Hi all.
> Worked fine with 2.6.22-4 here. AMD Turion (K7) if that helps. I run
> Testing.
I'm running VMWare Server (released free as the Player) with
2.6.22-3-686 (Centrino Duo) on lenny/sid.
To build correctly the modules , i use the "vmware-any-any-update",
that is a tool released by the VM
On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 06:16:23PM +0100, Chris wrote:
> anyone know what kernels the VMware modules compile under? Last I checked it
> did't work with current kernels and I'm stuck at 2.6.20, although I haven't
> tried it lately with newer kernels.
Worked fine with 2.6.22-4 here. AMD Turion
On Wednesday 02 January 2008, Carl Fink wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 01, 2008 at 09:52:36PM -0500, Andrew Malcolmson wrote:
> > On Tue, 1 Jan 2008 20:46:47 -0500, "Carl Fink" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > said:
> > > VMWare Player's source has been released. Does anyone know why it
> > > isn't packaged for
> This is what happens when I don't check myself. I found this page:
>
> http://www.vmware.com/download/open_source.html
>
> I assumed that if Player was listed here, they were releasing its source.
> Actually this is just a confusing page they use to contribute back any Open
> Source software
On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 01:22:52PM +0200, Sami Kallio wrote:
> I couldn't find any information about the license for VMWare Player on
> vmware webpage, I only could find the EULA which reads:
>
> "3.2 License Limitations. You may not copy the Software except for a
> reasonable number of machine-r
On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 09:18:52AM -0200, Cassiano Bertol Leal wrote:
> I don't think VirtualBox has such a conversion utility, but I'm almost
> sure that you can use one created by vmware's on VirtualBox. I have
> successfully run two physical Windows installs inside VirtualBox with
> just a l
On Tue, 2008-01-01 at 20:46 -0500, Carl Fink wrote:
> VMWare Player's source has been released. Does anyone know why it
> isn't
> packaged for Debian? Should I just submit an RTP?
I couldn't find any information about the license for VMWare Player on
vmware webpage, I only could find the EULA whi
Carl Fink wrote:
On Tue, Jan 01, 2008 at 09:52:36PM -0500, Andrew Malcolmson wrote:
On Tue, 1 Jan 2008 20:46:47 -0500, "Carl Fink" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
said:
VMWare Player's source has been released. Does anyone know why it isn't
packaged for Debian? Should I just submit an RTP?
--
FYI: a sim
On Tue, Jan 01, 2008 at 09:52:36PM -0500, Andrew Malcolmson wrote:
> On Tue, 1 Jan 2008 20:46:47 -0500, "Carl Fink" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> said:
> > VMWare Player's source has been released. Does anyone know why it isn't
> > packaged for Debian? Should I just submit an RTP?
> > --
>
> FYI: a sim
On Tue, 1 Jan 2008 20:46:47 -0500, "Carl Fink" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
said:
> VMWare Player's source has been released. Does anyone know why it isn't
> packaged for Debian? Should I just submit an RTP?
> --
FYI: a similar program 'Virtual Box' is packaged for Debian.
http://debaday.debian.net/200
On Jan 1, 2008 5:46 PM, Carl Fink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> VMWare Player's source has been released. Does anyone know why it isn't
> packaged for Debian?
Nobody's packaged it yet? What's the licensing like on it?
> Should I just submit an RTP?
Couldn't hurt...
--
Paul Johnson
[EMAIL PROT
"koffiejunkie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> > I had to reload new firmware to a Packard Bell AudioKey FM player
because I
> > had stupidly reformatted the vfat fs on it.
> > Problem: qemu' s USB service stinks, but it' s samba use is very g
Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
I had to reload new firmware to a Packard Bell AudioKey FM player because I
had stupidly reformatted the vfat fs on it.
Problem: qemu' s USB service stinks, but it' s samba use is very good. Could
not use it with the AudioKey inserted: system would hang. But it' s use of
sa
On Thursday 16 August 2007, Dr. Jennifer Nussbaum wrote:
> Hi, sorry if this is too basic or offtopic a question,
> but i didnt see a debian-newbie list or anything.
