promise would it be better to use "Reply-To-List".
> >
> > And in other cases is it also better to use "Reply-To-List".
>
> I know it is a hot topic here. Preferences vary by the sender, which
> I can't perfectly know.
>
> My e-mail client hon
On Sun, Feb 25, 2024 at 10:35:33AM +0100, Geert Stappers wrote:
[Adjusting the topic]
> For keeping that promise would it be better to use "Reply-To-List".
>
> And in other cases is it also better to use "Reply-To-List".
I know it is a hot topic here. Preference
lowup-To” and “Mail-Reply-To”
https://cr.yp.to/proto/replyto.html>.
> I could do that, I'm sure (though I'm not sure how) - but I'd rather
> that someone intending to send me a private reply didn't send it to the
> list by mistake. Having to (in my case) click &
From: joel.r...@gmail.com
> And Now Google Doesn't Think Users Should Ever Set Headers.
> Progress is progress.
Yeah.
Progress is progress.
ahem. Sorry. I guess I forgot something.
{irony}Progress is progress.{end-irony}
--
Joel Rees
If you live in a cave this may actually have some meaning amo
On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 10:52 PM, Fungi4All wrote:
> UTC Time: June 10, 2017 2:13 AM
>
> From: joel.r...@gmail.com
>
> On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 12:57 AM, Nicolas George wrote:
>> Le primidi 21 prairial, an CCXXV, The Wanderer a écrit :
>>> Disagreed. This results in sending extra copies to people
UTC Time: June 10, 2017 2:13 AM
From: joel.r...@gmail.com
On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 12:57 AM, Nicolas George wrote:
> Le primidi 21 prairial, an CCXXV, The Wanderer a écrit :
>> Disagreed. This results in sending extra copies to people who are
>> subscribed to the list, which is incorrect.
>
> Not
On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 12:57 AM, Nicolas George wrote:
> Le primidi 21 prairial, an CCXXV, The Wanderer a écrit :
>> Disagreed. This results in sending extra copies to people who are
>> subscribed to the list, which is incorrect.
>
> Not if the list is properly configured.
>
> Debian's lists are
On 2017-06-09 at 11:57, Nicolas George wrote:
> Le primidi 21 prairial, an CCXXV, The Wanderer a écrit :
>
>> Disagreed. This results in sending extra copies to people who are
>> subscribed to the list, which is incorrect.
>
> Not if the list is properly configured.
What configuration would avoi
Le primidi 21 prairial, an CCXXV, The Wanderer a écrit :
> Disagreed. This results in sending extra copies to people who are
> subscribed to the list, which is incorrect.
Not if the list is properly configured.
Debian's lists are badly configured, it results in burden to all users,
but the users
ing.
>
> This recommendation is unsustainable and should be eliminated from the
> guidelines. It only exists because the mailing-list server is not
> configured correctly.
>
> The reply-to-list feature is flawed because it requires the user to
> give special attention each time
e person you are
> answering.
This recommendation is unsustainable and should be eliminated from the
guidelines. It only exists because the mailing-list server is not
configured correctly.
The reply-to-list feature is flawed because it requires the user to give
special attention each time
ering.
>
> This recommendation is unsustainable and should be eliminated from
> the guidelines. It only exists because the mailing-list server is
> not configured correctly.
>
> The reply-to-list feature is flawed because it requires the user to
> give special attention each time &
guidelines. It only exists because the mailing-list server is not
configured correctly.
The reply-to-list feature is flawed because it requires the user to give
special attention each time "am I replying to a personal mail or to a
mailing-list"? The correct behaviour should be the default
Paul Cartwright schreef:
On 02/14/2011 06:09 AM, Sjoerd Hardeman wrote:
A copy to the list for the archive
ok, I see what I was doing wrong. In Eudora, CTRL-R is reply, it replies
to the person. CTRL-SHFT-L replies to THE LIST..
I didn't realize Eudora had that function.
No problem. And a d
On 02/14/2011 06:09 AM, Sjoerd Hardeman wrote:
A copy to the list for the archive
ok, I see what I was doing wrong. In Eudora, CTRL-R is reply, it replies
to the person. CTRL-SHFT-L replies to THE LIST..
