Re: Debian etch with 2.6.16.1 RAM not showing up in 'free'

2006-08-06 Thread Prepaid
Thanks a bunch! I wasn't able to figure that out myself, I knew it was a kernel recompile issue, but had no idea which option to change..For the archives, I was able to read up on it once I you told me about HIGHMEM: http://kerneltrap.org/node/2450 On 8/6/06, Roberto C. Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: Debian etch with 2.6.16.1 RAM not showing up in 'free'

2006-08-06 Thread Roberto C. Sanchez
On Sun, Aug 06, 2006 at 11:35:21PM -0400, Prepaid wrote: > Hello all > > I have a Debian etch box with a custom complied 2.6.16.1 kernel, running a > Tyan motherboard and a Xeon processor (started with Tyan GT20 barebone). > Currently there are 4 gigabytes of ram installed on the motherboard, as >

Debian etch with 2.6.16.1 RAM not showing up in 'free'

2006-08-06 Thread Prepaid
Hello allI have a Debian etch box with a custom complied 2.6.16.1 kernel, running a Tyan motherboard and a Xeon processor (started with Tyan GT20 barebone). Currently there are 4 gigabytes of ram installed on the motherboard, as reported in BIOS, but in Debian the amount of memory shown is the amou

Re: Ram Not Showing

2005-12-10 Thread Hal Vaughan
On Saturday 10 December 2005 02:19 pm, Dave Ewart wrote: > On Saturday, 10.12.2005 at 13:50 -0500, Hal Vaughan wrote: > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:thresh]$ uname -a > > > > Linux threshnet 2.6.8-2-386 #1 Thu May 19 17:40:50 JST 2005 i686 > > > > GNU/Linux > > > > > > > > Hal > > > > > > You can't get

Re: Ram Not Showing

2005-12-10 Thread Gene Heskett
On Saturday 10 December 2005 14:43, Dave Ewart wrote: >On Saturday, 10.12.2005 at 14:40 -0500, Gene Heskett wrote: >> > > [The Fix.] >> > >> >Good catch. I didn't even notice that. >> >> Me either, duh. > >Well, if you guys can return the favour by helping to get my > soundcard working - see the t

Re: Ram Not Showing

2005-12-10 Thread Marc Shapiro
Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: Hal Vaughan wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:root$ grep HIGHMEM /boot/config-2.6.8-2-386 CONFIG_NOHIGHMEM=y ^^ # CONFIG_HIGHMEM4G is not set # CONFIG_HIGHMEM64G is not set' [EMAIL PROTECTED]:thresh]$ uname -a Linux threshnet 2.6.8-2-386 #1 Thu May 19 17

Re: Ram Not Showing

2005-12-10 Thread Dave Ewart
On Saturday, 10.12.2005 at 14:40 -0500, Gene Heskett wrote: > > > [The Fix.] > > > >Good catch. I didn't even notice that. > > Me either, duh. Well, if you guys can return the favour by helping to get my soundcard working - see the thread about the "Audigy LS" - that'd be great. :-) :-) Dave.

Re: Ram Not Showing

2005-12-10 Thread Gene Heskett
On Saturday 10 December 2005 14:32, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: >Dave Ewart wrote: >> On Saturday, 10.12.2005 at 13:50 -0500, Hal Vaughan wrote: >[EMAIL PROTECTED]:thresh]$ uname -a >Linux threshnet 2.6.8-2-386 #1 Thu May 19 17:40:50 JST 2005 i686 >GNU/Linux > >Hal You ca

Re: Ram Not Showing

2005-12-10 Thread Roberto C. Sanchez
Dave Ewart wrote: > On Saturday, 10.12.2005 at 13:50 -0500, Hal Vaughan wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:thresh]$ uname -a Linux threshnet 2.6.8-2-386 #1 Thu May 19 17:40:50 JST 2005 i686 GNU/Linux Hal >>> >>>You can't get more than about 900 MB of accessible RAM with that kernel

Re: Ram Not Showing

2005-12-10 Thread Dave Ewart
On Saturday, 10.12.2005 at 13:50 -0500, Hal Vaughan wrote: > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:thresh]$ uname -a > > > Linux threshnet 2.6.8-2-386 #1 Thu May 19 17:40:50 JST 2005 i686 > > > GNU/Linux > > > > > > Hal > > > > You can't get more than about 900 MB of accessible RAM with that kernel. > > I'm sorr

Re: Ram Not Showing

2005-12-10 Thread Roberto C. Sanchez
Hal Vaughan wrote: > > Arrggghhh! (Not at you -- just at the thought of rolling my own kernel -- > for > some reason, I have *never* gotten a kernel I compiled to work properly!) > > Okay. I've forgotten how, but it's just a little Googling or some man pages > to remember how to grab a packa

Re: Ram Not Showing

2005-12-10 Thread Hal Vaughan
On Saturday 10 December 2005 01:42 pm, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: > Hal Vaughan wrote: > > On Saturday 10 December 2005 01:18 pm, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: > >>Hal Vaughan wrote: > >>>It's running the stock 2.6 kernel from Sarge already. > >>> > >>>Hal > >> > >>Interesting, what happens when you run

Re: Ram Not Showing

2005-12-10 Thread Roberto C. Sanchez
Hal Vaughan wrote: > On Saturday 10 December 2005 01:18 pm, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: > >>Hal Vaughan wrote: >> >>>It's running the stock 2.6 kernel from Sarge already. >>> >>>Hal >> >>Interesting, what happens when you run `grep HIGHMEM >>/boot/config-> >>-Roberto > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:root$

Re: Ram Not Showing

2005-12-10 Thread Hal Vaughan
On Saturday 10 December 2005 01:18 pm, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: > Hal Vaughan wrote: > > It's running the stock 2.6 kernel from Sarge already. > > > > Hal > > Interesting, what happens when you run `grep HIGHMEM > /boot/config- > -Roberto [EMAIL PROTECTED]:root$ grep HIGHMEM /boot/config-2.6.8-2-

Re: Ram Not Showing

2005-12-10 Thread Roberto C. Sanchez
Hal Vaughan wrote: > > It's running the stock 2.6 kernel from Sarge already. > > Hal > > Interesting, what happens when you run `grep HIGHMEM /boot/config-http://familiasanchez.net/~roberto signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Ram Not Showing

2005-12-10 Thread Hal Vaughan
On Saturday 10 December 2005 12:17 pm, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: > Hal Vaughan wrote: > > I had 1.5 GB (333 Mhz) in a system running Sarge with a 2.6 kernel and > > all of it was used. I've just replaced the .5 GB stick with a 1 GB > > stick, giving me 2 GB of RAM. When I boot, the motherboard r

Re: Ram Not Showing

2005-12-10 Thread Roberto C. Sanchez
Hal Vaughan wrote: > I had 1.5 GB (333 Mhz) in a system running Sarge with a 2.6 kernel and all > of > it was used. I've just replaced the .5 GB stick with a 1 GB stick, giving me > 2 GB of RAM. When I boot, the motherboard reports 2 GB, but when I check: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:root]$ cat /pr

Ram Not Showing

2005-12-10 Thread Hal Vaughan
I had 1.5 GB (333 Mhz) in a system running Sarge with a 2.6 kernel and all of it was used. I've just replaced the .5 GB stick with a 1 GB stick, giving me 2 GB of RAM. When I boot, the motherboard reports 2 GB, but when I check: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:root]$ cat /proc/meminfo MemTotal: 90673