On Fri, 26 Sep 2025 02:36:21 +
Cliff Kilby wrote:
> I am unsure how to report this, as it is not against a package, but
> rather the installer.
…
> The netinstall installer does not support socks5 proxies, even though
> apt does.
Report against "debian installer".
I am unsure how to report this, as it is not against a package, but rather
the installer.
I searched for any sock5 bugs to see if anything similar had been reported,
but found nothing.
The netinstall installer does not support socks5 proxies, even though apt
does.
https://manpages.debian.org
On Sun, Sep 14, 2025 at 09:08:38PM +, Andy Smith wrote:
> That is what Robert was talking about. That is the basis of my reply
> to Robert.
Apologies, that should of course be Roberto!
Thanks,
Andy
Hi,
On Sun, Sep 14, 2025 at 09:24:48PM +0100, debian-u...@howorth.org.uk wrote:
> Andy Smith wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 13, 2025 at 07:46:13PM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> > > On Sat, Sep 13, 2025 at 09:05:09PM +, Andy Smith wrote:
> > > > I'd hope that no Debian Developer wants to get invo
not understood Liam at all. In
the comments of another El Reg article about xlibre he says:
Liam Proven
Re: X11 over network connection
> For the first 60 years of my life I'd never once needed or used an
> ambulance. Doesn't mean I was stupid enough to suggest they weren'
Hi,
On Sat, Sep 13, 2025 at 07:46:13PM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 13, 2025 at 09:05:09PM +, Andy Smith wrote:
> > I'd hope that no Debian Developer wants to get involved with the
> > XLibre community.
> >
> >
> > https://utcc.utoronto.ca/~cks/space/blog/unix/XLibreIsE
On Sat, Sep 13, 2025 at 09:05:09PM +, Andy Smith wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Sep 13, 2025 at 02:46:08PM -0500, Aaron Johnson wrote:
> > it would be a joy to see the Debian project bring on XLibre as a valid
> > alternative to other X implementations as well as Wayland, etc.
>
> I'd hope that no
Hi,
On Sat, Sep 13, 2025 at 02:46:08PM -0500, Aaron Johnson wrote:
> it would be a joy to see the Debian project bring on XLibre as a valid
> alternative to other X implementations as well as Wayland, etc.
I'd hope that no Debian Developer wants to get involved with the
XLibre community.
htt
Greetings Debian community.
Not sure if this will inspire any dialog or action, but I've been
following the XLibre project/fork for a period of time now and was
wondering if anyone knows is there any likelihood it will be included in
the official Debian repositories in the [near] future?
The
Haddad, Serge wrote...
> Could you please clarify whether armel will be supported during future
> upgrades from Trixie to Forky (and even Duke)?
Short answer: There will not be such a support.
So, as of today, Debian 14 ("trixie") will be the last release to
support armel, with
On 2025-09-05, Christoph Biedl wrote:
>
> Andrea Pappacoda wrote...
>
>> On Fri Sep 5, 2025 at 3:50 PM CEST, Christoph Biedl wrote:
>> > [...]
>> > So, as of today, Debian 14 ("trixie") will be the last release to
>> > support armel
>> &g
On Friday 05 September 2025 10:21:42 am Greg wrote:
> On 2025-09-05, Christoph Biedl wrote:
> >
> > Andrea Pappacoda wrote...
> >
> >> On Fri Sep 5, 2025 at 3:50 PM CEST, Christoph Biedl wrote:
> >> > [...]
> >> > So, as of today, Debian 14
sible%2C%20reinstalling%20armel%20systems%20as%20armhf%20or%20arm64%2C%20or%20retiring%20the%20hardware.>
stating that Debian Trixie will be the last release to support the armel
architecture. As we're planning ahead, we wanted to confirm whether armel will
still be supported for upgrades to For
Am Fr, Sep 05, 2025 at 12:57:09 -0400 schrieb Roy J. Tellason, Sr.:
On Friday 05 September 2025 10:21:42 am Greg wrote:
Sometimes there is no 13th floor for superstitious reasons.
The apartment building where I grew up had the apartments numbered 1-12,
then "12A", then 14...
