Kent West wrote:
>There are sights ...
>
D'oh! "sites".
--
Kent
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
David R. Litwin wrote:
>
> AFAIK
>
>
> What does that mean?
As Far As I Know.
There are sights that list the common acronyms. I don't have a link, but
if you're interested, you can just google for it.
BTW, "btw" is a TLA, just FYI.
(Sorry.)
> There is another problem, though. KDE does not
AFAIKWhat does that mean? Nonetheless, thank you for that information. It's nice to know that it won't break in the cold.
I've actually solved the mystery. It was the programme Azureus. My computer is very allergic to it. It froze every time. At least that is solved.There is another problem, though
On Fri, 11 Nov 2005, David R. Litwin wrote:
> I have an interesting update. I normally use my laptop in my room, which I
> like to keep between 11 and 15 degrees centigrade. However, in the kitchen,
No current consumer computer hardware will fail to work on that temperature
range, unless it is def
I have an interesting update. I normally use my laptop in my room, which I like to keep between 11 and 15 degrees centigrade. However, in the kitchen, where I am currently, it is around 22 degrees centigrade. After three or so hours of usage, it has yet to freeze.
Could it be that the temperature i
On Wednesday 09 November 2005 13:19, [eMAXX] Vince wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I really have no idea if this is the correct mailinglist for this, but
> I'll give it a try.
>
> I tried to compile a SMP/SMT kernel for a Intel P4 with HyperThreading
> support CPU from debia
Are you using ATI or nVidia proprietary kernel modules? If so, get rid ofthem and see if the crash goes away. If it does, you know where to direct
your complains.If you are rederening to what is currently in my kernel, I am using the standard linux-image from the Debian repository and, subsequent
Hi folks,
I really have no idea if this is the correct mailinglist for this, but
I'll give it a try.
I tried to compile a SMP/SMT kernel for a Intel P4 with HyperThreading
support CPU from debian kernel sources ( I tried
linux-source-2.6.12_2.6.12-10_all.deb
<ftp://ftp.snt.utwent
wer, but it did not
> seem to use an "ati" driver), but then I thought I would check if the kernel
> was loaded with SMP since the CPU was a Pentium D 820. KDE's Kinfo clearly
> showed there being 2 CPUs - CPU 0 and CPU 1, but there was nothing actually
> showing a kern
d check if the kernel
was loaded with SMP since the CPU was a Pentium D 820. KDE's Kinfo clearly
showed there being 2 CPUs - CPU 0 and CPU 1, but there was nothing actually
showing a kernel with SMP support was running.
What I'm wondering is:
1) Are the new (dual core) Pentium D and
On Wed, 09 Nov 2005, David R. Litwin wrote:
> I have a multithreading processor. After doing more research, I finaly
> figured out that the smp is the kernel for me.
Only if it runs whatever you like to do with your computer faster than a
non-SMP kernel. SMT (multithreading) is not always
I haven't had the pleasure of running an smp kernel. Those are for Symmetricmulti processing if I'm not mistaken, and you need two processors or maybe a
dual core cpu.I have a multithreading processor. After doing more research, I finaly figured out that the smp is the kernel for me.So
port position the the more exoticfacitilies of the recent chips is. Is this a hyperthreading chip or
multicore?Hyperthreading. It's a Pentium four. I did much research and it seems that the P4 is quite capable of running an smp. In fact, I recently tried to use the non smp kernel I still have. It did freez
On Sun November 6 2005 06:30 pm, David R. Litwin wrote:
> I have a Pentium Four processor with 3.06GHz speed. As far as I can tell,
> this means that I am eligible to use a 686-smp kernel. Though in comparison
> to the non smp kernel it seems to be much faster, an odd thing is also
&g
On 06/11/05, David R. Litwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have a Pentium Four processor with 3.06GHz speed. As far as I can tell, this means that I am eligible to use a 686-smp kernel. Though in comparison to the non smp kernel it seems to be much faster, an odd thing is also happening which
I have a Pentium Four processor with 3.06GHz speed. As far as I can tell, this means that I am eligible to use a 686-smp kernel. Though in comparison to the non smp kernel it seems to be much faster, an odd thing is also happening which I can only attribute to the smp (since I have not really seen
r 10 years ago; the reason was incorrect
>> combination of interrupts in multiple ISA network cards.
