Em Thu, 05 Aug 2004 20:00:05 +0200, morais escreveu:
alguem ai sabe quando seralancado a nova versao do debian e tambem se ela vai
vir com kernel 2.6?
Setembro, e sim.
--
Leandro Guimarães Faria Corsetti Dutra +55 (44) 3028 7467 ext34
Rua Guarani 361 ap 601 – Z4
Thadeu Penna wrote:
On Mon, 26 Apr 2004, Marlo wrote:
amigo, claro que é legal atualizar seu kernel, muitos bugs são
corrigidos nessas novas versões e tambem a novas funcões e novos
programas são adicionados a este kernel.
E novos bugs são adicionados também ;) Eu atualizei para o 2.6,
Olá Jefferson e outros colegas da lista.
Aos idos de Tue, 27 Jul 2004 08:28:43 -0300 eu sonhei que
Jefferson Ike [EMAIL PROTECTED] me dizia:
Thadeu Penna wrote:
esqueça compilar o kernel e instale a imagem já pronta:
apt-get install kernel-image-2.6.7-(depende da sua arquitetura)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Olá Jefferson e outros colegas da lista.
Aos idos de Tue, 27 Jul 2004 08:28:43 -0300 eu sonhei que
Jefferson Ike [EMAIL PROTECTED] me dizia:
Thadeu Penna wrote:
esqueça compilar o kernel e instale a imagem já pronta:
apt-get install kernel-image-2.6.7-(depende da
Sem querer optar por uma das duas vias (compilar ou instalar imagem) e falando
da pouca experiência que possuo de linucses,
compilar o seu próprio kernel ajuda a compreender como funciona o seu
computador e tb de como funciona o principio do open source. Voçê leva as
sources para o seu pc e
- Original Message -
From:
Marlo
To: morais
Sent: Monday, April 26, 2004 2:26
PM
Subject: Re: kernel 2.6
amigo, claro que é legal atualizar seu kernel,
muitos bugs são corrigidos nessas novas versões e tambem a novas funcões e
novos programas são
apt-get install kernel-image(escolhe ae..)
Eu prefiro usar em casa o kernel 2.6 2 usar na empresa o kernel 2.4.25..
O kernel 2.6 eh mais rapido (eu achei) e o suporte dele pra hardware é
melhor, inclusive a configuracao de placas de som 5.1. e placas de vide
principalmente da nvidia(com o
Amigo basta você baixa-lo do site www.kernel.org descompacta-lo dentro de
/usr/src então
compila-lo para o seu hardware e com o comando installkernel instala-lo, mas a
versão
2.6 não esta muito madura, te recomendo usar a 2.4.26 que esta bastante madura e
depurada.
Falow.
João Salvatti.
On Mon, 26 Apr 2004, Marlo wrote:
amigo, claro que é legal atualizar seu kernel, muitos bugs são
corrigidos nessas novas versões e tambem a novas funcões e novos
programas são adicionados a este kernel.
E novos bugs são adicionados também ;) Eu atualizei para o 2.6, meu
mouse ficou mais
Aos idos de Mon, 26 Apr 2004 14:26:49 -0300 eu sonhei que
Marlo [EMAIL PROTECTED] me dizia:
vc pode atualizar assim
baixe o souce
descompact
make menuconfig
make
make modules
make modules_install
não esqueça de instalar o make, o module-init-tools e o
No dia 26/07/2004 às 17:34,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] escreveu:
[...]
No Debian, a maneira mais indicada de se fazer isso é baixando o pacote
kernel-source-versão e o kernel-package, e executando:
Não sei qual o conhecimento do co-listeiro que originalmente postou a dúvida
sobre atualização do
Bertram Scharpf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
wie behebe ich folgendes Problem:
host:~# lsmod
Module Size Used byNot tainted
lsmod: QM_MODULES: Function not implemented
Kernel 2.6? module-init-tools nicht aktuell/installiert?
amd64 im cross-compile-chroot? UNAME_MACHINE
Hallo,
Am Sonntag, 25. Jul 2004, 18:46:32 +0200 schrieb Sven Hartge:
Bertram Scharpf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
wie behebe ich folgendes Problem:
host:~# lsmod
Module Size Used byNot tainted
lsmod: QM_MODULES: Function not implemented
Kernel 2.6?
