Brian Nelson wrote:
>
>
> Besides, isn't this the debian-user mailing list, for discussions
> among debian users?
>
Hmmm, I'm right now using a mailer that is not running on Debian. Yet,
I am a Debian user. I'm not even a newbie. How can this be?
Open your mind to the possibilities...
Johann Spies wrote:
>
> On Wed, Nov 21, 2001 at 04:04:36PM -0600, DvB wrote:
> > God, I wish "YODA" would stop sending this crap :-(
>
> If you wish to address God about this issue, I don't think the list is
> the right place to do it.
>
That would be 'debian-devel'. ;-)
Hi Brian
, On 23-Nov-01, you wrote:
> So you're saying newbie questions are appropriate...
Of course they are, weren't you a newbie once? or were you born a genius? ;-P
> But no one wants to read newbie questions. So why are they
> appropriate if no one wants to read them?
So now you are the
* Brian Nelson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> "nate" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Karsten M. Self said:
> > >
> > > If that's the one I think it was, it's the researcher at a major
> > > university who found himself frustrated at trying to get
> > > unsubscribed from debian-user, which he an
"nate" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Karsten M. Self said:
> >
> > If that's the one I think it was, it's the researcher at a major
> > university who found himself frustrated at trying to get
> > unsubscribed from debian-user, which he announced loudly and
> > widely. I don't think he'll do that
n't you mean:
response to message
- Original Message -
From: Karsten M. Self
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Sent: Saturday, November 24, 2001 1:54 AM
Subject: Re: ObElitist (was Re: Virus incident)
> entire message
God, that shit makes me violent. If I ever find the guy at MS who
thought
"nate" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> which reminds me..anyone seen ethan benson ? he used to
> participate a lot on debian-user..haven't seen any posts
> from him since ive started posting again.
He's been on debian-devel recently, packing some heat...
--
Brian Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[EMAIL
nate wrote:
> which reminds me..anyone seen ethan benson ? he used to
> participate a lot on debian-user..haven't seen any posts
> from him since ive started posting again.
He shows up on debian-security now and again.
Craig
Karsten M. Self said:
>
> If that's the one I think it was, it's the researcher at a major
> university who found himself frustrated at trying to get
> unsubscribed from debian-user, which he announced loudly and
> widely. I don't think he'll do that again. Note that I posted
> both on list and o
on Fri, Nov 23, 2001 at 10:19:11PM -0800, nate ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Gary Turner said:
> > On Fri, 23 Nov 2001 17:07:22 -0800, you wrote:
> >
> >>
> >
> > Karsten, you obviously have too much time on your hands. For which
> > I am eternally grateful.
>
>
> karsten isn't entirely innocent
nate said:
> Gary Turner said:
>> On Fri, 23 Nov 2001 17:07:22 -0800, you wrote:
>>
>>>
>>
>> Karsten, you obviously have too much time on your hands. For
>> which I am eternally grateful.
>
>
> karsten isn't entirely innocent himself..i remember pretty
> clearly he was quite involved in a flame
Gary Turner said:
> On Fri, 23 Nov 2001 17:07:22 -0800, you wrote:
>
>>
>
> Karsten, you obviously have too much time on your hands. For which
> I am eternally grateful.
karsten isn't entirely innocent himself..i remember pretty
clearly he was quite involved in a flame war about a year
or maybe
On Fri, 23 Nov 2001 17:07:22 -0800, you wrote:
>
Karsten, you obviously have too much time on your hands. For which I am
eternally grateful.
gt
Yes I fear I am living beyond my mental means--Nash
on Thu, Nov 22, 2001 at 03:30:24PM -0800, ben ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> in light of recent responses relative to exclusionary notions, vis-a-vis
> the elitism of debian, i would like to draw attention to the primary
> reason of my own personal choice of debian. i choose debian because i
> believ
On Thu, Nov 22, 2001 at 08:36:21PM -0800, Brian Nelson wrote:
> But no one wants to read newbie questions. So why are they
> appropriate if no one wants to read them?
