On Sat, 2009-08-29 at 14:51 -0700, Kevin Ross wrote:
> If this is official Debian policy, then why don't they set the Reply-To
> header to be the list? As it is now, every time I reply, I have to manually
> edit the addressee list. Hitting Reply only goes to the original poster.
> Reply All goes
On Sat, 2009-08-29 at 13:50 -0700, Jason C. Wells wrote:
> Is it customary here to CC both respondents and the list, or just the
> list? In BSD-land we CC every individual in a discussion plus the list.
No, it's not. http://lists.debian.org/ has the explaination; I must say
that the BSD folks a
In <4a9cd879.8040...@cox.net>, Ron Johnson wrote:
>On 2009-09-01 03:01, Steve Lamb wrote:
>> After a quick check with the all knowing oracle,
>> Google,
>
>When did Larry Ellison buy Google??
Case is important. Larry Ellison is associated with Oracle; Google is a bit
of an oracle.
--
Boyd Steph
On Tue, 01 Sep 2009 01:01:51 -0700
Steve Lamb wrote:
Hello Steve,
> Er, you do know there's little correlation between the to and cc
> headers with what goes on at SMTP time? Those headers exist for the
Yes, I know that. The "something" I was referring to would have been
local. Beyond th
On 2009-09-01 03:01, Steve Lamb wrote:
[snip]
As for the client side I don't recall if 2822 states there can only be one
of those headers. After a quick check with the all knowing oracle, Google,
When did Larry Ellison buy Google??
looks like to and cc can have a minimum of 0 and a max
Brad Rogers wrote:
> On Sun, 30 Aug 2009 16:36:39 -0700
> Marc Shapiro wrote:
> Hello Marc,
>> As Brad said, it does not appear to be included in the outgoing mail,
> If it were, I would hope something somewhere would complain about the
> empty header, rather than just silently ignore it, even
On Sun, 30 Aug 2009 16:36:39 -0700
Marc Shapiro wrote:
Hello Marc,
> As Brad said, it does not appear to be included in the outgoing mail,
If it were, I would hope something somewhere would complain about the
empty header, rather than just silently ignore it, even though a valid
header exists.
On Monday 31 August 2009 15:35:57 Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 2009-08-31 12:39, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> > On Sunday 30 August 2009 09:24:26 Jason C. Wells wrote:
> >> Gosh you would think that I said micro-kernels are a waste of time or
> > No, micro-kernels are the only way to move forward int
On Mon,31.Aug.09, 13:51:09, Chris Jones wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 03:19:43AM EDT, Andrei Popescu wrote:
>
> [..]
>
> > Maybe you should 'set ignore_list_reply_to'?
>
> Perfect.
>
> Why the "maybe" - is there a caveat?
I don't know, I never used that option ;)
Regards,
Andrei
--
If you
On 2009-08-31 12:39, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
On Sunday 30 August 2009 09:24:26 Jason C. Wells wrote:
Gosh you would think that I said micro-kernels are a waste of time or
No, micro-kernels are the only way to move forward into a pervasive cloud of
computing resources.
Why? No, really
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 03:19:43AM EDT, Andrei Popescu wrote:
[..]
> Maybe you should 'set ignore_list_reply_to'?
Perfect.
Why the "maybe" - is there a caveat?
CJ
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@l
On Sunday 30 August 2009 09:24:26 Jason C. Wells wrote:
> Gosh you would think that I said micro-kernels are a waste of time or
No, micro-kernels are the only way to move forward into a pervasive cloud of
computing resources.
> that vi is the one true editor.
Well, at least you got that one rig
On 2009-08-30 23:12, Mihira Fernando wrote:
On Sun, 30 Aug 2009 19:11:28 -0600
ghe wrote:
On Aug 30, 2009, at 6:39 PM, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 2009-08-30 19:07, John Hasler wrote:
Ron Johnson writes:
...and vi *is* the 1TE.
