Hi
On 12/7/20 9:02 AM, Reco wrote:
A followup. They have released Debian 10.7 last weekend, kernel version
4.19.0-13 fixes this vulnerability.
Yes, and we have installed it! :-)
Thanks again!
MJ
Hi.
On Mon, Dec 07, 2020 at 08:31:27AM +0100, mj wrote:
> Hi Roberto and Reco,
>
> Thanks for the replies!
A followup. They have released Debian 10.7 last weekend, kernel version
4.19.0-13 fixes this vulnerability.
Reco
Hi Roberto and Reco,
Thanks for the replies!
MJ
On 12/4/20 3:58 PM, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 12:13:02PM +0100, mj wrote:
Hi,
I am wondering about the SAD DNS vulnerability, and wether or not it is
solved in up-to-date debian 10.6.
https://blog.kernelcare.com
On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 12:13:02PM +0100, mj wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am wondering about the SAD DNS vulnerability, and wether or not it is
> solved in up-to-date debian 10.6.
>
> https://blog.kernelcare.com/vulnerability/kernelcare-patches-for-sad-dns-are-on-the-way
>
> It
Hi.
On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 12:13:02PM +0100, mj wrote:
> I am wondering about the SAD DNS vulnerability, and wether or not it is
> solved in up-to-date debian 10.6.
> https://blog.kernelcare.com/vulnerability/kernelcare-patches-for-sad-dns-are-on-the-way
> It says, bottom
Hi,
I am wondering about the SAD DNS vulnerability, and wether or not it is
solved in up-to-date debian 10.6.
https://blog.kernelcare.com/vulnerability/kernelcare-patches-for-sad-dns-are-on-the-way
It says, bottom of the page, that fixes are scheduled to in week 48 for
debian and ubuntu
On 01/20/2014 05:20 AM, Helmut Wollmersdorfer wrote:
Am 17.01.2014 um 22:10 schrieb Ralf Mardorf :
A computer is able to produce a jazz, rock,
classical style song, but not able to touch human emotions.
Artificial Intelligence needs Artificial Emotions.
It was in the year 1987 taht I first s
Am 17.01.2014 um 22:10 schrieb Ralf Mardorf :
> Is there any computer able to produce just a simple pop song that
> reaches the top ten? A computer is able to produce a jazz, rock,
> classical style song, but not able to touch human emotions.
Artificial Intelligence needs Artificial Emotions.
On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 02:34:18PM +, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Saturday 18 January 2014 09:45:29 Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> > Most probably sexuality is not taboo for some/many/most people
> > reading debian-user, but there is a good chance that it is not
> > appropriate for at least some readers.
>
On Fri, 17 Jan 2014 22:42:55 +0100
Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-01-17 at 15:35 -0600, John Hasler wrote:
> > Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> > > Why does a manually wound coil for guitars does sound better than a
> > > mechanically wounded coil does?
> >
> > I doubt that it would in a double-bli
On 1/19/14, Tony van der Hoff wrote:
> On 18/01/14 20:24, Go Linux wrote:
>> Please cease and desist this stupid off topic chatter. I gave up reading
>> this thread days ago .
>>
>>
> +1
We owe it to others on our list, to post all our OT type replies
"To: d-community-offto...@lists.alioth.debi
Capacitor?
On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 3:16 AM, Karen Lewellen
wrote:
> Actually, yes it does. All humans have the capacitor to be. explore some
> of the many science and general science text on human brain function and
> you will find some rich support.
> The capacitor to be, however each creati
On 18/01/14 20:24, Go Linux wrote:
> Please cease and desist this stupid off topic chatter. I gave up reading
> this thread days ago .
>
>
+1, but ...
How then are you able to respond to it?
--
Tony van der Hoff | mailto:t...@vanderhoff.org
Ariège, France |
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
Please cease and desist this stupid off topic chatter. I gave up reading this
thread days ago .
