On 29/01/12 21:51, Colin wrote:
> Hi all,
> After reading the security support on testing[1], I was thinking if I
> would use wheezy at the moment on my sources.list instead of testing,
> then I would all have the "updates" from testing plus the security
> ones?
> Or should I just use 'deb http://s
On Du, 29 ian 12, 15:17:06, Colin wrote:
>
> Right.
> Then I could check debian-testing-security-announce@ to check which
> ones were fast tracked?
> Although the last post on that list is from Feb 2011 acording to the
> archives [1].
Debian Testing Security Advisories are used only when the upda
On 1/29/12, Paul E Condon wrote:
> OP wouldn't have asked the question unless he were somewhat worried
> that each choice had consequences, which, for him, were unknown and
> therefore unintended. Because he has asked the question, I think OP
> is, like me, a person who wants a system that basical
On 20120129_122817, Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2012-01-29 11:51 +0100, Colin wrote:
>
> > After reading the security support on testing[1], I was thinking if I
> > would use wheezy at the moment on my sources.list instead of testing,
> > then I would all have the "updates" from testing plus the secu
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 3:07 PM, Christofer C. Bell
wrote:
> To answer your other question, security updates for Testing move through
> from Unstable like any other update except for being fast tracked:
Right.
Then I could check debian-testing-security-announce@ to check which
ones were fast trac
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 8:27 AM, Colin wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 11:28 AM, Sven Joachim wrote:
> > On 2012-01-29 11:51 +0100, Colin wrote:
> > This depends on what you intend to do when wheezy becomes stable. Do
> > you want to continue to use testing forever, or do you want to have a
>
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 11:28 AM, Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2012-01-29 11:51 +0100, Colin wrote:
> This depends on what you intend to do when wheezy becomes stable. Do
> you want to continue to use testing forever, or do you want to have a
> system that remains basically unchanged for a long time?
On 2012-01-29 11:51 +0100, Colin wrote:
> After reading the security support on testing[1], I was thinking if I
> would use wheezy at the moment on my sources.list instead of testing,
> then I would all have the "updates" from testing plus the security
> ones?
No. Also, wheezy and testing are cu
Hi all,
After reading the security support on testing[1], I was thinking if I
would use wheezy at the moment on my sources.list instead of testing,
then I would all have the "updates" from testing plus the security
ones?
Or should I just use 'deb http://security.debian.org testing/updates
main cont
9 matches
Mail list logo