Why wouldn't you want to read newbie question? How are the newbies going
to learn to if they can't ask someone with more knowledge
On Thu, Nov 22, 2001 at 09:12:19PM -0800, Karsten M. Self wrote:
> There are a number of skills which help in tackling this stuff. Basic
> intelligence and a willingness to learn help a lot. I try not to be
> unintentionally rude, or intentionally rude without a reason. But an
> ability to take
Karsten M. Self wrote:
Here's my line, usually given offlist:
Post your request in an open, coeherent, and legible manner. That
(That would be "coherent", right?)
means grammar, spelling, using that pesky shift key (but not the one
labled SHIFT LOCK), and attending to issues lik
On Friday 23 November 2001 04:37, Gary Turner wrote:
> I use Agent Forte on an M$ machine. My Linux box is not online yet
> because I don't yet have a second NIC, nor do I understand IP masking
> or a lot of other things. I have asked questions recently in this
> forum. They were, I believe, 'de
On Friday 23 November 2001 04:36, Brian Nelson wrote:
> Craig Dickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Yes, and newbies are also users, so their questions are appropriate in
> > this forum.
>
> So you're saying newbie questions are appropriate...
Very much so!
> But no one wants to read newbie
Brian Nelson wrote:
>
[snip]
> Although I'm almost done trolling, I just have to comment on this:
[snip]
Now that it is clear to all what you are...
*plonk*
Linda
--
Linda J Laubenheimer
UNIX Geek, Bibliophile and Iconoclast
http://www.modusvarious.net/ -
Brian Nelson wrote:
> Craig Dickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Brian Nelson wrote:
> >
> > > Debian isn't about holding newbies' hands.
> >
> > What do you want them to use, Red Hat? Heaven forbid.
> >
> > > There isn't a mailing list dedicated to newbies
> > > installing debian. The info
on Fri, Nov 23, 2001 at 09:37:59AM +1100, John Griffiths ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> >My point wasn't that people who use a .*Microsoft email client are
> >"lesser beings" because they can't make Debian work; I mean that they
> >most likely aren't trying hard enough. Debian isn't about holding
>
I am a newbie to Debian. One of the things I look forward to is
receiving intelligent
polite answers to my stupid newbie questions. I have experienced
newbie-only lists on other
distributions. They are depressing.
Thanks to all you experienced Debian users who are welcoming and
helpful.
Paul
ai
Brian Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> "Robert L. Harris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Hmm, when did this become an elitist, better than you mailing list? Is this
> > debian-users or debian-I-am-God-worship-me?
>
> Is this debian-user, or [EMAIL PROTECTED] Debian's always
> been eliti
On Thu, 22 Nov 2001 14:31:15 -0800, you wrote:
>Linda Laubenheimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Brian Nelson wrote:
>> >
>> > "Robert L. Harris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> >
>> > > Hmm, when did this become an elitist, better than you mailing list? Is
>> > > this
>> > > debian-users or
Craig Dickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Brian Nelson wrote:
>
> > Debian isn't about holding newbies' hands.
>
> What do you want them to use, Red Hat? Heaven forbid.
>
> > There isn't a mailing list dedicated to newbies
> > installing debian. The information is out there; it's up to them
On Thursday 22 November 2001 14:46, Dimitri Maziuk wrote:
> * Jesse Goerz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) spake thusly:
> > On Wednesday 21 November 2001 20:11, Josh Everist wrote:
> > > Well I can take responsibility for the messages from
> > > '[EMAIL PROTECTED]', however if the Debian User
> > > mailing lis
On Thu, Nov 22, 2001 at 02:31:15PM -0800, Brian Nelson wrote:
> Linda Laubenheimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Are you deliberately acting like a poorly reared, snotty pre-teen, or
> > is it a genetic fault?
>
> Mostly the former, since this is infinitely more amusing than being
> with the re
Alan Shutko writes:
> Anyone who has had any contact with any sort of mass media in the last
> year should know by now not to open executables.