>> /proc/interrupts, dmesg?
>>
>> Alexey
>>
>> On 05/10/05 22:35, Svein Seldal wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Hi.
>>>
>>> I have some stran
nge problems during boot of my system:
I'm running stable (Sarge) with kernel-image-2.6.7-2-686 plus ditto-smp.
I have a Intel machine with a Intel P4 (family 15, model 4) @3GHz. I
have 1G of memory. My SATA HDD's are running software RAID-1 with LVM
(but that's probably irrelevant o
combination of interrupts in multiple ISA network cards.
/proc/interrupts, dmesg?
Alexey
On 05/10/05 22:35, Svein Seldal wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I have some strange problems during boot of my system:
>
> I'm running stable (Sarge) with kernel-image-2.6.7-2-686 plus ditto-smp.
> I have
Hi.
I have some strange problems during boot of my system:
I'm running stable (Sarge) with kernel-image-2.6.7-2-686 plus ditto-smp.
I have a Intel machine with a Intel P4 (family 15, model 4) @3GHz. I
have 1G of memory. My SATA HDD's are running software RAID-1 with LVM
(but that&
On Wed, 28 Sep 2005, michael wrote:
> > user interface, and did not explain what I wanted to know (WTF are those
> > "hi" and "si" CPU statistics).
>
> May I redeem myself by pointing out they are h/w and s/w interrupts, resp
Thanks.
--
"One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One d
> On Tue, 27 Sep 2005, Clive Menzies wrote:
>> On (27/09/05 08:10), Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
>> > On Mon, 26 Sep 2005, Bob Proulx wrote:
>> > > Dick Davies wrote:
>> > > > Yup, use SMP. I get 2 cpus in cpuinfo that way (although top
On Tue, 27 Sep 2005, Clive Menzies wrote:
> On (27/09/05 08:10), Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > On Mon, 26 Sep 2005, Bob Proulx wrote:
> > > Dick Davies wrote:
> > > > Yup, use SMP. I get 2 cpus in cpuinfo that way (although top doesn't
> > > &g
x wrote:
> > > > > Dick Davies wrote:
> > > > > > Yup, use SMP. I get 2 cpus in cpuinfo that way (although top doesn't
> > > > > > see them for some reason).
> > >
> > > cpuinfo will tell you about the logical CPUs; top will te
On Tue, 27 Sep 2005, michael wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-09-27 at 08:10 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > On Mon, 26 Sep 2005, Bob Proulx wrote:
> > > Dick Davies wrote:
> > > > Yup, use SMP. I get 2 cpus in cpuinfo that way (although top doesn'
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> Bob Proulx wrote:
> > Dick Davies wrote:
> > > Yup, use SMP. I get 2 cpus in cpuinfo that way (although top doesn't
> > > see them for some reason).
> >
> > Have you ever run a top that lists individual processors on
On Tue, 2005-09-27 at 13:19 +0100, Dick Davies wrote:
> On 27/09/05, michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2005-09-27 at 08:10 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > > On Mon, 26 Sep 2005, Bob Proulx wrote:
> > > > Dick Davies wrote:
> > &
On 27/09/05, michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-09-27 at 08:10 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > On Mon, 26 Sep 2005, Bob Proulx wrote:
> > > Dick Davies wrote:
> > > > Yup, use SMP. I get 2 cpus in cpuinfo that way (although top does
On (27/09/05 08:10), Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Sep 2005, Bob Proulx wrote:
> > Dick Davies wrote:
> > > Yup, use SMP. I get 2 cpus in cpuinfo that way (although top doesn't
> > > see them for some reason).
