> I was perplexed by two things. The first was that anyone would think
> -- t was a sig-sep, because a sig-sep is "Hyphen Hyphen Space Newline",
> and the second was that I couldn't think of any particularly bad
> effects that the -- t would cause.
>
> After all, if it's *not* recognised as a sig-s
On Fri 31 Jul 2020 at 12:07:14 (-0400), The Wanderer wrote:
> On 2020-07-31 at 11:29, David Wright wrote:
> > On Fri 31 Jul 2020 at 16:07:29 (+0100), Brad Rogers wrote:
>
> >> The Wanderer couched his response to that far more politely than I would
> >> have done.
> >
> > That might be because Th
On Fri 31 Jul 2020 at 14:51:13 (-0700), Charlie Gibbs wrote:
> On Fri Jul 31 14:39:39 2020 Stefan Monnier wrote:
>
> >>> Then you're confused: his `-- t` is perfectly normal and valid
> >>
> >> No, I'm not confused. '-- t' is NOT a valid sig separator.
> >
> > Indeed it's not, and that's OK beca
On Fri Jul 31 14:39:39 2020 Stefan Monnier
wrote:
>>> Then you're confused: his `-- t` is perfectly normal and valid
>>
>> No, I'm not confused. '-- t' is NOT a valid sig separator.
>
> Indeed it's not, and that's OK because Tomas doesn't use it as
> a "signature separator" (the thing that shou
> In a properly compliant situation, the '-- t' itself would be omitted
> when replying to the message, because it is (part or all of) the
> signature block and not actually anything that will need to be
> responded to.
Just like the `\tStefan` at the end of this email, the `-- t` is *not*
meant t
On 2020-07-31 at 11:29, David Wright wrote:
> On Fri 31 Jul 2020 at 16:07:29 (+0100), Brad Rogers wrote:
>> The Wanderer couched his response to that far more politely than I would
>> have done.
>
> That might be because The Wanderer was responding to some information
> in Reco's post. It was mu
On 2020-07-31 at 11:30, Stefan Monnier wrote:
>> I can read everything fine. Nothing gets trashed, but things that
>> one expects to happen (non quoting of text after a valid sig
>> separator) because Tomas has DELIBERATELY, broken his, don't
>> occur.
>
> I don't see any text following his `--
On Fri, 31 Jul 2020 10:29:56 -0500
David Wright wrote:
Hello David,
>kmail's alleged bug. But surely, if kmail has a bug, then isn't the
>correct path to report it?
Indeed.
BUT:
I don't use kmail.
Finally (IOW, last I'm going to say on the subject); I've dealt with
the problem.
--
Rega
> I can read everything fine. Nothing gets trashed, but things that one
> expects to happen (non quoting of text after a valid sig separator)
> because Tomas has DELIBERATELY, broken his, don't occur.
I don't see any text following his `-- t`.
What text do you see after `-- t` that you think shou
On Fri 31 Jul 2020 at 16:07:29 (+0100), Brad Rogers wrote:
> On Fri, 31 Jul 2020 18:00:03 +0300 Reco wrote:
>
> >I agree. But it's a valid part of a e-mail body, and any MUA that
> >mishandles that is broken in this regard.
>
> I can read everything fine. Nothing gets trashed, but things that o
>>Then you're confused: his `-- t` is perfectly normal and valid (just as
> No, I'm not confused. '-- t' is NOT a valid sig separator.
Indeed it's not, and that's OK because Tomas doesn't use it as
a "signature separator" (the thing that should be `-- \n`), but just as
the last line of text in hi
On Fri, 31 Jul 2020 18:00:03 +0300
Reco wrote:
Hello Reco,
>I agree. But it's a valid part of a e-mail body, and any MUA that
>mishandles that is broken in this regard.
I can read everything fine. Nothing gets trashed, but things that one
expects to happen (non quoting of text after a valid si
On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 02:50:00PM +0100, Brad Rogers wrote:
> >Then you're confused: his `-- t` is perfectly normal and valid (just as
>
> No, I'm not confused. '-- t' is NOT a valid sig separator.
I agree. But it's a valid part of a e-mail body, and any MUA that
mishandles that is broken in th
On Fri, 31 Jul 2020 08:59:35 -0400
Stefan Monnier wrote:
Hello Stefan,
>Then you're confused: his `-- t` is perfectly normal and valid (just as
No, I'm not confused. '-- t' is NOT a valid sig separator.
Unfortunately, I forgot to change the Subject header, and when somebody
else did, they use
>>Do you mean that his -- t
>
> Of course I do.
Then you're confused: his `-- t` is perfectly normal and valid (just as
much as my `\tStefan` below which I occasionally change to `-- Stefan`
depending on the indentation of the previous text).
The signature problem you're apparently seeing in your
On Fri, 31 Jul 2020 07:15:40 -0400
rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello rhkra...@gmail.com,
>Do you mean that his -- t
Of course I do.
--
Regards _
/ ) "The blindingly obvious is
/ _)radnever immediately apparent"
Drums quite good, bass is too loud, and I can't
On 2020-07-31 at 07:15, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Friday, July 31, 2020 05:49:14 AM Brad Rogers wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 31 Jul 2020 08:55:22 +0300 Andrei POPESCU
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hello Andrei,
>>
>>> What difference does it make for a signature like his ("-- t")?
>>
>> It doesn't work.
>
> F
On Friday, July 31, 2020 07:15:40 AM rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Friday, July 31, 2020 05:49:14 AM Brad Rogers wrote:
On Friday, July 31, 2020 07:15:40 AM rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> Or the PGP signatures don't work?
I meant to say that both his messages and your messages show up with the "En
On Friday, July 31, 2020 05:49:14 AM Brad Rogers wrote:
> On Fri, 31 Jul 2020 08:55:22 +0300
> Andrei POPESCU wrote:
>
> Hello Andrei,
>
> >What difference does it make for a signature like his ("-- t")?
>
> It doesn't work.
From left field (I learned that I probably shouldn't say "from the pe
19 matches
Mail list logo
