-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
A. F. Cano wrote:
> if test "$DISPLAY" ; then
> export PROMPT_COMMAND='echo \
> -ne "\033]30;`echo $PWD | sed \
> -e "s/^.*\(.\{20\}\)$/\1/"
> `\007\033]31;$PWD\007"'
> fi
Thanks for the little script. It works great. It's now in my .profil
Andrei Popescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There are more ways to do it, but I prefer creating a
> file /etc/modprobe.d/00local with all my customizations. This has the
> benefit of preserving your settings across upgrades.
And for completeness here is mine:
~$ cat /etc/modprobe.d/00local
# we
"A. F. Cano" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For the longest time, I had been annoyed that shells in a konsole did
> not execute startup files. The last time this worked was in woody.
Don't know about konsole, but other xterm's I tried have an option
called 'login shell'.
[snip]
> [...] I
> notic
> A related issue is: Is there an easy way to go through the system and
> identify (and possibly purge, after being asked) old files that are no
> longer needed/used? I presume that the packaging system would take care
> of files no longer needed, but what about old packages from previous
> distr
On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 12:59:02PM -0500, Trey Perrin wrote:
> I tried several S3 video cards as well, all with exactly the same result.
>
> I am trying to contact HP. However, I fear their response will be
> something along the lines of: "We don't support Debian on hardware that
> old!"
>
> I
I tried several S3 video cards as well, all with exactly the same result.
I am trying to contact HP. However, I fear their response will be
something along the lines of: "We don't support Debian on hardware that
old!"
I grabbed the Etch kernel source, built and installed a 2.6.18 kernel,
an
On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 11:12:03AM -0500, Trey Perrin wrote:
> The box will not touch the internet, and will be quite secure. It won't
> be a server, I am just using server hardware.
>
> Forwarding X isn't an option for me.
>
> Whether I "should" be running X is irrelevant. X "should" work on t
The box will not touch the internet, and will be quite secure. It won't
be a server, I am just using server hardware.
Forwarding X isn't an option for me.
Whether I "should" be running X is irrelevant. X "should" work on this
hardware.
Trey
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
w
On Fri, 2007-03-02 at 15:35 -0500, Trey Perrin wrote:
> All,
>
> I have several Compaq Proliant 1850R servers that have add-on Matrox PCI
> video cards. Sarge installs with no problems, but the servers completely
> lock up (power cycle required) when attempting to start X. If I remove
> the PCI
On Fri, Mar 02, 2007 at 04:21:35PM -0500, Trey Perrin wrote:
> >
> I have multiple applications that require an X server.
>
That's why you have a workstation :-)
You ssh in, forward the X connection back to your workstation and viola.
You can also use VNC if you would prefer to see the entire
Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
On Fri, Mar 02, 2007 at 03:35:21PM -0500, Trey Perrin wrote:
All,
I have several Compaq Proliant 1850R servers that have add-on Matrox PCI
video cards. Sarge installs with no problems, but the servers completely
lock up (power cycle required) when attempting to st
On Fri, Mar 02, 2007 at 03:35:21PM -0500, Trey Perrin wrote:
> All,
>
> I have several Compaq Proliant 1850R servers that have add-on Matrox PCI
> video cards. Sarge installs with no problems, but the servers completely
> lock up (power cycle required) when attempting to start X. If I remove
>
On Thu, 2007-03-01 at 23:17 -0800, Arlie Stephens wrote:
> Well, I'm not exactly the world's most experienced systems
> administrator - in fact, the term "incompetent amateur" is perhaps
> more like it ;-) So it might be a bit more onerous for me than for
> others.
I've been running Etch for so
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/02/07 01:17, Arlie Stephens wrote:
> On Mar 01 2007, Ron Johnson wrote:
[snip]
>> Now, you've got to upgrade from Woody to Sarge and then soon
>> upgrade from Sarge to Etch. That 2-step process is much slower
>> and error-prone than the one-st
On Mar 01 2007, Ron Johnson wrote:
> >
> > *sigh* You are the second person to suggest in effect never actually
> > upgrading a debian system,
>
> We'd *never* say that.