I didn't realize Eudora had that function.
--
Paul Cartwright
rt to edit the CC list, but I'll lapse when I get
lazy! Thanks, Boyd.
If you use thunderbird/icedove:
https://addons.mozilla.org/nl/thunderbird/addon/4455/
this gives you a reply-to-list button. The new version of icedove in
squeeze/sid has this button by default, and does not require this pl
In <4a9cd879.8040...@cox.net>, Ron Johnson wrote:
>On 2009-09-01 03:01, Steve Lamb wrote:
>> After a quick check with the all knowing oracle,
>> Google,
>
>When did Larry Ellison buy Google??
Case is important. Larry Ellison is associated with Oracle; Google is a bit
of an oracle.
--
Boyd Steph
On Tue, 01 Sep 2009 01:01:51 -0700
Steve Lamb wrote:
Hello Steve,
> Er, you do know there's little correlation between the to and cc
> headers with what goes on at SMTP time? Those headers exist for the
Yes, I know that. The "something" I was referring to would have been
local. Beyond th
On 2009-09-01 03:01, Steve Lamb wrote:
[snip]
As for the client side I don't recall if 2822 states there can only be one
of those headers. After a quick check with the all knowing oracle, Google,
When did Larry Ellison buy Google??
looks like to and cc can have a minimum of 0 and a max
Brad Rogers wrote:
> On Sun, 30 Aug 2009 16:36:39 -0700
> Marc Shapiro wrote:
> Hello Marc,
>> As Brad said, it does not appear to be included in the outgoing mail,
> If it were, I would hope something somewhere would complain about the
> empty header, rather than just silently ignore it, even
On Sun, 30 Aug 2009 16:36:39 -0700
Marc Shapiro wrote:
Hello Marc,
> As Brad said, it does not appear to be included in the outgoing mail,
If it were, I would hope something somewhere would complain about the
empty header, rather than just silently ignore it, even though a valid
header exists.
On Sun,30.Aug.09, 10:41:10, Ken Heard wrote:
> What is needed to get it to work? I have Lenny and Icedove 2.0.0.22
> (20090726). I downloaded from http://alumnit.ca replytolist-0.3.0.xpi;
> put it in directory /usr/lib/icedove/extensions; changed owner:group to
> root:root; and changed permissi
Ken Heard wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Steve Lamb wrote:
Ken Heard wrote:
Am I doing something wrong?
Overthinking it? I just downloaded, went to TBird, Tools -> Addons ->
Install and chose the file from my download directory.
That's exactly what I did, but it d
this extra To: also does not appear.
Finally, thanks to Ron Johnson for finally teaching us how to actually
make Reply to List work, instead of only displaying a greyed button. :-)
The extra "To:" line appears to be harmless, or, at least, mostly
harmless. As Brad said, it does not app
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Steve Lamb wrote:
> Ken Heard wrote:
>> Am I doing something wrong?
>
> Overthinking it? I just downloaded, went to TBird, Tools -> Addons ->
> Install and chose the file from my download directory.
That's exactly what I did, but it did not inst
Ken Heard wrote:
> Am I doing something wrong?
Overthinking it? I just downloaded, went to TBird, Tools -> Addons ->
Install and chose the file from my download directory.
--
Steve C. Lamb | But who decides what they dream?
PGP Key: 8B6E99C5 | And dream I do.
the
> file anymore.
>
>> However it would not install. Clicking on Tools>Add-ons says that Reply
>> To List 03.0 will be installed when Icedove is restarted, but it never
>> gets installed -- even if I hit the Install button.
>
> Dumb question, but... did you re
-x; and told Icedove where
> it is.
This is not necessary, you just need to open Add-ons, install, and point
to the file - wherever it is. And afterwards you don't really need the
file anymore.
