Hello Tomy!
On Sun, Apr 18, 2004 at 05:45:14PM +, Tomy Alarie wrote:
> How can i dist upgrade to Sarge ?
Please see the Debian Reference at
http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/reference/ch-woody.en.html#s-testing-transition
Although this chapter describes updating from Potato to Woody (when it
On Sun, Apr 18, 2004 at 04:40:00PM +, Tomy Alarie wrote:
> Hi, i've downloaded 2 first cd iso of sarge today and boot with the
first,
> i configure my location keyboard, and after when its time to initialize a
> hard drive, it couldnt complete this step etc.. or something that means
it
> does
On Sun, 18 Apr 2004 17:47:14 +0100
Dave Thorn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Apr 18, 2004 at 04:40:00PM +, Tomy Alarie wrote:
> > Hi, i've downloaded 2 first cd iso of sarge today and boot with the
> > first, i configure my location keyboard, and after when its time to
> > initialize a
On Sun, Apr 18, 2004 at 04:40:00PM +, Tomy Alarie wrote:
> Hi, i've downloaded 2 first cd iso of sarge today and boot with the first,
> i configure my location keyboard, and after when its time to initialize a
> hard drive, it couldnt complete this step etc.. or something that means it
> doe
This is weird.
It was still locked up this morning, so I started closing programs,
preparatory to the necessary "non-clean" reboot.
Except something in one of the programs I was closing must have been wedging
things, because abruptly the hard drives went into overdrive and load
quickly climbed to
On Fri, Apr 16, 2004 at 07:54:24PM -0700, Erik Steffl wrote:
> what about strace-ing something that tries to authentificate?
Good idea, and this is really, really weird.
Something's screwed up in the library path. It's looking for all
libraries (including libpam) in the
/home/myaccount/qtopia
Carl Fink wrote:
On Fri, Apr 16, 2004 at 05:56:52PM -0700, Erik Steffl wrote:
look at the logs, there is probably something about something there
:-) try ls -lrt to see which logs were changed last (right after you do
sudo or something that doesn't work)
Sure, as soon as I can get a root she
Carl Fink wrote:
I apt-get updated the system this morning. I now find that I can't
do anything that requires login authentication. I noticed it when a
sudo attempt just hung forever. Checking discovered that I can't
sign on as either root or a user, at any prompt including VT's (which
would ru
On Fri, Apr 16, 2004 at 05:56:52PM -0700, Erik Steffl wrote:
> look at the logs, there is probably something about something there
> :-) try ls -lrt to see which logs were changed last (right after you do
> sudo or something that doesn't work)
Sure, as soon as I can get a root shell. I don't
Carl Fink wrote:
I apt-get updated the system this morning. I now find that I can't
do anything that requires login authentication. I noticed it when a
sudo attempt just hung forever. Checking discovered that I can't
sign on as either root or a user, at any prompt including VT's (which
would rul
wex wrote:
Don't start a new thread within an old one.
Lilo is broke on the installer:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=group:linux.debian.user+author:joey+author:hess&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&scoring=d&selm=1CZin-80n-41%40gated-at.bofh.it&rnum=3
Boot the installer vanilla and let him install
Jansen Carlo Sena wrote:
Hi all,
where can I get a installable ISO image from sarge? Can I do this just
with jigdo?
Regards,
Jansen.
http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/cd/jigdo-area/i386/jigdotemplates/sarge-i386-1.template
http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/cd/jigdo-area/i386/sarge-i
On Fri, Apr 02, 2004 at 02:27:10PM +0200, Diepeveen, Jos wrote:
> In starting the download of 'sarge' CD images via the jigdo-mechanism,
> I saw that there are various versions of the first image:
> sarge--1.jigdo, sarge--10.jigdo,
> sarge--11.jigdo and sarge--12.jigdo.