On Mon, Jul 19, 2004 at 05:51:48AM -0400, Antonio Rodriguez wrote:
Where would I find a comprehensive discussion about the flaws, maturity and
problems related to kernels 2.6.*?
More exactly: comprehensive (as much as possible). sites are many, but
I haven't found any that is comprehensive.
This one's a pretty good what has changed, what new is available document.
As to the flaws, maturity and problems, I havn't seen one.
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk/docs/post-halloween-2.6.txt
Chris
On Mon, 19 Jul 2004, Antonio Rodriguez wrote:
On Mon, Jul 19, 2004 at 05:51:48AM -0400, Antonio
Hello
Chris Gorman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Mon, 19 Jul 2004, Antonio Rodriguez wrote:
On Mon, Jul 19, 2004 at 05:51:48AM -0400, Antonio Rodriguez wrote:
Where would I find a comprehensive discussion about the flaws,
maturity and problems related to kernels 2.6.*?
More exactly:
Silvan wrote:
On Tuesday 06 July 2004 11:00 am, Christoph Sticksel wrote:
What is the preferred way to load modules? modconf or
/etc/also/modultils/0.5? Does is matter that /etc/alsa/0.9 is empty?
I don't know what the preferred way is, I don't suppose. I always use
modconf, but that's
On Saturday 10 July 2004 08:54 am, Christoph Sticksel wrote:
| open(/dev/snd/controlC0, O_RDONLY)= -1 ENODEV (No such device)
| open(/dev/aloadC0, O_RDONLY) = -1 ENODEV (No such device)
| open(/dev/snd/controlC0, O_RDWR) = -1 ENODEV (No such device)
|
On Tuesday 06 July 2004 11:00 am, Christoph Sticksel wrote:
That's what I thought. This is what lsmod tells me about loaded modules
| snd_ac97_codec 70020 1 snd_ymfpci
[etc...]
That looks fine off-hand, though I don't know exactly what I should see there
for your hardware. I don't
Silvan wrote:
On Sunday 04 July 2004 01:14 pm, Christoph Sticksel wrote:
Everything sound-related is loaded and lsmod shows a whole bunch of snd_*
modules, snd, soundcore, opl3sa2 and ad1848 are there as well.
If I do a modprobe -r opl3sa2 and reload it with modprobe opl3sa2 I
see
I'm
On Sunday 04 July 2004 01:14 pm, Christoph Sticksel wrote:
Everything sound-related is loaded and lsmod shows a whole bunch of snd_*
modules, snd, soundcore, opl3sa2 and ad1848 are there as well.
If I do a modprobe -r opl3sa2 and reload it with modprobe opl3sa2 I see
I'm not familiar with
hej
Jag undrar om det finns några större nackdelar på att byta till kernel 2.6
istället för nuvarande 2.4?
jag tror inte det.
Anta att jag byter nu, går det smärtfritt att byta tillbaks till 2.4 om
jag märker problem? Inga andra filer i systemet som skadas?
du behöver paketet
co pokazuje lspci?
Pozdrawiam
Andrzej
00:00.0 Host bridge: nVidia Corporation: Unknown device 01e0 (rev c1)
00:00.1 RAM memory: nVidia Corporation: Unknown device 01eb (rev c1)
00:00.2 RAM memory: nVidia Corporation: Unknown device 01ee (rev c1)
00:00.3 RAM memory: nVidia Corporation: Unknown
Użytkownik adam napisał:
Mam pytanie czy wie może ktoś co trzeba zrobić,
Żeby przy wersji kernela 2.6.6 zaczął działać dzwięk
Z płyty głównej i sieciówka nvidii, bo wcześniej miałem
Kernela z serii 2.4.21 i wszystko działało
Zrobiłem wpisy w pliku /etc/modutils/local i już,
chciałem się
Dnia nie 6. czerwca 2004 20:48, adam napisał:
Mam pytanie czy wie może ktoś co trzeba zrobić,
Żeby przy wersji kernela 2.6.6 zaczął działać dzwięk
Z płyty głównej i sieciówka nvidii, bo wcześniej miałem
Kernela z serii 2.4.21 i wszystko działało
Zrobiłem wpisy w pliku /etc/modutils/local
Wiadomosc od adam, z dnia Sun, Jun 06, 2004 at 08:48:10PM +0200:
Mam pytanie czy wie może ktoś co trzeba zrobić,
Żeby przy wersji kernela 2.6.6 zaczął działać dzwięk
Z płyty głównej i sieciówka nvidii, bo wcześniej miałem
Kernela z serii 2.4.21 i wszystko działało
Zrobiłem wpisy w
Thanks Joris, but I would like make more a question:
What can I do to my symbolic link in /dev become permanent???
