Le Tue, 30 Jun 2015 15:50:02 +0200, steve a écrit :
Pour se détendre 2 minutes, que donne ceci chez vous ?
history | awk '{print $5} ; ' | sort | uniq -c | sort -rn | head -10
je travaille que sous X. et en console sous screen. Donc les programmes
appelés sont inconnus ...
Le Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 03:47:23PM +0200, steve a écrit :
Salut,
Pour se détendre 2 minutes, que donne ceci chez vous ?
history | awk '{print $5} ; ' | sort | uniq -c | sort -rn | head -10
Et hop, un mail de plus dans des miliers de boîtes. On aurait peut-être pu
attendre vendredi
FR-PORT:/home/fabricer# history | awk '{print $2}' | sort | uniq -c | sort -rn
| head -10
^
|
Hum… tu bosses sous root ?
ouais... j'suis viré ? ;)
attends, je vais répondre à la question qui te brûle les lèvres:
prompt (if he can figure a
way to authenticate). Systemd made forking one or two orders of
magnitude more difficult.
Stop infringing the rules of this mailing list (because, I
really doubt that insulting people is allowed)?
Agreed. Too nasty and over the top. In my opinion systemd leaves enough
Buenas,
Hoy ando espesísimo ... Recuerdo que hace un tiempo tuve que asociar
una cpu a un proceso via comando. Hasta ahí todo ok. Pero ahora mismo
no recuerdo como hacer que el top me muestre los procesos por cpu (y
eso que en su dia lo hice), es decir:
CPU 0 proceso 1
El día 26 de febrero de 2014, 14:50, C. L. Martinez
carlopm...@gmail.com escribió:
Buenas,
Hoy ando espesísimo ... Recuerdo que hace un tiempo tuve que asociar
una cpu a un proceso via comando. Hasta ahí todo ok. Pero ahora mismo
no recuerdo como hacer que el top me muestre los procesos por
ahora mismo
no recuerdo como hacer que el top me muestre los procesos por cpu (y
eso que en su dia lo hice), es decir:
CPU 0 proceso 1
- proceso 2
CPU 1 -- proceso 3
--- proceso 4
Ideas?
Gracias.
No se si te refieres a la opción de pulsar A estando
tiempo tuve que asociar
una cpu a un proceso via comando. Hasta ahí todo ok. Pero ahora mismo
no recuerdo como hacer que el top me muestre los procesos por cpu (y
eso que en su dia lo hice), es decir:
CPU 0 proceso 1
- proceso 2
CPU 1 -- proceso 3
. Martinez
carlopm...@gmail.com escribió:
Buenas,
Hoy ando espesísimo ... Recuerdo que hace un tiempo tuve que asociar
una cpu a un proceso via comando. Hasta ahí todo ok. Pero ahora mismo
no recuerdo como hacer que el top me muestre los procesos por cpu (y
eso que en su dia lo hice), es decir
El Wed, 26 Feb 2014 13:50:18 +, C. L. Martinez escribió:
Hoy ando espesísimo ... Recuerdo que hace un tiempo tuve que asociar
una cpu a un proceso via comando. Hasta ahí todo ok. Pero ahora mismo
no recuerdo como hacer que el top me muestre los procesos por cpu (y
eso que en su dia lo
El día 26 de febrero de 2014, 14:50, C. L. Martinez
carlopm...@gmail.com escribió:
Buenas,
Hoy ando espesísimo ... Recuerdo que hace un tiempo tuve que asociar
una cpu a un proceso via comando. Hasta ahí todo ok. Pero ahora mismo
no recuerdo como hacer que el top me muestre los procesos por
2014-02-26 14:47 GMT+00:00 Camaleón noela...@gmail.com:
El Wed, 26 Feb 2014 13:50:18 +, C. L. Martinez escribió:
Hoy ando espesísimo ... Recuerdo que hace un tiempo tuve que asociar
una cpu a un proceso via comando. Hasta ahí todo ok. Pero ahora mismo
no recuerdo como hacer que el top me
todo ok. Pero ahora mismo
no recuerdo como hacer que el top me muestre los procesos por cpu (y
eso que en su dia lo hice), es decir:
(...)
