On Mi, 21 nov 12, 13:22:14, Tom Furie wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 09:18:48AM +, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> > On Wednesday 21 November 2012 08:53:38 Chris Bannister wrote:
> > > On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 10:43:16PM -0500, Fred White wrote:
>
> > > > Hello List,
> > >
> > > It is considered (well, a
On Mi, 21 nov 12, 09:18:48, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Wednesday 21 November 2012 08:53:38 Chris Bannister wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 10:43:16PM -0500, Fred White wrote:
> > > Hello List,
> >
> > It is considered (well, actually it is) rude to hijack threads on
> > mailing lists.
>
> According
id (I even did not know that there were ids here, thanks
> > for info).
> >
> > I think people on linux's mailing lists should know that automated things
> > are never perfect, and must be taken carefully.
> >
> > But I do not think it have anything related to &quo
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 01:09:54PM +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> The main problem still is, that humans on this list count to much on all
> kinds of automatic selection. An id shouldn't be that important as a
> subject is. We had thousands of years of natural evolution and now we
> try to be better
7;s mailing lists should know that automated things
> are never perfect, and must be taken carefully.
>
> But I do not think it have anything related to "Re: Sources.list Question".
Um, not to pour gasoline on a dying fire, but the OP was told it was
rude to hijack another thread. B
even did not know that there were ids here, thanks
for info).
I think people on linux's mailing lists should know that automated things
are never perfect, and must be taken carefully.
But I do not think it have anything related to "Re: Sources.list Question".
--
To UNSUBSC
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 09:18:48AM +, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Wednesday 21 November 2012 08:53:38 Chris Bannister wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 10:43:16PM -0500, Fred White wrote:
> > > Hello List,
> >
> > It is considered (well, actually it is) rude to hijack threads on
> > mailing lists.
François, a good idea to open a new subject, but keeping the id. Others
might think, this is bad too. I say, use a client that enables to
select, as you want the selection, even if people "use" the id in
different ways.
> But it has powerfull possibilities, and is customisable using Lisp.
>
> May
On Wednesday 21 November 2012 12:23:00 Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> ignore something that's hidden in the headers and
> that isn't human readable, something we receive all the times, shouldn't
> cause chaos.
It doesn't!
Lisi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a sub
On Wednesday 21 November 2012 12:09:54 Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> The main problem still is, that humans on this list count to much on all
> kinds of automatic selection. An id shouldn't be that important as a
> subject is. We had thousands of years of natural evolution and now we
> try to be better tha
hould?
>
> Gmail doesn't even know what a thread is. It goes purely by subject.
>
> And yes, hijacking a thread can be very disadvantageous to the hijacker and
> very confusing for everybody else.
>
> Sorry, Chris.
> Lisi
Evolution 3.6.0 and I can't recommend to
On Wed, 2012-11-21 at 11:39 +0100, François TOURDE wrote:
> Le 15665ième jour après Epoch,
> Ralf Mardorf écrivait:
>
> > On Wed, 2012-11-21 at 09:27 +, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> >> On Wednesday 21 November 2012 09:22:57 Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> >> > On Wed, 2012-11-21 at 09:18 +, Lisi Reisz wrote:
Sorry, Lars. Sent to you in error. Resending to list. I fear that th
ethreading may have been broken. I think that my KMail is definitely
sickly. :-(
On Wednesday 21 November 2012 11:16:09 Lars Noodén wrote:
> On 11/21/12, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> ...
>
> > Gmail doesn't even know what a thread
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 6:16 AM, Lars Noodén wrote:
> On 11/21/12, Lisi Reisz wrote:
>>
>> Gmail doesn't even know what a thread is. It goes purely by subject.
>
> Is there even any place to report such bugs with their mail client?
Possibly
https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups#!forum/to-
On Wednesday 21 November 2012 11:10:46 François TOURDE wrote:
> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.6.0-0ubuntu3
>
> As marked on his message.
Do'h. :-(
Lisi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
On 11/21/12, Lisi Reisz wrote:
...
> Gmail doesn't even know what a thread is. It goes purely by subject.
...
Is there even any place to report such bugs with their mail client?
Regards
/Lars
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". T
Le 15665ième jour après Epoch,
Lisi Reisz écrivait:
> On Wednesday 21 November 2012 10:39:46 François TOURDE wrote:
[...]