Anyone who has paid attention in the last year should know by now that
there is no reason to believe that not opening executables is sufficient
protection
Brian Nelson wrote:
> Debian isn't about holding newbies' hands.
What do you want them to use, Red Hat? Heaven forbid.
> There isn't a mailing list dedicated to newbies
> installing debian. The information is out there; it's up to them to
> find it, understand it, and apply it. It's like a ri
Richard Cobbe wrote:
> I understood all of the rules that were posted except for one thing.
> Just out of curiosity, what does the 1^0 above do? The procmail
> manpages weren't much help.
Try "man procmailsc" and read up on scoring.
Craig
Lo, on Thursday, November 22, Linda Laubenheimer did write:
> Craig Dickson wrote:
>
> > * 1^0 ^From:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > * 1^0 ^From:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > /dev/null
>
> Add
>* 1^0 ^From:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> to that last one...
>
I understood all of the rules that were posted except for o
>My point wasn't that people who use a .*Microsoft email client are
>"lesser beings" because they can't make Debian work; I mean that they
>most likely aren't trying hard enough. Debian isn't about holding
>newbies' hands. There isn't a mailing list dedicated to newbies
>installing debian. The i
Linda Laubenheimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Brian Nelson wrote:
> >
> > "Robert L. Harris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > Hmm, when did this become an elitist, better than you mailing list? Is
> > > this
> > > debian-users or debian-I-am-God-worship-me?
> >
> > Is this debian-user
On Thu, Nov 22, 2001 at 11:56:07AM -0800, Brian Nelson wrote:
> Is this debian-user, or [EMAIL PROTECTED] Debian's always
> been elitist. That's why it's so much fun.
I think you're confused. This is debian-user. You're looking for
debian-jackasses. You need to unsubscribe from this one and
actually debian hasn't been elitest. Debian has been willing to accept
teenagers to be maintainers of packages, giving those teenagers a
valuable learning experience.
I should know, I was one of the first 5 + years ago.
shaya
On Thu, 2001-11-22 at 14:56, Brian Nelson wrote:
> "Robert L. Harri
On Friday 23 November 2001 03:21, Robert L. Harris wrote:
> Hmm, when did this become an elitist, better than you mailing list?
> Is this debian-users or debian-I-am-God-worship-me?
>
> And the language isn't needed either. There are children who read
> this.
Hmm, prodigies will probably underst
Craig Dickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> My guess is that the antivirus thing thinks it's processing mail that is
> addressed to one of its local users. So it assumes the To: line is one of
> those local users, and sends the notice to that address. Which is sort of
> stupid.
I doubt it. I'm s
John Hasler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Not to new users using Windows from work or to ask for help getting on the
> Net with Debian. Filtering .exe's from this list would be a kindness.
Anyone who has had any contact with any sort of mass media in the last
year should know by now not to open
* Brian Nelson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> But setting up DHCP is covered in the installation manual. Is it
> really worthwhile helping people that are too lazy to read and
> understand material that's readily available?
Including the kernel mods req'd to get dhcp-client to work with a
tweaked
Brian Nelson wrote:
>
> "Robert L. Harris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Hmm, when did this become an elitist, better than you mailing list? Is this
> > debian-users or debian-I-am-God-worship-me?
>
> Is this debian-user, or [EMAIL PROTECTED] Debian's always
> been elitist. That's why i
"Robert L. Harris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hmm, when did this become an elitist, better than you mailing list? Is this
> debian-users or debian-I-am-God-worship-me?
Is this debian-user, or [EMAIL PROTECTED] Debian's always
been elitist. That's why it's so much fun.
--
Brian Nelson <[EM
* Jesse Goerz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) spake thusly:
> On Wednesday 21 November 2001 20:11, Josh Everist wrote:
> > Well I can take responsibility for the messages from
> > '[EMAIL PROTECTED]', however if the Debian User mailing
> > list didn't send out viruses in the first place, there
> > wouldn't be
Hmm, when did this become an elitist, better than you mailing list? Is this
debian-users or debian-I-am-God-worship-me?
