* From: Sjoerd Hardeman sjo...@lorentz.leidenuniv.nl
* Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 21:24:00 +0200
Better, try luvcview or guvcview, specialised programmes to just grab
the output of the camera. They also allow to alter the settings, maybe
you can fix things.
luvcview -L lists formats
* From: Sjoerd Hardeman sjo...@lorentz.leidenuniv.nl
* Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 21:24:00 +0200
Better, try luvcview or guvcview, specialised programmes to just grab
the output of the camera. They also allow to alter the settings, maybe
you can fix things.
Thanks for the tip.
The
Somewhere I've read that a camera must be UVC conformant to qualify to use
the Vista label on the package. It wasn't an authoritative source.
Recently I put an inexpensive camera on Squeeze and got a local image in
Skype. Oddly the remote image was OK without the camera but garbled with
the
On Tuesday 12 October 2010 05:00:36 PETER EASTHOPE wrote:
Somewhere I've read that a camera must be UVC conformant to qualify to use
the Vista label on the package. It wasn't an authoritative source.
Recently I put an inexpensive camera on Squeeze and got a local image in
Skype. Oddly the
On Tue, 12 Oct 2010 07:57:40 -0300, Eike Lantzsch wrote:
On Tuesday 12 October 2010 05:00:36 PETER EASTHOPE wrote:
Somewhere I've read that a camera must be UVC conformant to qualify to
use the Vista label on the package. It wasn't an authoritative source.
Recently I put an inexpensive
Op 12-10-10 18:05, Camaleón schreef:
On Tue, 12 Oct 2010 07:57:40 -0300, Eike Lantzsch wrote:
On Tuesday 12 October 2010 05:00:36 PETER EASTHOPE wrote:
Somewhere I've read that a camera must be UVC conformant to qualify to
use the Vista label on the package. It wasn't an authoritative
6 matches
Mail list logo