> Why that many versions? An
15:09
To: Diepeveen, Jos; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Sarge jigdo versions
Diepeveen, Jos wrote:
Hi,
In starting the download of 'sarge' CD images via the jigdo-mechanism, I saw that there are various versions
of the first image: sarge--1.jigdo, sarge--10.jigdo,
sarge--11.jigdo
Diepeveen, Jos wrote:
Hi,
In starting the download of 'sarge' CD images via the jigdo-mechanism, I saw that there are various versions
of the first image: sarge--1.jigdo, sarge--10.jigdo,
sarge--11.jigdo and sarge--12.jigdo.
Why that many versions? And which to choose?
Thx.
hello jos,
start
Incoming from Tim Connors:
>
> I miss the old days when people cared about the size of their programs
> and optimising things, instead of just using the "oh it's so cheap to
Me too. :-P A lot of people should go read Bentley's "Programming
Pearls" and find out what it's like to have 2k words of
Colin: thanks for the info. I have the feeling that
Netscape is not the only critical application that
has been broken as I note (but have not yet read) a
messages about compupic further down the page. Your
answer that others have seen and fixed the problem
is comforting... the last time this happe
Leo Spalteholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said on Mon, 29 Mar 2004 13:27:54 -0800:
> On March 29, 2004 11:40 am, Marc Wilson wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 29, 2004 at 10:30:22AM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
> > > Dale Amon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > > While the Mozilla family has many nice new features,
> >
On Mon, Mar 29, 2004 at 11:40:11AM -0800, Marc Wilson wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 29, 2004 at 10:30:22AM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
> > Dale Amon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > While the Mozilla family has many nice new features,
> > > it simply falls over and dies when attempting to print
> > > pages
On March 29, 2004 11:40 am, Marc Wilson wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 29, 2004 at 10:30:22AM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
> > Dale Amon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > While the Mozilla family has many nice new features,
> > > it simply falls over and dies when attempting to print
> > > pages on many major
On Mon, Mar 29, 2004 at 10:30:22AM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
> Dale Amon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > While the Mozilla family has many nice new features,
> > it simply falls over and dies when attempting to print
> > pages on many major news outlets. After Mozilla crashes
> > or locks up cold,
Dale Amon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The latest round of updates seems to be trying to
> remove my netscape browser, which is much unappreciated.
>
> While the Mozilla family has many nice new features,
> it simply falls over and dies when attempting to print
> pages on many major news outlets.
Wolfgang Jeltsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Am Montag, 29. März 2004 11:15 schrieb Krikket:
>> [...]
>
>> Googling hasn't been much use (finding Windows-related stuff...),
>
> Didn't you include "Linux" in the list of words to search for?
"Debian" also can narrow it down a bit as well.
--
.
I had to hand-edit my fstab to get my two CD drives to work.
Under 2.4 kernels, they go on /dev/hd*.
Under 2.6 kernels, if you are using the "deprecated" ide-scsi (still works),
they go on /dev/scd*. If you go over to the "preferred" ide-cd, they go back
to the hd* locations. You can set the mou
On Mon, Mar 29, 2004 at 08:53:23AM -0500, Chris Metzler wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Mar 2004 12:39:15 +0100
> Dale Amon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The latest round of updates seems to be trying to
> > remove my netscape browser, which is much unappreciated.
>
> Presumably you mean Netscape 4.77. It d
On Mon, 29 Mar 2004 12:39:15 +0100
Dale Amon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The latest round of updates seems to be trying to
> remove my netscape browser, which is much unappreciated.
Presumably you mean Netscape 4.77. It depends on old X library
packages whose functionality is replaced by new p
On Mon, Mar 29, 2004 at 04:15:31AM -0500, Krikket wrote:
> I've done a few installs with Sarge, and something wonky has started
> happening. (Although I blame my router for this... For some reason it's
> started issuing IPs to any machine (in networlk) that sends along a DHCP
> request, even if t
Am Montag, 29. März 2004 11:15 schrieb Krikket:
> [...]