> However it would not install. Clicking on Tools>Add-ons says that Reply
> To Lis
I have Lenny and Icedove 2.0.0.22
(20090726). I downloaded from http://alumnit.ca replytolist-0.3.0.xpi;
put it in directory /usr/lib/icedove/extensions; changed owner:group to
root:root; and changed permissions to -rwxr-xr-x; and told Icedove where
it is.
However it would not install. Clicking on
is extra To: also does not appear.
Finally, thanks to Ron Johnson for finally teaching us how to actually
make Reply to List work, instead of only displaying a greyed button. :-)
--
BOFH excuse #310:
asynchronous inode failure
Eduardo M KALINOWSKI
edua...@kalinowski.com.br
--
On Sat, 29 Aug 2009 23:32:41 -0700
Marc Shapiro wrote:
Hello Marc,
> additional blank "To:" line is added. Is there a setting to avoid
> this additional "To:" line?
If T'Bird is anything like Claws-Mail, the appearance of a second,
empty, To: field is only an aesthetic inconvenience. It's the
On 2009-08-30 00:25, Steve Lamb wrote:
Ron Johnson wrote:
These are the two which I need:
mnenhy
replytolist
"Reply To List" will still be greyed out, though, until within Mnenhy
you enable "Extended Normal View". And don't forget that you can
customize the to
s there an official mail client
of this
mailing list that I should be using, on all computers (and OSes) that I
access email from?
lol, very funny, but no. You just need reply-list, which now that I look
(Google), you need an extension to enable this in Icedove.
These are the two which I need:
Ron Johnson wrote:
> These are the two which I need:
> mnenhy
> replytolist
> "Reply To List" will still be greyed out, though, until within Mnenhy
> you enable "Extended Normal View". And don't forget that you can
> customize the toolbar to add the RT
al mail client of this
mailing list that I should be using, on all computers (and OSes) that I
access email from?
lol, very funny, but no. You just need reply-list, which now that I look
(Google), you need an extension to enable this in Icedove.
These are the two which I need:
mnenhy
replyto
I know a few people are interested in this feature in TBird and, like me,
have issues with the current addon which provides similar functionality. This
just came through bugzilla.
-
--- Comment #184 from Bryan W Clark (:clarkbw) 2009-05-08
18:18:29 PDT ---
Blake, I'm guessing you don
Andrei Popescu said:
> Sylpheed and Claws-Mail have Win32 versions.
And they reply correctly to mailing lists.
Cybe R. Wizard
--
Nice computers don't go down.
Larry Niven, Steven Barnes
"The Barsoom Project"
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debia
On Mon,05.Jan.09, 15:27:44, Ken Teague wrote:
> Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> > See, I just think you guys should stop using bad clients. ;) Kmail
> > replies
> > to the list (and only to the list) by default. (Which, actually, appears
> > to
> > be a violation on the relevant standards.
On Mon, 5 Jan 2009 23:20:14 +0100 (CET), Moderation Robot in
gmane.linux.debian.user wrote:
> Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
>> I believe the (quite valid) suggestion to ditch Gmail is because it
>> does not have a 'reply to list function'. Well, there are several
>>
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 07:37:39 -0500, Paul Cartwright in gmane.linux.debian.user
wrote:
> On Tue January 6 2009, Michelle Konzack wrote:
>> I am using "mutt" since 9 years now and currently I have open four XTerm
>> running "mutt". There is nothing which does not work on it.
>>
>> Thanks, Greetings
Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 01/07/09 05:30, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
>> iceape-mailnews ;-)
> The MUA that starts with Ice and isn't the red-headed step-child...
Ice ice baby?
Da dun nun da nunnun?
--
Steve C. Lamb | But who can decide what they dream
PGP Key: 1FC
On 01/07/09 05:30, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 10:44:48PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 01/06/09 22:37, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 10:27:46PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 01/06/09 21:48, Steve Lamb wrote:
Ron Johnson wrote:
Are you using stock Tbird, or Icew
On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 10:44:48PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 01/06/09 22:37, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 10:27:46PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
>>> On 01/06/09 21:48, Steve Lamb wrote:
Ron Johnson wrote:
> Are you using stock Tbird, or Iceweasel? (I/w has certain pa
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> I agree and there has been work on that. However, I've yet to see a good
> UI for composing sieve scripts. I think one of the webmail packages
> SquirelMail(?) or RoundCube(?) has the beginning of a UI.