Hugs
Gilberto
Em Tue, 01 Jun 2004 23:18:17 +0200
Joris Huizer [EMAIL PROTECTED] escreveu:
Gilberto Villani Brito wrote:
Hi,
I'm using Kernel 2.6.4 in my desktop, so I
Gilberto Villani Brito wrote:
Hi,
I'm using Kernel 2.6.4 in my desktop, so I didn't note difference
about velocity, but I liked.
I have a nvidia and I need to create the devs to use the driver,
but when I restart my computer this devs disappear.
How can I do to this devs become permanent???
When I
Uwe Dippel escribió:
Having read around 100 posts on this list, I am still confused.
I do understand that we don't want scsi-emulation any longer. So far so
good.
I did change the link /dev/cdrom to /dev/hdb, consequentially.
In order to have access to the drive, I also had to chgrp cdrom
Sylvain a écrit :
Bonjour,
#error This driver does not support 2.6.x or newer
kernels
As tu essayé la derniere version du driver dispo sur le site de nvidia ?
Celle ci: NVIDIA-Linux-x86-1.0-5336-pkg1.run fonctionne tres bien avec un
noyau 2.6.5
bon courage :)
merci, tu as raison j'ai lancé
Bonjour,
#error This driver does not support 2.6.x or newer
kernels
As tu essayé la derniere version du driver dispo sur le site de nvidia ?
Celle ci: NVIDIA-Linux-x86-1.0-5336-pkg1.run fonctionne tres bien avec un
noyau 2.6.5
bon courage :)
On Tue, May 25, 2004 at 02:25:34AM +0200, franck
Aurélien Sanrey wrote:
J'ai recompilé le kernel 2.6 avec les modules alsa, mais par moments, le
son s'accélère et grésille pendant quelques secondes avant de redevenir
normal. D'ou cela peut-il venir Ma carte son est une AC97 sur
chipset via 82.
sur mon portable avec un chip VIA
bonjour,
Le samedi 22 mai 2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit...
C'est asser embêtant, j'aimerai bien un peu d'aide pour récupérer mon
2e disque dur! Si cela vous semble être un bug, j'aimerai un peu
d'aide pour savoir à qui m'adresser pour envoyer un rapport, parceque
là je n'ai
[EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
Selon [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Bonjour,
Bonjour
[...]
Il y'a 2 disques durs IDE, branchés sur le 1er controleur (ide1) et
aussi un lecteur cd IDE sur le 2e controleur. Quand tout est branché,
seule l'image du noyau 2.6.3-1-k7 fourni par le debian-installer
Selon daniel huhardeaux [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
Selon [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Bonjour,
Bonjour
[...]
Il y'a 2 disques durs IDE, branchés sur le 1er controleur (ide1) et
aussi un lecteur cd IDE sur le 2e controleur. Quand tout est branché,
seule
Hallo
Gernot Galli ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
mein Abenteuer mit dem 2.6er Kernel wird immer lustiger. Nachdem ich
schon massive Probleme mit Capi und dem Nvidia Modul habe (die Device
Files muessen bei jedem Neustart neu angelegt werden), kommen nun auch
noch Probleme mit meinen CD-Rom
On 21.5.2004 0:58 Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
On Thu, 20 May 2004, Andrei Badea wrote:
just upgraded to the 2.6 kernel (2.6.6) and when I reboot, the hard
drives are turned off. They are then powered on during the boot
Kernel bug. I hope it will be fixed in 2.6.7.