Well, what the other fellow said was that in his shop, they prefer
to reinstall from scratch, at least when going from woody
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/01/07 19:10, Arlie Stephens wrote:
> On Mar 01 2007, Ron Johnson wrote:
>> On 03/01/07 18:22, Arlie Stephens wrote:
>>> On Mar 01 2007, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 03/01/07 09:48, Arlie Stephens wrote:
>> [snip]
>>> I'll make one tonight, and try
On Mar 01 2007, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 03/01/07 18:22, Arlie Stephens wrote:
> > On Mar 01 2007, Ron Johnson wrote:
> >> On 03/01/07 09:48, Arlie Stephens wrote:
> >
> [snip]
> > I'll make one tonight, and try re-installing LILO.
> > Then I'll doubtless be on to the next problem, but it's a stag
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/01/07 18:22, Arlie Stephens wrote:
> On Mar 01 2007, Ron Johnson wrote:
>> On 03/01/07 09:48, Arlie Stephens wrote:
>
[snip]
> I'll make one tonight, and try re-installing LILO.
> Then I'll doubtless be on to the next problem, but it's a stage
On Mar 01 2007, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 03/01/07 09:48, Arlie Stephens wrote:
> > The problem - I tried to upgrade an elderly system from woody to
> > sarge. Now it doesn't boot. I suspect the upgrade ate the master boot
> > record - but I don't even know the right terminology to figure out
> > wh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/01/07 09:48, Arlie Stephens wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> I'm hoping the collective wisdom of this list can point me at the
> right TFM. I'm also somewhat inclined to vent.
>
> The problem - I tried to upgrade an elderly system from woody to
> sarge.
Kent West wrote:
> Ken Heard wrote:
>> Kent West wrote:
>>
What happens when you run "/etc/init.d/networking restart"?
>> Returned:
>>
>> Setting up IP spoofing protection: rp_filter.
>> Reconfiguring network interfaces...Failed to bring up eth0.
>> done.
>>
>> Then a
On Fri, 16 Feb 2007 10:12:32 -0500
Andrei Popescu wrote:
On Tue, 13 Feb 2007 21:54:24 -0500
Ken Heard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> > >> Ifconfig only reports the loop back IP address. The IP address
>>> > >> assigned by the gateway, 192.168.0.114, was not reported by
>>> > >> ifconfig, pre
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/15/07 14:19, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 02:04:41PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
>> On 02/15/07 12:51, Siju George wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Could some one recommend which File System is best for partitions above
>>> 600GB?
>>>
Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 02:04:41PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
>> On 02/15/07 12:51, Siju George wrote:
>>> I am considering XFS. The System is Debian Sarge for amd64.
>> Why? Sarge on that is definitely not supported. You should
>> definitely go with Etch.
>>
> Why woul
Ron Johnson wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/15/07 12:51, Siju George wrote:
Hi,
Could some one recommend which File System is best for partitions above
600GB?
I am considering XFS. The System is Debian Sarge for amd64.
Why? Sarge on that is definitely not supporte
On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 02:04:41PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 02/15/07 12:51, Siju George wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Could some one recommend which File System is best for partitions above
> > 600GB?
> > I am considering XFS. The System is Debian Sarge for amd64.
>
> Why? Sarge on that is defini
Ken Heard wrote:
> Kent West wrote:
>
>>> What happens when you run "/etc/init.d/networking restart"?
>>>
>
> Returned:
>
> Setting up IP spoofing protection: rp_filter.
> Reconfiguring network interfaces...Failed to bring up eth0.
> done.
>
> Then a series of messages scrolle
also sprach Johannes Wiedersich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.02.02.1403 +0100]:
> Is it common, that a failure of a raid disk leads to a system freeze,
> even though the affected drive is _NOT_ part of / or any FSH directory?