> >
> > Have you ever run
On Tue, 2005-09-27 at 08:10 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Sep 2005, Bob Proulx wrote:
> > Dick Davies wrote:
> > > Yup, use SMP. I get 2 cpus in cpuinfo that way (although top doesn't
> > > see them for some reason).
cpuinfo will tell you
On Mon, 26 Sep 2005, Bob Proulx wrote:
> Dick Davies wrote:
> > Yup, use SMP. I get 2 cpus in cpuinfo that way (although top doesn't
> > see them for some reason).
>
> Have you ever run a top that lists individual processors on a 64
> processor machine? I have and to
Dick Davies wrote:
> Yup, use SMP. I get 2 cpus in cpuinfo that way (although top doesn't
> see them for some reason).
Have you ever run a top that lists individual processors on a 64
processor machine? I have and top is quite useless there with
all of the screen being taken up
On Mon, 26 Sep 2005, michael wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-09-26 at 14:01 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > On Sun, 25 Sep 2005, James He wrote:
> > > Should one CPU(Hyper-Threading) machine use SMP kernel, or stick to a
> > > regular kernel?
> >
> > I
uld use, for example,
a Debian patched kernel as
linux-image-2.6.12-1-686-smp
Regards,
MC
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 2005-09-26 at 14:01 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Sun, 25 Sep 2005, James He wrote:
> > Should one CPU(Hyper-Threading) machine use SMP kernel, or stick to a
> > regular kernel?
>
> It depends:
> - If it is a 2.4 kernel, don't bother. Us
On Sun, 25 Sep 2005, James He wrote:
> Should one CPU(Hyper-Threading) machine use SMP kernel, or stick to a
> regular kernel?
It depends:
- If it is a 2.4 kernel, don't bother. Use an UP kernel.
- If it is a recent 2.6 kernel, it depends on the workload. Try it,
and do some m
Hi Marco,
I didn't notice it that there is no "ht" sign in the flags info below
until you pointed it out. I'm sorry. But I do have another machine with
one hyper-threading CPU, so never mind.
Thanks for all. :-)
$ cat /proc/cpuinfo
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr mce cx8 apic sep mtrr p
On Mon, 2005-09-26 at 10:37 +0100, michael wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-09-26 at 10:03 +0100, Dick Davies wrote:
> > On 25 Sep 2005 23:23:48 -0700, James He <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Should one CPU(Hyper-Threading) machine use SMP kernel, or stick to a
> >
On Mon, 2005-09-26 at 10:03 +0100, Dick Davies wrote:
> On 25 Sep 2005 23:23:48 -0700, James He <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Should one CPU(Hyper-Threading) machine use SMP kernel, or stick to a
> > regular kernel?
>
> Yup, use SMP. I get 2 cpus in cpuinfo
James He wrote:
$ cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 13
model name : Intel(R) Pentium(R) M processor 1.60GHz
stepping: 8
cpu MHz : 1600.096
cache size : 2048 KB
Hi James,
your CPU does not
On 25 Sep 2005 23:23:48 -0700, James He <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Should one CPU(Hyper-Threading) machine use SMP kernel, or stick to a
> regular kernel?
Yup, use SMP. I get 2 cpus in cpuinfo that way (although top doesn't
see them for
some reason).
--
Rasputin :: Jack of Al
Hi,
Should one CPU(Hyper-Threading) machine use SMP kernel, or stick to a
regular kernel?
I know it's a dumb question. Please do help me. Thanks a lot! :-)
$ cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 13
model name : In
On Tuesday September 13 2005 00:09, Nicos Gollan wrote:
> There's a really "funny" thing happening with my new machine (Athlon 64
> X2). Everytime the machine sees some load (e.g. [EMAIL PROTECTED] or a -j4
> make
> job), something seems to go bam in the scheduler, IRQ routing or something
> else.
Hi,
There's a really "funny" thing happening with my new machine (Athlon 64 X2).