Thank you, it seems
Andrei Badea wrote:
On 21.5.2004 0:58 Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
On Thu, 20 May 2004, Andrei Badea wrote:
just upgraded to the 2.6 kernel (2.6.6) and when I reboot, the hard
drives are turned off. They are then powered on during the boot
Kernel bug. I hope it will be fixed in 2.6.7.
* Gernot Galli [EMAIL PROTECTED] [20-05-2004 18:47]:
cannot open /dev/capi20 or /dev/isdn/capi20
Schon mal versucht beim Booten das Modul capi zu laden?
Das sollte dann capifs und kernelcapi laden.
Eigentlich sind diese Dateien ja da, trotzdem gehts nicht.
Was heißt eigentlich? Benutzt du
Am Do, den 20.05.2004 um 17:53 Uhr +0200 schrieb Uwe Kerstan:
* Gernot Galli [EMAIL PROTECTED] [20-05-2004 18:47]:
cannot open /dev/capi20 or /dev/isdn/capi20
Schon mal versucht beim Booten das Modul capi zu laden?
Das sollte dann capifs und kernelcapi laden.
capi als Modul waerend des
On Thu, 20 May 2004, Andrei Badea wrote:
just upgraded to the 2.6 kernel (2.6.6) and when I reboot, the hard
drives are turned off. They are then powered on during the boot
Kernel bug. I hope it will be fixed in 2.6.7.
--
One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to
On Thursday 20 May 2004 06:58 pm, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
On Thu, 20 May 2004, Andrei Badea wrote:
just upgraded to the 2.6 kernel (2.6.6) and when I reboot, the hard
drives are turned off. They are then powered on during the boot
Kernel bug. I hope it will be fixed in 2.6.7.
Hallo,
dieser Fehler wird dadurch verursacht, dass die Partitionen mit den Attributen acl,user_xattr gemountet werden.
Durch ändern der Optionen zu defaults wird er beseitigt, allerdings ist das sicherlich nicht im Sinne des Erfinders. Ich bin
mir nicht sicher, ob er auch durch setzen bestimmter
Salut,
Le 12/05/2004 a 22:14:19 +0200, Aurélien Sanrey a ecrit :
tu as quel noyau 2.6.X et quel version de Debian ?
alors c'est le 2.6.1 sur la woody. En espérant que vous pourrez m'aider.
Il faut au moins changer de version. Jusqu'au 2.6.3, la liste des cartes sons
via correctement
On Thu, 13 May 2004 10:49:09 +0200
C. Mourad Jaber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bonjour,
Je suis en kernel 2.6.4 depuis qq temps et au démarage, il m'informe (
gentiment :) ) que le ide-scsi est deprécié et qu'il serait temps de
passer à autre chose... genre ide-cd...
Comment fonctionne ce
Aurélien Sanrey a écrit :
Salut,
J'ai recompilé le kernel 2.6 avec les modules alsa, mais par moments,
le son s'accélère et grésille pendant quelques secondes avant de
redevenir normal. D'ou cela peut-il venir Ma carte son est une AC97
sur chipset via 82.
Orel
Hello,
tu as
On Wed, 5 May 2004 22:08:25 -0300
caio ferreira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A minha duvida não é em relação a como compilar o kernel, mas como adequar
o debian stable para trabalhar com módulo do kernel 2.6
Pegue o config 2.4.xx e make oldconfig nele!
Não foi perfeito mas funciona.
--
Savio
On Tue, 04 May 2004 08:08:49 -0300
Stan ! [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Até onde eu sei, no debian compilar o 2.6 é a mesma coisa.. mas nunca
usei o 2.6 :P
Tem esse esquema aqui que eu tinha no meu bookmark, não sei se te ajuda
em algo : http://anarka.org/linux/debian_kernel.html
A
On Mon, 03 May 2004 16:31:59 -0300
Stan ! [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Da uma lida neste tutorial :
http://www.holtmann.org/linux/kernel/debian.html (em inglês). Ensina
como instalar o novo kernel no debian passo a passo..