I bet you this is an issue with hardware, and x86 notoriously sucks
at that
On Fri, Feb 02, 2007 at 05:19:48PM +0100, Johannes Wiedersich wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > These messages look similar -- but not identical -- to the ones I had
> > while installing an etch system -- and eventually I came to suspect the
> > file-system-damage bug in the Debian 2.6.18-3 k
On Fri, Feb 02, 2007 at 02:03:16PM +0100, Johannes Wiedersich wrote:
> First the good news: after some repairs, the system appears to be
> 'clean' again, running as usual.
>
> The box has three hard disks: /dev/hda with the root partition and
> /dev/hdb and /dev/hdd with a raid1 for data.
I agree
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> These messages look similar -- but not identical -- to the ones I had
> while installing an etch system -- and eventually I came to suspect the
> file-system-damage bug in the Debian 2.6.18-3 kernel (sometimes
> because of a race condition a buffer is not written to ha
Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
> Personally, I run something like samhain, not so much to check for
> intrusion as to monitor data integrity.
>
> I wonder if the failed /dev/hdb took out the controller (ide0) and so /dev/hda
> got corrupted.
No idea how to figure that out.
> Its too bad that your sy
On Fri, Feb 02, 2007 at 02:03:16PM +0100, Johannes Wiedersich wrote:
> First the good news: after some repairs, the system appears to be
> 'clean' again, running as usual.
>
> The box has three hard disks: /dev/hda with the root partition and
> /dev/hdb and /dev/hdd with a raid1 for data.
>
> /--
On Fri, Feb 02, 2007 at 02:03:16PM +0100, Johannes Wiedersich wrote:
> First the good news: after some repairs, the system appears to be
> 'clean' again, running as usual.
>
> The box has three hard disks: /dev/hda with the root partition and
> /dev/hdb and /dev/hdd with a raid1 for data.
>
> Y
> On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 03:59:44AM +0100, Marc wrote:
>> Hi there,
>> my kernel (2.6.18) has hashlimit support for iptables compiled in.
>> Now I try to insert a rule using hashlimit, then the following appears:
>>
>> iptables v1.2.11: Couldn't load match
>> `hashlimit':/lib/iptables/libipt_hashl
On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 03:59:44AM +0100, Marc wrote:
> Hi there,
> my kernel (2.6.18) has hashlimit support for iptables compiled in.
> Now I try to insert a rule using hashlimit, then the following appears:
>
> iptables v1.2.11: Couldn't load match
> `hashlimit':/lib/iptables/libipt_hashlimit.so
Carl Fink wrote:
On Sun, Dec 31, 2006 at 10:34:19PM -0500, Marty wrote:
Carl Fink wrote:
>So, do I hold the record for "questions debian-user can't answer"?
The broken link sounds like an issue for the maintainer to sort out. My
guess is the name resolution with non-existent resolv.conf files
On Mon, Jan 01, 2007 at 09:13:28AM -0600, Peter Michaux wrote:
> Hi,
>
> My new hosting company has standard choices of Fedora Core 5 or 6 or
> Debian Sarge. They suggest Fedora Core because it comes with Apache
> 2.2 which I want. They say that they could install Debian Etch for me
> because that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Jan 01, 2007 at 09:13:28AM -0600, Peter Michaux wrote:
> Hi,
>
> My new hosting company has standard choices of Fedora Core 5 or 6 or
> Debian Sarge. They suggest Fedora Core because it comes with Apache
> 2.2 which I want. They say that they
On Sun, Dec 31, 2006 at 10:34:19PM -0500, Marty wrote:
> Carl Fink wrote:
> >So, do I hold the record for "questions debian-user can't answer"?
>
> The broken link sounds like an issue for the maintainer to sort out. My
> guess is the name resolution with non-existent resolv.conf files is someho
Carl Fink wrote:
So, do I hold the record for "questions debian-user can't answer"?
The broken link sounds like an issue for the maintainer to sort out. My guess
is the name resolution with non-existent resolv.conf files is somehow related to
virtualization.
Happy new year to everyone (w
So, do I hold the record for "questions debian-user can't answer"?
Happy new year to everyone (who uses the Gregorian calendar--and to the rest
of you, too, just less appropriately).
