On Wed, 02 Apr 2008 16:54:29 +0100
michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-04-02 at 11:36 -0400, Frank wrote:
> > Recently my Debian Sid installation has stopped mounting second
> > partition (/dev/hda3) on boot. As far as I know nothing has changed.
> >
> > /dev/hda3 /media/gutsy
Frank:
>
> Recently my Debian Sid installation has stopped mounting second partition
> (/dev/hda3) on boot. As far as I know nothing has changed.
What does 'mount /dev/hda3' print when executed as root? If it looks
like an error, what are the last few lines from 'dmesg'?
J.
--
Thy lyrics in pop
On Wed, 2008-04-02 at 11:36 -0400, Frank wrote:
> Recently my Debian Sid installation has stopped mounting second partition
> (/dev/hda3) on boot. As far as I know nothing has changed.
>
> Here's my fstab:
>
> # /etc/fstab: static file system information.
> #
> #
> proc
Mumia W.. wrote:
On 06/06/2007 01:01 PM, Mike McCarty wrote:
[...]
The BIOS has nothing to do with disc partitions. The BIOS works either
at an absolute physical level using geometric address: cylinder, head,
sector, or at a logical physical level (LBA) using logical sector
number. It has no ot
On 06/06/2007 01:01 PM, Mike McCarty wrote:
[...]
The BIOS has nothing to do with disc partitions. The BIOS works either
at an absolute physical level using geometric address: cylinder, head,
sector, or at a logical physical level (LBA) using logical sector
number. It has no other conception of t
Bob McGowan wrote:
Which is why I asked the question. I'm not a hardware engineer or
firmware developer, so having others, more knowledgeable than myself in
those areas provide helpful info, is good.
No criticism intended. I've posted this type of explanation on various
groups like this a few
Mike McCarty wrote:
Bob McGowan wrote:
Johannes Wiedersich wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
jeffry s wrote:
i am also wondering what all those partition type mean. can anyone
point
any
documentation about
the difference of amiga, bsd, dvh, gpt, mac, msdos, pc98, s390,
s
Bob McGowan wrote:
Johannes Wiedersich wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
jeffry s wrote:
i am also wondering what all those partition type mean. can anyone point
any
documentation about
the difference of amiga, bsd, dvh, gpt, mac, msdos, pc98, s390,
sun, loop?
It's just
Johannes Wiedersich wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
jeffry s wrote:
i am also wondering what all those partition type mean. can anyone point
any
documentation about
the difference of amiga, bsd, dvh, gpt, mac, msdos, pc98, s390,
sun, loop?
It's just a different format of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
jeffry s wrote:
> i am also wondering what all those partition type mean. can anyone point
> any
> documentation about
> the difference of amiga, bsd, dvh, gpt, mac, msdos, pc98, s390,
> sun, loop?
It's just a different format of how the start of your
On 6/5/07, Andrew Sackville-West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 11:49:46AM -0300, Marcelo Chiapparini wrote:
> Hello
>
> I am installing etch in a new hd. I am using the expertgui method.
> During the partition stage, I am asking about what type of partition
> table I should
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 11:49:46AM -0300, Marcelo Chiapparini wrote:
> Hello
>
> I am installing etch in a new hd. I am using the expertgui method.
> During the partition stage, I am asking about what type of partition
> table I should select: amiga, bsd, dvh, gpt, mac, msdos, pc98, s390,
> sun, l
Am 2007-03-08 13:14:02, schrieb Albert Dengg:
> who needs >2TB for /boot ?
M
I want to test all kernels from 1.0.0 to 9.9.99 at once
and want prepared for the future!
:-P
Thanks, Greetings and nice Day
Michelle Konzack
Systemadministrator
Tam
Am 2007-03-08 08:12:17, schrieb Jon Ingason:
> OK then, what is the logical limit? I have disk array with 14x500 GB
> disks with hardware raid 6. That i about 7 TB. Can the kernel handle
> that large filesystem and how do I do?
Yes it can, even with 2.4.27.