Você por acaso teria algum link para o kernel 2.6 ?!?!?
--
Até onde eu sei, no debian compilar o 2.6 é a mesma coisa.. mas
nunca usei o 2.6 :P
Tem esse esquema aqui que eu tinha no meu bookmark, não sei se te
ajuda em algo : http://anarka.org/linux/debian_kernel.html
A minha maior duvida eh em relacao a modulo. Sei que o aplicativo
module-init-tools
Até onde eu sei, no debian compilar o 2.6 é a mesma coisa.. mas nunca
usei o 2.6 :P
Tem esse esquema aqui que eu tinha no meu bookmark, não sei se te ajuda
em algo : http://anarka.org/linux/debian_kernel.html
Falou !
MD
Você por acaso teria algum link para o kernel 2.6 ?!?!?
On Sun, 25 Apr 2004 07:30:05 +0200, Mike Chandler wrote:
I give up. What is wrong with k3b?
Everything. Especially the 'k'. Because it means you run KDE. Look at the
dependencies !
That is one of the great things of xcdroast: You can run it from any
desktop environment. Non-bloated ones, e.g.:
Marc Wilson wrote:
On Sat, Apr 24, 2004 at 07:49:20PM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
Uwe Dippel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I do understand that we don't want scsi-emulation any longer. So far so
good.
Whatwhatwhat? This changed? I upgraded from 2.4 to 2.6 and didn't
lose my
On Sun, 2004-04-25 at 10:00, Uwe Dippel wrote:
On Sun, 25 Apr 2004 07:30:05 +0200, Mike Chandler wrote:
I give up. What is wrong with k3b?
Everything. Especially the 'k'. Because it means you run KDE. Look at the
dependencies !
That is one of the great things of xcdroast: You can run it
On Sun, 25 Apr 2004 09:48:54 +0100, stephen parkinson wrote:
actually xcdroast works quite nicely, in 2.6 with hdc=cdrom hdd=cdrom
and no ide-scsi anywhere in sight
You *think* so; or it *does* ??
Then tell us your secret. I tried ... root=/dev/hda5 hdb=cdrom
and re-detected the drive, etc.,
Uwe Dippel wrote:
I did change the link /dev/cdrom to /dev/hdb, consequentially.
In order to have access to the drive, I also had to chgrp cdrom /dev/hdb.
Some posters say that you need to add hdc=cdrom to your boot
parameters. Is this correct ? Anything needed at all ?
In your case, since
Uwe Dippel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I do understand that we don't want scsi-emulation any longer. So far so
good.
Whatwhatwhat? This changed? I upgraded from 2.4 to 2.6 and didn't
lose my burner...I'm now confused and surprised I didn't.
--
Paul Johnson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux. You can
On Sat, Apr 24, 2004 at 07:49:20PM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
Uwe Dippel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I do understand that we don't want scsi-emulation any longer. So far so
good.
Whatwhatwhat? This changed? I upgraded from 2.4 to 2.6 and didn't
lose my burner...I'm now confused and
On Sat, 24 Apr 2004 23:00:08 +0200, Adam Aube wrote:
In your case, since your CD-ROM is /dev/hdb, that should be hdb=cdrom, not
hdc=cdrom.
Ah, sure. Typo.
Question is: *do* I need this boot parameter ??
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
On Sun, 25 Apr 2004 04:50:07 +0200, Paul Johnson wrote:
Whatwhatwhat? This changed? I upgraded from 2.4 to 2.6 and didn't
lose my burner...I'm now confused and surprised I didn't.
Because you left the scsi-emulation as boot parameter. But it is badly
broken in 2.6.X and Linus fully
On Sun, 25 Apr 2004 05:10:07 +0200, Marc Wilson wrote:
Ide-scsi will continue to work for some time.
It, actually, doesn't. At least, not in all occasions. It is considered
broken.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
Marc Wilson wrote:
It's true that ide-scsi is depreciated, but I can't think of a
single front-end to cdrecord that supports ATAPI device specifications
other than k3b, and who wants to use *that*?
Anyone want to put forward a front-end that does?
I use CDR Toaster without problems.