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/1390073080.59110.ya
>> I'm not arguing one is better than the other, just in all situations
>> neither is the best. You said in another reply that we haven't created
>> a computer that can create as we do,
>What do yo mean we? Just because one person is a good musician doesn't
>mean we are. Just because one person i
Actually, yes it does. All humans have the capacitor to be. explore some
of the many science and general science text on human brain function and
you will find some rich support.
The capacitor to be, however each creative effort is as unique as your DNA.
This is not philosophy, its physics.
On Fri, 17 Jan 2014 23:42:41 -0800 Chris Bannister wrote
>
>Just a bit of advice, if it's not NSFW why on earth do you think it's
>OK on this list? Do you say what ever you like to your mother or anyone
>you meet?
>
Yeah, and that bitch (and the rest of them) don't much appreciat
On Saturday 18 January 2014 09:45:29 Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> Most probably sexuality is not taboo for some/many/most people
> reading debian-user, but there is a good chance that it is not
> appropriate for at least some readers.
Sexuality is not taboo. But it seems to me that detailed descriptio
On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 04:47:24AM -0500, Jeff Bauer wrote:
> On 01/18/2014 03:12 AM, Chris Bannister wrote:
> >On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 06:00:53PM +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> >>On Fri, 2014-01-17 at 14:38 +0100, Denis Witt wrote:
> >>>Or think about machines in mills, sorting out single grains of
On 01/18/2014 03:12 AM, Chris Bannister wrote:
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 06:00:53PM +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Fri, 2014-01-17 at 14:38 +0100, Denis Witt wrote:
Or think about machines in mills, sorting out single grains of poor
quality while they are falling down like a waterfall into the
mil
On Vi, 17 ian 14, 22:53:20, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>
> I agree, but they will kill you and now me too, because you mentioned
> that. Sexuality is a taboo! It's evil, it doesn't exist in the clean
> computer world!
Most probably sexuality is not taboo for some/many/most people reading
debian-user, b
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 06:00:53PM +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-01-17 at 14:38 +0100, Denis Witt wrote:
> > Or think about machines in mills, sorting out single grains of poor
> > quality while they are falling down like a waterfall into the
> > millstone granting a better flour qualit
On Sat, 2014-01-18 at 18:01 +1100, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> On 1/18/14, Chris Bannister wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 07:13:17PM +1100, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> >> Certainly humans have technology, and gadgets, and technological power
> >> (awesome chariots, ...
> >
> > Mmmm, so the last char
On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 10:32:07AM +0900, Joel Rees wrote:
> As food for thought, it seems to me that the other problem, while I
> assume it's the one you reference in your comment about rules,
> involves principles of human condition which parallel the computer
> security problem. If you don't see
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 01:38:08PM -0800, cletusjenkins wrote:
> I'm not arguing one is better than the other, just in all situations
> neither is the best. You said in another reply that we haven't created
> a computer that can create as we do,
What do yo mean we? Just because one person is a go
On 1/18/14, Chris Bannister wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 07:13:17PM +1100, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
>> Certainly humans have technology, and gadgets, and technological power
>> (awesome chariots, ...
>
> Mmmm, so the last chariot I saw wasn't on "Ben Hur"?
Yes, definitely, and did you notice th
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 07:13:17PM +1100, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> Certainly humans have technology, and gadgets, and technological power
> (awesome chariots, ...
Mmmm, so the last chariot I saw wasn't on "Ben Hur"?
--
"If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people
who ar
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 07:45:04PM +0200, Cristian Baboi wrote:
> În data de Thu, 16 Jan 2014 19:36:09 +0200, Iain M Conochie
> >Gazing into my crystal ball, there will be a 3D interface that
> >will blowus all away, and the kids will laugh at us for using a
> >mouse / keyboard.
> >
>
> There woul
old people :(.
But lets end this discussion. Computers are good and lets continue
complaining "sad but true, Linux sucks, a bit", just because some humans
won't understand the limits of computers.
:(
Ralf
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
..besides, the film I referenced "her," is all about a sensing computer
who trust me has no problem with sexuality.
