On Sat, Nov 02, 2002 at 04:07:28AM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 02, 2002 at 11:51:50AM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> > Paul Johnson wrote:
> > > Spamcop email address. If the number of messages reported by humans
> > > as spam via Spamcop exceeds 2%, that IP gets blacklisted for 7 days,
On Sat, Nov 02, 2002 at 11:51:50AM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> > Spamcop email address. If the number of messages reported by humans
> > as spam via Spamcop exceeds 2%, that IP gets blacklisted for 7 days,
> > the spam percentage goes back below 2%, or until the ISP notifies SC
> > that it's fixe
On Sat, Nov 02, 2002 at 11:51:50AM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 01, 2002 at 08:54:15PM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
>
> So that would be why they blacklisted master.debian.org a while back?
Probably they received some spam through the debian mailing lists. They
reported the spam to some
On Fri, Nov 01, 2002 at 08:54:15PM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
> Spamcop, for example, works in the exact opposite manner you describe.
> It checks against what @spamcop.net email addresses are recieving and
> what's reported by all users, regaurdless of wheter or not they have a
> Spamcop email add
On Sat, 2002-11-02 at 00:11, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 01, 2002 at 11:02:51AM -0500, Mark L. Kahnt wrote:
> > These usually have some promotion of features on the originating website
> > - enough to trigger spam filtering. Unfortunately, my attempts to rescue
> > these with whitelisted addr
On Fri, Nov 01, 2002 at 11:02:51AM -0500, Mark L. Kahnt wrote:
> These usually have some promotion of features on the originating website
> - enough to trigger spam filtering. Unfortunately, my attempts to rescue
> these with whitelisted addresses has proven useless as I'd said, because
> by my exp
hi david
On Fri, 1 Nov 2002, David Z Maze wrote:
> Alvin Oga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > if i was gonna tagg an email ( spam ) for later processing ...
> > i might as well have spent the 1 second to check it the first
> > time and hit the "D" key ... instead of looking at that email twice
On Fri, 2002-11-01 at 12:19, Bob George wrote:
> Mark L. Kahnt wrote:
>
> > [...]
> > SpamAssassin 2.43-1 - tried upgrading it tied to unstable and it says
> > that I'm at the newest version. Basically, it was clobbering anything in
> > html on a commercial mailing list, such as personalised horos
Mark L. Kahnt wrote:
[...]
SpamAssassin 2.43-1 - tried upgrading it tied to unstable and it says
that I'm at the newest version. Basically, it was clobbering anything in
html on a commercial mailing list, such as personalised horoscopes.
These usually have some promotion of features on the origin
Alvin Oga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> if i was gonna tagg an email ( spam ) for later processing ...
> i might as well have spent the 1 second to check it the first
> time and hit the "D" key ... instead of looking at that email twice
Does your MUA have some concept of folders? What I do is h
On Fri, 2002-11-01 at 08:47, Alan Shutko wrote:
> "Mark L. Kahnt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I just switched off SpamAssassin here because what had been an equal
> > number of false positives and false negatives has instead proven to be
> > nearly every spam not already filtered by my own E
"Mark L. Kahnt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I just switched off SpamAssassin here because what had been an equal
> number of false positives and false negatives has instead proven to be
> nearly every spam not already filtered by my own Evolution filters and
> local blacklisting of a swath of wo
hi ya jesus
On Fri, 1 Nov 2002, Jesus Climent wrote:
>
> From my experience i would say: Do not use RBLs to reject mail, but to
> tag it.
a good reason against rbl's
http://www.ifn.net/rblstory.htm
and i agree... and i also disagree
if i was gonna tagg an email ( spam ) for later
On Thu, Oct 31, 2002 at 10:37:45PM -0800, Alvin Oga wrote:
>
> hi paul
>
> On Thu, 31 Oct 2002, Paul Johnson wrote:
>
> > I also bounce mail based on the following DNSBL zones with great success.
> >
> > relays.ordb.org (tested open relays)
> > orbs.dorkslayers.com (Dorkslayer's RBL)
> > relays
hi paul
On Thu, 31 Oct 2002, Paul Johnson wrote:
> I also bounce mail based on the following DNSBL zones with great success.
>
> relays.ordb.org (tested open relays)
> orbs.dorkslayers.com (Dorkslayer's RBL)
> relays.visi.com (More tested open relays)
> postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org (Any site tha
On Thu, Oct 31, 2002 at 09:08:07PM -0500, Scott Henson wrote:
> I am looking to start using a spam filter on my mail. I was wondering
> if anyone on this list had opinions/suggestions on the best one to use.
Personally, I use spamassassin, and I have it set up using dman's
solution as a filter t
On Thu, 2002-10-31 at 21:08, Scott Henson wrote:
> I am looking to start using a spam filter on my mail. I was wondering
> if anyone on this list had opinions/suggestions on the best one to use.
> I am using Evolution as my mail client, and postfix/woody on my mail
> server. I looked on line for
Scott Henson wrote:
I am looking to start using a spam filter on my mail. I was wondering
if anyone on this list had opinions/suggestions on the best one to use.
It's low tech, but I've set about 2 dozen conditions in a Mozilla
message filter and trap 99% of spam in my Trash folder for ready
d
On 2002-10-31 18:21-0800 Alvin Oga wrote:
> On 31 Oct 2002, Scott Henson wrote:
> > I am looking to start using a spam filter on my mail. I was
> > wondering if anyone on this list had opinions/suggestions on the
> > best one to use.
>
> see the postfix section w/ spamassassin
> http://www.L
hi ya scoot
see the postfix section w/ spamassassin
http://www.Linux-Sec.net/Mail/antispam.gwif.html
c ya
alvin
- but i say run your own mta... to do all your own filtering
before it even hits your mailbox
On 31 Oct 2002, Scott Henson wrote:
> I am looking to start using a spam filt
Hello Scott,
On Oct 31, Scott Henson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| new abyssian filter technique
: Bayesian?
-Jason
--
Jason [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wonka.hampshire.edu/~jason
GPG key - 0EFB1DFE
You can tell how far we have to go, when FORTRAN is the language of
supercomputers.
I am looking to start using a spam filter on my mail. I was wondering
if anyone on this list had opinions/suggestions on the best one to use.
I am using Evolution as my mail client, and postfix/woody on my mail
server. I looked on line for some documentation on how to use
spamassassin on my wood
22 matches
Mail list logo