>
> Im running Etch on an IBM ThinkPad T60. I need to run
> a Windows application on it, so i installed VMWare
> Server
> following s
Dr. Jennifer Nussbaum wrote:
> Hi, sorry if this is too basic or offtopic a question,
> but i didnt see a debian-newbie list or anything.
>
> Im running Etch on an IBM ThinkPad T60. I need to run
> a Windows application on it, so i installed VMWare
> Server
> following some detailed instructions i
I'm in the process of trying to reconfigure VMWare Workstation 5.0 after
upgrading to Etch. I also saw the error you mention. In my case, it was
caused by not having the folder asm present in /usr/src/linux/include. I
created the symlink asm-->asm-i386 which resolved this particular issue.
U
Scott Reese wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Freddy Freeloader wrote:
Scott Reese wrote:
Freddy Freeloader wrote:
Hi All,
I have run across something in vmware-server that has me buffaloed. It
installs fine, but when I attempt to install Win2K server as a guest
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Freddy Freeloader wrote:
> Scott Reese wrote:
> Freddy Freeloader wrote:
>
Hi All,
I have run across something in vmware-server that has me buffaloed. It
installs fine, but when I attempt to install Win2K server as a guest OS
>>>
Scott Reese wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Freddy Freeloader wrote:
Hi All,
I have run across something in vmware-server that has me buffaloed. It
installs fine, but when I attempt to install Win2K server as a guest OS
things go wrong in a fairly strange way. It's as
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Freddy Freeloader wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I have run across something in vmware-server that has me buffaloed. It
> installs fine, but when I attempt to install Win2K server as a guest OS
> things go wrong in a fairly strange way. It's as if the guest O
Le samedi 17 mars 2007 03:53, Freddy Freeloader a écrit :
> Hi All,
>
> I have run across something in vmware-server that has me buffaloed. It
> installs fine, but when I attempt to install Win2K server as a guest OS
> things go wrong in a fairly strange way. It's as if the guest OS loses
> track
Mihira Fernando wrote:
Freddy Freeloader wrote:
Hi All,
I have run across something in vmware-server that has me buffaloed.
It installs fine, but when I attempt to install Win2K server as a
guest OS things go wrong in a fairly strange way. It's as if the
guest OS loses track of it's own ab
Freddy Freeloader wrote:
Hi All,
I have run across something in vmware-server that has me buffaloed. It
installs fine, but when I attempt to install Win2K server as a guest OS
things go wrong in a fairly strange way. It's as if the guest OS loses
track of it's own ability to keep track of t
On 3/10/07, Adrian Midgley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
"The directory of kernel headers (version @@VMWARE@@ UTS_RELEASE) does
not match
your running kernel (version 2.6.18-3-686). Even if the module were to
compile
successfully, it would not load into the running kernel.
What is the location of
On Mon, 2007-03-12 at 02:06 -0300, Bruno Buys wrote:
> Greg Folkert wrote:
> > On Sat, 2007-03-10 at 23:21 +, Adrian Midgley wrote:
> >
> >> "The directory of kernel headers (version @@VMWARE@@ UTS_RELEASE) does
> >> not match
> >> your running kernel (version 2.6.18-3-686). Even if the mod
Greg Folkert wrote:
On Sat, 2007-03-10 at 23:21 +, Adrian Midgley wrote:
"The directory of kernel headers (version @@VMWARE@@ UTS_RELEASE) does
not match
your running kernel (version 2.6.18-3-686). Even if the module were to
compile
successfully, it would not load into the running kernel
On Sat, 2007-03-10 at 23:21 +, Adrian Midgley wrote:
> "The directory of kernel headers (version @@VMWARE@@ UTS_RELEASE) does
> not match
> your running kernel (version 2.6.18-3-686). Even if the module were to
> compile
> successfully, it would not load into the running kernel.
>
> What is t
On 2/21/07, Greg Folkert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, 2007-02-21 at 17:12 -0400, Guillermo Garron wrote:
> Hi,
>
> three days ago I switched from Ubuntu 6.06 to Etch, an now i am not
> able to run Debian
>
Have you properly compiled and setup VMware on you new installation?