Kare
On Fri, 17 Jan 2014, cletusjenkins wrote:
On Fri, 17 Jan 2014 13:53:20 -0800 Ralf
Mardorf wrote
> I agree, but they will kill you and now me too, because you me
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 10:42:55PM +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-01-17 at 15:35 -0600, John Hasler wrote:
> > Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> > > Why does a manually wound coil for guitars does sound better than a
> > > mechanically wounded coil does?
> >
> > I doubt that it would in a doubl
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 10:10:32PM +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-01-17 at 22:02 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> > On Fri, 2014-01-17 at 21:43 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2014-01-17 at 12:13 -0700, Robert Holtzman wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 01:07:55PM +0100, Ralf Ma
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 09:43:10PM +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-01-17 at 12:13 -0700, Robert Holtzman wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 01:07:55PM +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2014-01-16 at 12:05 -0700, Robert Holtzman wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 06:58:11PM +010
On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 8:51 AM, cletusjenkins wrote:
>
> On Fri, 17 Jan 2014 13:53:20 -0800 Ralf
> Mardorf wrote
>
> > I agree, but they will kill you and now me too, because you mentioned
> > that. Sexuality is a taboo! It's evil, it doesn't exist in the clean
> > computer world!
>
On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 4:13 AM, Robert Holtzman wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 01:07:55PM +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>> On Thu, 2014-01-16 at 12:05 -0700, Robert Holtzman wrote:
>> > On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 06:58:11PM +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>> > > On Thu, 2014-01-16 at 17:36 +, Iain M C
On Fri, 17 Jan 2014 13:53:20 -0800 Ralf
Mardorf wrote
> I agree, but they will kill you and now me too, because you mentioned
> that. Sexuality is a taboo! It's evil, it doesn't exist in the clean
> computer world!
Any computer sufficiently complex to be considered sentient wil
Have you seen the movie her?
one person's case is another person's preference! smiles.
Kare
On Fri, 17 Jan 2014, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Fri, 2014-01-17 at 16:53 -0500, Karen Lewellen wrote:
Computer cases seem so...bland by comparison with say George Clooney
packages.
Women?!
As a heterosex
On Fri, 2014-01-17 at 16:53 -0500, Karen Lewellen wrote:
> Computer cases seem so...bland by comparison with say George Clooney
> packages.
Women?!
As a heterosexual man now I have to disagree, I prefer the sexy body of
my female computer case compared to the odd shape of George Clooney.
Karen,
well, I have no children, but the making process is indeed far more fun
then putting my hands inside a box. And consider all the wonderfully
imaginative and beautiful human art that results?
Computer cases seem so...bland by comparison with say George Clooney
packages.Kare
On Fri, 17 Jan 2014
On Fri, 2014-01-17 at 13:47 -0800, cletusjenkins wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Jan 2014 13:33:31 -0800 Jerry Stuckle wrote
> > >
> > >
> >
> > And the only complex machine that can be reproduced by unskilled labor!
> >
> > Jerry
>
> And not only that, it is in fact quite fun and enjoy
On Fri, 2014-01-17 at 13:38 -0800, cletusjenkins wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Jan 2014 13:21:49 -0800 Ralf
> Mardorf wrote
>
> >
> > Living beings are able to self-repair, to eat and to produce the needed
> > energy for doing some work. You only need to interrupt electrical power
> > gi
On Fri, 17 Jan 2014 13:33:31 -0800 Jerry Stuckle wrote
> >
> >
>
> And the only complex machine that can be reproduced by unskilled labor!
>
> Jerry
And not only that, it is in fact quite fun and enjoyable to make people. While
I enjoy tinkering with my computers, it was mo
On Fri, 2014-01-17 at 15:35 -0600, John Hasler wrote:
> Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> > Why does a manually wound coil for guitars does sound better than a
> > mechanically wounded coil does?
>
> I doubt that it would in a double-blind experiment.