Thanks, Greetings and nice Day
Mich
On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 08:12:17AM +0100, Jon Ingason wrote:
> Roberto C. Sanchez skrev:
> > On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 04:52:12PM +0100, Jon Ingason wrote:
> >> What is the physical limit for a diskpartition in kernel 2.6?
> >>
> > I think the kernel has a logical limit. The physical limit is
> > de
On Thursday, 08.03.2007 at 13:14 +0100, Albert Dengg wrote:
> who needs >2TB for /boot ?
Well, I don't like throwing away all those old kernels ... ;-)
Dave.
--
Please don't CC me on list messages!
...
Dave Ewart - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
All email from me is now digitally
On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 07:00:10AM -0500, Michael Pobega wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 08:12:17AM +0100, Jon Ingason wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > Roberto C. Sanchez skrev:
> > > On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 04:52:12PM +0100, Jon Ingason wrote:
> > >> What is t
On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 08:12:17AM +0100, Jon Ingason wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Roberto C. Sanchez skrev:
> > On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 04:52:12PM +0100, Jon Ingason wrote:
> >> What is the physical limit for a diskpartition in kernel 2.6?
> >>
> > I think the kern
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Roberto C. Sanchez skrev:
> On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 04:52:12PM +0100, Jon Ingason wrote:
>> What is the physical limit for a diskpartition in kernel 2.6?
>>
> I think the kernel has a logical limit. The physical limit is
> determined by your hardware.
On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 04:52:12PM +0100, Jon Ingason wrote:
> What is the physical limit for a diskpartition in kernel 2.6?
>
I think the kernel has a logical limit. The physical limit is
determined by your hardware.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sanchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
On Sun, Feb 04, 2007 at 09:46:36PM -0800, rocky wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> On my PC I have 2 hard disks. The primary one has Windows XP
> installed. Afterwards, I decide to learn Linux. So I got another Hard
> disk and installed Debian stable successfully on it. Now, I'm thinking
> of make my PC serve
rocky wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> On my PC I have 2 hard disks. The primary one has Windows XP
> installed. Afterwards, I decide to learn Linux. So I got another Hard
> disk and installed Debian stable successfully on it. Now, I'm thinking
> of make my PC serve as the file back up server for my home offi
Hey all,
On my PC I have 2 hard disks. The primary one has Windows XP
installed. Afterwards, I decide to learn Linux. So I got another Hard
disk and installed Debian stable successfully on it. Now, I'm thinking
of make my PC serve as the file back up server for my home office. I
will install back
Ok, thank you very much.
Im reading and trying LVM and rsnapshot and for while Ill use rsnapshot.
But both are excelent altenatives. Later Ill read about amanda too.
Thank you by hints
Tom
- Original Message -
From: "tomlobato" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, Apr
Digby Tarvin wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 03:41:26PM +0100, George Borisov wrote:
>> Ron Johnson wrote:
>>> dd? Only if the restore-partition is the *exact* same size, right?
>> Same, or larger. If it is larger then you resize the partition after dd
>> to the actual maximum size. We do this wi
On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 07:41:59PM +0200, Andreas Rippl wrote:
> have you thought about using something like rsync? It will speed up the
> process of taking images tremenduously. As you are talking about a diary
> backup - I'm not too sure what you mean by that - have you looked at
> rsnapshot? He
On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 03:41:26PM +0100, George Borisov wrote:
> Ron Johnson wrote:
> >
> > dd? Only if the restore-partition is the *exact* same size, right?
>
> Same, or larger. If it is larger then you resize the partition after dd
> to the actual maximum size. We do this with NTFS disk imag
On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 07:41:59PM +0200, Andreas Rippl wrote:
>
> #!/bin/bash
>
> /bin/rm -rf /mnt/sda1/backup/daily.6/
> mv /mnt/sda1/backup/daily.5/ /mnt/sda1/backup/daily.6/
> mv /mnt/sda1/backup/daily.4/ /mnt/sda1/backup/daily.5/
> mv /mnt/sda1/backup/daily.3/ /mnt/sda1/backup/daily.4/
>
On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 11:15:22AM -0300, tomlobato wrote:
Content-Description: Mail message body
>
> Hi!
