csj wrote:
>
> On Saturday 29 December 2001 06:55, Erik Steffl wrote:
> > > > i find the tabs rather confusing. but then again, my desktop is
> > > > simply four xterms (10 desktops thereof), and i usually don't
> > > need > more...
> > >
> > > I suppose you're talking about programs that require
also sprach csj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2001.12.29.2003 +0100]:
> That's the detail I decided to pass over. 10 desktops seems indecent. I
> can't see what applications you would run in 10 desktops that can't be
> done in 2 desktops and 10 (powershell/konsole) tabs. Personally I want
> the CLI stuff
On Saturday 29 December 2001 06:55, Erik Steffl wrote:
> > > i find the tabs rather confusing. but then again, my desktop is
> > > simply four xterms (10 desktops thereof), and i usually don't
> > need > more...
> >
> > I suppose you're talking about programs that require user
> > interaction (for
also sprach Steve Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2001.12.29.0507 +0100]:
> Also consider multi-gnome-terminal. It's a Debian Unstable package
> that's _much_ lighter weight than konsole and cleaner (IMO) than
> powershell. It also has the excellent feature of allowing you to invoke
> URLs without us
On Fri, Dec 28, 2001 at 08:58:54PM +0100, martin f krafft decreed:
> also sprach csj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2001.12.28.0807 +0100]:
> > From the powershell package description: "PowerShell is a GNOME/Gtk+
> > based terminal emulator which supports many terminals in a single
> > window (limited onl
csj wrote:
>
> On Saturday 29 December 2001 03:58, martin f krafft wrote:
> > also sprach csj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2001.12.28.0807 +0100]:
> > > From the powershell package description: "PowerShell is a
> > > GNOME/Gtk+ based terminal emulator which supports many terminals in
> > > a single windo
also sprach csj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2001.12.28.2228 +0100]:
> I suppose you're talking about programs that require user interaction
> (foreground processes). Aside from the hassle of manually opening 10
> different tabs, can you cite an instance where having ten instant shell
> sessions is actu
On Saturday 29 December 2001 03:58, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach csj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2001.12.28.0807 +0100]:
> > From the powershell package description: "PowerShell is a
> > GNOME/Gtk+ based terminal emulator which supports many terminals in
> > a single window (limited only by avail
also sprach csj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2001.12.28.0807 +0100]:
> From the powershell package description: "PowerShell is a GNOME/Gtk+
> based terminal emulator which supports many terminals in a single
> window (limited only by available RAM). Each terminal is given a
> "notebook" tab which makes
On Thursday 27 December 2001 07:37, Brian Nelson wrote:
> Besides, I hate managing windows. I don't want a bunch of terms
> running mutt just so I can see more than one email at a time. Just
> one window should do, thank you.
That shouldn't be a problem with KDE's Konsole or PowerShell.
>From t
John Hasler wrote:
>
> erik writes:
> > email storage - where the email is stored. traditionaly this is just
> > files, mostly mbox or maildir. that's what is replaced by IMAP. that way
> > you have no email in /var/spool/mail/username or ~/mbox or wherever your
> > email currently is, the email i
On Wed, Dec 26, 2001 at 09:58:11PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach dman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2001.12.26.2100 +0100]:
> > I recommend just using fetchmail intstead and having exim or procmail
> > sort the mail into folders for you. The advantage of using
> > fetchmail+exim/procmail is t
erik writes:
> email storage - where the email is stored. traditionaly this is just
> files, mostly mbox or maildir. that's what is replaced by IMAP. that way
> you have no email in /var/spool/mail/username or ~/mbox or wherever your
> email currently is, the email is stored by IMAP (you don't care
dman wrote:
>
> On Wed, Dec 26, 2001 at 05:23:49PM -0800, Erik Steffl wrote:
> | dman wrote:
> | >
> | > On Wed, Dec 26, 2001 at 04:21:53PM -0500, Brian Nelson wrote:
> | >
> | > | Not true! I switched from mutt to gnus. It's IMAP support was too weak
> | > | for me,
> | >
> | > IMAP in mutt is
On Wed, Dec 26, 2001 at 05:23:49PM -0800, Erik Steffl wrote:
| dman wrote:
| >
| > On Wed, Dec 26, 2001 at 04:21:53PM -0500, Brian Nelson wrote:
| >
| > | Not true! I switched from mutt to gnus. It's IMAP support was too weak
| > | for me,
| >
| > IMAP in mutt is actually somewhat controversia
dman wrote:
>
> On Wed, Dec 26, 2001 at 04:21:53PM -0500, Brian Nelson wrote:
>
> | Not true! I switched from mutt to gnus. It's IMAP support was too weak
> | for me,
>
> IMAP in mutt is actually somewhat controversial. The author doesn't
> really like it (mutt is _just_ a MUA), but there wou
also sprach Brian Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2001.12.27.0208 +0100]:
> - no vi(m), unless viper-mode is adequate
mh. i forgot it's emacs...