But your doubts are wrong, it was done a trillion tim
On Fri, 2014-01-17 at 16:33 -0500, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
> And the only complex machine that can be reproduced by unskilled labor!
Yesno, we need to be able to interact with other humans, in the real
world! ... to reproduce ourself ;)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian
On Fri, 17 Jan 2014 13:21:49 -0800 Ralf
Mardorf wrote
>
> Living beings are able to self-repair, to eat and to produce the needed
> energy for doing some work. You only need to interrupt electrical power
> given by humans, to kill a machine.
>
I'm not arguing one is better
Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> Why does a manually wound coil for guitars does sound better than a
> mechanically wounded coil does?
I doubt that it would in a double-blind experiment.
> The mechanically wound coil is more precise!
The mechanically wound coil could easily be made precisely as impreci
On 1/17/2014 4:14 PM, cletusjenkins wrote:
On Fri, 17 Jan 2014 12:43:10 -0800 Ralf
Mardorf wrote
>
> Why does a manually wound coil for guitars does sound better than a
> mechanically wounded coil does? The mechanically wound coil is more
> precise! Don't underestimate human to
On Fri, 2014-01-17 at 22:21 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-01-17 at 13:14 -0800, cletusjenkins wrote:
> > On Fri, 17 Jan 2014 12:43:10 -0800 Ralf
> > Mardorf wrote
> > >
> > > Why does a manually wound coil for guitars does sound better than a
> > > mechanically wounded
On Fri, 2014-01-17 at 13:14 -0800, cletusjenkins wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Jan 2014 12:43:10 -0800 Ralf
> Mardorf wrote
> >
> > Why does a manually wound coil for guitars does sound better than a
> > mechanically wounded coil does? The mechanically wound coil is more
> > precise! Don'
On Fri, 17 Jan 2014 12:43:10 -0800 Ralf
Mardorf wrote
>
> Why does a manually wound coil for guitars does sound better than a
> mechanically wounded coil does? The mechanically wound coil is more
> precise! Don't underestimate human touch. The human brain is a
> super-computer
On Fri, 2014-01-17 at 22:02 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-01-17 at 21:43 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> > On Fri, 2014-01-17 at 12:13 -0700, Robert Holtzman wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 01:07:55PM +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 2014-01-16 at 12:05 -0700, Robert Holtzma
On Fri, 2014-01-17 at 21:43 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-01-17 at 12:13 -0700, Robert Holtzman wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 01:07:55PM +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2014-01-16 at 12:05 -0700, Robert Holtzman wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 06:58:11PM +0100, Ralf
On Fri, 2014-01-17 at 12:13 -0700, Robert Holtzman wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 01:07:55PM +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> > On Thu, 2014-01-16 at 12:05 -0700, Robert Holtzman wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 06:58:11PM +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 2014-01-16 at 17:36 +, Iain
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 01:07:55PM +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-01-16 at 12:05 -0700, Robert Holtzman wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 06:58:11PM +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2014-01-16 at 17:36 +, Iain M Conochie wrote:
> > > > Gazing into my crystal ball, there will
On Fri, 2014-01-17 at 14:38 +0100, Denis Witt wrote:
> Or think about machines in mills, sorting out single grains of poor
> quality while they are falling down like a waterfall into the
> millstone granting a better flour quality than you can with dozens of
> human workers doing the same.
I menti
On Fri, 2014-01-17 at 07:02 -0600, Nate Bargmann wrote:
> I still see the glass as half full
:)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1389977923.3167.109.c
On Thu, 16 Jan 2014 18:58:11 +0100
Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> a good knife isn't produced by a computer controlled
> machine, but handcrafted by a craftsman.
But this isn't because a machine can't do the work of a good craftsman
(in some cases today, and in almost any in the future). It's because
it'
* On 2014 17 Jan 05:15 -0600, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> The advantage of Windows over Debian is hardware support and that more
> people get payed for writing software for exotic usages, such as audio
> and video editing.
