On 14Oct16:1151-0400, Miles Fidelman wrote:
> It strikes me that there's actually very little that needs to be done. In
> the short term, the world, including Debian, will continue to support
> sysvinit scripts - if only because the BSDs aren't going anywhere, I expect
> autotools will continue t
Steve Litt wrote:
On Thu, 16 Oct 2014 11:28:50 -0400
Steve Litt wrote:
POINT OF CLARIFICATION:
Nothing written below is nosh specific. It could be used with nosh, or
upstart, or sysvinit, or any other PID1 that's *only* a PID1. So how
about it, who wants to join me in neutering systemd on Deb
On Thu, 16 Oct 2014 11:28:50 -0400
Steve Litt wrote:
POINT OF CLARIFICATION:
Nothing written below is nosh specific. It could be used with nosh, or
upstart, or sysvinit, or any other PID1 that's *only* a PID1. So how
about it, who wants to join me in neutering systemd on Debian and
probably eve
On Thu, 16 Oct 2014 21:52:58 +0900
Joel Rees wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 9:33 PM, Nate Bargmann wrote:
> > * On 2014 15 Oct 19:39 -0500, Joel Rees wrote:
> >> systemd's problems would best be discussed at the systemd project.
> >> (Modulo the willingness of the devs over there to discuss th
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 9:57 PM, Nate Bargmann wrote:
> * On 2014 16 Oct 07:54 -0500, Joel Rees wrote:
>> Would that be debian's sysv-init?
>
> That link is from the sysvinit-core package's description in Sid's
> Aptitude. Presumably it is the upstream project.
Thank you. I was under the impress
* On 2014 16 Oct 07:54 -0500, Joel Rees wrote:
> Would that be debian's sysv-init?
That link is from the sysvinit-core package's description in Sid's
Aptitude. Presumably it is the upstream project.
- Nate
--
"The optimist proclaims that we live in the best of all
possible worlds. The pessim
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 9:33 PM, Nate Bargmann wrote:
> * On 2014 15 Oct 19:39 -0500, Joel Rees wrote:
>> systemd's problems would best be discussed at the systemd project. (Modulo
>> the willingness of the devs over there to discuss them.)
>>
>> What I'm thinking is to talk about specific feature
* On 2014 15 Oct 19:39 -0500, Joel Rees wrote:
> systemd's problems would best be discussed at the systemd project. (Modulo
> the willingness of the devs over there to discuss them.)
>
> What I'm thinking is to talk about specific features to enable the sort of
> "managing services" that systemd s
8 matches
Mail list logo