Ok here goes. I am an experienced PC user. I've been into it since the days
of 486SX chips. I have had in interest in Linux for quite some time, but
have always hit serious walls when trying to get it set up. I have tried
Caldera's distro, about 2 years ago on a 486 and found it basically useless.
Quoting Carson Christian ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
I have partitioned a separate physical disk into 3 partitions: /hdb1 is 3GB
for my root. /hdb5 is 800MB for /usr, and /hdb6 is 128MB for swap. My
primary OS is Win2k Pro. I want to be able to dual-boot when it's all said
and done, which is why
built ISO?
Also: What would the advantage of starting with SuSe be? Is it just simpler?
Thanks
- Original Message -
From: Sebastian Silva [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Carson Christian [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2000 12:24 PM
Subject: Re: Questions i can't answer
I dont
On Tuesday 12 December 2000 10:55, Carson Christian wrote:
I have partitioned a separate physical disk into 3 partitions: /hdb1 is 3GB
for my root. /hdb5 is 800MB for /usr, and /hdb6 is 128MB for swap. My
primary OS is Win2k Pro. I want to be able to dual-boot when it's all said
[...]
First:
At 06:58 AM 12/12/00, you wrote:
Ok here goes. I am an experienced PC user. I've been into it since the days
of 486SX chips. I have had in interest in Linux for quite some time, but
have always hit serious walls when trying to get it set up. I have tried
Caldera's distro, about 2 years ago on a
programs in a typical linux distro,
outside of core linux: including emacs, vi, TeX, LaTeX, Gimp, Apache,
etc...
HTH,
Daniel
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2000 12:32:43 -0500
From: Carson Christian [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian User List debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Questions i can't answer
I
6 matches
Mail list logo