Are you runnin
On Wed, 2007-02-21 at 17:12 -0400, Guillermo Garron wrote:
> Hi,
>
> three days ago I switched from Ubuntu 6.06 to Etch, an now i am not
> able to run Debian
>
Have you properly compiled and setup VMware on you new installation?
Are you running a Debian Kernel? which one? Do you have "kernel-pa
Greg Folkert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [-- text/plain, encoding quoted-printable, charset: ISO-8859-1, 33 lines --]
>
> On Mon, 2007-02-19 at 11:43 +, Stephen Chadfield wrote:
>> Kenneth Jacker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > Thanks for the letters from Liam and Greg!
>> >
>> > greg> http
On Mon, 2007-02-19 at 11:43 +, Stephen Chadfield wrote:
> Kenneth Jacker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Thanks for the letters from Liam and Greg!
> >
> > greg> http://ftp.cvut.cz/vmware/vmware-any-any-update108.tar.gz
> >
> > Could you (or someone) please explain the step-by-step sequence t
Kenneth Jacker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for the letters from Liam and Greg!
>
> greg> http://ftp.cvut.cz/vmware/vmware-any-any-update108.tar.gz
>
> Could you (or someone) please explain the step-by-step sequence to
> apply the above patch to install VMware-workstation-5.5.1-19175 on
>
On Sun, 2007-02-18 at 10:34 -0500, Kenneth Jacker wrote:
> Thanks for the letters from Liam and Greg!
>
> greg> http://ftp.cvut.cz/vmware/vmware-any-any-update108.tar.gz
>
1. Download and extract the VMware-workstation-5.5.1-19175 non-RPM
version.
2. Once extracted, run the s
Thanks for the letters from Liam and Greg!
greg> http://ftp.cvut.cz/vmware/vmware-any-any-update108.tar.gz
Could you (or someone) please explain the step-by-step sequence to
apply the above patch to install VMware-workstation-5.5.1-19175 on
Debian/etch?
Here's what I just did:
o Made sure
On Sat, 2007-02-17 at 14:00 -0500, Kenneth Jacker wrote:
> Has anyone successfully compiled the required modules for 'VMware
> Workstation' under Debian/etch? Though I've been able to do this on
> two Ubuntu systems, I keep getting errors during the installation
> process on my 'etch' systems:
se
liam> I understand that there is an issue with vmware on recent
liam> kernels. See here for a discussion:
liam>
http://groups.google.co.uk/group/linux.debian.user/browse_thread/thread/f6ca3ef81023f93d/e7b10484cd229960
Thanks for the excellent reference ... I'll check into it tomorrow ...
On Sat, 17 Feb 2007 14:00:47 -0500
Kenneth Jacker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Has anyone successfully compiled the required modules for 'VMware
> Workstation' under Debian/etch? Though I've been able to do this on
> two Ubuntu systems, I keep getting errors during the installation
> process on m
du> It would be nice to see the full error log, if possible
I can't seem to find one ...
The install script just continues to prompt me for a valid header
file:
What is the location of the directory of C header files that match
your running kernel? [/usr/src/linux/include]
The only way "
Greg Madden wrote:
On Mon, 05 Feb 2007 23:15:00 -0200
Bruno Buys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Greg Folkert wrote:
On Mon, 2007-02-05 at 20:38 +0100, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
On Mon, 05 Feb 2007 the mental interface of
Jan Schledermann told:
[...]
A significant
On Mon, 2007-02-05 at 18:10 -0900, Greg Madden wrote:
> On Mon, 05 Feb 2007 23:15:00 -0200
> Bruno Buys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Greg Folkert wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2007-02-05 at 20:38 +0100, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> > >
> > >> On Mon, 05 Feb 2007 the mental interface of
> > >> Jan Sch
On Mon, 05 Feb 2007 23:15:00 -0200
Bruno Buys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Greg Folkert wrote:
> > On Mon, 2007-02-05 at 20:38 +0100, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> >
> >> On Mon, 05 Feb 2007 the mental interface of
> >> Jan Schledermann told:
> >>
> >> [...]
> >>
> >>> A significant differen
Greg Folkert wrote:
On Mon, 2007-02-05 at 20:38 +0100, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
On Mon, 05 Feb 2007 the mental interface of
Jan Schledermann told:
[...]
