On Wed, Oct 24, 2001 at 06:29:39PM -0500, Ian Patrick Thomas wrote:
Is there a way to get a more accurate time value, preferably to a
nanosecond, using the system clock? I need to write a program that needs to
output the time it takes various sorting algprithms to sort various numbers
of
Dave Sherohman writes:
On Wed, Oct 24, 2001 at 06:29:39PM -0500, Ian Patrick Thomas wrote:
to a nanosecond, using the system clock? I need to write a
program that needs to output the time it takes various sorting
algprithms to sort various numbers of integers. For smaller
numbers of
On Thu, Oct 25, 2001 at 09:06:29AM -0700, Andrew Agno wrote:
Dave Sherohman writes:
faster than a quicksort.) If you are required to use a small data
set, just perform more repetitions to get measurable data.
This also allows you to obtain statistics like standard deviations and
-Original Message-
From: Dave Sherohman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 12:58 PM
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: More accurate time feedback
On Thu, Oct 25, 2001 at 09:06:29AM -0700, Andrew Agno wrote:
Dave Sherohman writes:
faster
On Wed, Oct 24, 2001 at 06:29:39PM -0500, Ian Patrick Thomas wrote:
| Is there a way to get a more accurate time value, preferably to a
| nanosecond, using the system clock? I need to write a program that needs to
| output the time it takes various sorting algprithms to sort various numbers
5 matches
Mail list logo