Pulsas f, luego bajas hasta seleccionar P, conmutas su estado con
d
y pulsas q para salir. No comprendo cómo pudiste olvidarlo ;-P
Lo he respondido en
ahora mismo
no recuerdo como hacer que el top me muestre los procesos por cpu (y
eso que en su dia lo hice), es decir:
CPU 0 proceso 1
- proceso 2
CPU 1 -- proceso 3
--- proceso 4
Ideas?
Gracias.
Ya lo tengo:
f para seleccionar el campo
comando. Hasta ahí todo ok. Pero ahora mismo
no recuerdo como hacer que el top me muestre los procesos por cpu (y
eso que en su dia lo hice), es decir:
CPU 0 proceso 1
- proceso 2
CPU 1 -- proceso 3
--- proceso 4
Ideas?
Gracias.
No se si te
El 26/02/14 15:55, C. L. Martinez escribió:
Ay, ay, ay ... Que estoy peor de lo que creo. A ver, pulsando f, yo
tengo esto:
Esos años...esos años...
(...)
¿Te vale esto?:
P = Last Used Cpu
De lo de pulsar P, nos olvidamos porque a mí no me da ni la opción ...
Si me muevo a CPU Usage
espesísimo ... Recuerdo que hace un tiempo tuve que asociar
una cpu a un proceso via comando. Hasta ahí todo ok. Pero ahora mismo
no recuerdo como hacer que el top me muestre los procesos por cpu (y
eso que en su dia lo hice), es decir:
CPU 0 proceso 1
- proceso 2
CPU 1
El 26/02/14 16:04, C. L. Martinez escribió:
Leches! ... Tiene usted toda la razón :)) Solucionado.
Muchas gracias a todos por las respuestas.
También tienes otras opciones que están 'deseleccionadas', pero puedes
activar a tu gusto.
--
Saludos de Santiago José López Borrazás.
El Wed, 26 Feb 2014 15:04:21 +, C. L. Martinez escribió:
(...)
Leches! ... Tiene usted toda la razón :)) Solucionado.
Muchas gracias a todos por las respuestas.
De nada ;-)
Saludos,
--
Camaleón
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-spanish-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
2014/1/24 William Romero wromer...@hotmail.com:
From: unefistano...@gmail.com
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2014 20:38:43 -0430
Subject: [LINK]Top de las 10 distribuciones Linux más vendidas de 2013 por
@Hoswedaje
To: debian-user-spanish@lists.debian.org
Acá una info de un tema que me llamó la
On Thu, 23 Jan 2014 20:38:43 -0430
Miguel Matos unefistano...@gmail.com wrote:
Puppy-es OS
Se vendió en México en PC Desktop. Dualboot con windows.
http://puppyes.com.ar
--
Servicios:. http://mamalibre.com.ar/servicios.php
MamaLibre, Casa en Lincoln, Ituzaingo 1085 CP6070,
Creo que lo mejor es usar distros que no dependan de una sola
empresa como Debian. Si le sucede algo a una empresa que le suceder
´a a su hija la distro?, se queda huerfana y eso no pasa con distros
mantenidas por una comunidad.
--
Si dominas los Bits, dominas el mundo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
El 24/01/14 14:24, Haylem Candelario Bauzá del INOR escribió:
Creo que lo mejor es usar distros que no dependan de una sola
empresa como Debian. Si le sucede algo a una empresa que le suceder
´a a su hija la distro?, se queda huerfana y eso no pasa con distros
mantenidas por una comunidad.
me llamó mucho la atención. El enlace es este:
http://www.todostartups.com/bloggers/top-de-las-10-distribuciones-linux-mas-vendidas-de-2013-por-hoswedaje;
(...)