On Fri, Dec 29, 2006 at 01:19:23PM -0500, Carl Fink wrote:
> So yesterday my Sarge server couldn't resolve any hos
On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 10:58:33AM -0800, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 11:54:24AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 10:27:29AM -0800, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> > > On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 08:57:03AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > > On
On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 11:54:24AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 10:27:29AM -0800, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 08:57:03AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > On Sun, Dec 10, 2006 at 07:38:37PM -0800, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> > > >
>
On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 10:27:29AM -0800, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 08:57:03AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 10, 2006 at 07:38:37PM -0800, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> > >
> > > why don't you boot sarge, chroot into etch and install a kernel from
>
On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 08:51:39AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 10, 2006 at 07:38:37PM -0800, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> >
> > why don't you boot sarge, chroot into etch and install a kernel from
> > inside the chroot? I think udev wants a kernel >= 2.6.15, IIRC.
>
> Interest
On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 08:57:03AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 10, 2006 at 07:38:37PM -0800, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> >
> > why don't you boot sarge, chroot into etch and install a kernel from
> > inside the chroot? I think udev wants a kernel >= 2.6.15, IIRC.
>
> Actually
On Monday 11 December 2006 14:57, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 10, 2006 at 07:38:37PM -0800, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 10, 2006 at 09:04:13AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > Unfortunately, after the mass upgrade yesterday, the system now boots
> > > without either
On Sun, Dec 10, 2006 at 07:38:37PM -0800, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 10, 2006 at 09:04:13AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > Unfortunately, after the mass upgrade yesterday, the system now boots
> > without either a functioning X or a functioning net. udev complains
> > t
On Sun, Dec 10, 2006 at 07:38:37PM -0800, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 10, 2006 at 09:04:13AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > Unfortunately, after the mass upgrade yesterday, the system now boots
> > without either a functioning X or a functioning net. udev complains
> > t
On 12/7/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, Dec 07, 2006 at 03:30:47PM -0500, Sarunas Burdulis wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > After failing to reconstitute my etch system (details abundantly
> > available on this mail
On Fri, Dec 08, 2006 at 11:40:27AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I tried that, and got a *huge* raft of proposed deletions -- just from
> asking for aptitude to be upgraded.
what did you use to upgrade aptitude? you might want to use something
that thinks its less intelligent to do this. I
On Thu, Dec 07, 2006 at 04:50:34PM -0500, Douglas Tutty wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 07, 2006 at 02:49:57PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > After failing to reconstitute my etch system (details abundantly
> > available on this mailing list a few months ago), I wiped its partition
> > and tried to ins
On Thu, Dec 07, 2006 at 05:05:05PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 07, 2006 at 03:30:47PM -0500, Sarunas Burdulis wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> > >
> > Sound like what I have seen "as usual" while doing dist upgrades (Debian
> > and Ubuntu). Several a
On Thu, Dec 07, 2006 at 04:50:34PM -0500, Douglas Tutty wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 07, 2006 at 02:49:57PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > After failing to reconstitute my etch system (details abundantly
> > available on this mailing list a few months ago), I wiped its partition
> > and tried to ins
On Thu, Dec 07, 2006 at 02:49:57PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> After failing to reconstitute my etch system (details abundantly
> available on this mailing list a few months ago), I wiped its partition
> and tried to install etch form scratch using installer release candidate
> one, only t
On Thu, Dec 07, 2006 at 03:30:47PM -0500, Sarunas Burdulis wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > After failing to reconstitute my etch system (details abundantly
> > available on this mailing list a few months ago), I wiped its partition
> > an
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> After failing to reconstitute my etch system (details abundantly
> available on this mailing list a few months ago), I wiped its partition
> and tried to install etch form scratch using installer release candidate
> one, o
Javier Viegas wrote:
> Hi everyone, i have Debian Sarge 3.1 installed as a file server, and i
> need
> to add another hard disk, as i already have the 4 ide ports bussy i can use
> sata ones to add a big sata hd, the problem is that sarge 3.1 doesn´t
> support sata controlers. I have an Asus mothe
On 12/4/06, Javier Viegas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi everyone, i have Debian Sarge 3.1 installed as a file server, and i need
to add another hard disk, as i already have the 4 ide ports bussy i can use
sata ones to add a big sata hd, the problem is that sarge 3.1 doesn´t
support sata controle
Hi,
* Thorsten Haude wrote (2006-11-27 16:33):
>* Sven Arvidsson wrote (2006-11-27 15:54):
>>You can use "dpkg -S /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/mga_drv.o" to find
>>out which package a file belongs to, and reinstall it.