Suse/SLES jump
On Fri, 2025-09-05 at 15:50 +0200, Christoph Biedl wrote:
> Haddad, Serge wrote...
>
> > Could you please clarify whether armel will be supported during future
> > upgrades from Trixie to Forky (and even Duke)?
>
> Short answer: There will not be such a support.
>
&
On Fri Sep 5, 2025 at 3:50 PM CEST, Christoph Biedl wrote:
[...]
So, as of today, Debian 14 ("trixie") will be the last release to
support armel
[...]
Just for clarity: Debian "trixie" is number 13, not 14.
Andrea Pappacoda wrote...
> On Fri Sep 5, 2025 at 3:50 PM CEST, Christoph Biedl wrote:
> > [...]
> > So, as of today, Debian 14 ("trixie") will be the last release to
> > support armel
> > [...]
>
> Just for clarity: Debian "trixie" is
The default Trixie install does not include the NCT6799 module required
to read sensors on the newer B850 series chipset motherboards.
For users with B850 chipset motherboards (ASUS TUF Gaming B850-E WIFI
tested), the standard sensors-detect may not find hardware monitoring
support
At Sun, 24 Aug 2025 22:08:35 +0300 Tran Duc Minh wrote:
>
> Subject: Suggestion to Improve Modern Laptop Wi-Fi Support on Debian
>
> Dear Debian Developers and Contributors,
>
> First, I would like to express my gratitude for the tremendous effort and
> dedication you all
Subject: Suggestion to Improve Wi-Fi Support for Modern Laptops in Debian
Stable Releases
Dear Debian Developers and Contributors,
First, I want to thank you for the incredible work you do in maintaining
Debian. It is a truly remarkable operating system, known worldwide for its
stability
Subject: Suggestion to Improve Modern Laptop Wi-Fi Support on Debian
Dear Debian Developers and Contributors,
First, I would like to express my gratitude for the tremendous effort and
dedication you all put into maintaining Debian. Debian is a remarkable
operating system, renowned for its
On 8/19/25 18:40, Felix Miata wrote:
Van Snyder composed on 2025-08-19 16:30 (UTC-0700):
MS says Windoze 11 isn't supported on Intel i5
I suspect this is inaccurate.
See:
https://www.dell.com/support/kbdoc/en-us/000187485/dell-computers-tested-for-upgrade-to-windows-11
That
On Tue, 2025-08-19 at 21:40 -0400, Felix Miata wrote:
> Van Snyder composed on 2025-08-19 16:30 (UTC-0700):
>
> > MS says Windoze 11 isn't
> > supported on Intel i5
>
> I suspect this is inaccurate. What I believe may be that Win11 is not
> supported on
> t
Van Snyder composed on 2025-08-19 16:30 (UTC-0700):
> MS says Windoze 11 isn't
> supported on Intel i5
I suspect this is inaccurate. What I believe may be that Win11 is not supported
on
the particular i5 tested for support.
# inxi -SC
System:
Host: ab250 Kernel: 6.12.38+deb13
On Fri, Jun 06, 2025 at 07:23:57 +0200, Mgr. Janusz Chmiel wrote:
> Dear developers and users,
> Please, is it still possible to add The I386 architecture by typing as Root
> dpkg --add-architecture I386
> while working with debian-12.11.0?
The architecture's name is "i386" with a lowercase "i".
ository from our country Czech
> Republic and I have got warning from apt that this repository does not
> support I386 architecture.
> So please. Did you decided to stop distribution of I386 packages? Or is it
> AN individual decision from The some repositories maintainers?
At http://
repository does not
support I386 architecture.
So please. Did you decided to stop distribution of I386 packages? Or is
it AN individual decision from The some repositories maintainers?
I Am need to use The I386 repository to be able to work with The 32 Bit
Windows Apps while using Wine.
I love some
e moment the P14s seems a bit cheaper for
> > > > similar specs.