A significant difference between the pre-compiled 2.6.18-1-686
kernel and the source code, is that the source code by default
create
some news
myself just installed kernel 2.6.18-4-686 and vmware (vmware-config.pl) was
configured without giving the error
- no linux/version.h in /usr/src/include/linux
not to mention 2.6.18-3-686 and 2.6.18-2-686 did give the error!
On 2/5/07, Margarita Manterola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi
On Mon, 2007-02-05 at 20:38 +0100, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> On Mon, 05 Feb 2007 the mental interface of
> Jan Schledermann told:
>
> [...]
> > A significant difference between the pre-compiled 2.6.18-1-686
> > kernel and the source code, is that the source code by default
> > creates version 2.
Take a look here:
http://www.vmware.com/community/thread.jspa?messageID=76957&tstart=0
Essentially, vmware in its raw state doesn't compile with relatively newer
kernels. You need patches to make them work. You can find these patches at
http://platan.vc.cvut.cz/ftp/pub/vmware .
Once you down
On Mon, 05 Feb 2007 the mental interface of
Jan Schledermann told:
[...]
> A significant difference between the pre-compiled 2.6.18-1-686
> kernel and the source code, is that the source code by default
> creates version 2.6.18 and NOT 2.6.18-1-686. This version
> difference could cause the compil
Margarita Manterola wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On 2/5/07, Shobhit Jindal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On 2/5/07, Bruno Buys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > The only
>> > catch ins't debian related: vmware seems to not like my
>> > /usr/src/include/linux, and asks for a new linux/version.h.
>>
>> i have b
Margarita Manterola wrote:
Hi!
On 2/5/07, Shobhit Jindal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 2/5/07, Bruno Buys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The only
> catch ins't debian related: vmware seems to not like my
> /usr/src/include/linux, and asks for a new linux/version.h.
i have been stuck to kernel 2
On Sun, Jan 28, 2007 at 12:20:56PM -0500, Carl Fink wrote:
> I just wanted to thank everyone who has contributed to this thread. I was
> about to start evaluating alternatives for virtual setups for two of my
> boxes, and you've collectively made my job much easier.
> --
> Carl Fink
I just wanted to thank everyone who has contributed to this thread. I was
about to start evaluating alternatives for virtual setups for two of my
boxes, and you've collectively made my job much easier.
--
Carl Fink [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Read my blog at nitpickingbl
All,
I have used both VMWare and qemu with kemu accel.
I find that VMWare is more easy if you want to do some quick emulation
and do not want to waste time in understanding how to enable
network device and other stuff.
VMware is more faster too.
I am not cancassing for VMWare here but i have u
hi all,
what about VirtualBox ?
has anyone used this before ?
any idea whether it's as good as vmware or worse than qemu ?
n has VMware only as an experimental
package.
Has anyone any opinions/experiences you can share re: VMware?
Thx
Attila
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject
of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wi
On Sat, 2007-01-27 at 10:46 -0500, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> > Just curious why. In my experience, qemu is slw.
> >
> With kqemu accelerator is actually quite responsive. It puts it on par
> with VMWare.
But sadly both kqemu and VMWare are proprietary. A better option is to
use kvm (i
Attila Horvath wrote:
> All
>
> Have read some very good things about VMware - particularly it's ability
> to support Linux distros. I notice Debian has VMware only as an
> experimental package.
>
> Has anyone any opinions/experiences you can share re: VMware?
>
ns/experiences you can share re: VMware?
Works fine, but taints the kernel of course, so I prefer qemu unless I
need the speed. (Or xen, depeneding on the task.)
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
bian.org
Subject: Re: VMware?
On Sat, Jan 27, 2007 at 10:19:09AM -0500, Attila Horvath wrote:
All
Have read some very good things about VMware - particularly it's ability to
support Linux distros. I notice Debian has VMware only as an experimental
package.
Has anyone any opinions/experie
On Sat, Jan 27, 2007 at 10:46:04AM -0500, Attila Horvath wrote:
> Did you use it w/ Debian or just generically.
>
> VMware's website doesn't list Debian as a supported disto?!?!
