Johannes Wiedersich schreef:
Ron Johnson wrote:
On 2010-04-20 07:27, Merciadri Luca wrote:
[snip]
Yes, but there are some nuances. Let's take my example: how would you
have done this? You need to transmit the document, but the receivers are
sufficiently dishonest to print it and to claim they
Sjoerd Hardeman wrote:
Johannes Wiedersich schreef:
May I advertise arXiv for this purpose? http://arxiv.org/
arXiv is a nice website. I tried it, but there is already a repo for my
university. Thanks.
--
Merciadri Luca
See http://www.student.montefiore.ulg.ac.be/~merciadri/
I use PGP. If
Ron Johnson wrote:
On 2010-04-20 07:27, Merciadri Luca wrote:
[snip]
Haven't Academicians had this problem for centuries? How have the
rest of them solved it in the past 30 years?
Sure. I don't know precisely.
In addition to a watermark, in both the header and footer I'd write
something
On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 10:13:01 -0400 (EDT), Merciadri Luca wrote:
One can still chop off header and footers. That is fairly easy.
I haven't been following this thread. I just took a look at it today,
primarily because there's been so much activity on it. So it's quite
possible that I'm repeating
Stephen Powell wrote:
On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 10:13:01 -0400 (EDT), Merciadri Luca wrote:
I haven't been following this thread. I just took a look at it today,
primarily because there's been so much activity on it. So it's quite
possible that I'm repeating sentiments that have been
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ron Johnson wrote:
On 2010-04-20 07:27, Merciadri Luca wrote:
[snip]
Yes, but there are some nuances. Let's take my example: how would you
have done this? You need to transmit the document, but the receivers are
sufficiently dishonest to print it
6 matches
Mail list logo