Adam
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Marc Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sat, Apr 24, 2004 at 07:49:20PM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
Uwe Dippel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I do understand that we don't want scsi-emulation any longer. So far so
good.
Whatwhatwhat? This
On Saturday 24 April 2004 09:21 pm, Paul Johnson wrote:
Marc Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sat, Apr 24, 2004 at 07:49:20PM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
Uwe Dippel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I do understand that we don't want scsi-emulation any longer. So far
so good.
Bonjour,
Le mer 21/04/2004 à 01:28, [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
En instable, avec le paquet kernel debian, je fais comme ça:
je suis aussi en unstable ;) ca tombe bien.
(paquets nvidia-glx et nvidia-kernel-source installés)
le glx install aussi un precompile en 2.4 c po grave je suppose
[EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
Kernel compiler version : 3.3.2
Detected compiler version : 3.3.3
You appear to be compiling the NVIDIA kernel module with
a compiler different from the one that was used to compile
the running kernel.
The compiler that will be used to compile this module has
On Tue, 2004-04-20 at 13:52, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bonjour à tous,
Salut :)
j'essai en vain d'installer le pilote nvidia sur un portable equipé d1
440 Go.
J'ai cherche un peu partout, apparement il existe une grosse
difference entre une installe sur un 2.4 et sur un 2.6. notamment en
Le Tue, 20 Apr 2004 14:14:59 +0200
Jerome Vandenende [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
On Tue, 2004-04-20 at 13:52, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bonjour à tous,
Salut :)
j'essai en vain d'installer le pilote nvidia sur un portable equipé d1
440 Go.
J'ai cherche un peu partout, apparement il
Bonjour,
Le mar 20/04/2004 à 13:52, [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
j'essai en vain d'installer le pilote nvidia sur un portable equipé d1
440 Go.
J'ai cherche un peu partout, apparement il existe une grosse
difference entre une installe sur un 2.4 et sur un 2.6. notamment en
ther me de
Bruno Muller a écrit :
Bonjour,
Le mar 20/04/2004 à 13:52, [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
j'essai en vain d'installer le pilote nvidia sur un portable equipé d1
440 Go.
J'ai cherche un peu partout, apparement il existe une grosse
difference entre une installe sur un 2.4 et sur un 2.6.
Hallo David!
On Tue, Apr 20, 2004 at 09:14:33AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anyone know when they will package sarge with the 2.6 kernel as a
default kernel instead of it being an add in?
Sarge and 2.6 as the default kernel? Well, I'd guess like »never«.
Maybe it will be the default
On Tue, Apr 20, 2004 at 04:54:50PM +0200, Florian Ernst wrote:
On Tue, Apr 20, 2004 at 09:14:33AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anyone know when they will package sarge with the 2.6 kernel as a
default kernel instead of it being an add in?
Sarge and 2.6 as the default kernel? Well,
On Tue, 2004-04-20 at 10:14, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anyone know when they will package sarge with the 2.6 kernel as a
default kernel instead of it being an add in?
I don`t know what you mean with package sarge, but new Mandrake 10
release has kernel 2.6.3.
See
Hello Colin!
On Tue, Apr 20, 2004 at 04:32:20PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
On Tue, Apr 20, 2004 at 04:54:50PM +0200, Florian Ernst wrote:
On Tue, Apr 20, 2004 at 09:14:33AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anyone know when they will package sarge with the 2.6 kernel as a
default
On Tue, Apr 20, 2004 at 06:07:21PM +0200, Florian Ernst wrote:
On Tue, Apr 20, 2004 at 04:32:20PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
On Tue, Apr 20, 2004 at 04:54:50PM +0200, Florian Ernst wrote:
Sarge and 2.6 as the default kernel? Well, I'd guess like »never«.
Maybe it will be the default in
OK, I see. I'm still somewhat surprised, but now I know what's what.
Thanks a lot,
Flo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi folk.
I have problem with using my USB Epson 2400 photo scanner.
uname -r
2.6.6-rc1
lsusb | grep -i epson
Bus 004 Device 002: ID 04b8:011b Seiko Epson Corp. Perfection 2400 Photo
...
sane-find-scanner | grep -i epson
found USB scanner (vendor=0x04b8 [EPSON], product=0x011b [EPSON
Hola.