Creo que el autor del artículo no tiene mucha idea lo que escribe y
tampoco le veo mucho sentido al texto (¿qué pinta una empresa de
/bloggers/top-de-las-10-distribuciones-linux-mas-vendidas-de-2013-por-hoswedaje;
pero les doy un aperitivo para que se animen a entrar:
La que más destaca sería Linux Mint (situado en la versión Mint 15)
una herramienta basada en la distribución Ubuntu (ver más abajo),
capaz de mantener un inventario
From: unefistano...@gmail.com
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2014 20:38:43 -0430
Subject: [LINK]Top de las 10 distribuciones Linux más vendidas de 2013 por
@Hoswedaje
To: debian-user-spanish@lists.debian.org
Acá una info de un tema que me llamó la atención al ver las noticias
de mi cuenta de Twitter
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/d-community-offtopic/2013-November/000303.html
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
On Thu, 21 Nov 2013 11:08:41 +1100
David bouncingc...@gmail.com wrote:
On 21 November 2013 10:31, Brad Alexander stor...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm just curious why so many people get so upset about top posting.
When you're curious about anything, use a search engine, like I used
to find
Kelly,
On a related note, something is wrong with your MUA and quoting. Here's
a section of the quoting from your last message, with an additional
layer of quoting applied, and trimmed to 20 characters (to avoid further
wrapping issues):
I'm just curious
so upset about top p
mind
David Guntner da...@guntner.com wrote:
GMail Yahoo Mail both support encrypted POP3 IMAP [...] I don't
have to look at their ads since I'm not using their web interface [...]
How long do you think it's going to be before they start inserting ads
into the message body then? (And/or offering a
I'm just curious why so many people get so upset about top posting. To my
mind, as threads get longer, those keeping up with the thread would not
want to scroll through messages that they have already read. I know that I
don't. If they are commenting inline, that is fine, but I think
The usual objection to top posting is that it destroys the logical
flow of the conversation (and no doubt someone will post a
conversation in reverse order to illustrate the point). But I agree
with you, and for years read my email in reverse chronological order
precisely so that I could save time
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 3:40 PM, Patrick Wiseman pwise...@gmail.com wrote:
The usual objection to top posting is that it destroys the logical
flow of the conversation (and no doubt someone will post a
conversation in reverse order to illustrate the point). But I agree
with you, and for years
Brad Alexander grabbed a keyboard and wrote:
I'm just curious why so many people get so upset about top posting. To my
mind, as threads get longer, those keeping up with the thread would not
want to scroll through messages that they have already read. I know that I
don't
to top posting is that it destroys the logical
flow of the conversation (and no doubt someone will post a
conversation in reverse order to illustrate the point). But I agree
with you, and for years read my email in reverse chronological order
precisely so that I could save time getting
On 21 November 2013 10:31, Brad Alexander stor...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm just curious why so many people get so upset about top posting.
When you're curious about anything, use a search engine, like I used
to find this for you:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
Especially
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 3:40 PM, Patrick Wiseman pwise...@gmail.com wrote:
The usual objection to top posting is that it destroys the logical
flow of the conversation (and no doubt someone will post a
conversation in reverse order to illustrate the point).
snip
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 6
On 11/20/2013 06:31 PM, Brad Alexander wrote:
I'm just curious why so many people get so upset about top posting. To
my mind, as threads get longer, those keeping up with the thread would
not want to scroll through messages that they have already read. I know
that I don't
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 6:59 PM, David Guntner da...@guntner.com wrote:
Brad Alexander grabbed a keyboard and wrote:
I'm just curious why so many people get so upset about top posting. To my
mind, as threads get longer, those keeping up with the thread would not
want to scroll through
are responding to hidden by a ... icon. Thus, if you
are not paying attention or are trying to respond quickly, it is easily
overlooked. I posted in a thread earlier, and was surprised when someone
started their response with don't top post. I didn't even realize I had,
thanks again to google.
In case
Hello folks,
So I might better ask before attempting something stupid. I need to add
a new hard drive to an encrypted debian box. The encryption scheme was
set using debian installer defaults which resulted in just /dev/sda1
- /boot outside block device encryption. Everything else is encrypted
Hello folks,
So I might better ask before attempting something stupid. I need to add
a new hard drive to an encrypted debian box. The encryption scheme was
set using debian installer defaults which resulted in just /dev/sda1
- /boot outside block device encryption. Everything else is encrypted
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 12:19:40PM -0300, Luther Blissett wrote:
My initial guess was that it should be possible to extend this
encryption scheme to the new hard disk using standard lvm tools and the
unencrypted open disk as physical volume to the already existing
volume group. However, after
I'm using xfce on jessie.