I wrote"
Which is why those of us who want something more than a me
On Sun,30.Aug.09, 10:41:10, Ken Heard wrote:
> What is needed to get it to work? I have Lenny and Icedove 2.0.0.22
> (20090726). I downloaded from http://alumnit.ca replytolist-0.3.0.xpi;
> put it in directory /usr/lib/icedove/extensions; changed owner:group to
> root:root; and changed permissi
On Sun,30.Aug.09, 06:46:26, Chris Jones wrote:
>
> Careful as I am, I did manage to send "OFF-LIST" replies to a mailing
> list by mistake on a couple of occasions.. with no serious damage, it
> was just innocuous stuff that I felt was a bit too OT for the list..
>
> But all the same it's not a
On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 08:07:24PM EDT, John Hasler wrote:
> Ron Johnson writes:
> > ...and vi *is* the 1TE.
>
> I wrote"
> > Which is why those of us who want something more than a mere editor use
> > Emacs.
>
> Ron Johnson writes:
> > That's what Linux is for...
>
> Linux is just a kernel. Yo
On Sun, 30 Aug 2009 19:11:28 -0600
ghe wrote:
>
> On Aug 30, 2009, at 6:39 PM, Ron Johnson wrote:
>
> > On 2009-08-30 19:07, John Hasler wrote:
> >> Ron Johnson writes:
> >>> ...and vi *is* the 1TE.
> >> I wrote"
> >>> Which is why those of us who want something more than a mere
> >>> editor
On Aug 30, 2009, at 6:39 PM, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 2009-08-30 19:07, John Hasler wrote:
Ron Johnson writes:
...and vi *is* the 1TE.
I wrote"
Which is why those of us who want something more than a mere
editor use
Emacs.
Ron Johnson writes:
That's what Linux is for...
Linux is just a ker
On 2009-08-30 19:07, John Hasler wrote:
Ron Johnson writes:
...and vi *is* the 1TE.
I wrote"
Which is why those of us who want something more than a mere editor use
Emacs.
Ron Johnson writes:
That's what Linux is for...
Linux is just a kernel. You don't have an OS until you install Emac
Ron Johnson writes:
> ...and vi *is* the 1TE.
I wrote"
> Which is why those of us who want something more than a mere editor use
> Emacs.
Ron Johnson writes:
> That's what Linux is for...
Linux is just a kernel. You don't have an OS until you install Emacs.
--
John Hasler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
On 2009-08-30 16:43, John Hasler wrote:
Ron Johnson writes:
...and vi *is* the 1TE.
Which is why those of us who want something more than a mere editor use
Emacs.
That's what Linux is for...
--
Brawndo's got what plants crave. It's got electrolytes!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-use
Ken Heard wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Steve Lamb wrote:
Ken Heard wrote:
Am I doing something wrong?
Overthinking it? I just downloaded, went to TBird, Tools -> Addons ->
Install and chose the file from my download directory.
That's exactly what I did, but it d
Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
Brad Rogers wrote:
If T'Bird is anything like Claws-Mail, the appearance of a second,
empty, To: field is only an aesthetic inconvenience. It's there to
allow you to send to multiple recipients, (B)Cc:, etc. In fact, the CM
editor always comes up with two To: fields
Ron Johnson writes:
> ...and vi *is* the 1TE.
Which is why those of us who want something more than a mere editor use
Emacs.
--
John Hasler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
>> Gosh you would think that I said micro-kernels are a waste of time or that
>> vi is the one true editor.
> But... MKs *are* a waste of time,
Fair enough.
> and vi *is* the 1TE.
Woa there!!
Stefan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
On 2009-08-30 09:24, Jason C. Wells wrote:
Gosh you would think that I said micro-kernels are a waste of time or
that vi is the one true editor.
But... MKs *are* a waste of time, and vi *is* the 1TE.
--
Obsession with "preserving cultural heritage" is a racist impediment
to moral, physical and
On 2009-08-30 07:14, Neal Hogan wrote:
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 11:44 PM, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 2009-08-29 23:34, Neal Hogan wrote:
I forget when we made this agreement :)
Well before you started using the internet on a regular basis.
Well, it must have been against my will.
In High School Ci
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Steve Lamb wrote:
> Ken Heard wrote:
>> Am I doing something wrong?
>
> Overthinking it? I just downloaded, went to TBird, Tools -> Addons ->
> Install and chose the file from my download directory.