> > > >
> > > > Up until now I have always stayed with Intel CPU and Intel Graphics
> > > > because of the solid Linux support but the alternative AMD Ryzen
> > > > processors
> Up until now I have always stayed with Intel CPU and Intel Graphics
> because of the solid Linux support but the alternative AMD Ryzen
> processors on the T14/P14 seem attractive. Is support for these
> pretty solid now? (Thay have been around for quite a while!)
IME, support for
have specified which particular AMD chipsets
>> feature in the particular computers, for which you want to find
>> whether support is provided.
>>
>> "So once you do know what the question actually is,
>> you'll know what the answer
I respectfully suggest that we all go to bed and talk again tomorrow.
Regards
--
Alain Williams
Linux/GNU Consultant - Mail systems, Web sites, Networking, Programmer, IT
Lecturer.
+44 (0) 787 668 0256 https://www.phcomp.co.uk/
Parliament Hill Computers. Registration Information:
https://www.
rticular AMD chipsets
>> feature in the particular computers, for which you want to find
>> whether support is provided.
>>
>> "So once you do know what the question actually is,
>> you'll know what the answer means."
>
&g
On 2/6/25 05:50, Darac Marjal wrote:
On 01/06/2025 22:11, Bret Busby wrote:
On 2/6/25 04:18, Chris Green wrote:
Marco Moock wrote:
On 01.06.2025 12:30 Uhr Chris Green wrote:
Up until now I have always stayed with Intel CPU and Intel Graphics
because of the solid Linux support but the
On Sun, Jun 1, 2025, 4:51 PM Bret Busby wrote:
> On 2/6/25 05:35, nsrx...@bruttocarattere.org wrote:
> >> Perhaps, you should have specified which particular AMD chipsets
> >> feature in the particular computers, for which you want to find
> >> whether support is pr
On 01/06/2025 22:11, Bret Busby wrote:
On 2/6/25 04:18, Chris Green wrote:
Marco Moock wrote:
On 01.06.2025 12:30 Uhr Chris Green wrote:
Up until now I have always stayed with Intel CPU and Intel Graphics
because of the solid Linux support but the alternative AMD Ryzen
processors on the T14
On 2/6/25 05:35, nsrx...@bruttocarattere.org wrote:
Perhaps, you should have specified which particular AMD chipsets
feature in the particular computers, for which you want to find
whether support is provided.
"So once you do know what the question actually is,
you'll know what
Perhaps, you should have specified which particular AMD chipsets
feature in the particular computers, for which you want to find whether
support is provided.
"So once you do know what the question actually is,
you'll know what the answer means."
this strikes me a
On 2/6/25 04:18, Chris Green wrote:
Marco Moock wrote:
On 01.06.2025 12:30 Uhr Chris Green wrote:
Up until now I have always stayed with Intel CPU and Intel Graphics
because of the solid Linux support but the alternative AMD Ryzen
processors on the T14/P14 seem attractive. Is support for
On Sun, Jun 01, 2025 at 09:18:41PM +0100, Chris Green wrote:
I don't **have** any 'chips', I'm asking which have reliable support.
You aren't going to have issues with any ryzens, and the support is no
better or worse than current intel processors.
ished) laptop to replace
> > > my long serving Thinkpad T470. The front runners seem to be either
> > > T14 or P14s gen2, at the moment the P14s seems a bit cheaper for
> > > similar specs.
> > >
> > > Up until now I have always stayed with Intel CPU a
Marco Moock wrote:
> On 01.06.2025 12:30 Uhr Chris Green wrote:
>
> > Up until now I have always stayed with Intel CPU and Intel Graphics
> > because of the solid Linux support but the alternative AMD Ryzen
> > processors on the T14/P14 seem attractive. Is support for th
On 01.06.2025 12:30 Uhr Chris Green wrote:
> Up until now I have always stayed with Intel CPU and Intel Graphics
> because of the solid Linux support but the alternative AMD Ryzen
> processors on the T14/P14 seem attractive. Is support for these
> pretty solid now? (Thay have bee
;
> Up until now I have always stayed with Intel CPU and Intel Graphics
> because of the solid Linux support but the alternative AMD Ryzen
> processors on the T14/P14 seem attractive. Is support for these
> pretty solid now? (Thay have been around for quite a while!)