It's convenient that I can get the top icon bar to minimize until the
mouse pointer reached it; I have a small screen. It's occasionally
convenient to be able to left-click on the little handle at the left and
move it elsewhere by moving the pointer while holding
Joel Roth:
Dear List,
ffmpeg/avconv aborts even with -strict experimental when input
file audio is encoded with AAC. Does the audio
*have* to be decoded? I was thinking there might
be some kind of pass-through option.
Yes, you can try '-acodec copy'.
J.
--
All participation is a myth.
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 08:55:16AM +0100, Jochen Spieker wrote:
Joel Roth:
Dear List,
ffmpeg/avconv aborts even with -strict experimental when input
file audio is encoded with AAC. Does the audio
*have* to be decoded? I was thinking there might
be some kind of pass-through option.
Dear List,
ffmpeg/avconv aborts even with -strict experimental when input
file audio is encoded with AAC. Does the audio
*have* to be decoded? I was thinking there might
be some kind of pass-through option.
The behavior of ffmpeg and avconv appears to be
identical.
$ avconv -acodec aac -strict
Le Sam 2 mars 2013 4:44, Miles Fidelman a écrit :
Yaro Kasear wrote:
I don't know if Debian's the most SECURE distribution. It doesn't
really have a hardened profile or anything like what Gentoo offers.
(Gentoo isn't a prime example of a secure Linux system, I more point
to the concept of
On Sun, 3 Mar 2013, Morel B?renger wrote:
Le Sam 2 mars 2013 4:44, Miles Fidelman a ?crit :
Yaro Kasear wrote:
I don't know if Debian's the most SECURE distribution. It doesn't
really have a hardened profile or anything like what Gentoo offers.
(Gentoo isn't a prime example of a secure
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 10:44 PM, Miles Fidelman
mfidel...@meetinghouse.net wrote:
Good point. And when you start talking security to the point of serious
testing and configuration control, I believe there are very few
distributions that are on the DoD approved product list.
I've tried to stay
Morel Bérenger wrote:
Le Sam 2 mars 2013 4:44, Miles Fidelman a écrit :
Yaro Kasear wrote:
I don't know if Debian's the most SECURE distribution. It doesn't
really have a hardened profile or anything like what Gentoo offers.
(Gentoo isn't a prime example of a secure Linux system, I more point
Hello,
Me and my lug have a weekly radio show and I thought I would do a
debian myths piece
it only has to be 4 or 5 min long but i'd need 5 or 10 myths abou
debian *with links to why they are myth*
I'm new to debian but not a new Linux user, so I don't know what is a
myth or not
things like
On Friday 01 March 2013 22:33:37 Dick Thomas wrote:
Me and my lug have a weekly radio show
\o/ Where?
Lisi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
On Friday 01 March 2013 22:33:37 Dick Thomas wrote:
that packages outside of the main Repo aren't tested as well as
the main so are prone to failure or bugs
The first of these propositions is true, the second false. Several of the
repos are very well tested indeed and rock solid (e.g. main
On Friday 01 March 2013 22:33:37 Dick Thomas wrote:
Debian is always out of date and even the stable is unsecure as
its backported fixes rather than updates
Sorry to answer piecemeal. Debian stable starts to go out of date as soon as
it is released, or even before, while it was still
Lisi writes:
I have had a problem with chromium, but that has its own repository.
Filename: pool/main/c/chromium-browser/chromium_25.0.1364.97-1_amd64.deb
--
John Hasler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
On 03/01/2013 05:19 PM, Lisi Reisz wrote:
On Friday 01 March 2013 22:33:37 Dick Thomas wrote:
Debian is always out of date and even the stable is unsecure as
its backported fixes rather than updates
Sorry to answer piecemeal. Debian stable starts to go out of date as soon as
it is released,
Yaro Kasear wrote:
I don't know if Debian's the most SECURE distribution. It doesn't
really have a hardened profile or anything like what Gentoo offers.