That's exactly what I did, but it did not inst
Ken Heard wrote:
> Am I doing something wrong?
Overthinking it? I just downloaded, went to TBird, Tools -> Addons ->
Install and chose the file from my download directory.
--
Steve C. Lamb | But who decides what they dream?
PGP Key: 8B6E99C5 | And dream I do.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
> Ken Heard wrote:
>> What is needed to get it to work? I have Lenny and Icedove 2.0.0.22
>> (20090726). I downloaded from http://alumnit.ca replytolist-0.3.0.xpi;
>> put it in directory /usr/lib/icedove/extensions; change
Ken Heard wrote:
> What is needed to get it to work? I have Lenny and Icedove 2.0.0.22
> (20090726). I downloaded from http://alumnit.ca replytolist-0.3.0.xpi;
> put it in directory /usr/lib/icedove/extensions; changed owner:group to
> root:root; and changed permissions to -rwxr-xr-x; and told Ic
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Steve Lamb wrote:
> ... You know, every time this topic came up you would mention
> replytolist and I would point out it never worked for me. I think we've had
> that exchange publicly at least 2-3 times and privately at least once. Except
>
Gosh you would think that I said micro-kernels are a waste of time or
that vi is the one true editor.
Cheers,
Jason
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Patrick Wiseman wrote:
> [Yikes! I just sent this to the poster instead of the list, because
> gmail defaults that way. Oh, the irony (at my own expense)!]
>
> On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 4:42 AM, Rakotomandimby
> Mihamina wrote:
> > 08/30/2009 07:28 AM, Neal Hogan:
> >>
> >> As with all subject
Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
> Ron Johnson wrote:
> > We keepers of the in-line posting flame are a shrinking minority,
> > now dominant only on Very Geeky lists.
> >
>
> I have to agree. It's sad, but it's true.
>
> But this is not only Gmail's fault. Long before it existed The Proper
> W
[Yikes! I just sent this to the poster instead of the list, because
gmail defaults that way. Oh, the irony (at my own expense)!]
On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 4:42 AM, Rakotomandimby
Mihamina wrote:
> 08/30/2009 07:28 AM, Neal Hogan:
>>
>> As with all subject changing threads, stuff gets confusing . .
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 11:44 PM, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 2009-08-29 23:34, Neal Hogan wrote:
I forget when we made this agreement :)
>>>
>>> Well before you started using the internet on a regular basis.
>>
>> Well, it must have been against my will.
>
> In High School Civics class, that
Ron Johnson wrote:
> We keepers of the in-line posting flame are a shrinking minority,
> now dominant only on Very Geeky lists.
>
I have to agree. It's sad, but it's true.
But this is not only Gmail's fault. Long before it existed The Proper
Way of replying was dying. Outlook and Hotmail (whi
Brad Rogers wrote:
> If T'Bird is anything like Claws-Mail, the appearance of a second,
> empty, To: field is only an aesthetic inconvenience. It's there to
> allow you to send to multiple recipients, (B)Cc:, etc. In fact, the CM
> editor always comes up with two To: fields for this very reason.
Chris Jones wrote:
> You're in mutt, you hit "r" for reply to poster instead of "L" for reply
> to list and this annoying "Reply-To: list" causes the "To:" header that
> is automatically created to point to the list instead of the poster's
> private address.
Oh, doesn't even need to be in mutt
On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 06:24:55AM EDT, Cameron Hutchison wrote:
> Chris Jones writes:
[..]
> >Thanks for the idea.
>
> >I will take a look at my .procmailrc and see how I can conversely
> >eliminate these noxious Reply-to headers before they cause further
> >damage.
>
> I feed all my mailing
Chris Jones writes:
>On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 06:53:41PM EDT, ghe wrote:
>>
>> :0Hfhw
>> * ^Return-Path:
>> | $FORMAIL -i "Reply-To: "
>Thanks for the idea.
>I will take a look at my .procmailrc and see how I can conversely
>eliminate these noxious Reply-to headers before they cause further
>da
On 2009-08-30 04:03, Andrei Popescu wrote:
[snip]
As Windows is not the cause for people using their computers logged in
as administrators. It's just that they (Windows and Gmail) make it quite
hard to do it the right way and many people just choose the easy way.