Everytime the machine sees some load (e.g. [EMAIL PROTECTED] or a -j4 make
job),
something seems to go bam in the scheduler, IRQ routing or something else.
The visible results are:
- Multiplied input events from
On Sun, 11 Sep 2005, Holger Harling wrote:
> The Bond0 startparameters are in the networking script under case "$1" in ..
> behind ifup -a
> modprobe bonding mode=1 miimon=100
> ifup bond0
> ifenslave bond0 eth0 eth1
what is the contents of your "bonding files"
manually..
modprobe bondin
Hello,
I am running three machines with 1 Xeon (2 Cores) and
a machine with 2 Pentium III with 1,26 Ghz. In all machines I have 2 Intel
Network Cards.
The Xeon machine (2Cores) is running the 2.6.8-2-smp kernel without bonding
problems.
The PIII Machine with the Kernel 2.6.8-2 runs in
> image?
Hmm - seeing this too. Was testing beagle on a 2.6.11 (a stock 686
debian kernel - non SMP). Seemed to be working fine (although without
inotify). Here user_xattr runs just fine on xfs.
Then - on a second sid machine - running 2.6.12-1-k7 (again stock) - the
same mount option and I
media/usbdisk not mounted already, or bad option
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:$ sudo mount -o remount,user_xattr /dev/mapper/balaraw-home
mount: /home not mounted already, or bad option
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:$ uname -a
Linux balaraw 2.6.12-1-686-smp #1 SMP Wed Jul 20 22:42:26 UTC 2005
i686 GNU/Linux
Is the user_xattr
On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 01:00:48AM -0700, eversj wrote:
> Hi I am a real newbie to linux and would really appreciate some help. I
> am trying to enable SMP on a digital 3100. Debian was the only linux I
> tried that would install and reboot with no problems. Below is my dmesg
> output
Initializing CPU#0
But only one of these, so the kernel is not going to use more than one.
So no, you don't have an SMP-kernel.
--
regards,
Christopher Pharo Glæserud
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 2005-08-01 at 01:00 -0700, eversj wrote:
> Hi I am a real newbie to linux and would really appreciate some help. I
> am trying to enable SMP on a digital 3100. Debian was the only linux I
> tried that would install and reboot with no problems. Below is my dmesg
> output. It
Hi I am a real newbie to linux and would really appreciate some help. I
am trying to enable SMP on a digital 3100. Debian was the only linux I
tried that would install and reboot with no problems. Below is my dmesg
output. It implies that SMP is loaded, and has found 2 CPU's. When i
run "
On Monday 11 July 2005 03:47 pm, Angelo R. Rossi wrote:
> http://www.debian.org/distrib/ packages
Sorry,
There shouldn't any spaces in the URL.
--
Greg Madden
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dear Greg Madden:
Thanks for your response. But the link
'http://www.debian.org/distrib/ packages' does not exist. I'll try to
go down to this link another way.
Kind regards,
Angelo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTE
Dear Greg Madden:
Thanks for your response. But the link
'http://www.debian.org/distrib/ packages' does not exist. I'll try to
go down to this link another way.
Kind regards,
Angelo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTE
Hello:
Can someone provide me with information regarding the debian unstable
smp kernel?
Regards,
A. R. Rossi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Monday 11 July 2005 05:04 am, Angelo R. Rossi wrote:
> Hello:
>
> I want to run debian unstable on a dual-processor xeon system. Can
> someone please point me to information on the appropriate smp kernel
> as well as other information I should know, if I use debian unst
Hello:
I want to run debian unstable on a dual-processor xeon system. Can
someone please point me to information on the appropriate smp kernel as
well as other information I should know, if I use debian unstable for
this?
Thank you so much for your help.