And the language isn't needed either. There are children who read this.
Thus spake Brian Nelson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> John Hasler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Bria
Brian Nelson writes:
> Yeah, fuck em.
You might be happier using FreeBSD.
> If they can't figure out which module to load for their network card,
> they can do a google or mailing list search,...
And get thousands of hits on confusing, poorly written HOW-TO's that assume
that they are using Red
John Hasler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Brian Nelson writes:
> > If you're gonna post to debian-user, I would hope you'd be *using
> > Debian*...
>
> So you figure that new users who are having trouble getting Debian to work
> should not ask for help using their legacy OS?
Yeah, fuck em. If t
Craig Dickson wrote:
>
> Linda Laubenheimer wrote:
>
> > Michael Heldebrant wrote:
> > >
> > > Actually, I wish [EMAIL PROTECTED] would fix his machine.
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] too... Grrr!
>
> In the meantime, I suggest you filter it yourself. If you're using
> procmail, the following reci
Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote:
> In fact I do not understand how it could ever send the message back
> to the list. That address is only in the To: header.
My guess is that the antivirus thing thinks it's processing mail that is
addressed to one of its local users. So it assumes the To: line is on
François writes:
> I may be saying something stupid, but: it seems to me that it is only
> some kind of address rewriting.
It is. The Antigen thing is sending out messages with a blank From: line.
Look at the Received: lines and you can see where it is coming from.
--
John Hasler
[EMAIL PROTECTE
On Thu, Nov 22, 2001 at 02:26:18PM +0100, François THOMAS wrote:
|
| > -Message d'origine-
| > De : Nigel Pauli [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| > What I can't understand though is why I'm sending out Antigen warnings.
| > I don't run it, I don't run MS Exchange. I run postfix and qpopper and
Brian Nelson writes:
> If you're gonna post to debian-user, I would hope you'd be *using
> Debian*...
So you figure that new users who are having trouble getting Debian to work
should not ask for help using their legacy OS?
--
John Hasler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Hasler)
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwood
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Nigel Pauli [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Envoyé : jeudi 22 novembre 2001 14:13
> À : Craig Dickson; debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Objet : Re: Virus incident
>
>
> On Thursday 22 November 2001 00:29, Craig Dickson wrote:
On Thursday 22 November 2001 00:29, Craig Dickson wrote:
> Linda Laubenheimer wrote:
> > Michael Heldebrant wrote:
Thanks for the useful, practical advice. At one point over the summer I
found myself stranded without reading matter and read and re-read the
articles in Linux Magazine on procmail -
According to ben:
> all of this garbage is coming across european servers (ecrc.net and
> cistron.nl--use dig, ping, traceroute, etc., to verify this.
What, garbage coming from cistron.nl? Are you out of your mind?
> check the mail
> headers for appropriate addresses). i vote for a universal ping
all of this garbage is coming across european servers (ecrc.net and
cistron.nl--use dig, ping, traceroute, etc., to verify this. check the mail
headers for appropriate addresses). i vote for a universal ping campaign to the
servers involved. it won't disrupt their mail servers but it will get their
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Josh Everist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Well I can take responsibility for the messages from
>'[EMAIL PROTECTED]', however if the Debian User mailing list didn't send
>out viruses in the first place, there wouldn't be the automated reply.
>The same goes for the YODA
Panda Antivirus has found the following viruses in the message:
Server :YODA
Sent by : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Address : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To :debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject : Fw: stuff to check !!
Date : 22/11/2001
Panda Antivirus has found the following viruses in the message:
Server :YODA
Sent by : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Address : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To :debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject : Fw: stuff to check !!
Date : 22/11/2001
Panda Antivirus has found the following viruses in the message:
Server :YODA
Sent by : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Address : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To :debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject : Fw: stuff to check !!