>
>
> It is possible to make partition image on the fly? With the system (*Linux
> server) running?
>
> I think in the aproach: At midnigth (less system use), the script remounts
tomlobato wrote:
>
> It is possible to make partition image on the fly? With the system (*Linux
> server) running?
>
> I think in the aproach: At midnigth (less system use), the script remounts
> partition readonly by some minutes while put the output of 'dd if=/dev/...'
> to a file in an
Ron Johnson wrote:
>
> dd? Only if the restore-partition is the *exact* same size, right?
Same, or larger. If it is larger then you resize the partition after dd
to the actual maximum size. We do this with NTFS disk images all the
time, I assume ext2/3 will work just as well.
--
George Boriso
On Tue, 2006-04-18 at 11:15 -0300, tomlobato wrote:
> Hi!
>
>
> It is possible to make partition image on the fly? With the system (*Linux
> server) running?
>
> I think in the aproach: At midnigth (less system use), the script remounts
> partition readonly by some minutes while put th
On Sat, 21 Jan 2006 15:56:17 + (GMT)
david cuthbertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> Sorry, I am still learning, so not very good at
> explaining things.
>
> /dev/hda1 is winxp
> I now know that /dev/hda2 is the extended partition
> Then comes Debian:
> /dev/hda5 is swap
> /dev/hda7 is /
Hi,
Sorry, I am still learning, so not very good at
explaining things.
/dev/hda1 is winxp
I now know that /dev/hda2 is the extended partition
Then comes Debian:
/dev/hda5 is swap
/dev/hda7 is /home (ext3)
/dev/hda6 is / (and everything else) (ext3)
There are no other unused partitons or unpartitio
david cuthbertson wrote:
Hi,
Mounting /dev/hda2 or /dev/hda6 to backup my
hard-drive fails. /dev/hda7 mounts OK.
Running fdisk I get:
Command (m for help): p
Disk /dev/hda: 20.4 GB, 20490559488 bytes
16 heads, 63 sectors/track, 39703 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 1008 * 512 = 516096 bytes
Command (m for help): p
Disk /dev/hda: 20.4 GB, 20490559488 bytes
16 heads, 63 sectors/track, 39703 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 1008 * 512 = 516096 bytes
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id
System
/dev/hda1 1 13564 6836224+ 7
HPFS/NTFS
/dev/hda2
On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 01:11:53AM -0800, scanda wrote:
> ==> update
>
> i've another laptop ( an old texas instrument ) with debian sarge,
> kernel 2.4
>
> if i plug the usb pen ( iomega mini 128 ) i've the same problem
>
> afther the command "fdisk -l /dev/sda" udev find the sda1 partit
==> update
i've another laptop ( an old texas instrument ) with debian sarge,
kernel 2.4
if i plug the usb pen ( iomega mini 128 ) i've the same problem
afther the command "fdisk -l /dev/sda" udev find the sda1 partition
and
everything went ok
any idea
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
On 11 Jan 2006 07:55:03 -0800, scanda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> i'm a debian sarge user, i've it on a compaq nx9010 with 2.6 kernel.
> when i plug my usb pen ( iomega mini 128 usb 1.1 ) udev find it and
> create the /dev/sda device but don't find the sda1 partition (FAT32)
by google sear
On Wed, 2006-01-11 at 18:00 +0100, Pascal Huisman wrote:
> I made a partition on a new disk, sda1 with size of approx. 189 Gig.
>
> But when I use df the size reported back, is 20 GB.
>
> What I did which led to this is:
> With partimage I copied a image from a different hdd (size 20GB) to a
On Wed, 11 Jan 2006 12:33:03 -0500
Hal Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wednesday 11 January 2006 12:00 pm, Pascal Huisman wrote:
> > I made a partition on a new disk, sda1 with size of approx. 189 Gig.
> >
> > But when I use df the size reported back, is 20 GB.
> >
> > What I did which led
On Wednesday 11 January 2006 12:00 pm, Pascal Huisman wrote:
> I made a partition on a new disk, sda1 with size of approx. 189 Gig.
>
> But when I use df the size reported back, is 20 GB.