See <https://linux-hardware.org/>.
Jeff
P14s gen2, at the moment the P14s seems a bit cheaper for
> > similar specs.
> >
> > Up until now I have always stayed with Intel CPU and Intel Graphics
> > because of the solid Linux support but the alternative AMD Ryzen
> > processors on the T14/P14 seem attractive.
eaper for
> similar specs.
>
> Up until now I have always stayed with Intel CPU and Intel Graphics
> because of the solid Linux support but the alternative AMD Ryzen
> processors on the T14/P14 seem attractive. Is support for these
> pretty solid now? (Thay have been around for quit
the solid Linux support but the alternative AMD Ryzen
processors on the T14/P14 seem attractive. Is support for these
pretty solid now? (Thay have been around for quite a while!)
--
Chris Green
·
Hi folks,
Our product is using VLC with RTSP support with live555
(http://www.live555.com/) - which was disabled in Debian because of licensing
changes by live555.
I want compile VLC with live555 RTSP streaming support, most of the tutorials
or hints I found resulted-in to be outdated. I&#
Jaikumar Sharma wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> Our product is using VLC with RTSP support with live555
> (http://www.live555.com/) - which was disabled in Debian because of licensing
> changes by live555.
>
> I want compile VLC with live555 RTSP streaming support, most of the tu
Reza Bojnordi [2025-05-06 09:53:54] wrote:
> I hope this message finds you well. I am reaching out to inquire about the
> possibility of enhanced support and development for the Snapdragon X Plus
> processor, specifically for my laptop model, the ASUS Q5507QA-S15.
There's
arch/
gene heskett wrote:
> On 5/6/25 03:29, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> > On Tue, May 06, 2025 at 09:53:54AM +0330, Reza Bojnordi wrote:
> >> Dear Debian
> >>
> >> I hope this message finds you well. I am reaching out to inquire
> >> about the possibilit
On 5/6/25 03:29, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
On Tue, May 06, 2025 at 09:53:54AM +0330, Reza Bojnordi wrote:
Dear Debian
I hope this message finds you well. I am reaching out to inquire about the
possibility of enhanced support and development for the Snapdragon X Plus
processor, specifically for
On Tue, May 06, 2025 at 09:53:54AM +0330, Reza Bojnordi wrote:
> Dear Debian
>
> I hope this message finds you well. I am reaching out to inquire about the
> possibility of enhanced support and development for the Snapdragon X Plus
> processor, specifically for my laptop model, t
Dear Debian
I hope this message finds you well. I am reaching out to inquire about the
possibility of enhanced support and development for the Snapdragon X Plus
processor, specifically for my laptop model, the ASUS Q5507QA-S15.
As a user of this device, I believe that expanding the support for
On Sun 23 Mar 2025 at 01:12:29 (-0400), Felix Miata wrote:
> songbird composed on 2025-03-22 08:16 (UTC-0400):
> > Felix Miata wrote:
> >> I'm not sure the subject is asking the right question, but determining
> >> available
> >> versions of any Debian package has always vexed me. In opensuse, it'
On Sun, 23 Mar 2025 15:25:31 -0400
Felix Miata wrote:
> 0 upgraded, 48 newly installed, 0 to remove and 1 not upgraded.
> Need to get 6,874 kB of archives.
> After this operation, 23.0 MB of additional disk space will be used.
> Do you want to continue? [Y/n] n
> Abort.
> #
> :~(
Yes, I'm gettin
David Wright composed on 2025-03-23 13:27 (UTC-0500):
> On Sun 23 Mar 2025 at 01:12:29 (-0400), Felix Miata wrote:
>> Looks perfect, but for 43 things:
>> # rmadison linux-image
>> Command 'rmadison' not found, but can be installed with:
>> apt install devscripts
>> # apt-get install devscripts
>
Felix Miata wrote:
> songbird composed on 2025-03-22 08:16 (UTC-0400):
...
>> i'm not able to dig into this further (way behind on this list)
>> but rmadison works ok for something like that:
...