In amateur radio circles there is a constant warning against USB to
serial dongle
On Fri, 2014-01-17 at 13:07 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-01-16 at 12:05 -0700, Robert Holtzman wrote:
> >
> > But these, sure as hell, aren't sold in grocery stores.
>
> Correct! And I suspect that it isn't allowed to sell and buy a good
> knife in Germany anymore
My father, a gifted
On Fri, 2014-01-17 at 12:57 +0100, Gian Uberto Lauri wrote:
> I heard about some doubts about TrueCrypt...
Encryption doesn't work, when there is already a backdoor before the
encryption takes place. For FLOSS operating systems it's hard to place
such a backdoor, for closed operating systems from
On Thu, 2014-01-16 at 12:05 -0700, Robert Holtzman wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 06:58:11PM +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> > On Thu, 2014-01-16 at 17:36 +, Iain M Conochie wrote:
> > > Gazing into my crystal ball, there will be a 3D interface that will
> > > blow us all away, and the kids will
Ralf Mardorf writes:
> On Fri, 2014-01-17 at 10:26 +0100, Gian Uberto Lauri wrote:
> > In the long term the support he gets from XP could become worse than
> > the support supplied by GNU/Linux. It does not seem wise to me.
>
> There are some cracked XP and 98 se versions out there, that ar
On Fri, 2014-01-17 at 12:13 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-01-17 at 10:26 +0100, Gian Uberto Lauri wrote:
> > In the long term the support he gets from XP could become worse than
> > the support supplied by GNU/Linux. It does not seem wise to me.
>
> There are some cracked XP and 98 s
On Fri, 2014-01-17 at 10:26 +0100, Gian Uberto Lauri wrote:
> In the long term the support he gets from XP could become worse than
> the support supplied by GNU/Linux. It does not seem wise to me.
There are some cracked XP and 98 se versions out there, that are as good
as FreeBSD and Linux for m
On Fri, 2014-01-17 at 19:13 +1100, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> _Every_ generalisation is _always_ wrong :)
Ok, I agree :). My statements are in a context, so I guess most people
will understand, even if they should disagree.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
Ma Xiaojun writes:
> Yet another read: http://www.g4ilo.com/linux.html
Awesome! The truth incarnate!
WILMAA! The trashcaan!
That post is about the experience of a single man, the weight against
the whole mankind is about 1.25e-10 to 1.
Has that man the right to use XP? According to
On Vi, 17 ian 14, 14:29:55, Ma Xiaojun wrote:
> Yet another read: http://www.g4ilo.com/linux.html
,
| This software is Windows-only, does not run under wine, and an email to
| the manufacturer asking for details of the communication protocol so I
| could write my own went unanswered. Not the
On 1/17/14, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-01-17 at 14:29 +0800, Ma Xiaojun wrote:
>> Yet another read: http://www.g4ilo.com/linux.html
>
> So what?
>
> I bought a professional sound card, that should work with Linux, but it
> doesn't, it does perfectly work on Windows XP.
>
> XP isn't a bad O
On Fri, 2014-01-17 at 14:29 +0800, Ma Xiaojun wrote:
> Yet another read: http://www.g4ilo.com/linux.html
So what?
I bought a professional sound card, that should work with Linux, but it
doesn't, it does perfectly work on Windows XP.
XP isn't a bad OS regarding to some technically things, I anywa
Yet another read: http://www.g4ilo.com/linux.html
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/cagvx7uu0egsy4p__-k8c9pzvrsinlz7wpgjmdqf0_nabafa...@mail.gmail.com
tter quality. They perhaps will read books again instead
> of "Linux sucks" blogs.
You're, indulging in wishful thinking. That world died circa 1970. It won't
return because large corporations won't be able to make as much money as they
can now. Sad, huh?
>
>
On 15 January 2014 21:42, Jarth Berilcosm wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Jan 2014 11:08:22 -0600, yaro wrote:
>
> Yeah, well, all this bitching proves i should look harder for the off-
> topic list.
>
True.