>
> What I did which led to this is:
> With partimage I copied a image from a different hdd (size 20GB) to a
On 8 Jun 2005 12:05:38 -0700
"prash" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hello,
> i have a spanking new machine with a 40 gb hard disk - all for my
> favorite distro! of course too much space is a bad thing too
> (especially when you don't know how to allocate it).
> i have decided on this scheme to
prash wrote:
hello,
i installed the partitions using lvm on my home machine which only
has 10 GB.
here is a df -h:
mantra:/home/prash# df -h
FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/mapper/rootvol-root
1.7G 200M 1.4G 13% /
tmpfs 126M
hello,
i installed the partitions using lvm on my home machine which only
has 10 GB.
here is a df -h:
mantra:/home/prash# df -h
FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/mapper/rootvol-root
1.7G 200M 1.4G 13% /
tmpfs 126M 0 126M
Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
On Thu, Jun 09, 2005 at 03:21:57PM +0100, Graham Smith wrote:
When I first tried out the new installer yes I did read what documentation was
available (the version of the installer I used was a pretty early release so I
thought it would be worth mugging up on it) but
On Thu, Jun 09, 2005 at 03:21:57PM +0100, Graham Smith wrote:
>
> When I first tried out the new installer yes I did read what documentation
> was
> available (the version of the installer I used was a pretty early release so
> I
> thought it would be worth mugging up on it) but I admit that t
thanks everyone for your suggestions.
i do accept that lvm was a little difficult to grasp, but once i got
the hang of it, it was a breeze. thanks roberto for a great idea!
the thing i forgot to do that made me confused for awhile, was that i
did not set the single partition to be of type "Physical
Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
On Thu, Jun 09, 2005 at 12:28:44PM +0100, Graham Smith wrote:
If you have not yet installed, then don't worry about it. The installer
lets you choose LVM as an option. Then you can add your harddrive as a
physical volume and then make it the logical volume. From the
On Thu, Jun 09, 2005 at 12:28:44PM +0100, Graham Smith wrote:
> >If you have not yet installed, then don't worry about it. The installer
> >lets you choose LVM as an option. Then you can add your harddrive as a
> >physical volume and then make it the logical volume. From there you can
> >create
If you have not yet installed, then don't worry about it. The installer
lets you choose LVM as an option. Then you can add your harddrive as a
physical volume and then make it the logical volume. From there you can
create volume groups, which are analogous to partitions but can be
resized at w
On Wednesday June 8 2005 12:05 pm, prash wrote:
> hello,
> 1. why should i (and how can i) define a /tmp partition when i
> don't know what temporary space each app might take? a dvd burner
> might decide to take 4 gb, a regular app just 10 kb. if i go higher
> it's a waste 95% of the time, lower a
On Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 03:07:12PM -0700, prash wrote:
> Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> >
> > Scrap the whole scheme. Just use LVM. Trust me on this. It is quite
> > worth it. Setting up LVM on a new drive is a piece of cake. Trying to
> > do it once the drive has been in use for a year and you h
Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 12:05:38PM -0700, prash wrote:
> > hello,
> > i have a spanking new machine with a 40 gb hard disk - all for my
> > favorite distro! of course too much space is a bad thing too
> > (especially when you don't know how to allocate it).
> > i hav
On 2005-06-08, prash wrote:
> hello,
> i have a spanking new machine with a 40 gb hard disk - all for my
> favorite distro! of course too much space is a bad thing too
> (especially when you don't know how to allocate it).
> i have decided on this scheme to begin with:
> / : 7.
prash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| hello,
| i have a spanking new machine with a 40 gb hard disk - all for my
| favorite distro! of course too much space is a bad thing too
| (especially when you don't know how to allocate it).
| i have decided on this scheme to begin with:
| /
On Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 12:05:38PM -0700, prash wrote:
> hello,
> i have a spanking new machine with a 40 gb hard disk - all for my
> favorite distro! of course too much space is a bad thing too
> (especially when you don't know how to allocate it).