> Googling hasn't been much use (finding Windows-related stuff...),
Didn't you include "Linux" in the list of words to search for?
> [...]
Wolfgang
Andy Zbikowski (Zibby) wrote:
> I dug an old Alpha box (Digital/Compaq/HP/Whatever Personal Workstation
> 500a) out of storage today, threw a couple drives and some memory in, and
> grabbed the latest Sarge netinst CD.
>
> Unfourtanatly, the installer hangs on detecting hardware, specifically the
On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 04:20:13PM -0600, Andy Zbikowski (Zibby) wrote:
> I dug an old Alpha box (Digital/Compaq/HP/Whatever Personal Workstation
> 500a) out of storage today, threw a couple drives and some memory in, and
> grabbed the latest Sarge netinst CD.
>
> Unfourtanatly, the installer hang
I didn't follow the whole thread, so I hope the following is
meaningful. I also believe I had a similar problem and got help on
debian-boot.
In my case the reason that the kernel installation, and, more
precisely, mkinitrd failed is that there is/was a bug with etc/fstab in
the partitioner. Wh
Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
steef wrote:
Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
steef
3. with the aumatic installer i did not come anywhere, during
installing sarge this part of the sarge-installer did not recognize
my hd's in two occasions.
Thanks Steef! We'll wait still a little bit longer!
Hugo.
yep
steef wrote:
Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
steef wrote:
On Friday 12 March 2004 23:44, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
steef wrote:
Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
on my machine i got the sarge-installer running after manually
selecting
a root partition __and___ defining the file-type manually. (this
after
' part
Original Message
Subject: Re: sarge installer ver. 03/10/2004
Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2004 22:55:57 +0100
From: steef <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Organization: zeta
To: Hugo Vanwoerkom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Debian-User
<[EMAIL PROTECT
Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
steef wrote:
On Friday 12 March 2004 23:44, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
steef wrote:
Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
on my machine i got the sarge-installer running after manually
selecting
a root partition __and___ defining the file-type manually. (this
after
' partitioning' of
steef wrote:
On Friday 12 March 2004 23:44, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
steef wrote:
Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
on my machine i got the sarge-installer running after manually selecting
a root partition __and___ defining the file-type manually. (this after
' partitioning' of course) did you do so too?
On Friday 12 March 2004 23:44, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> steef wrote:
> > Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> >> Hi!
> >>
> >> I have reported this also in the bugreports, but I get the impression
> >> that that is a bottomless pit somehow.
> >>
> >> Using the 03/10/2004 iso image of the installer I tried to u
steef wrote:
Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
Hi!
I have reported this also in the bugreports, but I get the impression
that that is a bottomless pit somehow.
Using the 03/10/2004 iso image of the installer I tried to use it.
If you just press enter on boot he cycles himself through the steps.
Problems
Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
Hi!
I have reported this also in the bugreports, but I get the impression
that that is a bottomless pit somehow.
Using the 03/10/2004 iso image of the installer I tried to use it.
If you just press enter on boot he cycles himself through the steps.
Problems started in "
On Fri, Mar 12, 2004 at 09:13:16AM -0600, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> I have reported this also in the bugreports, but I get the impression
> that that is a bottomless pit somehow.
It's unlikely that you'll get better help here than on debian-boot.
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson
On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 10:08:47AM +0200, Aryan Ameri wrote:
> Does anyone have any idea when Debian Sarge will be released as stable?
> I know, it will be released when it's ready, but I am setting up a
> schedule here for my tasks, and even if I could have an approximate
> date of it's release
On Wednesday 03 March 2004 20:30, Steffen Michalek wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I just today tried to install sarge testing:
>
> Downloaded 3 floppy images, proofed them,
> I booted, loaded net driver, processed the
> installation procedure...