Many (most?) apps (including
On Sat, 29 Aug 2009 23:32:41 -0700
Marc Shapiro wrote:
Hello Marc,
> additional blank "To:" line is added. Is there a setting to avoid
> this additional "To:" line?
If T'Bird is anything like Claws-Mail, the appearance of a second,
empty, To: field is only an aesthetic inconvenience. It's the
On Sat,29.Aug.09, 23:14:54, Neal Hogan wrote:
> > Standards are the reason we're all here. Standards are the reason we use
> > things
> > like Debian. Standards are the reason that Debian works.
>
> It does . . . no disagreement here. But, to expect users to use the
> standards that are not clea
08/30/2009 07:28 AM, Neal Hogan:
As with all subject changing threads, stuff gets confusing . . .
mailing list etiquette 101?
We should add somewhere in another etiquette "dont post from Gmail" ;-)
--
Architecte Informatique chez Blueline/Gulfsat:
Administration Systeme, Recherche & D
Ron Johnson wrote:
> Besides features already enabled via Addons?
Shredder (Tbird 3.0) has it built directly into the client now. No need
for Mnenhy + replytolist. They finally, fi-nal-ly, hashed out some what to
present the options to reply-to-list. While for people who found replytoli
On 2009-08-30 02:18, Rakotomandimby Mihamina wrote:
08/30/2009 10:07 AM, Ron Johnson:
What benefits does it have over the paned format that Tbird has had
since it was Netscape 1.0?
The reply to list feature? :-)
Besides features already enabled via Addons?
--
Obsession with "preserving cu
08/30/2009 10:07 AM, Ron Johnson:
What benefits does it have over the paned format that Tbird has had
since it was Netscape 1.0?
The reply to list feature? :-)
--
Architecte Informatique chez Blueline/Gulfsat:
Administration Systeme, Recherche & Developpement
On 2009-08-30 01:44, Rakotomandimby Mihamina wrote:
08/30/2009 12:51 AM, Kevin Ross:
If this is official Debian policy, then why don't they set the Reply-To
header to be the list? As it is now, every time I reply, I have to
manually
edit the addressee list. Hitting Reply only goes to the ori
On 2009-08-30 00:25, Steve Lamb wrote:
Ron Johnson wrote:
These are the two which I need:
mnenhy
replytolist
"Reply To List" will still be greyed out, though, until within Mnenhy
you enable "Extended Normal View". And don't forget that you can
customize the toolbar to add the RTL icon.
08/30/2009 12:51 AM, Kevin Ross:
If this is official Debian policy, then why don't they set the Reply-To
header to be the list? As it is now, every time I reply, I have to manually
edit the addressee list. Hitting Reply only goes to the original poster.
Reply All goes to the poster and the list
Ron Johnson wrote:
On 2009-08-29 18:05, JoeHill wrote:
Kevin Ross wrote:
From: JoeHill [mailto:joeh...@teksavvy.com] Sent: Saturday, August
29, 2009 3:11 PM
As it is now, every time I reply, I have to manually edit
the addressee
list. Hitting Reply only goes to the original poster.
Re
Ron Johnson wrote:
> These are the two which I need:
> mnenhy
> replytolist
> "Reply To List" will still be greyed out, though, until within Mnenhy
> you enable "Extended Normal View". And don't forget that you can
> customize the toolbar to add the RTL icon.
... You know, every time this t
Kevin Ross wrote:
> It's true I'm currently using Outlook from my Windows computer. But when
> I'm at a Linux computer, I use Icedove, with the same results.
3.0 it is built
directly into the client... finally!
> Same with SquirrelMail webmail client.
Except for you you enable the addo
On 2009-08-29 23:34, Neal Hogan wrote:
I forget when we made this agreement :)
Well before you started using the internet on a regular basis.
Well, it must have been against my will.
In High School Civics class, that was called "tacit consent of the
governed".
--
Obsession with "preservin
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 11:36 PM, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 2009-08-29 23:25, Neal Hogan wrote:
> [snip]
>>
>> We don't have to think
>
> Arrrghhh! The dumbing-down of American civilization!!
>
> Must... end... thread... now... before... write... mile... long... screed!!!