> i have decided on this scheme to begin with
At Tuesday, 14 December 2004, David Baron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Tuesday 14 December 2004 19:15, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
debian.org
>wrote:
>> After reboot, partitioning /dev/hdd and formating /dev/hdd partitions,
>> I fdisk -l /dev/hdc (and all drives for that matter) and I was
>> surprised
On Tuesday 14 December 2004 19:15, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> After reboot, partitioning /dev/hdd and formating /dev/hdd partitions,
> I fdisk -l /dev/hdc (and all drives for that matter) and I was
> surprised to see that the partition table is now correct after rebooting
> -- hdc was the drive t
You can also try "regular" parted, in the "parted" package.
This is a command-line tool, very reliable, and fairly easy to use.
Personally I'd rather not use a GUI to munge my partitions,
especially as the X server has not been all that stable lately.
qtparted is a frontend to parted.
Unfortunat
On Monday, 13.12.2004 at 08:57 +0200, David Baron wrote:
> QTparted is a very dangerous program.
Rubbish, unless you can provide some evidence?
I have used qtparted for a couple of years to resize partitions, without
any problems.
Dave.
--
Dave Ewart - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - jabber: [EMAIL PROTEC
Dnia 13-12-2004 10:56,Francois Cerbelle napisał:
> Le Mon, Dec 13, 2004 at 08:57:20AM +0200, David Baron ecrit :
>> On Monday 13 December 2004 06:33, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> wrote:
>> > I suggest you to download the Knoppix CD and use QTparted which is
>> > some sort of PartitionMagic clone.
>>
>> B
At Monday, 13 December 2004, Harland Christofferson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
com> wrote:
>At Monday, 13 December 2004, Dave Ewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>*snip*
>>
>>To be honest, I'm not sure. If you were planning to re-partition and
>>fdisk, the
At Monday, 13 December 2004, Dave Ewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
*snip*
>
>To be honest, I'm not sure. If you were planning to re-partition and
>fdisk, then you'll be backing up anyway ... So, do you backup, then try
>qtparted :-)
>
>Dave.
>--
>Dave Ew
On Monday 13 December 2004 17:24, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> Interesting. Will this work if I have to fix partitions that do not
> end on cylinder boundaries?
If it does in fact read them at all -- don't dare. At least in my case it
complains and exits leaving my partitions, for better or for wo
to later format the partitions,
> great!
To be honest, I'm not sure. If you were planning to re-partition and
fdisk, then you'll be backing up anyway ... So, do you backup, then try
qtparted :-)
Dave.
--
Dave Ewart - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
All email from me
On Monday 13 December 2004 15:36, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> > QTparted is a very dangerous program.
>
> Rubbish, unless you can provide some evidence?
In PartitionMagic (costs $), you set up your steps and then commit. Worked
perfectly first time out. QTparted looks like it works like this but
At Monday, 13 December 2004, Dave Ewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Monday, 13.12.2004 at 08:57 +0200, David Baron wrote:
>
>> QTparted is a very dangerous program.
>
>Rubbish, unless you can provide some evidence?
>
>I have used qtparted for a couple of years to resize partitions,
without
>any
Le Mon, Dec 13, 2004 at 08:57:20AM +0200, David Baron ecrit :
> On Monday 13 December 2004 06:33, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > I suggest you to download the Knoppix CD and use QTparted which is
> > some sort of PartitionMagic clone.
>
> Back it up first.
> PartitionMagic, if it does not complai
On Monday 13 December 2004 06:33, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> I suggest you to download the Knoppix CD and use QTparted which is
> some sort of PartitionMagic clone.
Back it up first.
PartitionMagic, if it does not complain about the partitions, will usually do
just fine. QTparted is a very dang
On Sun, Dec 12, 2004 at 01:22:33PM +, Leonard Chatagnier wrote:
> Trying to upgrade to Sarge and discovered that on my last reinstall of
> woody that I switched the partition sizes on /var and /home. Now /var
> is too small to hold packages when doing apt-get dist-upgrade. My
> question is
Apparently, _Leonard Chatagnier_, on 12/12/04 08:22,typed:
Please copy any response to [EMAIL PROTECTED] as I can't cope with all
the lists messages when subscribed.
