On Thu, Apr 07, 2011 at 07:08:54AM -0400, Tom H wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 6:27 AM, Tom H wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 9:56 PM, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
> > wrote:
> >> In , Tom H wrote:
> >>>On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 7:17 PM, Rob Owens wrote:
>
> With Ubuntu (I believe) you get "
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 6:27 AM, Tom H wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 9:56 PM, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
> wrote:
>> In , Tom H wrote:
>>>On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 7:17 PM, Rob Owens wrote:
With Ubuntu (I believe) you get "5 years for a server" and "3 years for
a desktop" if you go with
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 9:56 PM, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
wrote:
> In , Tom H wrote:
>>On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 7:17 PM, Rob Owens wrote:
>>>
>>> With Ubuntu (I believe) you get "5 years for a server" and "3 years for
>>> a desktop" if you go with an LTS release. What packages are server
>>> packages
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 7:58 PM, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 04/06/2011 06:39 PM, Tom H wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 7:17 PM, Rob Owens wrote:
>>>
>>> With Ubuntu (I believe) you get "5 years for a server" and "3 years for
>>> a desktop" if you go with an LTS release. What packages are server
>>>
In , Tom H wrote:
>On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 7:17 PM, Rob Owens wrote:
>> With Ubuntu (I believe) you get "5 years for a server" and "3 years for
>> a desktop" if you go with an LTS release. What packages are server
>> packages and what ones are desktop packages?
>
>Server = X-less so WM-less, DE-les
In <20110406231712.gb7...@aurora.owens.net>, Rob Owens wrote:
>With Ubuntu (I believe) you get "5 years for a server" and "3 years for
>a desktop" if you go with an LTS release. What packages are server
>packages and what ones are desktop packages?
According to documents on Canonical's site, ther
Hello,
On 07/04/11 01:58, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 04/06/2011 06:39 PM, Tom H wrote:
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 7:17 PM, Rob Owens wrote:
With Ubuntu (I believe) you get "5 years for a server" and "3 years for
a desktop" if you go with an LTS release. What packages are server
packages and what ones
On 04/06/2011 06:39 PM, Tom H wrote:
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 7:17 PM, Rob Owens wrote:
With Ubuntu (I believe) you get "5 years for a server" and "3 years for
a desktop" if you go with an LTS release. What packages are server
packages and what ones are desktop packages? I don't know. It would b
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 7:17 PM, Rob Owens wrote:
>
> With Ubuntu (I believe) you get "5 years for a server" and "3 years for
> a desktop" if you go with an LTS release. What packages are server
> packages and what ones are desktop packages? I don't know. It would be
> nice to see a list somewhere.
On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 06:15:26PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 04/05/2011 05:37 PM, Mark wrote:
> [snip]
> >upgrading. For all its flaws, one nice thing about Windows is that it
> >has a 10-year (14-year for XP) support cycle, so while there may be
> >service packs, etc., to the end user, the i
On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 03:37:16PM -0700, Mark wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 1:14 PM, Freeman wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 03:03:41PM -0400, Matt Harrison wrote:
> > > On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 3:00 PM, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
> > > wrote:
> > > > On 2011-04-05 12:24:39 Matt Harrison wrote
On Apr 5, 2011, at 7:15 PM, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 04/05/2011 05:37 PM, Mark wrote:
> [snip]
>> upgrading. For all its flaws, one nice thing about Windows is that it
>> has a 10-year (14-year for XP) support cycle, so while there may be
>> service packs, etc., to the end user, the interface is
In , Tom H wrote:
>On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 3:00 PM, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
> wrote:
>> Someone that doesn't necessarily want to upgrade on Debian's schedule.
>> With Ubuntu, you can get 5 years, as opposed to Debian's ~3 years. With
>> SLE* you can get 10 years. I'm not sure about RHEL, but I thi
On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 06:15:26PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 04/05/2011 05:37 PM, Mark wrote:
> [snip]
> >upgrading. For all its flaws, one nice thing about Windows is that it
> >has a 10-year (14-year for XP) support cycle, so while there may be
> >service packs, etc., to the end user, the i
On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 03:37:16PM -0700, Mark wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 1:14 PM, Freeman wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 03:03:41PM -0400, Matt Harrison wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > All fine pointshere you go:
> > > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
On 04/05/2011 05:37 PM, Mark wrote:
[snip]
upgrading. For all its flaws, one nice thing about Windows is that it
has a 10-year (14-year for XP) support cycle, so while there may be
service packs, etc., to the end user, the interface is virtually the
same for 10 years. I realize that not upgradin
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 3:00 PM, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
wrote:
>
> Someone that doesn't necessarily want to upgrade on Debian's schedule. With
> Ubuntu, you can get 5 years, as opposed to Debian's ~3 years. With SLE* you
> can get 10 years. I'm not sure about RHEL, but I think it is roughly a SL
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 1:21 PM, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
wrote:
>
> 10. Can I install server packages on an Ubuntu Desktop installation
> and vice versa?
>
> Yes – Ubuntu’s flexibility makes it easy. The Ubuntu software repositories
> do not isolate packages to particular types of deployments. All th
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 1:14 PM, Freeman wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 03:03:41PM -0400, Matt Harrison wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 3:00 PM, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
> > wrote:
> > > On 2011-04-05 12:24:39 Matt Harrison wrote:
> > >>
> > >>Are we seriously going to argue about which version
On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 03:03:41PM -0400, Matt Harrison wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 3:00 PM, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
> wrote:
> > On 2011-04-05 12:24:39 Matt Harrison wrote:
> >>
> >>Are we seriously going to argue about which version of Ubuntu is
> >>supported for how long?
> >
> > I think it
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 3:00 PM, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
wrote:
> On 2011-04-05 12:24:39 Matt Harrison wrote:
>>On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 1:21 PM, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
>> wrote:
>>> On 2011-04-05 12:07:16 George Standish wrote:
On 05/04/11 01:04 PM, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> On 2011-04-
On 2011-04-05 12:24:39 Matt Harrison wrote:
>On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 1:21 PM, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
> wrote:
>> On 2011-04-05 12:07:16 George Standish wrote:
>>>On 05/04/11 01:04 PM, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
On 2011-04-05 11:51:13 George Standish wrote:
>> If you need more support tha
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 1:21 PM, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
wrote:
> On 2011-04-05 12:07:16 George Standish wrote:
>>On 05/04/11 01:04 PM, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
>>> On 2011-04-05 11:51:13 George Standish wrote:
> If you need more support than Debian provides and<= 5 years, install an
>
On 2011-04-05 12:07:16 George Standish wrote:
>On 05/04/11 01:04 PM, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
>> On 2011-04-05 11:51:13 George Standish wrote:
If you need more support than Debian provides and<= 5 years, install an
Ubuntu LTS.
>>>
>>> Just to clarify, Ubuntu LTS releases are 5 years
24 matches
Mail list logo