>
> but suddenly, after loading things from
> ftp2.de.debian...(
Colin Watson wrote:
> As I understand it, that usually happens if you're trying to install
> onto a non-empty partition. The target filesystem needs to be blank.
Yes, and for what it's worth, current versions of the installer detect
this problem, give you a clear warning message and let you back u
Erich Waelde wrote:
> http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/sarge_d-i/i386/current/
Please don't use these. There are prominent links on the
debian-installer's web page (http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer)
to the CD images we recommend you use.
> Also note that you can search the l
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 08:54:35PM +0100, Cyril Bérion wrote:
> > I'm trying to install a sarge on an ext2 partition.
> > Partitionning configuration is ok but then I face the following
> > problem:
> > System installation ends with an error. The file
> > /target/var
On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 08:54:35PM +0100, Cyril Bérion wrote:
> I'm trying to install a sarge on an ext2 partition.
> Partitionning configuration is ok but then I face the following
> problem:
> System installation ends with an error. The file
> /target/var/log/debootstrap.log says:
>
> ln: /targe
On Monday 01 March 2004 20:54, Cyril Bérion wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to install a sarge on an ext2 partition.
> Partitionning configuration is ok but then I face the following problem:
> System installation ends with an error. The file
> /target/var/log/debootstrap.log says:
>
> ln: /target/usr/
Hello Timothy!
On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 08:47:45PM -0500, Timothy Spear wrote:
Since I am new to debian, I went for the gusto and have installed the
sarge release. :-) I recently ran aptitude to update all the installed
packages. Durring the update, a slew of warning messages went by. Does
aptitu
On Monday 16 February 2004 06:52 pm, Jack Carroll wrote:
> There's a new sarge installer???
Yes.
> Can anybody tell me where it resides?
http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/
> Is there documentation with it?
See the website for an installation HOWTO.
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
There's a new sarge installer??? Can anybody tell me where it
resides? Is there documentation with it?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hmm.
Your message was a multipart/alternative message, one part plain text,
the other part "text/enriched", which seems to be a strange pseudo-HTML
kind of thing (RFC 1896). The bug tracking system's logic follows the
MIME specification and takes the last part it understands.
Unfortunately, it tho
On Sun, Feb 15, 2004 at 09:42:03AM -0500, Steven Leach wrote:
> When I tried the Beta 2 a week or two ago, I tried (as per the
> instructions on the debian-installer website) to file a bug report.
>
> Fill out template
> (http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/report-template)
> chec
Please write to the debian-boot list and describe the problems you've
had, they love install reports :-)
When I tried the Beta 2 a week or two ago, I tried (as per the
instructions on the debian-installer website) to file a bug report.
Fill out template
(http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-instal
On Sat, Feb 14, 2004 at 08:05:19PM -0500, Steven Leach said
> After yet another failed attempt to install Sarge from the latest
> unofficial ISO onto my spare/testing partition, I am currently
> reinstalling Woody.
>
> I am curious what kind of luck others have had with the Sarge
> installer. The
On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 05:20:30PM +0100, Kjetil Kjernsmo wrote:
> I'm tracking Sarge now, and for the past couple of days, when I tried
> dist-upgrade, it has wanted to remove pretty much every KDE package on
> my system...
When I upgraded from stable to Sarge about 3-4 months ago, it remove
Kjetil Kjernsmo kjernsmo.net> writes:
> I'm tracking Sarge now, and for the past couple of days, when I tried
> dist-upgrade, it has wanted to remove pretty much every KDE package on
> my system...
Make sure to check the DebianKDE Wiki page as well:
http://wiki.debian.net/index.cgi?DebianKDE
On Thursday 12 February 2004 18:09, Adam Aube wrote:
> On Thursday 12 February 2004 11:20 am, Kjetil Kjernsmo wrote:
> > I'm tracking Sarge now, and for the past couple of days, when I
> > tried dist-upgrade, it has wanted to remove pretty much every KDE
> > package on my system...