Regards,
A. R. Rossi
--
To
:
> > # uname -a
> >
> > Linux Knoppix 2.6.7 #2 SMP Wed Jul 28 04:25:36 CEST 2004 i686 GNU/Linux
> >
> > # cat /proc/cpuinfo
> >
> > processor : 0
> > vendor_id : GenuineIntel
> > cpu family : 15
> > model
On Mon, 2005-05-09 at 23:20 +0100, Clive Menzies wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have a couple of servers (identical spec) with the advertised cpu as:
> 3.2GHz 3.2GHz Intel P4 Prescott
>
> If I boot from Knoppix I get:
> # uname -a
>
> Linux Knoppix 2.6.7 #2 SMP Wed Jul 28 04:25:
Hi
I have a couple of servers (identical spec) with the advertised cpu as:
3.2GHz 3.2GHz Intel P4 Prescott
If I boot from Knoppix I get:
# uname -a
Linux Knoppix 2.6.7 #2 SMP Wed Jul 28 04:25:36 CEST 2004 i686 GNU/Linux
# cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
Im getting this error when apt-getting the
kernel-image-2.6.8-9-em64t-p4-smp package... anyone know what i should
do next? Thanks...
Setting up kernel-image-2.6.8-9-em64t-p4-smp (2.6.8-8) ...
cpio: (0x): No such file or directory
cp: cannot stat `(0x)': No such fi
At this point I have a 2.6.9-smp kernel. The scsi card is only
detected if the scanner is turned on, so if it's off when
booting, run
# /sbin/rescan-scsi-bus.sh
and you're in business.
Beyond that, all it took was "aha152x" in /etc/modules. daveA
--
To UNSUBSCR
> On Thu, 2004-12-09 at 16:53, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote:
>> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>> michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >However, for one simple test (v.low memory, v.low comms, high compute)
>> >case which is Fortran90 compiled using mpich, I actually found turning
>> >HT off hel
On Thu, 2004-12-09 at 16:53, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >However, for one simple test (v.low memory, v.low comms, high compute)
> >case which is Fortran90 compiled using mpich, I actually found turning
> >HT off helped --
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>However, for one simple test (v.low memory, v.low comms, high compute)
>case which is Fortran90 compiled using mpich, I actually found turning
>HT off helped -- when it was on then for -np 2 there was no speed up
>(top implied the
gt; > > Hi - I've had a quick look on the WWW but can't find much of help. I've
> > > > a dual Xeon box running testing and kernel from backports:
> > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ uname -a
> > > > Linux r 2.4.27-1-686-smp #1 SMP Fri Sep 3 0
#x27;ve
> > > a dual Xeon box running testing and kernel from backports:
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ uname -a
> > > Linux r 2.4.27-1-686-smp #1 SMP Fri Sep 3 06:34:36 UTC 2004 i686
> > > GNU/Linux
> > >
> > > The SMP kernel does i
OTECTED]:~$ uname -a
> > Linux r 2.4.27-1-686-smp #1 SMP Fri Sep 3 06:34:36 UTC 2004 i686
> > GNU/Linux
> >
> > The SMP kernel does indeed make use of the processors available: 2 if
> > hyperthreading (HT) is off and 4 if it is on.
> >
> > My quest
On Thu, 2004-12-09 at 11:48 +, michael wrote:
> Hi - I've had a quick look on the WWW but can't find much of help. I've
> a dual Xeon box running testing and kernel from backports:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ uname -a
> Linux r 2.4.27-1-686-smp #1 SMP Fri S
Hi - I've had a quick look on the WWW but can't find much of help. I've
a dual Xeon box running testing and kernel from backports:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ uname -a
Linux r 2.4.27-1-686-smp #1 SMP Fri Sep 3 06:34:36 UTC 2004 i686
GNU/Linux
The SMP kernel does
Aha! Debian bug 272401 (see
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=272401) - and it
related not to said kernel but to g++-3.3) seems to be the reason I
could not get icpc to work on my Debian box. My workaround (not a proper
solution) is to
cd /usr/include/c++ ; ln -s 3.3 3.3.4
and
Top posting since this is a bit different (but still related - so kept
original stuff for reference if needed)
** also note I've rebooted into the 'testing' 2.4.27-1-686 kernel (ie so
not to confuse issues with having downloaded the SMP kernel from backports)
1) I didn't use
.