Then why don't you start using gmane newsgoups?
http://gmane.org/
With this you can read the mailing ist in a newsreader and you can
Le Sun, Dec 12, 2004 at 01:22:33PM +, Leonard Chatagnier ecrit :
> Trying to upgrade to Sarge and discovered that on my last reinstall
> of woody that I switched the partition sizes on /var and /home. Now
> /var is too small to hold packages when doing apt-get dist-upgrade.
> My question is: C
Hello
Leonard Chatagnier (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote:
> Trying to upgrade to Sarge and discovered that on my last reinstall of
> woody that I switched the partition sizes on /var and /home. Now /var
> is too small to hold packages when doing apt-get dist-upgrade. My
> question is: Can I resize
belahcene wrote:
Hi every body,
I have a machine with only ONE partion where win$ is installed,
I want the equivalent of magicPartition ( something like diskdrake of
mandrake on debian), either on windows or on linux ( to run it from
knoppix) to create a new partition without loosing the co
yes may be resize2fs could do it I don't check it , but don't forget
that I want to resize the partition, before installing the linux, if it
is , why to resize ??
so I want to use it either via gnoppix, knoppix or any other live-cd,
or from windows.
I tried on Knoppix 3.6, it 's true that qtpa
Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
belahcene <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 25/11/2004 10:57:25 AM:
> Hi every body,
> I have a machine with only ONE partion where win$ is installed,
> I want the equivalent of magicPartition ( something like diskdrake of
> mandrake on debian), e
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
belahcene <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 25/11/2004 10:57:25 AM:
> Hi every body,
> I have a machine with only ONE partion where win$ is installed,
> I want the equivalent of magicPartition ( something like diskdrake of
> mandrake on debian), either on windows or on
thank you I find it,
this tool is not integarted to the debian installeur ?
I is in suse!! suse ( this is not the case for RH ou fedora at least
for RC2) at the installation step, gives the possibility for disk
partitionning.
it will be very usefull, if it is integrated in next releases!!
t
Hi!
belahcene <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 25/11/2004
10:57:25 AM:
> Hi every body,
> I have a machine with only ONE partion where win$ is installed,
> I want the equivalent of magicPartition ( something like diskdrake
of
> mandrake on debian), either on windows or on linux ( to run
it from
on Tue, Sep 28, 2004 at 11:07:03PM +0100, Gerard Robin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> Hello,
> I have a problem with my partition /var which seems to be too small.
> When it is full my system deosn't work fine, for example: fetchmail can't
> download my messages in /var/mail/mylogin.
> To solve t
On Tue, Sep 28, 2004 at 05:14:36PM -0500, Patrick Albuquerque wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 28, 2004 at 11:07:03PM +0100, Gerard Robin wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> > I have a problem with my partition /var which seems to be too small.
> > When it is full my system deosn't work fine, for example: fetchmail can't
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Sep 28, 2004 at 11:07:03PM +0100, Gerard Robin wrote:
>
> Hello,
> I have a problem with my partition /var which seems to be too small.
> When it is full my system deosn't work fine, for example: fetchmail can't
> download my messages in /var
On Wed, Sep 29, 2004 at 12:08:54AM +0100, Gerard Robin wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 28, 2004 at 11:28:31PM +0200, Frank Gevaerts wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 28, 2004 at 11:07:03PM +0100, Gerard Robin wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello,
> > > I have a problem with my partition /var which seems to be too small.
> > >
On Tue, Sep 28, 2004 at 11:07:03PM +0100, Gerard Robin wrote:
>
> Hello,
> I have a problem with my partition /var which seems to be too small.
> When it is full my system deosn't work fine, for example: fetchmail can't
> download my messages in /var/mail/mylogin.
> To solve the problem temporari
On Tue, Sep 28, 2004 at 11:28:31PM +0200, Frank Gevaerts wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 28, 2004 at 11:07:03PM +0100, Gerard Robin wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> > I have a problem with my partition /var which seems to be too small.
> > When it is full my system deosn't work fine, for example: fetchmail can't
On Tue, Sep 28, 2004 at 11:07:03PM +0100, Gerard Robin wrote:
>
> Hello,
> I have a problem with my partition /var which seems to be too small.