>
Yes. VMWare on Debian host with Debian, RH and Win2K guests.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sanchez
http://peop
On Sat, Jan 27, 2007 at 10:28:46AM -0500, Stephen R Laniel wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 27, 2007 at 10:38:50AM -0500, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> > I have used VMWare some years ago and it is quite good. However, I tend
> > to prefer Qemu for most workstation-related things. YMMV.
>
> Just curious why.
On Sat, Jan 27, 2007 at 10:38:50AM -0500, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> I have used VMWare some years ago and it is quite good. However, I tend
> to prefer Qemu for most workstation-related things. YMMV.
Just curious why. In my experience, qemu is slw.
--
Stephen R. Laniel
[EMAIL PROTECT
On Sat, Jan 27, 2007 at 10:19:09AM -0500, Attila Horvath wrote:
> All
>
> Have read some very good things about VMware - particularly it's ability to
> support Linux distros. I notice Debian has VMware only as an experimental
> package.
>
> Has anyone any opinions/ex
Hi,
At first, this is Debian mailinglist, you should look for help in
Fedora or VMware support.
What i could suggest is that you shouldn't run neither .exe nor .msi
he your guest OS is Linux based, instead look for readme and some .sh
Regards
atis
On 1/24/07, Arfan A Mir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wr
On Saturday 18 November 2006 7:02 am, H.S. wrote:
> I understand that VMware server is free. Are there any other
> applications from them that are free (workstation?).
Quite a few. check the vmware site.
> Once I install vmware server, I want to install Windows XP in the
> virtual machine. This is
On Friday 17 November 2006 17:05, H.S. wrote:
> Joshua J. Kugler wrote:
> > On Friday 17 November 2006 16:33, H.S. wrote:
> >>When I gave the 'vmware' command as normal user after the installation,
> >>I got this error and no GUI:
> >>{tmp}$> vmware
> >>/usr/local/lib/vmware/bin/vmware:
> >>/usr/lo
Joshua J. Kugler wrote:
On Friday 17 November 2006 16:33, H.S. wrote:
When I gave the 'vmware' command as normal user after the installation,
I got this error and no GUI:
{tmp}$> vmware
/usr/local/lib/vmware/bin/vmware:
/usr/local/lib/vmware/lib/libpng12.so.0/libpng12.so.0: no version
informati
On Friday 17 November 2006 16:33, H.S. wrote:
> When I gave the 'vmware' command as normal user after the installation,
> I got this error and no GUI:
> {tmp}$> vmware
> /usr/local/lib/vmware/bin/vmware:
> /usr/local/lib/vmware/lib/libpng12.so.0/libpng12.so.0: no version
> information available (re
H.S. wrote:
H.S. wrote:
H.S. wrote:
I just reinstalled vmware and vmware-mui. vmwere went into
/usr/local/bin and mui also in /usr/local (pixmaps and icons also in
/usr/local).
The first time I try to access https://localhost:8333/, I get:
Forbidden
You don't have permission to access /
H.S. wrote:
H.S. wrote:
I just reinstalled vmware and vmware-mui. vmwere went into
/usr/local/bin and mui also in /usr/local (pixmaps and icons also in
/usr/local).
The first time I try to access https://localhost:8333/, I get:
Forbidden
You don't have permission to access / on this server
H.S. wrote:
I just reinstalled vmware and vmware-mui. vmwere went into
/usr/local/bin and mui also in /usr/local (pixmaps and icons also in
/usr/local).
The first time I try to access https://localhost:8333/, I get:
Forbidden
You don't have permission to access / on this server.
Apache/1.3
Joshua J. Kugler wrote:
On Friday 17 November 2006 14:59, H.S. wrote:
Joshua J. Kugler wrote:
On Friday 17 November 2006 14:44, H.S. wrote:
I have read the other replied, and I just now uninstalled vmware. I am
going to try the rpm now and I'll see if that works.
You installed via the TAR
On Friday 17 November 2006 14:59, H.S. wrote:
> Joshua J. Kugler wrote:
> > On Friday 17 November 2006 14:44, H.S. wrote:
> >>I have read the other replied, and I just now uninstalled vmware. I am
> >>going to try the rpm now and I'll see if that works.