Comprueba todo lo referente a la gestión de la energía (APM y/o ACPI).
Habitualmente suele fallar por eso.
Un saludo,
- Freud -
- Original Message -
From: Josep Lloret [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: debian-user-spanish@lists.debian.org
Sent: Monday, April 12, 2004 12:53
On Sun, Apr 11, 2004 at 10:19:21PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
I have a weird problem here: A machine with an XP 2200 downgraded to
1800 MHz, 256 Mb RAM and an nForce2 chipset. 512Mb swapspace exist.
Try turning APIC off. It's in the archives - nForce chipsets have
issues with APIC.
A
--
also sprach Antony Gelberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004.04.12.1611 +0200]:
Try turning APIC off. It's in the archives - nForce chipsets have
issues with APIC.
Per your request, I compiled a new kernel without APIC/IOAPIC
(realising only afterwards that I could have used kernel
parameters...).
On 03.Apr 2004 - 10:48:02, Klaus Becker wrote:
Check mal deine Kernelconfig
wie macht man das?
Hast du den Kernel selbst kompiliert? - Dann weisst du wo du suchen
musst.
Wenn nicht, dann vergiss die Frage...
Den Kernel (kernel-image-2.6.4-1-386) habe ich per apt-get install von
On Sun, Apr 04, 2004 at 02:56:57PM +0200, Peio wrote:
Aparte tambien he probado con el xfree-driver-synaptic, peror parece que
casualmente mi portatil no está soportado :(
Alguien con el mismo problema?
gracis por adelantado
Bueno, yo instalé esta semana mi nuevo portatil con touch-pad, lo
Am Samstag 03 April 2004 09:45 schrieb Klaus Becker:
Kann ich
durch Vergleich von woody mandrake herausfinden, was bei mir fehlt?
Ja. Allerdings ist nicht alles 1:1 übertragbar.
Besser wäre eine knoppix cd. AFAIK kommt am Montag mit der neuen c`t
eine vcr knoppix cd raus.
Hier mal eine
Am Samstag 03 April 2004 10:48 schrieb Klaus Becker:
Check mal deine Kernelconfig
wie macht man das?
Hast du den Kernel selbst kompiliert? - Dann weisst du wo du
suchen musst.
Wenn nicht, dann vergiss die Frage...
Den Kernel (kernel-image-2.6.4-1-386) habe ich per apt-get install
Hmm, wie sieht es denn aus wenn du mal mit tail -f
/dev/psaux checkst ob da ueberhaupt Daten von der Maus ankommen?
Hab' ich mal unter woody mit kernel 2.4 (unter dem ich jetzt schreibe)
probiert: da kommt gar nichts raus, der Befehl hängt (aber X funktionniert).
Woody mit kernel 2.6 hab' ich
* Klaus Becker wrote:
debian:/# apt-cache policy xserver-xfree86
xserver-xfree86:
Installed: 4.3.0-4.woody.1
Und was kann ich tun, damit dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xfree86 schreibt?
Die FAQ die XFree86 beiliegt lesen, da steht das drin.
Norbert
--
Haeufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten
On 02.Apr 2004 - 11:05:39, Klaus Becker wrote:
Hmm, wie sieht es denn aus wenn du mal mit tail -f
/dev/psaux checkst ob da ueberhaupt Daten von der Maus ankommen?
Hab' ich mal unter woody mit kernel 2.4 (unter dem ich jetzt schreibe)
probiert: da kommt gar nichts raus, der Befehl hängt
* Andreas Pakulat wrote:
On 02.Apr 2004 - 11:05:39, Klaus Becker wrote:
Und was kann ich tun, damit dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xfree86
schreibt?
apt-get remove --purge xserver-xfree86 und anschliessendes
Reinstall,
aua!
Norbert
--
Haeufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ):
On Fri, Apr 02, 2004 at 01:04:52AM -0800, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
^^
apt-get remove --purge xserver-xfree86 und anschliessendes Reinstall,
aber wozu? Ich meine soo kompliziert ist die X11-Config nun auch
Der erste April war gestern.