> Looks perfect, but for 43 things:
> # rmadison linux-image
> Command 'rmadison' not found, but ca
songbird composed on 2025-03-22 08:16 (UTC-0400):
> Felix Miata wrote:
>> I'm not sure the subject is asking the right question, but determining
>> available
>> versions of any Debian package has always vexed me. In opensuse, it's pretty
>> simple
>> from shell prompt to get a list of packages
Felix Miata wrote:
> I'm not sure the subject is asking the right question, but determining
> available
> versions of any Debian package has always vexed me. In opensuse, it's pretty
> simple
> from shell prompt to get a list of packages available in currently configured
> repos,
> one line each
Le 12/03/2025 à 13:54, didier gaumet a écrit :
[...]
But however, your current kernel 6.1 from Bullseye Backports does seem
affected by a bug?
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?pkg=linux-
image-6.1.0-0.deb11.21-amd64;dist=unstable
=> But however, your current kernel 6.1 from Bullse
Hello again Felix,
Fist thing first: sorry for having not read your first post carefully
enough :-)
From what I gather, the LTS team has provided the
linux-image-6.1.0-0.deb11.31-amd64-unsigned package through Bullseye
Security, without modifying the linux-image-amd64 package nor providing
s 10 months old (released last May). Why is explained here:
https://backports.debian.org/Instructions/
[quote]
While old stable releases may have Long Term Support, old-stable-backports
are only made available for a period of one year after a new Debian stable
release has been madePackages in
*
distributions) on the Debian Packages website indeed points to a 6.1
kernel available in Bullseye Backports
- in order to determine what kind of linux support (and from which
version of the kernel), I find linux-hardware.org useful. Here for the
Intel 730 graphic card:
https://linux-hardware.org
oldstable§ion=all
It looks like the kernel in the newest Debian Installer is:
kernel-image-5.10.0-34-amd64-di
But, trying to determine hardware support based on software versions is
something that has always vexed me as well I suggest downloading the
newest d-i and doing a fresh install onto
-1 from 2024-05
works as expected.
<https://packages.debian.org/bullseye-backports/kernel/linux-image-6.1.0-0.deb11.21-amd64>
Current Bullseye kernel (as on kernel.org) 5.10.234-1 boots, but acts as though
it
lacks needed GPU support:
(limited to VESA/FBDEV 1024x738)
# dmesg | grep aile
#
doesn't boot
The sha is fail permanently.
On today I've got a fail message during a test - download on youtube.
It mentioned there is no dirmanager but it is on my computer.
I have to repair the bootpartition on a dual boot system and the iso
files provide maybe support to repair the dama
On 1/21/25 23:23, Johannes Krottmayer wrote:
Hi!
I have planned to upgrade my (very old) system. The new system will be
a mainboard with X870-E chipset and a AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D (the CPU isn't
currently available), so have written AMD Ryzen 9 9950X in the mail
subject.
Has somebody such a combi
Hi!
I have planned to upgrade my (very old) system. The new system will be
a mainboard with X870-E chipset and a AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D (the CPU isn't
currently available), so have written AMD Ryzen 9 9950X in the mail
subject.
Has somebody such a combination running with Debian 12? Are there any
tr
On 1/12/25 1:05 PM, David Wright wrote:
On Sat 11 Jan 2025 at 06:58:04 (-0600), Richard Owlett wrote:
[ … ]
However I'm making practical use of mp3 files for the first time
(currently a dozen lectures). I looked for an mp3 player whose GUI
took up a very minimal amount of screen real estate. I w
Paul M. Foster wrote:
> I would suggest moc (Music On Console). It's a terminal app, but it's very
> easy to operate. Simple single character commands, but no real menus. It's
> not a GUI per se, but uses ncurses. If you can deal with the terminal
> visually, moc should work for you.
I use moc re
was more of a "I wonder if..." question than a specific "How do I.."
I don't think you're serious about wanting to write some sort of
multimedia application combining editing and presenting text and
audio clips, so I think it's safe to ignore these asides.
