On Sun, 20 Feb 2000 kmself@ix.netcom.com wrote:
> - Squid is designed for one thing. My perception is that browsing is
>faster using squid than relying on Netscape's cache. Squid is
My perception is that pressing Netscape's "back" button is faster. (I set
Netscape's local file cache to 0M
On Sat, 19 Feb 2000, Christian Dysthe wrote:
> would I gain anything by setting up, and configure my browser to
> use squid as a proxy on my workstation.
I don't think so.
Here in my place, I use Squid on a Linux dial-up router, used for
connecting to the Internet via 28.8K modem. I have set up
On Sat, Feb 19, 2000 at 10:30:19PM -0700, Robert L. Harris wrote:
>
>
> If you have only 1 machine, the only benefit would be the ease of adding
> "Ad Zapper". If you hvae more than one in use, it could definitely be
> a benefit.The difference on my fir apt-get, http and ftp is noticable,
>
On Sat, 19 Feb 2000, Christian Dysthe wrote:
cdysth >Hi,
cdysth >
cdysth >would I gain anything by setting up, and configure my browser to
cdysth >use squid as a proxy on my workstation.
cdysth >
cdysth >I'm running Debian unstable.
i do it, at the same time if your using netscape/X11 it may be g
If you have only 1 machine, the only benefit would be the ease of adding
"Ad Zapper". If you hvae more than one in use, it could definitely be
a benefit.The difference on my fir apt-get, http and ftp is noticable,
especially with Ad Zapper. Pages load ALOT faster.
Robert
Thus spake Christ
Hi,
would I gain anything by setting up, and configure my browser to
use squid as a proxy on my workstation.
I'm running Debian unstable.
TIA
--
Regards,
Christian Dysthe
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web: http://oddbird.dyndns.org
ICQ 3945810
eFax/Voicemai
6 matches
Mail list logo