Squirrelmail, with the appropriate addon activated.
--
On Tuesday 06 January 2009, Steve Lamb wrote about 'Re:
[OT] mailing lists versus usenet / reply to list, reply-to, reply':
>Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
>> I prefer a sieve, the standard language for server-side mail filtering,
>> implementation on my IMAP (and manag
Ron Johnson wrote:
> God must not love you.
Being an Atheist I'm used to it.
--
Steve C. Lamb | But who can decide what they dream
PGP Key: 1FC01004 | and dream I do
---+-
signature.
On 01/06/09 22:37, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 10:27:46PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 01/06/09 21:48, Steve Lamb wrote:
Ron Johnson wrote:
Are you using stock Tbird, or Iceweasel? (I/w has certain patches
needed by r-t-l.)
Stock from Ubuntu/Debian packaging respectively
On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 10:27:46PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 01/06/09 21:48, Steve Lamb wrote:
>> Ron Johnson wrote:
>>> Are you using stock Tbird, or Iceweasel? (I/w has certain patches
>>> needed by r-t-l.)
>>
>> Stock from Ubuntu/Debian packaging respectively. Both of which have
>> ha
On 01/06/09 21:48, Steve Lamb wrote:
Ron Johnson wrote:
Are you using stock Tbird, or Iceweasel? (I/w has certain patches
needed by r-t-l.)
Stock from Ubuntu/Debian packaging respectively. Both of which have
had the patch as part of the Debian version for close to 2 years now (I think).
On 01/06/09 18:53, Michelle Konzack wrote:
Hello Ron?
Am 2009-01-06 13:07:16, schrieb Ron Johnson:
maildrop is what you want. *Much* more rational than procmail.
(But then, I like Python...)
Maildrop is the last thing one would install... The
same for Sieve. If you try to konfigure those
Michelle Konzack wrote:
>
> Maildrop is the last thing one would install... The
> same for Sieve. If you try to konfigure those blobs
> you will get knots and cancer in your brain.
>
Glad to see you're as rational as ever.
--
Steve C. Lamb | But who can decide what they
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> I prefer a sieve, the standard language for server-side mail filtering,
> implementation on my IMAP (and managesieve) server.
If only mail clients would incorporate sieve into their normal filtering.
IE, my dad probably can't write sieve filters but he can use
Ron Johnson wrote:
> Are you using stock Tbird, or Iceweasel? (I/w has certain patches
> needed by r-t-l.)
Stock from Ubuntu/Debian packaging respectively. Both of which have
had the patch as part of the Debian version for close to 2 years now (I think).
--
Steve C. Lamb |
Hello Ron?
Am 2009-01-06 13:07:16, schrieb Ron Johnson:
> maildrop is what you want. *Much* more rational than procmail.
> (But then, I like Python...)
Maildrop is the last thing one would install... The
same for Sieve. If you try to konfigure those blobs
you will get knots and cancer in you
Hi,
Am 2009-01-06 12:09:24, schrieb hose:
> I used to use pine too - loved it. I switched to mutt shortly after
> college at the encouragement of a number of coworkers. It was
> unfortunately terrible for the first couple hours. Then someone gave
> me their .muttrc and it was like the who
On 01/06/09 13:44, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
On Tuesday 2009 January 06 13:07:16 Ron Johnson wrote:
I use procmail.
maildrop is what you want.
I prefer a sieve, the standard language for server-side mail filtering,
implementation on my IMAP (and managesieve) server.
Google doesn't seem
On Tuesday 2009 January 06 13:07:16 Ron Johnson wrote:
> > I use procmail.
>
> maildrop is what you want.
I prefer a sieve, the standard language for server-side mail filtering,
implementation on my IMAP (and managesieve) server.
--
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. ,= ,-_-. =.
b...@ig
On 01/06/09 11:51, Paul Cartwright wrote:
On Tue January 6 2009, Ron Johnson wrote:
Mine is the same that Debian Iceweasel has always been, but with
Mnenhy and Reply To List add-ons.