>
>Thanks for the hint! It's xserver-xfree86, one of the packages I
>already
Hi,
* Sven Arvidsson wrote (2006-11-27 15:54):
>You can use "dpkg -S /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/mga_drv.o" to find
>out which package a file belongs to, and reinstall it.
Thanks for the hint! It's xserver-xfree86, one of the packages I
already reinstalled. But now I also removed three files l
On Mon, 2006-11-27 at 15:36 +0100, Thorsten Haude wrote:
> * Thorsten Haude wrote (2006-11-27 15:24):
> >after a recent upgrade, my X server will not start up. Log entries seem
> >to indicate that X chokes on the Matrox drivers for my G550 DH AGP.
>
> Forgot something: A logfile can be found here:
Hi,
* Thorsten Haude wrote (2006-11-27 15:24):
>after a recent upgrade, my X server will not start up. Log entries seem
>to indicate that X chokes on the Matrox drivers for my G550 DH AGP.
Forgot something: A logfile can be found here:
http://www.vranx.de/XFree86.0.log.gz
Thorsten
--
He wh
Adrian Midgley wrote, On 2006-09-22 04:35:
David Mulcahy wrote:
I understand that, (but they do provide desktop software) but if you are
running debian on a server you probably know a bit about what you are doing
and are probably prepared for a kernel compile.
That set the bar high.
I don't
On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 12:29:36PM +0200, Albert Dengg wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 10:18:27PM +0100, David Mulcahy wrote:
> > On Wednesday 20 September 2006 15:04, Albert Dengg wrote:
> > > On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 11:22:04PM +0100, David Mulcahy wrote:
> > > > Hello All
> > > >
> > > > Just di
David Mulcahy wrote:
> I understand that, (but they do provide desktop software) but if you are
> running debian on a server you probably know a bit about what you are doing
> and are probably prepared for a kernel compile.
That set the bar high.
I don't think people who run NT/2003 on a serve
On Wednesday 20 September 2006 15:04, Albert Dengg wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 11:22:04PM +0100, David Mulcahy wrote:
> > Hello All
> >
> > Just did a sarge -> etch upgrade.
> >
> > Aptitude update , upgrade complained about libfam0 problems and stopped.
> >
> > apt-get worked. Although I hav
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 10:18:27PM +0100, David Mulcahy wrote:
> On Wednesday 20 September 2006 15:04, Albert Dengg wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 11:22:04PM +0100, David Mulcahy wrote:
> > > Hello All
> > >
> > > Just did a sarge -> etch upgrade.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 11:22:04PM +0100, David Mulcahy wrote:
> Hello All
>
> Just did a sarge -> etch upgrade.
>
> Aptitude update , upgrade complained about libfam0 problems and stopped.
>
> apt-get worked. Although I have in the passed disable
David Mulcahy escribe:
> On my hardware a fully functional desktop is still a problem (eg music and
> video) without a preemptive kernel so if debian is aiming at this sector then
> a preempt kernel would be most welcome.
Desktop optimized (preemptive) kernels are still not a trend in
mainstream
Joseph Le-Phan wrote:
> I recently completed a Sarge installation on lvm2 on raid. While the
> system appears to be working fine after a reboot, i found the following
> error message slightly distracting:
>
> devfs_mk_dir: invalid argument.<4>devfs_mk_dev: could not append to
> parent for /disc
>
>
On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 03:23:07PM -0700, Keith Christian wrote:
> The capacity of the DVD is 8gb, write speed is 16x, and the size of the
> directory to be burned to the DVD is about 7gb so there should be plenty
> of space.