>>
>> Lisi, consider change or upgrade your client ;)
>
> Obviously!! This is the first time, to my knowledge, that it has let me
> down,
> but one could say once is too oft
On Wednesday 21 November 2012 10:39:46 François TOURDE wrote:
> Le 15665ième jour après Epoch,
>
> Ralf Mardorf écrivait:
> > On Wed, 2012-11-21 at 09:27 +, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> >> On Wednesday 21 November 2012 09:22:57 Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> >> > On Wed, 2012-11-21 at 09:18 +, Lisi Reisz wro
Le 15665ième jour après Epoch,
Ralf Mardorf écrivait:
> On Wed, 2012-11-21 at 09:27 +, Lisi Reisz wrote:
>> On Wednesday 21 November 2012 09:22:57 Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>> > On Wed, 2012-11-21 at 09:18 +, Lisi Reisz wrote:
>> > > On Wednesday 21 November 2012 08:53:38 Chris Bannister wrote:
On Wed, 21 Nov 2012 09:27:34 +
Lisi Reisz wrote:
Hello Lisi,
>Quite. Exactly. And Chris said that he hijacked the thread.
He did; Crypticmofo's Guide/Tools post.
--
Regards _
/ ) "The blindingly obvious is
/ _)radnever immediately apparent"
Your fat
On Wed, 2012-11-21 at 09:27 +, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Wednesday 21 November 2012 09:22:57 Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> > On Wed, 2012-11-21 at 09:18 +, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 21 November 2012 08:53:38 Chris Bannister wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 10:43:16PM -0500, Fred White
On Wednesday 21 November 2012 09:22:57 Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-11-21 at 09:18 +, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> > On Wednesday 21 November 2012 08:53:38 Chris Bannister wrote:
> > > On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 10:43:16PM -0500, Fred White wrote:
> > > > Hello List,
> > >
> > > It is considered (wel
On Wed, 2012-11-21 at 09:18 +, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Wednesday 21 November 2012 08:53:38 Chris Bannister wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 10:43:16PM -0500, Fred White wrote:
> > > Hello List,
> >
> > It is considered (well, actually it is) rude to hijack threads on
> > mailing lists.
>
> Ac
On Wednesday 21 November 2012 08:53:38 Chris Bannister wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 10:43:16PM -0500, Fred White wrote:
> > Hello List,
>
> It is considered (well, actually it is) rude to hijack threads on
> mailing lists.
According to my email client (KMail 1.9.10) he didn't. What thread did
On Wednesday 21 November 2012 03:43:16 Fred White wrote:
> I need to upgrade Opendkim version 2.0.1 but squeeze repository remains
> with 2.0.1 since I started have to add opendkim to my server and this
> version seem never to be upgraded. However, 2.6.8 is in Debian backports
> repository and sinc
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 10:43:16PM -0500, Fred White wrote:
>
> Hello List,
>
It is considered (well, actually it is) rude to hijack threads on
mailing lists.
--
"If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people
who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing
There is also the solution of creating a file containing the needed line
in /etc/apt/sources.list.d
All files here are virtually added to the sources.list file by apt* when
updating the package list.
Le Mer 21 novembre 2012 5:34, Zenaan Harkness a écrit :
> This WFM (works for me):
> add the extra
On Tue, 2012-11-20 at 22:43 -0500, Fred White wrote:
> Hello List,
>
> I am learning to help myself installing and updates some minor programs
> on my dedicated server and need to ask a couple of questions.
>
> I need to upgrade Opendkim version 2.0.1 but squeeze repository remains
> with 2.0.1
This WFM (works for me):
add the extra dist/section
update
install package
remove the section
You will be left with your package.
Repeat if you need to upgrade just that package, either by install it
again, or by [dist-]upgrade with regular sources.list entries just
prior to upgrading for that pac
Hello List,
I am learning to help myself installing and updates some minor programs
on my dedicated server and need to ask a couple of questions.