>
> KDE is curre
On Thursday 12 February 2004 11:20 am, Kjetil Kjernsmo wrote:
> I'm tracking Sarge now, and for the past couple of days, when I tried
> dist-upgrade, it has wanted to remove pretty much every KDE package on
> my system...
KDE is currently broken in Sarge. The 3.1.5 packages coming from Sid
should
On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 05:20:30PM +0100, Kjetil Kjernsmo wrote:
> I'm tracking Sarge now, and for the past couple of days, when I tried
> dist-upgrade, it has wanted to remove pretty much every KDE package on
> my system...
KDE's not yet completely working in sarge, so I can't say I'm surprise
>> Hi, I'm attempting to install 'testing' on a very
>> old PC which will not boot from CDROM, and does not
>> have a "common" NIC (it's an SMC something). I have referred to
>> http://http.us.debian.org/debian/dists/testing/main/installer-i386/cu
>>rrent/doc/INSTALLATION-HOWTO and have tried to in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 11 February 2004 12:40 am, Alexis Huxley wrote:
> Hi, I'm attempting to install 'testing' on a very
> old PC which will not boot from CDROM, and does not
> have a "common" NIC (it's an SMC something). I have referred to
> http://http.us.de
On Mon, 02 Feb 2004 00:11:29 -0500
Travis Crump <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Simon Buchanan wrote:
> > Does anyone know what the timeframes are for debian testing to
> > become stable?
> >
> >
>
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2003/debian-devel-announce-200308/msg00010.html
>
>
Simon Buchanan wrote:
Does anyone know what the timeframes are for debian testing to become stable?
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2003/debian-devel-announce-200308/msg00010.html
;)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Mon, 02 Feb 2004 17:36:42 +1300
Simon Buchanan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does anyone know what the timeframes are for debian testing to become
> stable?
About six weeks on original estimates, but I would look at two months.
Regards,
David.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
High,
On 28 Jan 2004, Dr Gavin Seddon wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I cannot install Sarge, since when I start installing the kernel it
> stops and tells me there is an error on installing devices, I have a
> (scsi tape). The error is documented in /target/var/log. Which I
> cannot write to floppy and ca
On Sun, Jan 25, 2004 at 01:34:32AM +0900, Bengt Thure'e wrote:
| Hej,
|
| I am wondering if Sarges Postfix works with SMTP Auth.
Yes.
| Have not managed to get it to work with PAM-SASLauthd
| If anyone have managed to get it working I would be delighted to receive
| some hints and tips...
Ins
http://www.debian.org/CD/http-ftp/#testing
On Fri, Jan 23, 2004 at 10:29:14PM +0100, knoppix wrote:
> HI
>
> Where can I find a sarge iso please
>
> thx
>
> Arkel
>
HTH
--
Joachim Fahnenmüller
# Hi! I'm a .signature virus. Copy me into
# your ~/.signature to help me spread!
--
To UNSUBSC
Sometime near Fri, Jan 23, 2004 at 10:29:14PM +0100, knoppix wrote:
> HI
>
> Where can I find a sarge iso please
>
> thx
>
google
--
Cheers,
rinmak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 19 Jan 2004 23:30:20 +0100, schall wrote:
> Thanks a lot. But I think that my problem is that when I run base-config the
> system asks me some questions about X, and servers, and programs, ... and I
> can't answer them because I don't know what they are. As you can see, I'm a
> newbie.
Us
Thanks a lot. But I think that my problem is that when I run base-config the
system asks me some questions about X, and servers, and programs, ... and I
can't answer them because I don't know what they are. As you can see, I'm a
newbie. So, I'm looking for an installation guide especially for the
b
Yes sir :
here is the official site;
http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/
The page also points to a install howto manual. If you want more
options check this out.
http://linuxmafia.com/faq/Debian/installers.html
Enjoy;
Rthoreau
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wit
> Also, did a dist-upgrade this morning, which upgraded
> libapache-mod-speedycgi, check it out:
>
> Setting up libapache-mod-speedycgi (2.22-0) ...
