermind that he was impeached for lying under oath in an investigation
Er, sorry, Faced Impeachment is what I meant.
--
Steve C. Lamb | But who decides what they dream?
PGP Key: 8B6E99C5 | And dream I do...
1 - 100 of 180 matches
Mail list logo
