Am 2005-12-31 20:01:37, schrieb Matt England:
> I'm still looking for any guidance on this topic.
>
> In summary:
>
> Can one run Sarge-built binaries on Woody?
> Can one run Woody-built binaries on Sarge?
In both cases you will run into trouble because the "libc6"
> In the same context, how we
On Sat, Dec 31, 2005 at 08:01:37PM -0600, Matt England wrote:
> I'm still looking for any guidance on this topic.
>
> In summary:
>
> Can one run Sarge-built binaries on Woody?
As I tried to explain at length in my previous post: in general no,
except with massive tweaking (either at build-time,
On Sat, Dec 31, 2005 at 08:01:37PM -0600, Matt England wrote:
> I'm still looking for any guidance on this topic.
>
> In summary:
>
> Can one run Sarge-built binaries on Woody?
In general, no. It will depend on the binary: it will depend on how it
was linked. It may depend on how it was compiled
hi ya
On Sat, 31 Dec 2005, Matt England wrote:
> Can one run Sarge-built binaries on Woody?
you "might" be able to .. but it is NOT desired
> Can one run Woody-built binaries on Sarge?
you "might" be able to .. but it is NOT desired
--
you can usually run old binaries on newer systems
blish some Debian
binary-to-test-system rev-control policies before I got into first round
test on my group's software.
-Matt
At 12/29/2005 01:45 PM, Matt England wrote:
Sarge-built binaries running on Woody systems:
Is this feasible?
I'm not talking about package management...just t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
> Openoffice.org version 2 is wanted by Sarge users whereas it's only currently
> in testing (to be Etch when released) and unstable.
AFAIK it's not in etch currently, only unstable. Correct me if I'm wrong.
- --
Chris Howie
On Thu, Dec 29, 2005 at 01:45:55PM -0600, Matt England wrote:
> Sarge-built binaries running on Woody systems:
>
> Is this feasible?
>
> I'm not talking about package management...just the raw, binary.
>
Backward compatibility is not guaranteed. That's why, for exa
On Thu, Dec 29, 2005 at 01:45:55PM -0600, Matt England wrote:
> Sarge-built binaries running on Woody systems:
>
> Is this feasible?
>
> I'm not talking about package management...just the raw, binary.
>
> Are dynamic-library-management tricks needed? Does the Debia
Sarge-built binaries running on Woody systems:
Is this feasible?
I'm not talking about package management...just the raw, binary.
Are dynamic-library-management tricks needed? Does the Debian testing
authority (or whoever is given responsibility of anointing Debian releases
for distrib
9 matches
Mail list logo