I need to upgrade Opendkim version 2.0.1 but squeeze repository remains
with 2.0.1 since I started have to add opendkim to my server and this
ver
On Fri, 4 Jul 2003 14:29:10 +0100
Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
::On Fri, Jul 04, 2003 at 06:04:45AM -0700, Wm. G. McGrath wrote:
::> I'm setting up my sources.list file again looking for faster,
::closer> mirrors. I've used netselect to find the best urls for my
::location> and setup, a
On Fri, Jul 04, 2003 at 06:04:45AM -0700, Wm. G. McGrath wrote:
> I'm setting up my sources.list file again looking for faster, closer
> mirrors. I've used netselect to find the best urls for my location
> and setup, and have put together a comparitively small list of
> mirrors on which to base the
Howdy all,
I'm setting up my sources.list file again looking for faster, closer
mirrors. I've used netselect to find the best urls for my location
and setup, and have put together a comparitively small list of
mirrors on which to base the file. Ok so I've done that.
Now I'd like to test each lin
also sprach Joyce, Matthew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.09.17.0327 +0200]:
> On my laptop, when I am at home, I would like to use the Debian CDs 1-7,
> however at work I would prefer to use the mirrors at the local uni.
>
> Is there anyway to set which are my preferred sources or source order ?
Jus
Interesting...I use vi on the server but the machine I'm configuring has a
non-techie owner so needed somthing that offered at least a clue as to how
to exit without rebooting the machine ( and yes - that's how he exitted vi
first time!)
Nano is fine. I just wanted the ^X stuff on the bottom to k
On Sat, Feb 09, 2002 at 05:51:17PM -0800, Patrick Kirk wrote:
> [snip]
>
> > I remember pine is only available as source due to licensing issue and
> > removed from binary distribution. If I were desparate, I might download
> > source package and compile. (Which I believe comes with pico.)
> >
Patrick Kirk([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
> deb http://http.us.debian.org/debian testing main contrib non-free
> deb http://non-us.debian.org/debian-non-US testing/non-US main contrib
> non-free
>
> Hi all,
>
> My sources list is above. I can't find pine, pico or smbpasswd.
[snip]
> I remember pine is only available as source due to licensing issue and
> removed from binary distribution. If I were desparate, I might download
> source package and compile. (Which I believe comes with pico.)
>
> But, I will recommend you to move to "mutt" if you used "pine" or
> "el
On Sat, Feb 09, 2002 at 04:36:28PM -0800, Patrick Kirk wrote:
> deb http://http.us.debian.org/debian testing main contrib non-free
> deb http://non-us.debian.org/debian-non-US testing/non-US main contrib
> non-free
>
> Hi all,
>
> My sources list is above. I can't find pine, pico or smbpassw
deb http://http.us.debian.org/debian testing main contrib non-free
deb http://non-us.debian.org/debian-non-US testing/non-US main contrib
non-free
Hi all,
My sources list is above. I can't find pine, pico or smbpasswd. Is there
something essential I messed up when I changed from stable to w
--- William De Cat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Personnaly, I install the base system from an old
> CD, then edit /etc/apt/sources.list to point to the
> distribution I want and then do an "apt-get dist-
> upgrade".
I have done that, and have finally upgraded to Woody.
Right now I'm having a bi
--- "Karsten M. Self" wrote:
> This is among the reason few seasoned Debian users
> install from CD -- base tarball plus boot floppies
> is generally sufficient, packages are snared over
> the 'Net.
Well, I came here to learn, so where would I find
documentation outlining this procedure? Or where
--- "Karsten M. Self" wrote:
> This is among the reason few seasoned Debian users
> install from CD -- base tarball plus boot floppies
> is generally sufficient, packages are snared over
> the 'Net.
Well, I came here to learn, so where would I find
documentation outlining this procedure? Or w
On Monday 29 October 2001 03:18, Scott Henson wrote:
> > I'm just curious, what exactly are these files? My own mini-Debian
> > installer consists of the following files:
> >
> > base2_2.tgz
> > basecont.txt
> > drivers.tgz
> > kernel-config
> > linux
> > rescue.bin [2.88MB floppy version]
> >
> >
On Sunday 28 October 2001 13:04, Karsten M. Self wrote:
> on Sat, Oct 27, 2001 at 02:52:50PM +0800, csj ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> > On Saturday 27 October 2001 03:17, Karsten M. Self wrote:
> > [...]