(Gentoo isn't a prime example of a secure Linux system, I more point
to the concept of having a hardened base available, whihc Debian
On Sunday 30 December 2012 19:49:14 Dick Thomas wrote:
okay will bottom post, (like it matters)
Yes, it does. Top posting makes the thread really difficult, if not
impossible, to follow.
when gmail mobile client hides the post making a bottom / threaded post
impossible
there is no need
Lisi Reisz grabbed a keyboard and wrote:
On Sunday 30 December 2012 19:49:14 Dick Thomas wrote:
okay will bottom post, (like it matters)
Yes, it does. Top posting makes the thread really difficult, if not
impossible, to follow.
Yup, that was the point I was trying to make.
when gmail
. Chambers that sue completely clueless users
6. Completely clueless users
[1]
To of the Biggest PITA on the internet - Was: Re: OT: Captchas?
should be
Top of the Biggest PITA on the internet - Was: Re: OT: Captchas?
and this additionally is OT on a technical support mailing list
-community-offtopic] Outrageous sexism - dump questions -
carbon copy - ignoring hidden ids - HTML - top posting - brainstorming -
etc.
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2012 12:06:26 +0100
Is there anything people are else allowed on Debian user mailing list,
besides dissing people for harmless jokes, breaking
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 12:14:19PM +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
snip
All off-topic is caused by people who feel offended by harmless jokes,
breaking threads, asking the wrong questions, carbon copy, brainstorming
etc., not by the people who make harmless jokes, are breaking threads,
asking the
Hi,
My weather report has never worked in the top panel in Gnome, 6.06
amd64, is there any thing like YAWP for Gnome?
--
Cheers
Mark
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http
On Du, 01 apr 12, 16:49:34, Miles Fidelman wrote:
Right... but in this case, the Debian project is a pretty big one,
with some formal governance, and the rules are written to govern a
whole bunch of lists. So I kind of wonder if there's any formality
somewhere along the chain, like there is
On Sun, 01 Apr 2012 16:49:34 -0400, Miles Fidelman wrote:
Camaleón wrote:
El 2012-04-01 a las 09:44 -0400, Miles Fidelman escribió:
(sending back to the list)
Camaleón wrote:
Those rules (I prefer to see them as tips for good guidance) are
written by all of us, people like you or me, that
Andrei POPESCU wrote:
On Du, 01 apr 12, 16:49:34, Miles Fidelman wrote:
Right... but in this case, the Debian project is a pretty big one,
with some formal governance, and the rules are written to govern a
whole bunch of lists. So I kind of wonder if there's any formality
somewhere along the
On Sat, 31 Mar 2012 21:08:19 -0400, Celejar wrote:
On Sat, 31 Mar 2012 17:55:31 +0200
Tony van der Hoff t...@vanderhoff.org wrote:
...
Before you started posting here, the polite thing to do would have been
to read the list guidelines, and apply them. Seeing as you appear too
Camaleón wrote:
On Sat, 31 Mar 2012 21:08:19 -0400, Celejar wrote:
On Sat, 31 Mar 2012 17:55:31 +0200
Tony van der Hofft...@vanderhoff.org wrote:
...
Before you started posting here, the polite thing to do would have been
to read the list guidelines, and apply them. Seeing as you appear
and
post (this is an open list, no need for subscription).
Anyway, it's normal for mailing list newcomers to be unaware of these
conventions, that's why I usually politely note that html formatted
messages need to be avoided and also top-posting when I see a bad
formatted post.
Worth
El 2012-04-01 a las 09:44 -0400, Miles Fidelman escribió:
(sending back to the list)
Camaleón wrote:
On Sat, 31 Mar 2012 21:08:19 -0400, Celejar wrote:
On Sat, 31 Mar 2012 17:55:31 +0200
Tony van der Hofft...@vanderhoff.org wrote:
...
Before you started posting here, the polite thing
formatted
messages need to be avoided and also top-posting when I see a bad
formatted post.
Worth to remember that common sense is the best of the rules.
Greetings,
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas
On Sunday 01 April 2012 16:41:50 PMA wrote:
Nobody has been insulted :-?