> >
> > You installed via the TAR.GZ before?
Russell Ost wrote:
I've been using VMware player and Workstation for over a year now. The
default installation script works for both Sarge, and Etch without
issue. My current image (Etch) can be found at www.netliving.com. VMware
publishes a link to my server on VMTN. Over 10,000 images have be
Joshua J. Kugler wrote:
On Friday 17 November 2006 14:44, H.S. wrote:
I have read the other replied, and I just now uninstalled vmware. I am
going to try the rpm now and I'll see if that works.
You installed via the TAR.GZ before? That was what I did, and all seemed to
work.
I did change
I've been using VMware player and Workstation for over a year now. The
default installation script works for both Sarge, and Etch without
issue. My current image (Etch) can be found at www.netliving.com. VMware
publishes a link to my server on VMTN. Over 10,000 images have been
downloaded withi
On Friday 17 November 2006 14:44, H.S. wrote:
> I have read the other replied, and I just now uninstalled vmware. I am
> going to try the rpm now and I'll see if that works.
You installed via the TAR.GZ before? That was what I did, and all seemed to
work.
> Just for completeness, here is the te
Joshua J. Kugler wrote:
On Friday 17 November 2006 13:44, piter wrote:
H.S. wrote:
er ... I am not sure if I should be asking this in this forum since
vmware is not open source.
I wanted to play around with vmware server and installed it on my etch
system in /usr/local.
I also intalled vmwa
On Friday 17 November 2006 13:44, piter wrote:
> H.S. wrote:
> > er ... I am not sure if I should be asking this in this forum since
> > vmware is not open source.
> >
> > I wanted to play around with vmware server and installed it on my etch
> > system in /usr/local.
> >
> > I also intalled vmware
H.S. wrote:
er ... I am not sure if I should be asking this in this forum since
vmware is not open source.
I wanted to play around with vmware server and installed it on my etch
system in /usr/local.
I also intalled vmware-mui in /usr/local as well.
When I browse to localhost:8333, I get
H.S. wrote:
er ... I am not sure if I should be asking this in this forum since
vmware is not open source.
I wanted to play around with vmware server and installed it on my etch
system in /usr/local.
I also intalled vmware-mui in /usr/local as well.
When I browse to localhost:8333, I get
Hmm... I've been using vmware workstation for over a year in testing
(was sarge, then etch -- I think, not sure of the release dates). The
standard installation scripts they provided have worked for me each time.
Never played with server, though...
Thanks,
Rick Reynolds
--
"Released in 1996,
On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 11:40:12 -0800
Greg Madden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am running Etch. with 2.6.16 sources, doesn't require the ~any-any
> patch. After a recent upgrade Vmware no longer runs. It installs
> okay. I get an error message:
>
> "usr/lib/vmware/bin/vmware: /usr/lib/vmware/lib/l
On Tue, 3 Oct 2006 11:40:12 -0800
Greg Madden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am running Etch. with 2.6.16 sources, doesn't require the ~any-any
> patch. After a recent upgrade Vmware no longer runs. It installs
> okay. I get an error message:
>
> "usr/lib/vmware/bin/vmware: /usr/lib/vmware/lib/li
On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 14:49:31 +0200, Joerg Platte wrote:
>Am Mittwoch, 13. September 2006 14:34 schrieb Magnus Therning:
>Hi!
>
>> I'm having the same problem, but removing libdbus-1-2 isn't really an
>> option since it'll also trigger the removal of
>>
>> bmpx
>> evince
>> evolution
>> gnom
Am Mittwoch, 13. September 2006 14:34 schrieb Magnus Therning:
Hi!
> I'm having the same problem, but removing libdbus-1-2 isn't really an
> option since it'll also trigger the removal of
>
> bmpx
> evince
> evolution
> gnome-screensaver
>
> This in turn means that the GNOME virtual package wi
It's better to continue this in Jeorg Platte's thread instead :-)
http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2006/09/msg01063.html
/M
On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 11:58:21 +0100, Magnus Therning wrote:
>Today I noticed that vmware-server-console fails:
>
> /usr/lib/vmware-server-console/bin/vmware-server-c
On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 11:01:40 +0200, Joerg Platte wrote:
>Am Mittwoch, 13. September 2006 09:57 schrieb Joerg Platte:
>> Hi!