I thought you were the
On 2009-08-29 23:25, Neal Hogan wrote:
[snip]
We don't have to think
Arrrghhh! The dumbing-down of American civilization!!
Must... end... thread... now... before... write... mile... long...
screed!!!
--
Obsession with "preserving cultural heritage" is a racist impediment
to moral, phys
>>
>> I forget when we made this agreement :)
>
> Well before you started using the internet on a regular basis.
Well, it must have been against my will.
>
>>> If someone comes on here and starts asking us to forgive the
>>> fact that they use different letters than we do, we're gonna say 'go f
>
On 2009-08-29 23:14, Neal Hogan wrote:
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 11:02 PM, JoeHill wrote:
[snip]
It's not a question of 'pure', it's a question of standards. The reason we are
all able to communicate is that we all agree to a standard set of symbols to
convey meaning.
I forget when we made this
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 11:14 PM, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 2009-08-29 23:06, Neal Hogan wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 10:55 PM, Ron Johnson
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 2009-08-29 22:45, Neal Hogan wrote:
>
> [snip]
Just closing the gmail message (i.e., failed joke). I guess it should
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 11:10 PM, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 2009-08-29 23:02, JoeHill wrote:
>>
>> Neal Hogan wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> get over the email format!
>>
>> It's called being polite, and putting other people's needs ahead of your
>> own.
>> It's not a bad thing, it's a human thing.
>>
>>>
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 11:02 PM, JoeHill wrote:
> Neal Hogan wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> get over the email format!
>
> It's called being polite, and putting other people's needs ahead of your own.
> It's not a bad thing, it's a human thing.
>
>> gmail provides a nice gui-riffic format that many feel comf
On 2009-08-29 23:06, Neal Hogan wrote:
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 10:55 PM, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 2009-08-29 22:45, Neal Hogan wrote:
[snip]
Just closing the gmail message (i.e., failed joke). I guess it should
have been past tense.
Makes it difficult (impossible?) to find the correct thread t
On 2009-08-29 23:02, JoeHill wrote:
Neal Hogan wrote:
get over the email format!
It's called being polite, and putting other people's needs ahead of your own.
It's not a bad thing, it's a human thing.
gmail provides a nice gui-riffic format that many feel comfortable
using. I don't get wh
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 10:55 PM, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 2009-08-29 22:45, Neal Hogan wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 10:41 PM, Ron Johnson
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 2009-08-29 22:31, Neal Hogan wrote:
get over the email format!
>>>
>>> I know. Lost that war a long time ago.
Neal Hogan wrote:
>
>
> get over the email format!
It's called being polite, and putting other people's needs ahead of your own.
It's not a bad thing, it's a human thing.
> gmail provides a nice gui-riffic format that many feel comfortable
> using. I don't get where this complaining about cli
On 2009-08-29 22:45, Neal Hogan wrote:
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 10:41 PM, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 2009-08-29 22:31, Neal Hogan wrote:
get over the email format!
I know. Lost that war a long time ago...
gmail provides a nice gui-riffic format that many feel comfortable
using. I don't get wher
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 10:41 PM, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 2009-08-29 22:31, Neal Hogan wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> get over the email format!
>
> I know. Lost that war a long time ago...
>
>> gmail provides a nice gui-riffic format that many feel comfortable
>> using. I don't get where this complaining a
On 2009-08-29 22:31, Neal Hogan wrote:
get over the email format!
I know. Lost that war a long time ago...
gmail provides a nice gui-riffic format that many feel comfortable
using. I don't get where this complaining about client usage is going.
If you a want more "pure" OS, then . . . umm
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 06:53:41PM EDT, ghe wrote:
>
>>> If this is official Debian policy, then why don't they set the
>>> Reply-To
>>> header to be the list?
>
> Hey, Man. It's Policy. Put something like this in /etc/procmailrc on your
> mail server:
>
> FORMAIL=/usr/bin/formail
>
> :0Hfhw
> *
Tim Tebbit wrote:
> JoeHill wrote:
> >
> >
> > If there _was_ an official mail client, it would be Claws ;)
>
> mutt
Okay, Claws _or_ Mutt.