Granted, no-one has screamed. I saw, BTW, only an unattributed quote,
so don't know whose it was.
In this case (as often!) you needed to have read the thread rather than
reacting to an out of context quote. We have
Fair enough -- mea culpa.
Lisi wrote:
On Sunday 01 April 2012 16:41:50 PMA wrote:
Nobody has been insulted :-?
Granted, no-one has screamed. I saw, BTW, only an unattributed quote,
so don't know whose it was.
In this case (as often!) you needed to have read the thread rather than
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01.04.2012 19:32, PMA wrote:
Fair enough -- mea culpa.
Lisi wrote:
On Sunday 01 April 2012 16:41:50 PMA wrote:
...
Didn't this whole thread start, because some people (I) top-posted?
- --
Mika Suomalainen
gpg --keyserver pool.sks
On Sun, 01 Apr 2012 19:32:47 +0300, Mika Suomalainen wrote:
On 01.04.2012 19:32, PMA wrote:
Fair enough -- mea culpa.
Lisi wrote:
On Sunday 01 April 2012 16:41:50 PMA wrote:
...
Didn't this whole thread start, because some people (I) top-posted?
To be more precise, it started because
thread start, because some people (I)
top-posted?
To be more precise, it started because someone (you) asked what was
that ;-)
Greetings,
And after that I was taught to bottom post and so on...
- --
Mika Suomalainen
gpg --keyserver pool.sks-keyservers.net --recv-keys
4DB53CFE82A46728 Key
this whole thread start, because some people (I) top-posted?
To be more precise, it started because someone (you) asked what was
that ;-)
And after that I was taught to bottom post and so on...
That's what happens when someone opens Pandora's Box, you never know how
we'll gonna end
On Sun 01 Apr 2012 at 19:32:47 +0300, Mika Suomalainen wrote:
Didn't this whole thread start, because some people (I) top-posted?
It has continued to its present length of nearly fifty posts after you
said:
Could someone explain me, what are top- and bottom posting
styles?
If Debian
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01.04.2012 19:55, Brian wrote:
On Sun 01 Apr 2012 at 19:32:47 +0300, Mika Suomalainen wrote:
Didn't this whole thread start, because some people (I)
top-posted?
It has continued to its present length of nearly fifty posts after
you said
On 04/01/2012 12:21 PM, Lisi wrote:
On Sunday 01 April 2012 16:41:50 PMA wrote:
Nobody has been insulted :-?
Granted, no-one has screamed. I saw, BTW, only an unattributed quote,
so don't know whose it was.
In this case (as often!) you needed to have read the thread rather than
reacting to
Camaleón wrote:
El 2012-04-01 a las 09:44 -0400, Miles Fidelman escribió:
(sending back to the list)
Camaleón wrote:
Those rules (I prefer to see them as tips for good guidance) are
written by all of us, people like you or me, that is, people who
participate in the mailing lists.
The
I've seen passionate debate on this issue, based
mainly on disrupted expectation (as the Bottom
guy opens the Top guy's email).
Seems to me the important thing is for a given
list to adopt one or the other style as standard
*for the list*.
Take a vote, asking, Which is more important:
seeing
Hello Peter,
PMA peterarmstr...@aya.yale.edu wrote:
Take a vote,
That vote already happened many years ago.
asking, Which is more important:
seeing the current message immediately (Top),
or keeping the flow in one-direction (Bottom)?
Neither. Interleaved style is the way to go.
Best
On 31/03/12 16:40, PMA wrote:
Seems to me the important thing is for a given
list to adopt one or the other style as standard
*for the list*.
Take a vote, asking, Which is more important:
seeing the current message immediately (Top),
or keeping the flow in one-direction (Bottom)?
Who needs
On Sat, 31 Mar 2012 17:55:31 +0200
Tony van der Hoff t...@vanderhoff.org wrote:
...
Before you started posting here, the polite thing to do would have been
to read the list guidelines, and apply them. Seeing as you appear too
intellectually challenged to find them for yourself, here is the
On Wed, 29 Feb 2012 13:53:00 -0800, Peter Easthope wrote:
I don't see any way to give Icedove the References and In-reply-to
fields for the
header but they are here.