--
where do you get this add-on??
There are two addons which claim to do the same thing. I use the
one
On Jan 6, 2009, at 1:07 PM, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 01/06/09 12:36, hose wrote:
On Jan 6, 2009, at 12:30 PM, Paul Cartwright wrote:
[snip]
yeah, I can see that.. in kmail I have over 200 filters.. that
will be the
hardest part...
[snip]
I've never done email filtering in mutt though, so I c
does not need either. But here's the kick in the nads I
just read on the web page for it. The preview pane needs to be open and I
turn that idiotic crap off.
All of this looks confirmed. I installed 0.2.1, reply-to-list still did
not work, pane open or not. Installed 0.3.0 and TBird cr
On 01/06/09 12:36, hose wrote:
On Jan 6, 2009, at 12:30 PM, Paul Cartwright wrote:
[snip]
yeah, I can see that.. in kmail I have over 200 filters.. that will be
the
hardest part...
[snip]
I've never done email filtering in mutt though, so I can't speak to
that. I use procmail instead,
On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 01:01:18PM +0100, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> Am 2009-01-05 18:13:32, schrieb hose:
> > Just use the least sucky client out there (mutt). It has sane reply,
> > reply-to, and reply-to-list commands, is extremely fast, and can bend
> > to your will
On Jan 6, 2009, at 12:30 PM, Paul Cartwright wrote:
On Tue January 6 2009, hose wrote:
These days people seem to enjoy posting their config files online
with
screenshots, so you can see what you get. It's usually a good
starting place. I suppose this is why people call mutt a frontend to
a
On Tue January 6 2009, hose wrote:
> These days people seem to enjoy posting their config files online with
> screenshots, so you can see what you get. It's usually a good
> starting place. I suppose this is why people call mutt a frontend to
> a config file.
>
> http://wiki.mutt.org/?Confi
On Tue January 6 2009, Ron Johnson wrote:
> Mine is the same that Debian Iceweasel has always been, but with
> Mnenhy and Reply To List add-ons.
>
> --
where do you get this add-on?? google search wasn't too helpful.
--
Paul Cartwright
Registered Linux user # 367800
Regis
On Jan 6, 2009, at 6:37 AM, Paul Cartwright wrote:
On Tue January 6 2009, Michelle Konzack wrote:
I am using "mutt" since 9 years now and currently I have open four
XTerm
running "mutt". There is nothing which does not work on it.
Thanks, Greetings and nice Day/Evening
I used pine 20 year
But here's the kick in the nads I
> just read on the web page for it. The preview pane needs to be open and I
> turn that idiotic crap off.
All of this looks confirmed. I installed 0.2.1, reply-to-list still did
not work, pane open or not. Installed 0.3.0 and TBird crashes any t
for some reason.
Here's yours:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); en-US; rv:1.8.1.17)
Gecko/20081018 Thunderbird/2.0.0.17 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666
Here's mine from my desktop (KUbuntu 8.10, TBird 2.0.0.18, Enigmail 0.95,
reply-to-list 0.2.0):
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.18 (X11/2008
Still no r-t-l here.
No. It's still the same simplistic:
User-Agent: Mozilla-Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (X11/20081018)
Mine is the same that Debian Iceweasel has always been, but with
Mnenhy and Reply To List add-ons.
--
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA
I like my women like I like my coffee
ours:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); en-US; rv:1.8.1.17)
Gecko/20081018 Thunderbird/2.0.0.17 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666
Here's mine from my desktop (KUbuntu 8.10, TBird 2.0.0.18, Enigmail 0.95,
reply-to-list 0.2.0):
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.18 (X11/20081125)
And from my serve
Ron Johnson wrote:
> My User-Agent string is a lot more "rich" than yours. Are you
> purposefully minimizing it, or could it be a co-symptom of what
> ever is the real reason why r-t-l doesn't work for you?
Probably not. This one better? Still no r-t-l here.