> When it is full my system deosn't work fine, for example: fetchmail can't
> download my messages in /var/mail/mylogin.
> To solve the problem temporari
On Tue, Sep 28, 2004 at 11:07:03PM +0100, Gerard Robin wrote:
>
> Hello,
> I have a problem with my partition /var which seems to be too small.
> When it is full my system deosn't work fine, for example: fetchmail can't
> download my messages in /var/mail/mylogin.
> To solve the problem temporari
On Mon, Sep 27, 2004 at 10:36:45AM +1200, cr wrote:
> On Sun, 26 Sep 2004 04:01, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Hello all,
> > I had a dual boot system with Windows and Linux
> > installed. Bought a new cd writer and found out I had to
> > upgrade win 98 to SE to use new software for writer. SE
>
On Sunday 26 September 2004 07:02 pm, Alvin Oga wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 25, 2004 at 12:01:01PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > wrote:
>
> > > My question is How do I reformat my second hard
> > > drive that is presently Fat 32 windows so that Linux can
> > > use it for backup. I tried cfdisk b
On Saturday 25 September 2004 04:02 pm, Douglas G. Pollard Sr. wrote:
> hda: Maxtor 6E040L0, ATA DISK drive
> hdb: Maxtor 88400D8, ATA DISK drive
> /dev/ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0: [PTBL] [4998/255/63] p1 p2 < p5 >
> /dev/ide/host0/bus0/target1/lun0: [PTBL] [1021/255/63] p1
Looks like it shou
On Sat, 25 Sep 2004, Stefan O'Rear wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 25, 2004 at 12:01:01PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > My question is How do I reformat my second hard
> > drive that is presently Fat 32 windows so that Linux can
> > use it for backup. I tried cfdisk but linux cannot see th
On Sun, 26 Sep 2004 04:01, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello all,
> I had a dual boot system with Windows and Linux
> installed. Bought a new cd writer and found out I had to
> upgrade win 98 to SE to use new software for writer. SE
> costs more than the writer did. Nuts to microsoft.
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 25 Sep 2004, Douglas G. Pollard Sr. wrote:
This is the output from/sbin/lsmod. Sorry it took so long to get back. had a
configuration problem with kmail.
Module Size Used byNot tainted
input 3040 0 (auto
On Saturday 25 September 2004 12:10 pm, Stefan O'Rear wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 25, 2004 at 12:01:01PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Hello all,
> > I had a dual boot system with Windows and Linux
> > installed. Bought a new cd writer and found out I had to
> > upgrade win 98 to SE to use new s
On Sat, Sep 25, 2004 at 12:01:01PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello all,
> I had a dual boot system with Windows and Linux
> installed. Bought a new cd writer and found out I had to
> upgrade win 98 to SE to use new software for writer. SE
> costs more than the writer did. Nuts to
Russel Hill wrote:
Rob Benton wrote:
Yeah I've got a Seagate Barracuda 40 GB. I think the next thing I'll
try is using cfdisk to create my partitions and then just use the
sarge iso for installing. I'll report back later.
Any luck/news so far?
-
DISCLAIM
Russel Hill wrote:
Rob Benton wrote:
Hey I posted a couple weeks ago about not being able to boot w/grub
after installing from a sarge iso. I wound up returning the drive
b/c I thought it was bad. I got a new one in yesterday and I'm still
having the same problems.
install root to hdb1.
insta
Rob Benton wrote:
Hey I posted a couple weeks ago about not being able to boot w/grub
after installing from a sarge iso. I wound up returning the drive b/c I
thought it was bad. I got a new one in yesterday and I'm still having
the same problems.
install root to hdb1.
install grub to hdb1.
re
Cheers Patrick, that's helpful to know.
There's no decent reason for the small partition sizes - just me not
knowing what I'm doing :-/
Hey, if I changed the name from blue, I'd have to give it a paint job.
You'll just have to live with it :-P
Cheers,
Dave.
On 11/06/04 21:28, Patrick Lane wrote
201 - 300 of 551 matches
Mail list logo
