"Alexander N. Benner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Filesystem 1024-blocks Used Available Capacity Mounted on
> /dev/hdb1 63885 2864231944 47% /
> /dev/hdb9 761184 142804 579045 20% /var
> /dev/hdb52270179 210241050415 98%
Hi
Now I also want to write :)
Ship's Log, Lt. Jiri Baum, Stardate 041298.1122:
>
> > Usually, when you see a system with a bunch of mount points, it's because
> > there's more than one disk. Using 4 2GB drives is better than one 8GB
> > drive because:
> And a couple of others:
>
> 3. ch
Hello,
> > I decided to partition my hard disk into:
> > /boot 50MB
> > /home 50MB (maybe more)
> > /root 50MB
> > /var150MB (maybe more)
> > /usr700MB
> > /etc50MB
> > /swap 128MB
> >
On 03 Dec 1998q, Joseph Hartmann wrote:
> I have run linux for years with just a linux native partition as
> big as I can make it, and a linux swap (= 2x my ram size) with no
> problem. I believe your approach is some kind of "protection"
> for runaway events, but in four years I have had no such
to add to the mess:
I have three smaller disks, a 320mb, and two 500mb's, one of which is
scsi. The 320mb is /dev/hda and is partitioned as 32mb swap, rest is
"/". The 500mb scsi is mounted as /usr, and the 500mb /dev/hdb is
mounted as /usr/local.
Weird maybe, but I had some special needs.
"Michael Wahl" wrote:
> I decided to partition my hard disk into:
> /boot 50MB
> /home 50MB (maybe more)
> /root 50MB
> /var150MB (maybe more)
> /usr700MB
> /etc50MB
> /swap 1
I have run linux for years with just a linux native partition as
big as I can make it, and a linux swap (= 2x my ram size) with no
problem. I believe your approach is some kind of "protection"
for runaway events, but in four years I have had no such event.
I think the partitioning is not necessary
On Thu, 3 Dec 1998, Michael Wahl wrote:
[snip]
> I decided to partition my hard disk into:
> /boot 50MB
about 2-3 would have done. I left mine on / . The main reason you'd
separate it is to have it under the 540MB limit/1024 Cylinder limit on
some old BIOS's.
>
>
> So, I make a guess:
>
> For my first time installation:
> 1.7GB hard disk, 98MB RAM
>
>
> -NT40, Win95 (Im not sure about this)
> -Staroffice
> -ME10, ProE (CAD Software)
> -Excel
> -Neoplanet (Net Browser)
> -CorelDraw7
> -Some Games (WingC
At 02:10 AM 12/3/98 PST, Michael Wahl wrote:
>So, I make a guess:
>
>For my first time installation:
> 1.7GB hard disk, 98MB RAM
>
>
> -NT40, Win95 (Im not sure about this)
>-Staroffice
> -ME10, ProE (CAD Software)
> -Excel
> -Neoplanet (Net Browser)
> -
So, I make a guess:
For my first time installation:
1.7GB hard disk, 98MB RAM
-NT40, Win95 (Im not sure about this)
-Staroffice
-ME10, ProE (CAD Software)
-Excel
-Neoplanet (Net Browser)
-CorelDraw7
-Some Games (WingCommander, For
So, I make a guess:
For my first time installation:
1.7GB hard disk, 98MB RAM
-NT40, Win95 (Im not sure about this)
-Staroffice
-ME10, ProE (CAD Software)
-Excel
-Neoplanet (Net Browser)
-CorelDraw7
-Some Games (WingCommander, For
12 matches
Mail list logo