Date : 22/11/2001
Panda Antivirus has found the following viruses in the message:
Server :YODA
Sent by : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Address : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To :debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject : Fw: Re: Cool info i found
Date : 22/11/20
Panda Antivirus has found the following viruses in the message:
Server :YODA
Sent by : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Address : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To :debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject : Fw: Re: Cool info i found
Date : 22/11/20
Panda Antivirus has found the following viruses in the message:
Server :YODA
Sent by : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Address : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To :debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject : Fw: Re: Cool info i found
Date : 22/11/20
Panda Antivirus has found the following viruses in the message:
Server :YODA
Sent by : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Address : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To :debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject : Fw: Re: Nice info to check !
Date : 22/11/
Panda Antivirus has found the following viruses in the message:
Server :YODA
Sent by : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Address : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To :debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject : Fw: Re: Nice info to check !
Date : 22/11/
Panda Antivirus has found the following viruses in the message:
Server :YODA
Sent by : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Address : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To :debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject : Fw: Re: Nice info to check !
Date : 22/11/
Panda Antivirus has found the following viruses in the message:
Server :YODA
Sent by : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Address : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To :debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject : Fw: Re: Cool website for you
Date : 22/11
Panda Antivirus has found the following viruses in the message:
Server :YODA
Sent by : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Address : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To :debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject : Fw: Re: Cool website for you
Date : 22/11
Panda Antivirus has found the following viruses in the message:
Server :YODA
Sent by : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Address : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To :debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject : Fw: Re: Cool website for you
Date : 22/11
On Wed, Nov 21, 2001 at 04:04:36PM -0600, DvB wrote:
> God, I wish "YODA" would stop sending this crap :-(
If you wish to address God about this issue, I don't think the list is
the right place to do it.
Regards.
Johann.
--
Johann Spies Telefoon: 021-808 4036
Informasietegnologie, Univ
Josh Everist said:
> Well I can take responsibility for the messages from
> '[EMAIL PROTECTED]', however if the Debian User mailing list
> didn't send out viruses in the first place, there wouldn't be the
> automated reply.
i reccomend ditching exchange and go with a unix based mail
server, sendma
Adam Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This is a Debian GNU/Linux mailing list. Perhaps the administrators
> could look at filtering a problem caused by Windows users, but I
> wouldn't put a high priority on it.
Ah, that reminds me of my favorite procmail entry:
:0:
* ^TO_debian
* (^X-Mailer:
On Wed, Nov 21, 2001 at 06:11:22PM -0700, Josh Everist wrote:
> Well I can take responsibility for the messages from
> '[EMAIL PROTECTED]', however if the Debian User mailing list didn't send
> out viruses in the first place, there wouldn't be the automated reply.
Then the automated reply is broke
Adam Warner writes:
> The automated replies act like a denial of service.
Yes. At least patch your software to not send the same warning to the same
address more than once a day.
> Windows executables posted to a debian-user mailing list are pretty
> obvious.
Not to new users using Windows from
On Thu, 2001-11-22 at 14:11, Josh Everist wrote:
> Well I can take responsibility for the messages from
> '[EMAIL PROTECTED]', however if the Debian User mailing list didn't send
> out viruses in the first place, there wouldn't be the automated reply.
The automated replies act like a denial of ser
On Wednesday 21 November 2001 20:11, Josh Everist wrote:
> Well I can take responsibility for the messages from
> '[EMAIL PROTECTED]', however if the Debian User mailing
> list didn't send out viruses in the first place, there
> wouldn't be the automated reply.
I think you mean outlook express 5;
nesday, November 21, 2001 3:05 PM
To: 'debian-user@lists.debian.org'
Subject: Re: Virus incident
God, I wish "YODA" would stop sending this crap :-(
YODA Panda Antivirus for Exchange Server <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
> Panda Antivirus has found the following viruse
Linda Laubenheimer wrote:
> Michael Heldebrant wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 2001-11-21 at 16:04, DvB wrote:
> > >
> > > God, I wish "YODA" would stop sending this crap :-(
> >
> > Actually, I wish [EMAIL PROTECTED] would fix his machine.