> > It would help newbies with a little bandwidth to burn if somebody
> > cooks up an official
> I'm just curious, what exactly are these files? My own mini-Debian
> installer consists of the following files:
>
> base2_2.tgz
> basecont.txt
> drivers.tgz
> kernel-config
> linux
> rescue.bin [2.88MB floppy version]
>
> It would help newbies with a little bandwidth to burn if somebody cooks
> u
on Sat, Oct 27, 2001 at 02:52:50PM +0800, csj ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Saturday 27 October 2001 03:17, Karsten M. Self wrote:
> [...[
> > Once you've updated your sources lists from online and switched to
> > Woody, you're likely going to find none of the packages on CD are
> > considered up
On Saturday 27 October 2001 03:17, Karsten M. Self wrote:
[...[
> Once you've updated your sources lists from online and switched to
> Woody, you're likely going to find none of the packages on CD are
> considered up to date. This is among the reason few seasoned Debian
> users install from CD --
on Thu, Oct 25, 2001 at 05:40:00AM -0700, Hamma Scott ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I've recently had some problems upgrading to Woody after downloading
> all the packages for a dist-upgrade.
>
> I'm wondering if I didn't shoot myself in the foot with the sources I
> was pulling from.
>
> I instal
I've recently had some problems upgrading to Woody
after downloading all the packages for a dist-upgrade.
I'm wondering if I didn't shoot myself in the foot
with the sources I was pulling from.
I install from a CD, and first was updating my potato
installation, so I had all those options in the
s
Subject: Re: /etc/apt/sources.list question... Where are they?
Date: Thu, Aug 23, 2001 at 10:54:50PM -0500
In reply to:will trillich
Quoting will trillich([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> On Thu, Aug 23, 2001 at 08:05:02PM -0400, Wayne Topa wrote:
> > In reply to:will
I found that this url was a very informative source
for apt-get information
http://debian-br.sourceforge.net/docs/sgml/apt-howto-en/online/index.html
Don
--- Paul Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Craig Dickson wrote:
>
> > will trillich wrote:
> >
> >
> >># dpkg -S apt-setup
> >>base-co
Craig Dickson wrote:
will trillich wrote:
# dpkg -S apt-setup
base-config: /usr/sbin/apt-setup
base-config: /usr/share/debconf/templates/apt-setup.templates
base-config: /usr/share/man/man8/apt-setup.8.gz
apt-setup has one of the least helpful man pages I've ever seen. Is this
an interacti
On Thu, Aug 23, 2001 at 08:05:02PM -0400, Wayne Topa wrote:
> In reply to:will trillich
>
> Quoting will trillich([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > # dpkg -S apt-setup
> > base-config: /usr/sbin/apt-setup
> > base-config: /usr/share/debconf/templates/apt-setup.templates
> > base-config: /usr/share/man/man8/
On Thu, Aug 23, 2001 at 06:52:39PM -0700, Craig Dickson wrote:
> will trillich wrote:
>
> > # dpkg -S apt-setup
> > base-config: /usr/sbin/apt-setup
> > base-config: /usr/share/debconf/templates/apt-setup.templates
> > base-config: /usr/share/man/man8/apt-setup.8.gz
>
> apt-setup has one of the l
will trillich wrote:
> # dpkg -S apt-setup
> base-config: /usr/sbin/apt-setup
> base-config: /usr/share/debconf/templates/apt-setup.templates
> base-config: /usr/share/man/man8/apt-setup.8.gz
apt-setup has one of the least helpful man pages I've ever seen. Is this
an interactive program? It doesn
Subject: Re: /etc/apt/sources.list question... Where are they?
Date: Thu, Aug 23, 2001 at 04:50:57PM -0500
In reply to:will trillich
Quoting will trillich([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> On Wed, Aug 15, 2001 at 09:52:54AM -0700, Mike Egglestone wrote:
> > Hi...
> >
> &g
On Wed, Aug 15, 2001 at 09:52:54AM -0700, Mike Egglestone wrote:
> Hi...
>
> I was wondering if Debian had a spot on their web page where it listed
> the official available sources for the sources.list file?
# dpkg -S apt-setup
base-config: /usr/sbin/apt-setup
base-config: /usr/share/debconf/temp
On Wed, Aug 15, 2001 at 09:52:54AM -0700, Mike Egglestone wrote:
> I was wondering if Debian had a spot on their web page where it listed
> the official available sources for the sources.list file?
The page for each release (http://www.debian.org/releases/stable/ and
http://www.debian.org/releases
Hi...
I was wondering if Debian had a spot on their web page where it listed
the official available sources for the sources.list file?
thanks
Mike
~~Bill, Bill who?~~
60 matches
Mail list logo