--
Steve C. Lamb
On 01/06/09 05:06, Micha Feigin wrote:
[snip]
I also like to process my mail with fetchmail/procmail and store it in a Mail
directory in mh format, something that thunderbird and evolution don't
support, don't know about kmail (I don't use kde apps, they spawn too many
Have procmail drop it in
On 01/06/09 03:06, Steve Lamb wrote:
Ron Johnson wrote:
You've got to be doing something wrong...
Installed Thunderbird, installed Enigmail, downloaded reply-to-list, both
versions, installed them, neither work. Can't mess than up Ron, even for me.
My User-Agent string is
On Tue January 6 2009, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> I am using "mutt" since 9 years now and currently I have open four XTerm
> running "mutt". There is nothing which does not work on it.
>
> Thanks, Greetings and nice Day/Evening
I used pine 20 years ago, but I don't think I've ever tried mutt. star
Am 2009-01-05 20:33:09, schrieb Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.:
> Does it work outside of a terminal, yet? :) Seriously though, mutt *is* a
> very high-quality MUA. Even if you normally prefer X applications, mutt
> is worth a look.
I am using "mutt" since 9 years now and currently I have open four X
Am 2009-01-05 18:13:32, schrieb hose:
> Just use the least sucky client out there (mutt). It has sane reply,
> reply-to, and reply-to-list commands, is extremely fast, and can bend
> to your will if needed, no matter how wrong you are. It's the vim of
> the email world.
levant standards. :P)
>
There is a reply to list extension to thunderbird
http://alumnit.ca/wiki/index.php?page=ReplyToListThunderbirdExtension
personally I use claws-mail though (formerly sylpheed) don't know if it has a
windows version. among other things because it has the delete thr
Ron Johnson wrote:
> You've got to be doing something wrong...
Installed Thunderbird, installed Enigmail, downloaded reply-to-list, both
versions, installed them, neither work. Can't mess than up Ron, even for me.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
(Apologies to Boyd, been a while since I replied to D-U, got out of the habit
of reply-to-all and trim. ;)
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> See, I just think you guys should stop using bad clients. ;) Kmail replies
> to the list (and only to the list) by default. (Which, actually, appears to
On 01/06/09 02:46, Steve Lamb wrote:
Ron Johnson wrote:
Install the Reply To List add-on, v0.2.1 or v0.3.0, depending on whether
you access IMAP or not. Works perfectly.
For you... Still not working here. :P
You've got to be doing something wrong...
--
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jeffers
Ron Johnson wrote:
> Install the Reply To List add-on, v0.2.1 or v0.3.0, depending on whether
> you access IMAP or not. Works perfectly.
For you... Still not working here. :P
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Ken Teague wrote:
> Is Kmail available for Win32? I'm at work on my laptop and don't have
> the luxury of Linux all day.
http://windows.kde.org/
> I also stated in my previous post that the reply-to field was missing
> from the SMTP header. I can manually add it from my MUA (as I did with
> thi
to
on this mailing list? Is it the MUA that's broken?... or the mailing list?
Install the Reply To List add-on, v0.2.1 or v0.3.0, depending on
whether you access IMAP or not. Works perfectly.
--
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA
I like my women like I like my coffee - purchased at abo
On Mon, 5 Jan 2009 20:33:09 -0600
"Boyd Stephen Smith Jr." wrote:
...
> Does it work outside of a terminal, yet? :) Seriously though, mutt *is* a
> very high-quality MUA. Even if you normally prefer X applications, mutt
> is worth a look.
Although I have only dabbled with Mutt, from the li
On Monday 05 January 2009, hose wrote
about 'Re: [OT] mailing lists versus usenet / reply to list, reply-to,
reply':
>On Jan 5, 2009, at 5:58 PM, Celejar wrote:
>> On Mon, 05 Jan 2009 15:27:44 -0800
>> Ken Teague wrote:
>>> Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
>
violation on the relevant standards. :P)
Is Kmail available for Win32? I'm at work on my laptop and don't
have
the luxury of Linux all day.