You say y
Richard Owlett wrote:
> On 1/11/25 8:06 AM, debian-u...@howorth.org.uk wrote:
> > Richard Owlett wrote:
>
> *SNIP*
> >>
> >> Due to vision and perception issues, I avoid sites over using
> >> graphics or requiring JavaScript. For support I look for
On 2025-01-11 14:18, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Sat, Jan 11, 2025 at 07:01:23 -0700, Fred wrote:
On 1/11/25 05:58, Richard Owlett wrote:
> However I'm making practical use of mp3 files for the first time
> (currently a dozen lectures). I looked for an mp3 player whose GUI took
> up a very minimal a
hose VLC as most straight forward.
>
> Due to vision and perception issues, I avoid sites over using graphics or
> requiring JavaScript. For support I look for USENET groups &/or mailing
> lists (not having found _any_ usable WEB based fora).
>
> I didn't find anyt
On 1/11/25 10:24 AM, e...@gmx.us wrote:
On 1/11/25 09:01, Fred wrote:
On 1/11/25 05:58, Richard Owlett wrote:
I looked for an mp3 player whose GUI took up
a very minimal amount of screen real estate. I was referred to several
overpowered complex candidates and chose VLC as most straight forwar
On 1/11/25 9:00 AM, Paul M. Foster wrote:
On 1/11/25 07:58, Richard Owlett wrote:
*SNIP*
However I'm making practical use of mp3 files for the first time
(currently a dozen lectures). I looked for an mp3 player whose GUI
took up a very minimal amount of screen real estate.*SNIP*
I would sug
On 1/11/25 8:06 AM, debian-u...@howorth.org.uk wrote:
Richard Owlett wrote:
*SNIP*
Due to vision and perception issues, I avoid sites over using
graphics or requiring JavaScript. For support I look for USENET
groups &/or mailing lists (not having found _any_ usable WEB based
fora)
hat plays mp3s.
>
> But, as indicated above, I'm explicitly looking for a GUI .
> VLC includes desired features and has small visual footprint.
> I have problems with its documentation and their support channel.
>
It has been assumed that you can use a terminal and that su
tation and their support channel.
eal estate. I was referred to
several overpowered complex candidates and chose VLC as most straight
forward.
Due to vision and perception issues, I avoid sites over using graphics
or requiring JavaScript. For support I look for USENET groups &/or
mailing lists (not having found _any_ u
On 1/11/25 09:01, Fred wrote:
> On 1/11/25 05:58, Richard Owlett wrote:
>>
>> I looked for an mp3 player whose GUI took up
>> a very minimal amount of screen real estate. I was referred to several
>> overpowered complex candidates and chose VLC as most straight forward.
>>
> Hi,
> mpg123 is a comma
nd perception issues, I avoid sites over using graphics
or requiring JavaScript. For support I look for USENET groups &/or
mailing lists (not having found _any_ usable WEB based fora).
I didn't find anything at www.videolan.org (and linked pages).
Searching for alternativ
On Sat, Jan 11, 2025 at 07:01:23 -0700, Fred wrote:
> On 1/11/25 05:58, Richard Owlett wrote:
> > However I'm making practical use of mp3 files for the first time
> > (currently a dozen lectures). I looked for an mp3 player whose GUI took
> > up a very minimal amount of screen real estate.
> mpg12
forward.
>
> Due to vision and perception issues, I avoid sites over using
> graphics or requiring JavaScript. For support I look for USENET
> groups &/or mailing lists (not having found _any_ usable WEB based
> fora).
>
> I didn't find anything at www.videolan.or
nd perception issues, I avoid sites over using graphics
or requiring JavaScript. For support I look for USENET groups &/or
mailing lists (not having found _any_ usable WEB based fora).
I didn't find anything at www.videolan.org (and linked pages).
Searching for alternative
using graphics
or requiring JavaScript. For support I look for USENET groups &/or
mailing lists (not having found _any_ usable WEB based fora).
I didn't find anything at www.videolan.org (and linked pages).
Searching for alternative support channels, I went to
https://manpages.debian.