?
Icedove can cope with that automatically.
All fonts in the system where Iceweasel displays the upper half brackets
are
I don't see any way to give Icedove the References and In-reply-to
fields for the
header but they are here.
Bcc: pe...@easthope.ca
References: jifusr$288$4...@dough.gmane.org
171057435.35607.27295@cantor.invalid jigd87$288$1...@dough.gmane.org
In-reply-to: jigd87$288$1...@dough.gmane.org
*
From: Camaleon noela...@gmail.com
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 13:02:19 + (UTC)
What kind of symbols do you wnat to render?
I had referred to box-drawing characters.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Box-drawing_character
This morning I see that the required characters are
U+2E22 TOP LEFT HALF
not ;-)
This morning I see that the required characters are U+2E22 TOP LEFT HALF
BRACKET and U+2E23 TOP RIGHT HALF BRACKET which are not in box-drawing.
HALF BRACKETs are visible here.
http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Appendix:Unicode/Supplemental_Punctuation
Ah, let's see... I see nothing
have tried with DejaVu Sans inside OOo Writer and it does not
work, it renders a square symbol :-?
Okay, it seems the DejaVu TTF font I have installed does not have the
full extended unicode map included.
Everson Mono renders top-left-half-bracket (u+2e22) fine, but it's
shareware. You'll have
( whatever is left)
I realize that Debian default install encrypts the whole PV not the
individual LVs, I tried couple of times to setup LUKS encryption on
top of the LVM as mentioned above but failed miserably, it always
fails at the stage where it is trying to install software. By the way
I
partition (encrypted)
- leave the rest unassigned for the time being
sda3 150GB NTFS ( whatever is left)
I realize that Debian default install encrypts the whole PV not the
individual LVs, I tried couple of times to setup LUKS encryption on top of
the LVM as mentioned above but failed miserably
Hello all,
Where can I find the gnome-applet configuration setting that defines the
position (top, left, right, bottom) ?
I need to change it back to the default setting (bottom, I guess)...
changed it to right but the result is not so good and I can't find a way
to put it back the way
On Wed, 15 Jun 2011 13:53:20 +0100, Joao Ferreira Gmail wrote:
Where can I find the gnome-applet configuration setting that defines the
position (top, left, right, bottom) ?
Position of what, exactly? You mean the panel? :-?
I need to change it back to the default setting (bottom, I guess
On Wed, 2011-06-15 at 13:37 +, Camaleón wrote:
On Wed, 15 Jun 2011 13:53:20 +0100, Joao Ferreira Gmail wrote:
Where can I find the gnome-applet configuration setting that defines the
position (top, left, right, bottom) ?
Position of what, exactly? You mean the panel? :-?
:) sorry
Hola
Si me dieran 1 centavo por cada vez que leo lo del top-posting, los
correos en html y los privados en la lista no tendría problemas
financieros por el resto de mi vida :)
Las normativas de la lista son claras al respecto:
1- Evitar el uso de HTML
2- Evitar el top-posting
3- Evitar los
Walber Zaldivar Herrera escribió:
Hola
Si me dieran 1 centavo por cada vez que leo lo del top-posting, los
correos en html y los privados en la lista no tendría problemas
financieros por el resto de mi vida :)
Las normativas de la lista son claras al respecto:
1- Evitar el uso de HTML
2
On Mar 01 Dic 2009 14:16:16 JAP escribió:
Walber Zaldivar Herrera escribió:
Hola
Si me dieran 1 centavo por cada vez que leo lo del top-posting, los
correos en html y los privados en la lista no tendría problemas
financieros por el resto de mi vida :)
Las normativas de la lista son
Estimados nuevos (o newbies, si prefieren el inglés).
Son todos bienvenidos a hacer cualquier tipo de pregunta en esta lista,
siempre y cuando vuestras preguntas cumplan estos requisitos:
Se note que hayan leído las “netiquettes”, o normas de convivencias. Si
no lo hicieron, háganlo en
201 - 300 of 1631 matches
Mail list logo