No, unless you're using DL media, the capacity of the DVD is approximate
On Monday 07 August 2006 17:23, Keith Christian wrote:
> Having gotten a new internal DVD burner, I'd like to know the best
> way to burn a directory of files to a DVD for system backup. (Also,
> I'd rather burn the DVD using a command at the BASH prompt instead of
> from a GUI.) The capacity of
#include
* Keith Christian [Mon, Aug 07 2006, 03:23:07PM]:
> Having gotten a new internal DVD burner, I'd like to know the best way to burn
> a directory of files to a DVD for system backup. (Also, I'd rather burn the
> DVD using a command at the BASH prompt instead of from a GUI.) The capacity
On (06/08/06 16:57), S. M. Ibrahim (Lavlu) wrote:
> tring to move to sid from sarge but getting some file missing message.
>
> Get:15 http://mirrors.kernel.org unstable/main debconf 1.5.2 [134kB]
> Err http://mirrors.kernel.org unstable/main gcc-4.1-base 4.1.1-9
> 404 Not Found [IP: 204.152.191
On 08/05/2006 05:33 PM, Luis Ariel Lecca wrote:
[...]
If somebody know a site that where I get these cds I will apreciate your
help very much.
[...]
There are many vendors of Debian. Look at the Debian vendors
on the web site http://www.debian.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROT
Exactly Florian !!! :D jojo THANKS A LOT !
Luis Ariel Lecca
- Original Message -
From: "Florian Kulzer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, August 05, 2006 9:12 PM
Subject: Re: Sarge 3.1r1 ?
> On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 21:41:05 -0300, Luis Ariel Lecca wrote:
>
On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 21:41:05 -0300, Luis Ariel Lecca wrote:
> Hello again, I will apreciate some help:
>
> > Hello all,
> > Could any body tell me where could I get Debian Sarge
> >
> > 3.1r1. I can't find somes cds that I need (cd4, cd8 and cd11).
> >
> > Should I use the cd3 of 3.1r2
of security
> that comes from having the entire Debian system on a bookshelf in case
> the internet goes permanently, irrecoverably down.
>
> -- hendrik
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, August 05, 2006 10:08 AM
Subject: Re: Sarge 3.1r1
Thanks Mumia. It was usefull,
Luis Ariel Beca
- Original Message -
From: "Mumia W." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Debian User"
Sent: Friday, August 04, 2006 7:42 PM
Subject: Re: Sarge 3.1r1 -> 3.1r2
> On 08/04/2006 01:50 PM, Luis Ariel Lecca wrote:
> >
On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 05:42:38PM -0500, Mumia W. wrote:
> On 08/04/2006 01:50 PM, Luis Ariel Lecca wrote:
> > Hello all,
> > Could any body tell me where could I get Debian Sarge
> >
> > 3.1r1. I cant find somes cds that I need (p.e. cd3).
> >
> > Should I use the cd3 of 3.1r2 instead these and
On 08/04/2006 01:50 PM, Luis Ariel Lecca wrote:
Hello all,
Could any body tell me where could I get Debian Sarge
3.1r1. I cant find somes cds that I need (p.e. cd3).
Should I use the cd3 of 3.1r2 instead these and mix
the releases ?
It breaks the stability of my dpkgs and system ?
Alexander Sack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Jul 24, 2006 at 07:02:33PM -0400, Angelina Carlton wrote:
>> "Dr Adrian Midgley (In th e office)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> > Loading TheRegister in Firefox as came with Sarge is followed by a
>> > segfault. This is new.
>> >
>> > Anyo
On Mon, Jul 24, 2006 at 08:06:11PM +0100, Dr Adrian Midgley (In th e office)
wrote:
>
> Uninstalled Athens Toolbar. Working fine so far.
>
> Athens toolbar then...
>
You have a safe way to reproduce the crash with athens toolbar
installed?
- Alexander
--
GPG messages preferred.| .''
On Mon, Jul 24, 2006 at 07:02:33PM -0400, Angelina Carlton wrote:
> "Dr Adrian Midgley (In th e office)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Loading TheRegister in Firefox as came with Sarge is followed by a
> > segfault. This is new.
> >
> > Anyone else?