--
Jens Kubieziel
Und was kann ich tun, damit dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xfree86
schreibt?
apt-get remove --purge xserver-xfree86 und anschliessendes
Reinstall,
Hab' ich auch gemacht. Ebenso modprobe psmouse. Habe auch mit modconf
gesucht, was da fehlen könnte, aber nichts für die Mauserkennung
On 02.Apr 2004 - 12:04:17, Jens Kubieziel wrote:
On Fri, Apr 02, 2004 at 01:04:52AM -0800, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
^^
apt-get remove --purge xserver-xfree86 und anschliessendes Reinstall,
aber wozu? Ich meine soo kompliziert ist die X11-Config nun auch
Der erste April war
On 02.Apr 2004 - 15:08:27, Klaus Becker wrote:
Und was kann ich tun, damit dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xfree86
schreibt?
apt-get remove --purge xserver-xfree86 und anschliessendes
Reinstall,
Hab' ich auch gemacht.
Das war eigentlich ein Scherz
Ich möchte mir gerne eine
Am Freitag 02 April 2004 09:05 schrieb Klaus Becker:
OptionProtocolExplorerPS/2
Bist Du Dir sicher, dass das richtig ist?
Installier mal mdetect und gpm. Vielleicht kommst Du mit denen der Maus
auf die Spur?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ lsmod |grep mouse
busmouse7996 0
psmouse
On 02.Apr 2004 - 20:22:58, Gerhard Gaussling wrote:
Am Freitag 02 April 2004 09:05 schrieb Klaus Becker:
Option Protocol ExplorerPS/2
Bist Du Dir sicher, dass das richtig ist?
Klaus sicher nicht, aber ich schon. Ich hab das aus zuverlaessiger
Quelle, die ich
OptionProtocolExplorerPS/2
Bist Du Dir sicher, dass das richtig ist?
Mir wurde hier gesagt, kernel 2.6 verwendet dieses Protokoll, egal welche Maus
man hat.
Ich hab' mir inzwischen einen neuen Muserich zugelegt: Logitech Wheel
Optical. Ist eine USB-Maus, luft aber im Moment noch per Adapter
Installier mal mdetect und gpm. Vielleicht kommst Du mit denen der Maus
auf die Spur?
Ich habe woody-kernel 2.6 gestartet und folgendes gemacht:
mdetect: keine Ergebnis, sagt nichts
lsmod | grep mouse: psmouse 18184 0
cat /dev/psaux: no such file or device
ls -l /dev/psaux: crw--- 1
On 02.Apr 2004 - 22:56:28, Klaus Becker wrote:
Option Protocol ExplorerPS/2
habe folgendes gemacht:
chroot /mnt/rack/test1 (dort nistet woody mit kernel 2.6)
mdetect
/dev/psaux
intellimouse
So hast du aber trotzdem nicht den 2.6er Kernel benutzt. Du musst
On 02.Apr 2004 - 23:40:59, Klaus Becker wrote:
Installier mal mdetect und gpm. Vielleicht kommst Du mit denen der Maus
auf die Spur?
Ich habe woody-kernel 2.6 gestartet und folgendes gemacht:
Mit chroot oder richtigem Boot?
mdetect: keine Ergebnis, sagt nichts
lsmod | grep mouse:
Ich habe woody-kernel 2.6 gestartet und folgendes gemacht:
Mit chroot oder richtigem Boot?
mit richtigem Boot
mdetect: keine Ergebnis, sagt nichts
lsmod | grep mouse: psmouse 18184 0
cat /dev/psaux: no such file or device
ls -l /dev/psaux: crw--- 1 root root 10, Datum,
On 03.Apr 2004 - 09:45:13, Klaus Becker wrote:
Ich habe woody-kernel 2.6 gestartet und folgendes gemacht:
koennte es sein das noch
irgendwelche input-Module fehlen. Check mal deine Kernelconfig
wie macht man das?
Hast du den Kernel selbst kompiliert? - Dann weisst du wo du suchen
201 - 300 of 468 matches
Mail list logo
