on Sun, Nov 11, 2001 at 04:35:06PM +0100, Eduard Bloch ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> #include
> Karsten M. Self wrote on Sun Nov 11, 2001 um 03:49:33AM:
>
> > > the list and searched for that entry. Ext3 stores the position the
> > > last found entry, so when accessing again, the search begins an
On Saturday, November 10, 2001, at 05:03 PM, Karsten M. Self wrote:
on Sat, Nov 10, 2001 at 03:16:54PM -0500, Tom Allison
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
So, unlike what I read in ReiserFS, I can just hang out on this for a
while and then upgrade at my leisure? This is so totally cool
Is the
#include
Karsten M. Self wrote on Sun Nov 11, 2001 um 03:49:33AM:
> > the list and searched for that entry. Ext3 stores the position the
> > last found entry, so when accessing again, the search begins an this
> > position and you get your entry wery fast, in best case within the
> > first search
on Sun, Nov 11, 2001 at 11:59:55AM +0100, Eduard Bloch ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> #include
> Karsten M. Self wrote on Sat Nov 10, 2001 um 02:48:33PM:
> > > Now that you said this... I'd like to see how reiserfs and
> > > ext3 in writeback mode perform. I'd think ext3 would still be
> > > outper
#include
Karsten M. Self wrote on Sat Nov 10, 2001 um 02:48:33PM:
> > Now that you said this... I'd like to see how reiserfs and
> > ext3 in writeback mode perform. I'd think ext3 would still be
> > outperformed by reiser for the large dir listings.
>
> The issue isn't writing the directories, bu
on Sat, Nov 10, 2001 at 08:12:09PM -0200, Jeronimo Pellegrini ([EMAIL
PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 10, 2001 at 02:03:10PM -0800, Karsten M. Self wrote:
> > I've got both ext3fs and reiserfs on my most recent laptop build.
> >
> > There are advantages to each.
> >
> > Reiserfs has better perf
On Sat, Nov 10, 2001 at 02:03:10PM -0800, Karsten M. Self wrote:
> I've got both ext3fs and reiserfs on my most recent laptop build.
>
> There are advantages to each.
>
> Reiserfs has better performance with larger filesystems, particularly
> for large directory listings. In one case, I've got a
on Sat, Nov 10, 2001 at 03:16:54PM -0500, Tom Allison ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> So, unlike what I read in ReiserFS, I can just hang out on this for a
> while and then upgrade at my leisure? This is so totally cool
> Is there an performance difference between this "conversion" and
> start
8 matches
Mail list logo