> /usr/sbin/apachectl: line 171: 28155 Segmentation fault $HTTPD -t >/dev/null 2>&1
>
Apparently one of the things automatically upgraded durin
On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 12:50:49AM -0600, Hanasaki JiJi wrote:
> lsmod is reporting the below under kernel 2.6.0test9 The kernel is
> running on a sarge box that is updated for all packages as of 11/18/2003
> @ 12:50AM
>
> what is QM_Modules? what does this mean? is there a fix?
>
> thank you.
Hanasaki JiJi wrote:
lsmod is reporting the below under kernel 2.6.0test9 The kernel is
running on a sarge box that is updated for all packages as of 11/18/2003
@ 12:50AM
what is QM_Modules? what does this mean? is there a fix?
thank you.
=>lsmod
Module Size Used byNot t
- Original Message -
Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
>
> Because of previous posts that the "stable" sarge netiso was not booting
> I downloaded the 11/15 version on Sunday.
>
> Very fast server: could do it easy on my 56kb line.
>
> It boots.
I'm not sure what you mean by "stable" sarge, but
> Yesterday, I downloaded the following image:
> http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/netinst/i386/sarge-i386-netinst.iso
> Burned the image to CD using Xcdroast, CD refuses to boot. The CD
> will mount and read properly. Tried another self-burned bootable CD
> (different image) and it boote
On Fri, Nov 07, 2003 at 05:10:56 -0800, Ralph Bacolod wrote:
> Hi! When is sarge release date?
When it is ready.
For more information, follow the debian-release list and
http://bugs.debian.org/release-critical/ .
This really ought to be in the FAQ.
Ray
--
"Perhaps they spent some of the time w
Dani wrote:
> I installed a Samsung SC-148B CD driver in my secondary master and tried
> the installation. Guess what. I had exactly the same problem. It seems
> not to be something of the CD or CD-RW driver. Might it be the
> motherboard?
Maybe it would help if you tried to get it working aft
Hi.
On Fri, 31 Oct 2003 04:58:56 -0800, "Bob Nielsen nielsen-at-oz.net
|debian-testing|" said:
> On Fri, Oct 31, 2003 at 01:21:06PM +0100, Dani wrote:
> > On Wed, 29 Oct 2003 19:10:26 -0800, "Bob Nielsen nielsen-at-oz.net
> > |debian-testing|" said:
> > > On Wed, Oct 29, 2003 at 07:58:18PM +0100
Hi.
On Wed, 29 Oct 2003 19:10:26 -0800, "Bob Nielsen nielsen-at-oz.net
|debian-testing|" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Wed, Oct 29, 2003 at 07:58:18PM +0100, Dani wrote:
> > I'm netinstalling Debian Sarge from a minimal CD. I boot the CD
> > and it fails to autodetect the CD drive, maybe becaus
On Wed, 29 Oct 2003 13:31:34 -0800, "Marc Wilson msw-at-cox.net
|debian-user|" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Wed, Oct 29, 2003 at 07:58:18PM +0100, Dani wrote:
> > I'm netinstalling Debian Sarge from a minimal CD.
> > The installation show me the following list of kernel modules:
> > aztcd, cdu31a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 29 October 2003 09:58 am, Dani wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I'm netinstalling Debian Sarge from a minimal CD. I boot the CD and
> it fails to autodetect the CD drive, maybe because it's a CD-RW.
> It's Sony CRX175A1. The installation show me the fo
On Wed, Oct 29, 2003 at 07:58:18PM +0100, Dani wrote:
> I'm netinstalling Debian Sarge from a minimal CD.
> The installation show me the following list of kernel modules:
> aztcd, cdu31a, cm206, gscd, isp16, mcd, mcdx, optcd, sbpcd, sjcd,
> sonycd535.