>
> Yeah I am getting regular segfaults wi
"Dr Adrian Midgley (In th e office)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Loading TheRegister in Firefox as came with Sarge is followed by a
> segfault. This is new.
>
> Anyone else?
Yeah I am getting regular segfaults with the following message
,
| The program 'Gecko' received an X Window System
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Steve Kemp wrote:
>
> Disable all your extensions one by one until the problem goes away.
>
> If that works then report back here and let us know which one(s)
> caused the problem.
Extensions present:-
Greasemonkey
Athens Toolbar
Mouse gest
On Mon, Jul 24, 2006 at 05:25:32PM +0100, Dr Adrian Midgley (In th e office)
wrote:
> Loading TheRegister in Firefox as came with Sarge is followed by a
> segfault. This is new.
Probably a result of the recent security update?
I'd suggest it is the result of an extension which was erron
Hi Mike,
Before we proceed, please pardon me if I'm rehashing, but I don't know
your level of skills.
> On Tuesday 18 July 2006 21:58, mike williams wrote:
> > > is it possible to use the gnu\lnux as a "normal" OS to do things
like
> > > browse webpages and download programs etc... and if so,ho
John O'Hagan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Tuesday 18 July 2006 21:58, mike williams wrote:
> > is it possible to use the gnu\lnux as a "normal" OS to do things like
> > browse webpages and download programs etc... and if so,how? i dont have a
> > problem logging in,but then all i get is debia"a"mike~
On Tuesday 18 July 2006 21:58, mike williams wrote:
> is it possible to use the gnu\lnux as a "normal" OS to do things like
> browse webpages and download programs etc... and if so,how? i dont have a
> problem logging in,but then all i get is debia"a"mike~$, what do i do from
> there to browse web
On Tue, Jul 18, 2006 at 04:58:39AM -0700, mike williams wrote:
> is it possible to use the gnu\lnux as a "normal" OS to do things like
> browse webpages and download programs etc... and if so,how? i dont
> have a problem logging in,but then all i get is debia"a"mike~$, what
> do i do from there to
mike williams:
>
> is it possible to use the gnu\lnux as a "normal" OS to do things like
> browse webpages and download programs etc...
Sure it is!
I am not sure what you mean by "downloading programs". With Debian, you
will usually be installing software from (semi-) official repositories.
The t
I did it the other way round and when installing the 64 bit debian, grub found
my 32 bit install and added it to menu.lst.
I have successfully maintained both systems current on unstable for over a year now. Most of the upgrading can be done from within the chroot, although occasionally I
ha
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Jul 14, 2006 at 03:58:32PM +0100, Wackojacko wrote:
...
> I did it the other way round and when installing the 64 bit debian, grub
> found my 32 bit install and added it to menu.lst.
>
> I have successfully maintained both systems current on
Dave Ewart wrote:
On Thursday, 13.07.2006 at 22:40 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Would the above advice still apply if I wanted to use my 32 bit
software and data with a Socket 754 Sempron CPU i.e. I would use a
Sempron which has AMD64 support built in, but I would not use the 64
bit capabili
On Thursday, 13.07.2006 at 22:40 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > Would the above advice still apply if I wanted to use my 32 bit
> > > software and data with a Socket 754 Sempron CPU i.e. I would use a
> > > Sempron which has AMD64 support built in, but I would not use the 64
> > > bit capab
On Thu, Jul 13, 2006 at 07:22:10PM +0100, Dave Ewart wrote:
> On Thursday, 13.07.2006 at 07:27 -0700, michael bailey wrote:
>
> > Would the above advice still apply if I wanted to use my 32 bit
> > software and data with a Socket 754 Sempron CPU i.e. I would use a
> > Sempron which has AMD64 suppo
On Thursday, 13.07.2006 at 07:27 -0700, michael bailey wrote:
> Would the above advice still apply if I wanted to use my 32 bit
> software and data with a Socket 754 Sempron CPU i.e. I would use a
> Sempron which has AMD64 support built in, but I would not use the 64
> bit capability ?
It's alway
101 - 200 of 995 matches
Mail list logo