[snip]
I have just installed 'testing' on my dual Xeon. I downloaded a
suitable SMP kernel from backports. Thus I have:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/src/netcdf-3_6_0-beta6/src$ uname -a
Linux ratty 2.4.27-1-686-smp #1 SMP Fri Sep 3 06:34:36 UTC 2004 i686
GNU/Linux
I need to use the Intel com
Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
On Tue, 2004-11-23 21:40:52 +, michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp$ cat sizes.cpp
#include
using namespace std;
int main() {
cout << sizeof(char) << "\n";
cout << sizeof(int) << "\n";
cout << sizeof(float) << "\n"
On Friday 12 November 2004 12:21 pm, Greg Madden wrote:
> On Friday 12 November 2004 07:26 am, David Raleigh Arnold wrote:
> > I used the sarge debian-installer to install with a 2.6 kernel. My
> > My ISA adaptec scsi2 card was not found, of course, but I can't find
> > any adaptec drivers in the
ng of atmospheric physics/chemistry models). Cheers!
Michael
- Original Message -
From: "Jens Bech Madsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "linux" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, November 12, 2004 6:01 PM
Subject: Re: smp: am i see
; package and installed smoothly using `dpkg -i `,
> rebooted
> into that kernel. I now seem to be seeing 4 (four!) processors eg as reported
> by
> `top`, `cat /proc/cpulist` and in the /var/log/messages file. (Aside: with the
> uni-processor kernel, `top` only reported 1Gb memory bu
On Friday 12 November 2004 07:26 am, David Raleigh Arnold wrote:
> I used the sarge debian-installer to install with a 2.6 kernel. My
> My ISA adaptec scsi2 card was not found, of course, but I can't find
> any adaptec drivers in the distribution, my superdisk is recognized
> twice, and my ISA cdr
ing 4 (four!) processors eg as reported by
`top`, `cat /proc/cpulist` and in the /var/log/messages file. (Aside: with the
uni-processor kernel, `top` only reported 1Gb memory but the smp kernel,
correctly, reports the 2Gb memory
I've just rebooted to WinXP and the SystemProperties implies
I used the sarge debian-installer to install with a 2.6 kernel. My
My ISA adaptec scsi2 card was not found, of course, but I can't find
any adaptec drivers in the distribution, my superdisk is recognized
twice, and my ISA cdrom r/w at hdd doesn't have any scsi emulation
for writing. What happened
Stuart Murray wrote:
>Ok, So I booted from an image which the author
>reckoned had SMP compiled in. How do I actually know
>if both processors are being used?
>
beside cat /proc/cpuinfo you can use top, then press 1
button to see how much resource used by each
processor.
>Yeah I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Stuart Murray wrote:
| Ok, So I booted from an image which the author
| reckoned had SMP compiled in. How do I actually know
| if both processors are being used?
Hi Stuart!
You can have a look into /proc/cpuinfo - there you might find if there
are two
On Sat, 2004-10-23 at 21:00 +0100, Stuart Murray wrote:
> Ok, So I booted from an image which the author
> reckoned had SMP compiled in. How do I actually know
> if both processors are being used?
>
cat /proc/cpuinfo
--
Eric Gaumer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Desc
Ok, So I booted from an image which the author
reckoned had SMP compiled in. How do I actually know
if both processors are being used?
Yeah I know, its dead obvious to you gurus out there,
but I've had a hard day ;-)
On the plus side I have got all my partitions in
place, learning how to
On Tuesday 31 August 2004 07:55 am, Lance Hoffmeyer wrote:
> How do I configure make-kpkg (kernel-package) so
> that MAKE using the -j3 switch?
>
> The smp.txt says edit the Makefile but the line that the smp.txt
> says to modify does not exist.