I'm a Sylpheed fanboy; it has a built in Reply-to-list function. I've
never used Sylph on Windows, but when I used to follow
t; be a violation on the relevant standards. :P)
>
> Is Kmail available for Win32? I'm at work on my laptop and don't have
> the luxury of Linux all day.
I'm a Sylpheed fanboy; it has a built in Reply-to-list function. I've
never used Sylph on Windows, but when I used
ard header for information about where to
send mail directed at the list is List-Post, which is added by the Debian
mailing list software.[2]
A good MUA should provide a "Reply to List" feature that uses the information
in the List-Post header. It is more pleas
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> See, I just think you guys should stop using bad clients. ;) Kmail replies
> to the list (and only to the list) by default. (Which, actually, appears to
> be a violation on the relevant standards. :P)
Is Kmail available for Win32? I'm at work on my laptop and
On Monday 2009 January 05 16:20:14 Moderation Robot wrote:
> From: Ken Teague <"kteague at pobox dot com"@giganews.com>
> Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
> > I believe the (quite valid) suggestion to ditch Gmail is because it
> > does not have a 'reply to
-Version: 1.0
Subject: [OT] mailing lists versus usenet / reply to list, reply-to, reply
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Df-Seen-By: ms
Message-ID:
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace:
sv3-zsweG2aeDYsb5BA/svdJwcWSkyzrKKM7EX
if there is a way of fixing the missing
>> 'reply-to-list' functionally of icedove for lenny?
>>
>> Since the extension doesn't work any more, I acquired the habit of
>> always using 'reply-all' and then editing the 'to's and 'cc&#
Ron Johnson wrote:
> This works for me:
> http://members.cox.net/ron.l.johnson/replytolist-0.2.1.xpi
>
> v0.3.0 fails, since I use IMAP.
>
> I think that you need to install the Mnenhy add-on.
Yes, downgrading to 0.2.1 works for me also. I don't think Icedove needs Mnenhy
(but stock Thunderbird
On 09/11/08 02:53, Johannes Wiedersich wrote:
On 2008-09-11 09:41, thveillon.debian wrote:
I have "reply to mailing list 0.3.1" and it works ok with Icedove here.
https://addons.mozilla.org/fr/thunderbird/addon/4455
It is considered "experimental" on Mozilla website I just noticed, but
never h
On 2008-09-11 09:41, thveillon.debian wrote:
> I have "reply to mailing list 0.3.1" and it works ok with Icedove here.
>
> https://addons.mozilla.org/fr/thunderbird/addon/4455
>
> It is considered "experimental" on Mozilla website I just noticed, but
> never had a problem with it.
Thanks! It wor
On 2008-09-11 09:41, thveillon.debian wrote:
> I have "reply to mailing list 0.3.1" and it works ok with Icedove here.
>
> https://addons.mozilla.org/fr/thunderbird/addon/4455
>
> It is considered "experimental" on Mozilla website I just noticed, but
> never had a problem with it.
Thanks. It doe
Johannes Wiedersich a écrit :
On 2008-09-10 13:31, Johannes Wiedersich wrote:
[snip]
I am sorry for having accidentally sent that OT message to list.
Does anyone know, if there is a way of fixing the missing
'reply-to-list' functionally of icedove for lenny?
Since the extension do
On 2008-09-10 13:31, Johannes Wiedersich wrote:
[snip]
I am sorry for having accidentally sent that OT message to list.
Does anyone know, if there is a way of fixing the missing
'reply-to-list' functionally of icedove for lenny?
Since the extension doesn't work any more, I acquir
stake. We all make
> > simple mistakes. One that is so simply avoidable should be, IMO. but
> > it's only that, my opinion.
>
> On one list which I am subscribed to this issue came up and the response
> was that it was only the opinion of who ever wrote it.
oh I agree. Bu
be subscribed to post and
hence may not be subscribed. b) The list was for newbies and therefore
the majority wouldn't even think of saying, "I'm not subscribed so
please CC me on any replies."
I wonder how many people who are not subscribed to debian-user are
aware of *our*
1 - 100 of 182 matches
Mail list logo
