On Thu, 17 Nov 2005, Andreas Rippl wrote:
> Hi Ed,
>
> first you should ask yourself, how do I quantify 'rather slowly'?
> And now just some random thoughts...
>
> - what does some kind of network monitoring tool (I use xnetload) show
> for the interface in question when idle? when making a co
On Thu, Nov 17, 2005 at 09:02:37AM -0500, Ed Curtis wrote:
>
> Just recently one of our servers has started to respond to certain
> requests rather slowly. POP, SMTP, and SSH reqeusts have started showing
> slower reponse times from the server. I'm running Woody on a dual
> processor machine with
On Thu, Nov 17, 2005 at 10:10:42AM -0500, Ed Curtis wrote:
> Carl Fink wrote:
> >Check the logs -- is the slowness in server response itself, or in the
> >network? For instance, if there's a firewall/router upstream of the
> >server,
> >that could have slowed down or been overloaded.
> >
> The l
Carl Fink wrote:
On Thu, Nov 17, 2005 at 09:02:37AM -0500, Ed Curtis wrote:
Just recently one of our servers has started to respond to certain
requests rather slowly. POP, SMTP, and SSH reqeusts have started showing
slower reponse times from the server. I'm running Woody on a dual
processor
On Thu, Nov 17, 2005 at 09:02:37AM -0500, Ed Curtis wrote:
>
> Just recently one of our servers has started to respond to certain
> requests rather slowly. POP, SMTP, and SSH reqeusts have started showing
> slower reponse times from the server. I'm running Woody on a dual
> processor machine with
Just recently one of our servers has started to respond to certain
requests rather slowly. POP, SMTP, and SSH reqeusts have started showing
slower reponse times from the server. I'm running Woody on a dual
processor machine with 2 gigs of memory and a hardware raid. Uptime shows
our load average a
6 matches
Mail list logo