>
> The kernel-package man does not really cover this
On Tue, 31 Aug 2004 10:55:57 -0500
Lance Hoffmeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How do I configure make-kpkg (kernel-package) so
> that MAKE using the -j3 switch?
>
> The smp.txt says edit the Makefile but the line that the smp.txt
> says to modify does not exist.
>
> The kernel-package man does
How do I configure make-kpkg (kernel-package) so
that MAKE using the -j3 switch?
The smp.txt says edit the Makefile but the line that the smp.txt
says to modify does not exist.
The kernel-package man does not really cover this.
Do I modify the kernel-pkg.conf? If so, how?
Lance
--
I just built a system using the new debian-installer. Everything (almost)
worked fine, but the d-i installed the default kernel,
kernel-image-2.6.7-1-386. No problem. I just used aptitude to upgrade to
kernel-image-2.6.7-1-686-smp. I then updated my menu.1st file and grub and
rebooted
On Thu, 12 Aug 2004, Clement wrote:
> botio wrote:
> >Clement wrote:
> >>I can boot up with kernel-image-2.6.7-1-686 but not
> >>kernel-image-2.6.7-1-686-smp. The booting just half soon after
> >>starting. Can you give me some suggestions?
> >>
>
botio wrote:
Clement wrote:
I can boot up with kernel-image-2.6.7-1-686 but not
kernel-image-2.6.7-1-686-smp. The booting just half soon after
starting. Can you give me some suggestions?
The hardware is, Intel m/b w 875r chip set and P4-2.8GHz processor.
I have this problem too on a intel
Clement wrote:
> I can boot up with kernel-image-2.6.7-1-686 but not
> kernel-image-2.6.7-1-686-smp. The booting just half soon after
> starting. Can you give me some suggestions?
>
> The hardware is, Intel m/b w 875r chip set and P4-2.8GHz processor.
>
I have this prob
I can boot up with kernel-image-2.6.7-1-686 but not
kernel-image-2.6.7-1-686-smp. The booting just half soon after
starting. Can you give me some suggestions?
The hardware is, Intel m/b w 875r chip set and P4-2.8GHz processor.
Regards,
Clement
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
it would have been
> during installation? In other words, if I smack in a 2nd processor,
> will it be recognised by linux and will it work properly, or do I have
> to reinstall everything from scratch?
It will work fine. The smp kernels do detection to see how many cpus
you have installed
Steven Jones wrote:
If you have a smp kernel it will automatically detect the extra kernel after reboot,
this is not NT land...
;]
regards
Thing
Nice :]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you have a smp kernel it will automatically detect the extra kernel after reboot,
this is not NT land...
;]
regards
Thing
-Original Message-
From: Patrick Donker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, 10 August 2004 8:44 a.m.
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: smp install
If I
If I install deb with a dual proc kernel, while only having one cpu on
the board, can I slam in a second one after the installation is done,
and at the same time have the 2nd proc working as it would have been
during installation? In other words, if I smack in a 2nd processor, will
it be recogn
On Thursday 22 July 2004 12:59 am, Jacob Friis Larsen wrote:
> Do kernel-image-2.4.26-2-686-smp at least support the same drivers as
> kernel-image-2.4.26-2-686?
It most likely will. The easiest way to make sure that the ones you need are
present is to install it and look in /lib/modu
Do kernel-image-2.4.26-2-686-smp at least support the same drivers as
kernel-image-2.4.26-2-686?
I need a smp kernel and support for tg3 and 3ware, which is supported in
kernel-image-2.4.26-2-686.
What is the difference between kernel-image-2.4.26-1-686-smp and
kernel-image-2.4.26-2-686-smp
On Sun, Jun 20, 2004 at 03:04:13PM -0400, Kamaraju Kusumanchi said
> Can someone help me how to get software suspend working on debian
> unstable machine? In particular I would like to try the hibernating
> feature. I am using default kernel-image and the
> /boot/config-2.6.5-1-686
101 - 200 of 526 matches
Mail list logo