--
J
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.o
get over the email format!
gmail provides a nice gui-riffic format that many feel comfortable
using. I don't get where this complaining about client usage is going.
If you a want more "pure" OS, then . . . u . . . go somewhere
else.
Ron (et al) . . . you seem to have no problem responding
On 2009-08-29 21:21, Celejar wrote:
On Sat, 29 Aug 2009 14:51:04 -0700
"Kevin Ross" wrote:
...
If this is official Debian policy, then why don't they set the Reply-To
header to be the list? As it is now, every time I reply, I have to manually
edit the addressee list. Hitting Reply only goes
On Sat, 29 Aug 2009 14:51:04 -0700
"Kevin Ross" wrote:
...
> If this is official Debian policy, then why don't they set the Reply-To
> header to be the list? As it is now, every time I reply, I have to manually
> edit the addressee list. Hitting Reply only goes to the original poster.
> Reply
On 2009-08-29 18:05, JoeHill wrote:
Kevin Ross wrote:
From: JoeHill [mailto:joeh...@teksavvy.com]
Sent: Saturday, August 29, 2009 3:11 PM
As it is now, every time I reply, I have to manually edit
the addressee
list. Hitting Reply only goes to the original poster.
Reply All goes to t
JoeHill wrote:
If there _was_ an official mail client, it would be Claws ;)
mutt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
> From: ghe [mailto:g...@slsware.com]
> Sent: Saturday, August 29, 2009 3:54 PM
>
> >> If this is official Debian policy, then why don't they set the
> >> Reply-To
> >> header to be the list?
>
> Hey, Man. It's Policy. Put something like this in /etc/procmailrc on
> your mail server:
>
> FO
Kevin Ross wrote:
> > From: JoeHill [mailto:joeh...@teksavvy.com]
> > Sent: Saturday, August 29, 2009 3:11 PM
> >
> > > As it is now, every time I reply, I have to manually edit
> > the addressee
> > > list. Hitting Reply only goes to the original poster.
> > Reply All goes to the
If this is official Debian policy, then why don't they set the
Reply-To
header to be the list?
Hey, Man. It's Policy. Put something like this in /etc/procmailrc on
your mail server:
FORMAIL=/usr/bin/formail
:0Hfhw
* ^Return-Path:
| $FORMAIL -i "Reply-To: "
(Note that my name is in the
> From: JoeHill [mailto:joeh...@teksavvy.com]
> Sent: Saturday, August 29, 2009 3:11 PM
>
> > As it is now, every time I reply, I have to manually edit
> the addressee
> > list. Hitting Reply only goes to the original poster.
> Reply All goes to the
> > poster and the list.
>
> That's because
Kevin Ross wrote:
> > From: Eduardo M KALINOWSKI [mailto:edua...@kalinowski.com.br]
> > Sent: Saturday, August 29, 2009 2:07 PM
> >
> > Jason C. Wells wrote:
> > > Is it customary here to CC both respondents and the list,
> > or just the
> > > list? In BSD-land we CC every individual i
Kevin Ross wrote:
> If this is official Debian policy, then why don't they set the Reply-To
> header to be the list? As it is now, every time I reply, I have to manually
> edit the addressee list. Hitting Reply only goes to the original poster.
> Reply All goes to the poster and the list.
>
T
> From: Eduardo M KALINOWSKI [mailto:edua...@kalinowski.com.br]
> Sent: Saturday, August 29, 2009 2:07 PM
>
> Jason C. Wells wrote:
> > Is it customary here to CC both respondents and the list,
> or just the
> > list? In BSD-land we CC every individual in a discussion
> plus the list.
> >
Jason C. Wells wrote:
Is it customary here to CC both respondents and the list, or just the
list? In BSD-land we CC every individual in a discussion plus the list.
Regards,
Jason
There are also those of us who follow the list via gmane. A CC would
never reach me anyways.
--
To UNSUBSC
Jason C. Wells wrote:
> Is it customary here to CC both respondents and the list, or just the
> list? In BSD-land we CC every individual in a discussion plus the list.
>
Just the list. (After all, the purpose of the mailing list software is
to distribute e-mails to those who want them, so no
86 matches
Mail list logo
