Michelle
The subject matter is mine but the content is some else's. I did not
write what you quoted. Probably, the original email trail was missing.
I know that Xen development is far further along than Xen 2. I have a
copy of the original email if you want to see it -- just ask. The
origina
Since you do not use a realname in your message I have found it in
the SPAM-Folder.
I do not understand why you are talkong abour Xen 2 if I have Etch-
DVD's from November last year which have already Xen 3:
---[ command 'apt-cache search xen |grep -v roxen' ]
libc6-xen - GNU
On Sun, Feb 18, 2007 at 01:28:52PM -0700, Archive wrote:
> So I am not arguing aginst LVM. Those that use it and recommend it keep
> telling me I should plan on using it. I will do that if these same
> people start explaining the features in way that makes sense to the
> kinds of things I have
On Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at 05:47:03PM +0100, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> I have tried to compile my own Xen-Kernel but failed...
>
> Is there a Step-by-Step docu/howto HOW to build your OWN Xen-Kernel
> on a Debian-System?
This is something I wrote a while back about compiling your
own Xen kerne
Michelle
Here is an excerpt from Xen Development that I think applies to your
situation. There do not appear to be a lot of Debian possibilities as
near as I can find out. But I'm still forging around. Your questions are
further down.
Here is the scoop from Xen Development regarding AMD.
Th
Hello Unknown Admin,
Am 2007-02-17 00:07:47, schrieb Admin:
> BTW if anyone (I've seen a few Xen emails like the one where the AMD
> package disappeared only to be replaced by a 686 based Xen package that
> crashed) would like to set up a Debian Xen thread maybe we could help
> one another as
On Sun, Feb 18, 2007 at 01:28:52PM -0700, Archive wrote:
> Information for the database server might involve languages and language
> translation, and so on. So there is an obvious need for data
> management, data bases, etc., but my question to all reading this email
> is: "Why LVM"
>
> S
On Sun, Feb 18, 2007 at 03:14:39PM -0700, Archive wrote:
> I really like the idea passed on to me of getting the entire 14 disk
> ETCH (older and therefore stable) distribution on a R/W DVD where the
> first DVD contains the installer.
I think you're slightly confused here. The current stable
On Sun, Feb 18, 2007 at 02:44:50PM -0700, Archive wrote:
> As mentioned in an earlier email the DOMU or secondary Xen system(s) can
> not only talk to the DOM0 or Xen primary system but also to other other
> DOMU or secondary Xen system(s) and that most likely involves not only
> LAN interaction
On Sun, Feb 18, 2007 at 03:14:39PM -0700, Archive wrote:
> I really like the idea passed on to me of getting the entire 14 disk
> ETCH (older and therefore stable) distribution on a R/W DVD where the
> first DVD contains the installer. Apparently, this approach using the
> appropriate package m
On Sun, 18 Feb 2007 15:14:39 -0700
Archive <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
Regarding the DVDs:
AFAIK you cannot make changes to a full DVD, even if it is rewritable.
Rewritable on a CD (and I suppose the same for a CD) means you can
erase it all and start over. This is not the same as with a f
On Sun, Feb 18, 2007 at 03:14:39PM -0700, Archive wrote:
> I really like the idea passed on to me of getting the entire 14 disk
> ETCH (older and therefore stable) distribution on a R/W DVD where the
An older Etch is exactly the opposite of what you want. In the time
since the freeze, there hav
On Sun, Feb 18, 2007 at 02:44:50PM -0700, Archive wrote:
> It would be nice to have some examples of this route management code
> with an explanation of it's operation and theory for both simple and
> complex scenarios, especially some Xen scenarios.
>
> Any takers on this
Le dimanche 18 février 2007 21:28, Archive a écrit :
[...]
> but my question to all reading this email
> is: "Why LVM"
[...]
The first two words :
1) merge
2) resize
1) Device block merging, everything, disks, RAID arrays
2) Online resizing of your logical volumes (slices of the previous merg
On Sat, Feb 17, 2007 at 12:07:47AM -0700, Admin wrote:
> The Debian distribution is installed in a large partition so it
> can be added to in the future. Other distributions and/or
> specific Debian applications (derived from the primary
> distribution in the large partition) can be installed in
On Sat, Feb 17, 2007 at 05:06:46PM -0700, Archive wrote:
> I put your text below mine. Yes, it does sound neat. Did you do a
> special compile for the RAID so it was built into the kernel or do you
> have a hardware raid controller, or what?
I use the in-kernel software RAID and mdadm, bog sta
On Sat, Feb 17, 2007 at 01:47:33PM +0100, Peter Teunissen wrote:
>
> On 17-feb-2007, at 8:07, Admin wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >BTW if anyone (I've seen a few Xen emails like the one where the
> >AMD package disappeared only to be replaced by a 686 based Xen
> >package that crashed) would like to se
On Sat, Feb 17, 2007 at 12:07:47AM -0700, Admin wrote:
> One of the several reasons I left a large space on the hard drive was to
> establish a Debian based Xen virtual machine. To do this Xen is
> installed on top of the Debian kernel.
If you are going to do this, may I recommend strongly that
On 17-feb-2007, at 8:07, Admin wrote:
BTW if anyone (I've seen a few Xen emails like the one where the
AMD package disappeared only to be replaced by a 686 based Xen
package that crashed) would like to set up a Debian Xen thread
maybe we could help one another as it seems that this
v
19 matches
Mail list logo
