On Mon, Oct 22, 2001 at 10:20:56AM -0500, Hanasaki JiJi wrote:
> Where, exactly, did this text come from?
It's quoted from the license agreement for Star Office 6 beta.
--
Tommi Komulainen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG 1024D/68388EE66FD6 DD79 EB38 BF6F 3533 09C0 0
Where, exactly, did this text come from?
will trillich wrote:
On Sat, Oct 13, 2001 at 08:35:51PM +0300, Tommi Komulainen wrote:
On Sat, Oct 13, 2001 at 06:11:08AM -0700, sheine wrote:
I have downloaded all the files for Star Office 6, but haven't the
slightest idea of how to install them.
On Sat, Oct 13, 2001 at 08:35:51PM +0300, Tommi Komulainen wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 13, 2001 at 06:11:08AM -0700, sheine wrote:
> > I have downloaded all the files for Star Office 6, but haven't the
> > slightest idea of how to install them. The guide describes a method that
> > relates to the CD ver
On Sat, Oct 13, 2001 at 01:37:55PM -0700, sheine wrote:
> Tommi Komulainen wrote:
>
> > Just a thought, you weren't planning to do anything productive with, or
> > did you? If you did, guess you'd better reconsider:
[I was referring to StarOffice there]
I guess I should've added more smileys th
Phillip Deackes wrote:
>
> On Sat, 13 Oct 2001 07:12:06 -0700
> sheine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I changed the permissions and got new troubles. The soa and sop files
> > started, but told me that I did not have enough disk memory, when I am
> > reasonably sure that I do. The first so file
Hello sheine,
I am not sure what qualifies for serious work. I have been using
StarOffice 5.2 since it came out for serious and productive work
without nearly the amount of lost work as I had previously with
any MS office product. It's not perfect but it is more reliable
than MS products I have
sheine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Tommi Komulainen wrote:
>> Just a thought, you weren't planning to do anything productive
>> with, or did you? If you did, guess you'd better reconsider:
> This message caused me to reconsider the several years that I have
> fooled around with linux. Maybe i
Tommi Komulainen wrote:
Just a thought, you weren't planning to do anything productive with, or
did you? If you did, guess you'd better reconsider:
This message caused me to reconsider the several years that I have fooled
around with linux. Maybe it is just a computer game, not a serious tool
On Sat, Oct 13, 2001 at 06:11:08AM -0700, sheine wrote:
> I have downloaded all the files for Star Office 6, but haven't the
> slightest idea of how to install them. The guide describes a method that
> relates to the CD version. All the files are of the form *.bin. Does
> anybody know what to do
On Sat, Oct 13, 2001 at 07:12:06AM -0700, sheine wrote:
> I changed the permissions and got new troubles. The soa and sop files
> started, but told me that I did not have enough disk memory, when I am
> reasonably sure that I do. The first so file told me that I needed the
> directory on the las
On Sat, 13 Oct 2001 07:12:06 -0700
sheine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I changed the permissions and got new troubles. The soa and sop files
> started, but told me that I did not have enough disk memory, when I am
> reasonably sure that I do. The first so file told me that I needed the
> direct
I changed the permissions and got new troubles. The soa and sop files
started, but told me that I did not have enough disk memory, when I am
reasonably sure that I do. The first so file told me that I needed the
directory on the last so file. When I tried it, I was told that a bin
file couldn't
On Sat, Oct 13, 2001 at 06:11:08AM -0700, sheine wrote:
> I have downloaded all the files for Star Office 6, but haven't the
> slightest idea of how to install them. The guide describes a method that
> relates to the CD version. All the files are of the form *.bin. Does
> anybody know what to do
13 matches
Mail list logo