--
martin; (greetings from the heart of the sun.)
\ echo mailto: !#^."<*>"|tr "<*> mailto:"; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
sum quod eris.
pgpqK
martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> also sprach Brian Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2001.12.27.0037 +0100]:
> > > as a devoted pine user for years, and eudora for more before that, i
> > > concur that mutt rocks. and you *can* (as martin points out) compose
> > > and read at the same time
also sprach dman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2001.12.27.0154 +0100]:
> Well, fetchmail is easy enough -- you just write down what your
> mail account information is. exim can be used in place of procmail
> (I'm using it now) as it has filter capability. Have you gotten mutt
> to automatically put list m
On Wed, Dec 26, 2001 at 04:21:53PM -0500, Brian Nelson wrote:
| Not true! I switched from mutt to gnus. It's IMAP support was too weak
| for me,
IMAP in mutt is actually somewhat controversial. The author doesn't
really like it (mutt is _just_ a MUA), but there would be too much
wailing and
On Wed, Dec 26, 2001 at 09:58:11PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
| also sprach dman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2001.12.26.2100 +0100]:
| > I recommend just using fetchmail intstead and having exim or procmail
| > sort the mail into folders for you. The advantage of using
| > fetchmail+exim/procmail is t
also sprach Brian Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2001.12.27.0037 +0100]:
> > as a devoted pine user for years, and eudora for more before that, i
> > concur that mutt rocks. and you *can* (as martin points out) compose
> > and read at the same time, all of which stay happily-synchonized with
> > '$'
Nori Heikkinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> on Wed, 26 Dec 2001 11:18:07PM +0100, marTin insinuated:
> > > and I didn't like the single window nature of it (you can't compose
> > > a message and read other mail at the same time).
> >
> > but you can happily spawn two hundred separate instances a
on Wed, 26 Dec 2001 11:18:07PM +0100, marTin insinuated:
> > and I didn't like the single window nature of it (you can't compose
> > a message and read other mail at the same time).
>
> but you can happily spawn two hundred separate instances and point
> them wherever you like... it works just fin
also sprach Brian Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2001.12.26.2221 +0100]:
> Not true! I switched from mutt to gnus. It's IMAP support was too
> weak for me,
yes, IMAP is not a strength. but then again, an IMAP client isn't
really a MUA on the same scale of interpretation that mutt without
IMAP is on
martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> also sprach dman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2001.12.26.2100 +0100]:
> > I recommend just using fetchmail intstead and having exim or procmail
> > sort the mail into folders for you. The advantage of using
> > fetchmail+exim/procmail is that you can switch m
also sprach dman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2001.12.26.2100 +0100]:
> I recommend just using fetchmail intstead and having exim or procmail
> sort the mail into folders for you. The advantage of using
> fetchmail+exim/procmail is that you can switch mailers all you want
> and are not dependent on a give
On Wed, Dec 26, 2001 at 03:00:53PM -0500, dman wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 26, 2001 at 02:09:24PM -0500, Thomas H. George,,, wrote:
> | I ran apt-get install mutt in hopes of setting up a mail box with
> | threading for this list. There does not seem to be any POP3 connection
> | in the application as
on Wed, Dec 26, 2001 at 02:09:24PM -0500, Thomas H. George,,, ([EMAIL
PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I ran apt-get install mutt in hopes of setting up a mail box with
> threading for this list. There does not seem to be any POP3 connection
> in the application as downloaded. Any suggestions?
$ apt-
On Wed, Dec 26, 2001 at 02:09:24PM -0500, Thomas H. George,,, wrote:
| I ran apt-get install mutt in hopes of setting up a mail box with
| threading for this list. There does not seem to be any POP3 connection
| in the application as downloaded. Any suggestions?
www.mutt.org
There is a good m
I ran apt-get install mutt in hopes of setting up a mail box with
threading for this list. There does not seem to be any POP3 connection
in the application as downloaded. Any suggestions?
Tom George
31 matches
Mail list logo
