Re^3: UVC cameras

2011-02-17 Thread peasthope
* From: Sjoerd Hardeman sjo...@lorentz.leidenuniv.nl * Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 21:24:00 +0200 Better, try luvcview or guvcview, specialised programmes to just grab the output of the camera. They also allow to alter the settings, maybe you can fix things. luvcview -L lists formats

Re^2: UVC cameras

2011-02-16 Thread peasthope
* From: Sjoerd Hardeman sjo...@lorentz.leidenuniv.nl * Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 21:24:00 +0200 Better, try luvcview or guvcview, specialised programmes to just grab the output of the camera. They also allow to alter the settings, maybe you can fix things. Thanks for the tip. The

UVC cameras

2010-10-12 Thread PETER EASTHOPE
Somewhere I've read that a camera must be UVC conformant to qualify to use the Vista label on the package. It wasn't an authoritative source. Recently I put an inexpensive camera on Squeeze and got a local image in Skype. Oddly the remote image was OK without the camera but garbled with the

Re: UVC cameras

2010-10-12 Thread Eike Lantzsch
On Tuesday 12 October 2010 05:00:36 PETER EASTHOPE wrote: Somewhere I've read that a camera must be UVC conformant to qualify to use the Vista label on the package. It wasn't an authoritative source. Recently I put an inexpensive camera on Squeeze and got a local image in Skype. Oddly the

Re: UVC cameras

2010-10-12 Thread Camaleón
On Tue, 12 Oct 2010 07:57:40 -0300, Eike Lantzsch wrote: On Tuesday 12 October 2010 05:00:36 PETER EASTHOPE wrote: Somewhere I've read that a camera must be UVC conformant to qualify to use the Vista label on the package. It wasn't an authoritative source. Recently I put an inexpensive

Re: UVC cameras

2010-10-12 Thread Sjoerd Hardeman
Op 12-10-10 18:05, Camaleón schreef: On Tue, 12 Oct 2010 07:57:40 -0300, Eike Lantzsch wrote: On Tuesday 12 October 2010 05:00:36 PETER EASTHOPE wrote: Somewhere I've read that a camera must be UVC conformant to qualify to use the Vista label on the package. It wasn't an authoritative