I.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscrib
On Thu, 2014-01-16 at 17:36 +, Iain M Conochie wrote:
> Gazing into my crystal ball, there will be a 3D interface that will
> blow us all away, and the kids will laugh at us for using a mouse /
> keyboard.
Not necessarily! We eat using classic knifes since several hundred years
and btw. a good
În data de Thu, 16 Jan 2014 19:36:09 +0200, Iain M Conochie
a scris:
A lot of Linux geeks spent a lot of time worrying about Microsoft's
desktop dominance over those years. I would often hear people claim
that Linux had to get on to the desktop *now* (1999, 2004, 2007, etc)
or it would be l
A lot of Linux geeks spent a lot of time worrying about Microsoft's
desktop dominance over those years. I would often hear people claim
that Linux had to get on to the desktop *now* (1999, 2004, 2007, etc)
or it would be locked out *forever*.
I concluded some time in the late 90s that soo
On Thursday, January 16, 2014 10:40:40 PM Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> On 1/16/14, Ma Xiaojun wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 10:08 PM, Jarth Berilcosm wrote:
> >> Looking back on using Linux as a desktop OS for almost 15 years we've
> >> seen tons of features added but not much in terms of 'bite'
On 1/16/14, Ma Xiaojun wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 10:08 PM, Jarth Berilcosm wrote:
>> Looking back on using Linux as a desktop OS for almost 15 years we've
>> seen tons of features added but not much in terms of 'bite'.
>> Also, how many projects can one need for a specific purpose built o
On Thursday 16 January 2014 09:37:21 Lisi Reisz wrote:
> It's basic
> meaning
Ouch! Its basic meaning
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20140116102
On Thursday 16 January 2014 02:06:23 Ma Xiaojun wrote:
> I guess Unix junkie can claim xterms with whatever window manager a
> "desktop".
You are being hamstrung by your own definition of desktop. It's basic
meaning is something (in this case a computer) that sits on top of
your desk. It does
Andrei POPESCU writes:
> On Mi, 15 ian 14, 16:53:15, Jarth Berilcosm wrote:
> >
> > Computers are cheap crap because they can be made to be cheap crap. The
> > production proces permits this.
>
> Of course it does, as it is possible to make knifes that don't cut (not
> sharpened, bad qua
On Mi, 15 ian 14, 16:53:15, Jarth Berilcosm wrote:
>
> Computers are cheap crap because they can be made to be cheap crap. The
> production proces permits this.
Of course it does, as it is possible to make knifes that don't cut (not
sharpened, bad quality steel, etc.). IMNSHO the problem is wit
On Jo, 16 ian 14, 11:38:01, Robert Brockway wrote:
>
> FWIW I expect yet another disruptive technology to come along soon.
> I very much doubt we'll be using a single finger or thumb to type on
> small mobile screens to get anything done in 10 years time.
I agree.
Kind regards,
Andrei
--
http:/
2014/1/15 Jarth Berilcosm
>
> Looking back on using Linux as a desktop OS for almost 15 years we've
> seen tons of features added but not much in terms of 'bite'.
>
> Hardware support is a lot better but still sucks when it comes to
> consumer multi-media, gaming performance etc.
>
> Someone wrot
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 9:38 AM, Robert Brockway
wrote:
> The whole question of whether Linux is 'ready for the desktop' is specious.
> This statement presumes that everyone has the same desktop requirements
> which they demonstratably do not.
>
> I've been using Linux on the desktop continuously
On Wed, 15 Jan 2014, y...@marupa.net wrote:
These "reasons why Linux is not ready for the desktop" lists are so stupid.
The whole question of whether Linux is 'ready for the desktop' is
specious. This statement presumes that everyone has the same desktop
requirements which they demonstratab
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 10:08 PM, Jarth Berilcosm wrote:
> Looking back on using Linux as a desktop OS for almost 15 years we've
> seen tons of features added but not much in terms of 'bite'.
Well deserved for its always crappy state throughout history.