Sent from my iPhone
On 24/12/24 02:10, e...@gmx.us wrote:
On 12/23/24 12:43, koffie wrote:
Forwarded Message
Subject: fail message dirmanager
Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2024 20:38:24 +0100
From: koffie
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Ubuntu / Oracular
Hello,
It is not possible to download an iso fil
On 12/23/24 12:43, koffie wrote:
>
>
>
> Forwarded Message
> Subject: fail message dirmanager
> Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2024 20:38:24 +0100
> From: koffie
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
>
> Ubuntu / Oracular
> Hello,
>
> It is not possible to download an iso file.
From where? How
fail permanently.
On today I've got a fail message during a test - download on youtube.
It mentioned there is no dirmanager but it is on my computer.
I have to repair the bootpartition on a dual boot system and the iso
files provide maybe support to repair the damage.
Anyone who can help?
On 2024-11-15 22:19, Farblos wrote:
> any comment from your side on below mail or a general pointer on
> "the future of Debian and utmp"?
Ok, my bad.
I have been focusing on/searching in debian-user, but debian-devel
would have been the more appropriate place. If anybody else comes
across this
oked an existing discussion ...]
>
> systemd version 256.7-2 on Debian disabled UTMP support (from the
> Debian changelog):
>
> ,
> | [ Luca Boccassi ]
> | * systemd-boot: depend on systemd for kernel-install (Closes: #1085012)
> | * Disable utmp support, not y2038 safe. utmp
> I am guessing from the version number that this is on trixie/sid. On
Correct, thanks for guessing.
> November 4th, systemd 256.7-3 came through. Have you tested whether
> that fixed the issue?
Nothing has changed with that version (note the "-UTMP"):
,
| [~]$ systemctl --version
| systemd
On Wed, 6 Nov 2024 21:18:33 +0100
Jens Schmidt wrote:
> [I hope this is the right way to address this question - apologies
> if not or if I have overlooked an existing discussion ...]
>
> systemd version 256.7-2 on Debian disabled UTMP support (from the
> Debian changelog):
I a
[I hope this is the right way to address this question - apologies
if not or if I have overlooked an existing discussion ...]
systemd version 256.7-2 on Debian disabled UTMP support (from the
Debian changelog):
,
| [ Luca Boccassi ]
| * systemd-boot: depend on systemd for kernel-install
On 10/31/24 6:14 AM, Richard Owlett wrote:
On 10/30/24 10:49 AM, David Wright wrote:
On Wed 30 Oct 2024 at 04:53:27 (-0500), Richard Owlett wrote:
I'm attempting to read a USDA document "Thrifty Food Plan,2021" that
seems to be only available as a PDF document [
https://fns-prod.azureedge.us/s
* On 2024 31 Oct 09:07 -0500, Richard Owlett wrote:
> On 10/31/24 7:46 AM, Nate Bargmann wrote:
> > * On 2024 31 Oct 06:02 -0500, Richard Owlett wrote:
> > Currently, my Debian 12 installations have Firefox 128.3.1esr-1~deb12u1.
> > Aptitude also shows that this version is from the Debian Security
On 10/31/24 7:46 AM, Nate Bargmann wrote:
* On 2024 31 Oct 06:02 -0500, Richard Owlett wrote:
On 10/30/24 10:12 AM, debian-u...@howorth.org.uk wrote:
Richard Owlett wrote:
I'm attempting to read a USDA document "Thrifty Food Plan,2021" that
seems to be only available as a PDF document [
https
* On 2024 31 Oct 06:02 -0500, Richard Owlett wrote:
> On 10/30/24 10:12 AM, debian-u...@howorth.org.uk wrote:
> > Richard Owlett wrote:
> > > I'm attempting to read a USDA document "Thrifty Food Plan,2021" that
> > > seems to be only available as a PDF document [
> > > https://fns-prod.azureedge.u
On 10/30/24 10:49 AM, David Wright wrote:
On Wed 30 Oct 2024 at 04:53:27 (-0500), Richard Owlett wrote:
I'm attempting to read a USDA document "Thrifty Food Plan,2021" that
seems to be only available as a PDF document [
https://fns-prod.azureedge.us/sites/default/files/resource-files/TFP2021.pd
1 - 100 of 4384 matches
Mail list logo