None of those. Those are all meant to drive t
On Sun, 17 Aug 2003 08:21:29 -0400 (GMT)
Paul Morgan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Fixed it. Ran an upgrade via aptitude which installed a few packages
> but removed none. Now apt-get dist-upgrade thinks everything's up to
> date. Must have been some dependency glitch.
[snip]
> 1 packages upgr
Fixed it. Ran an upgrade via aptitude which installed a few packages but removed
none. Now apt-get dist-upgrade thinks everything's up to date. Must have been some
dependency glitch.
..paul
---Original Message---
From: Paul Morgan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: 08/17/03 10:21 AM
To: [
Hi Yall & Manolis,
most cool from another Greek Geek :-)
Still, some of these non-Greeks (Barbarians), are not half bad
Geeks ;-)
*please note; tongue in cheek!*
This is weird, maybe one of your dimms is bad ? Run memtest86
for 5-6 hrs. to verify it before installing. (www.lnx-bbc.or
[20030620] Haralambos ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Hiya,
Hello
> If I take out one stick, then I can get the OS on, but not stable.
> Any tips, tricks or links please?
This is weird, maybe one of your dimms is bad ? Run memtest86
for 5-6 hrs. to verify it before installing. (www.lnx-bbc.org
fo
Hello Glen,
Glen Snyder wrote:
> I did a dist-upgrade yesterday with sarge, and had a problem. If I use
> "apt-get -f install" , I get the following error:
Sorry, but what do you want to install?
> Removing pxfonts ...
> chmod: failed to get attributes of `/etc/texmf/dvips/updmap': No such
> fil
Once upon a time Hanasaki JiJi wrote @ Mon, 26 May 2003 09:14:56 -0500
> Hello all,
>
> Seems sarge has xchat2 that needs gtk2
> Seems woody has xchat1 that needs gtk1
> sarge has gnome 1.4
> gnome2 is needed to configure gtk2
>
> xchat2 is showing black text on black.
>
> Any ideas for resolut
The views seem to be gone.. in sawfish-ui add more "workspaces" this
will get more desktops. still wondering if its normal behavior and a
enhancement to sawfish or i broke something.
Jeremy Brooks wrote:
On Tue, 2003-05-27 at 20:32, Hanasaki JiJi wrote:
Just did a dist-upgrade on sarge and gn
On Tue, 2003-05-27 at 20:32, Hanasaki JiJi wrote:
> Just did a dist-upgrade on sarge and gnome sawfish no longer has the
> panels / menus on the borders.
>
> is it broken in sarge? did i break something?
>
> Thanks
I'm having a similar problem - the sawfish config tool is now missing
from the g
On Sun, Mar 30, 2003 at 10:28:07AM -0500, David Krider wrote:
> Please note that I'm NOT trolling or looking to start a flamewar. It's
> just that it took me three tries to get Woody installed. I've heard that
> Sarge will have a new installer and a new manual.
In that case, don't worry about it.
On Sunday 30 March 2003 10:28, David Krider wrote:
> Please note that I'm NOT trolling or looking to start a flamewar. It's
> just that it took me three tries to get Woody installed. I've heard that
> Sarge will have a new installer and a new manual. I'm looking to get a
> feel for the timeframe.
On Sun, 2003-03-30 at 10:28, David Krider wrote:
> I realize that there's no official release date for Sarge, but does
> anyone have a guesstimate of when it might actually be? I'm not looking
> for a day, per se, but 3 months? Six months? A year?
>
> Please note that I'm NOT trolling or looking t
On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 11:35:01PM -0800, Cordazer Calvin Broadus wrote:
> In the ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/dists/woody/main folder there
> exists a subdirectory 'disks-i386' Why does this subdirectory exist
> for the sid and sarge releases?
Er, do you mean `why _doesn't_ this directory exist f
901 - 995 of 995 matches
Mail list logo