Windows was very crappy internally (conside
On Wednesday 15 January 2014 17:08:22 y...@marupa.net wrote:
> This is practically trolling.
Practically?
Lisi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20140
On 16/01/14 08:39, Jarth Berilcosm wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Jan 2014 18:22:27 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>
> Honestly ? Get a break, go live in a tent or something.
Jarth, don't let Ralf upset you, it's not his fault he's human, and that
comes with all sorts of illogical baggage. Bash on the other h
On Wed, 15 Jan 2014 11:08:22 -0600, yaro wrote:
Yeah, well, all this bitching proves i should look harder for the off-
topic list.
> On Wednesday, January 15, 2014 04:53:15 PM Jarth Berilcosm wrote:
>> On Wed, 15 Jan 2014 17:29:01 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>>
>> I'm using a news-reader and coul
On Wed, 15 Jan 2014 18:22:27 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
Honestly ? Get a break, go live in a tent or something.
> On Wed, 2014-01-15 at 16:53 +, Jarth Berilcosm wrote:
>> I'm using a news-reader and could not find the off-topic mailinglist.
>
> That is a good example how the cheap crap ca
Origineel bericht
On Wed, 2014-01-15 at 16:53 +, Jarth Berilcosm wrote:
I'm using a news-reader and could not find the off-topic mailinglist.
That is a good example how the cheap crap called computer nowadays is
misused, for laziness, carelessness, abyss of ignorance,
Ralf Mardorf wrote:
It's a misunderstanding to guess that computer technology is that
progressed. Computers are cheap crap. If you are aware that they are
nothing but cheap crap, you can use them from an relatively objective
point of view.
Well put :-)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-us
On Wed, 2014-01-15 at 16:53 +, Jarth Berilcosm wrote:
> I'm using a news-reader and could not find the off-topic mailinglist.
That is a good example how the cheap crap called computer nowadays is
misused, for laziness, carelessness, abyss of ignorance, to produce
other cheap crap.
> Most impo
On Wednesday, January 15, 2014 04:53:15 PM Jarth Berilcosm wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Jan 2014 17:29:01 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>
> I'm using a news-reader and could not find the off-topic mailinglist.
>
> Sorry to say so but your reply sounds more like rambling than anything.
> I'll reply to the par
On Wed, 15 Jan 2014 17:29:01 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
I'm using a news-reader and could not find the off-topic mailinglist.
Sorry to say so but your reply sounds more like rambling than anything.
I'll reply to the part i was able to comprehend.
Expectations ? Man, get a good night sleep.
Com
> Most importantly this list is not an opinion. Almost every listed
> point has links to appropriate articles, threads and discussions
> centered on it, proving that I haven't pulled it out of my < expletive
> >. And please always check your "facts".
> If you get an impression that Linux sucks -
Looking back on using Linux as a desktop OS for almost 15 years we've
seen tons of features added but not much in terms of 'bite'.
Hardware support is a lot better but still sucks when it comes to
consumer multi-media, gaming performance etc.
Someone wrote down a well documented list on all
On Sun, Mar 11, 2007 at 08:19:34AM -0700, Freddy Freeloader wrote:
> >
> LOL. I hadn't even noticed he's from the evil empire. Now we know why
> he has a bad attitude ;)
>
He somewhat reminds me of William Ballard? Anyone remember him?
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sanchez
http://
On 10.03.07 22:42, Ben Humpert wrote:
> Like i said, your client can't handle it correctly.
if it is NOT correctly formatted, nobody can correctly handle it.
> It should notice "oh,
> its HTML, lets rewrite it into plain text".
Invalid. Your e-mail contain plaintext part that is broken.
> You do
Joe Hart wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Wayne Topa wrote:
Sorry Mr. Bumpert but your HTML mail is just to hard on my eyes.
Your atitude doesn't set well with me either, therefore you are being
added to the Deny list.
Have a nice life.
He's hit mine as well.
1 - 100 of 145 matches
Mail list logo