>>
>> Today I realized that my VMware workstation segfaults on my up-to-date
>> unstable system. Setting "VMWARE_USE_SHIPPED_GTK" to either no, force or
>> yes does not he
Am Mittwoch, 13. September 2006 09:57 schrieb Joerg Platte:
> Hi!
>
> Today I realized that my VMware workstation segfaults on my up-to-date
> unstable system. Setting "VMWARE_USE_SHIPPED_GTK" to either no, force or
> yes does not help. Does anybody know a solution?
I found a solution. libdbus-1-2
On Thu, 17 Aug 2006 19:08:32 +0200
T <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
>
> How can I access my host shares from under Linux within WMWare?
>
> My host's samba and share folders are working fine -- I can access my
> host shares from win2k guest OS. But I just don't know how to access
> it from Lin
T wrote:
>
> - I also tried to use "smbclient -L ", but that fails too.
Try "smbclient -L -U Administrator"
Hope this helps,
--
George Borisov
DXSolutions Ltd
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Friday 04 August 2006 18:12, Carl Fink wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 04:36:22PM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
> > On Friday 04 August 2006 14:39, Carl Fink wrote:
> > > Now that FSW is in the process of freeing VMWare Server (it's already
> > > free of charge, and they plan to release the source
On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 09:49:28PM -0400, Carl Fink wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 09:45:28PM -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
>
> > The acroread packages are not legally redistributable (at least in the
> > US). They are not official packages and are hosted from a server
> > outside the US. A
On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 09:45:28PM -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> The acroread packages are not legally redistributable (at least in the
> US). They are not official packages and are hosted from a server
> outside the US. All the flashplugin-nonfree package does is to download
> the tarball
On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 09:12:49PM -0400, Carl Fink wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 04:36:22PM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
> > On Friday 04 August 2006 14:39, Carl Fink wrote:
> > > Now that FSW is in the process of freeing VMWare Server (it's already free
> > > of charge, and they plan to release
On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 04:36:22PM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Friday 04 August 2006 14:39, Carl Fink wrote:
> > Now that FSW is in the process of freeing VMWare Server (it's already free
> > of charge, and they plan to release the source, in some vague sense not
> > made clear on their web sit
On Friday 04 August 2006 14:39, Carl Fink wrote:
> Now that FSW is in the process of freeing VMWare Server (it's already free
> of charge, and they plan to release the source, in some vague sense not
> made clear on their web site), is anyone beginning to think about a Debian
> package of it?
Prob
On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 17:39:32 -0400, Carl Fink wrote:
>Now that FSW is in the process of freeing VMWare Server (it's already
>free of charge, and they plan to release the source, in some vague
>sense not made clear on their web site), is anyone beginning to think
>about a Debian package of it?
Rick Reynolds wrote:
And you need at least a 3GHz processor to have it run halfway decent.
I don't know if you're using a bit of hyperbole, or if there is a big
performance difference between the free server and the commercial
"VMWare Workstation" product that I use, but it runs very snapp
Linas Žvirblis wrote:
> David Baron wrote:
>
>>> "elevator=cfq"
>>>
>
> This sets a default I/O scheduler (a driver that organizes reads and
> writes to a disk in a certain way) to CFQ. It should improve
> interactivity, but can sometimes degrade performance. I did not read the
> thread, so do no
David Baron wrote:
>> "elevator=cfq"
>>
>> These things are probably case-sensitive. :-$
>
> What is this?
This sets a default I/O scheduler (a driver that organizes reads and
writes to a disk in a certain way) to CFQ. It should improve
interactivity, but can sometimes degrade performance. I did
On Tuesday 06 June 2006 19:20, George Borisov wrote:
> George Borisov wrote:
> > Plenty of memory and fast disks also helps. ;-) As does adding
> > "elevator=CFQ" to the kernel options in the boot loader.
>
> "elevator=cfq"
>
> These things are probably case-sensitive. :-$
What is this?
I am runn
101 - 200 of 564 matches
Mail list logo