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] too... Grrr!
In the meantime, I suggest
Michael Heldebrant wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2001-11-21 at 16:04, DvB wrote:
> >
> > God, I wish "YODA" would stop sending this crap :-(
>
> Actually, I wish [EMAIL PROTECTED] would fix his machine.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] too... Grrr!
Linda
--
Linda J Laubenheimer
U
Panda Antivirus has found the following viruses in the message:
Server :YODA
Sent by : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Address : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To :debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject : Funny website for you :-)
Date : 22/11/200
Panda Antivirus has found the following viruses in the message:
Server :YODA
Sent by : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Address : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To :debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject : Funny website for you :-)
Date : 22/11/200
Panda Antivirus has found the following viruses in the message:
Server :YODA
Sent by : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Address : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To :debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject : Funny website for you :-)
Date : 22/11/200
Panda Antivirus has found the following viruses in the message:
Server :YODA
Sent by : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Address : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To :debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject : Fw: Funny info
Date : 22/11/2001 00:36:
Panda Antivirus has found the following viruses in the message:
Server :YODA
Sent by : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Address : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To :debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject : Fw: Funny info
Date : 22/11/2001 01:36
Panda Antivirus has found the following viruses in the message:
Server :YODA
Sent by : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Address : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To :debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject : Fw: Funny music i found
Date : 22/11/2001
Panda Antivirus has found the following viruses in the message:
Server :YODA
Sent by : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Address : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To :debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject : Fw: Funny music i found
Date : 22/11/2001
Panda Antivirus has found the following viruses in the message:
Server :YODA
Sent by : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Address : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To :debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject : Fw: Funny music i found
Date : 22/11/2001
Panda Antivirus has found the following viruses in the message:
Server :YODA
Sent by : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Address : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To :debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject : Fw: Funny info
Date : 22/11/2001 00:36:
Panda Antivirus has found the following viruses in the message:
Server :YODA
Sent by : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Address : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To :debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject : Fw: Re: Cool urls to check !
Date : 22/11/
Panda Antivirus has found the following viruses in the message:
Server :YODA
Sent by : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Address : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To :debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject : Fw: Re: Cool urls to check !
Date : 22/11/
Panda Antivirus has found the following viruses in the message:
Server :YODA
Sent by : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Address : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To :debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject : Fw: Re: Cool urls to check !
Date : 22/11/
Panda Antivirus has found the following viruses in the message:
Server :YODA
Sent by : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Address : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To :debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject : Fw: weird shit for you !
Date : 22/11/2001
Panda Antivirus has found the following viruses in the message:
Server :YODA
Sent by : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Address : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To :debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject : Fw: weird shit for you !
Date : 22/11/2001
Panda Antivirus has found the following viruses in the message:
Server :YODA
Sent by : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Address : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To :debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject : Fw: weird shit for you !
Date : 22/11/2001
Panda Antivirus has found the following viruses in the message:
Server :YODA
Sent by : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Address : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To :debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject : info to see !
Date : 22/11/2001 00:24:19
Panda Antivirus has found the following viruses in the message:
Server :YODA
Sent by : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Address : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To :debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject : info to see !
Date : 22/11/2001 00:24:19
Panda Antivirus has found the following viruses in the message:
Server :YODA
Sent by : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Address : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To :debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject : info to see !
Date : 22/11/2001 01:24
VA
Panda Antivirus has found the following viruses in the message:
Server :YODA
Sent by : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Address : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To :debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject : weird pictures - check it ?!
Date : 22/11/
Panda Antivirus has found the following viruses in the message:
Server :YODA
Sent by : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Address : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To :debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject : weird pictures - check it ?!
Date : 22/11/
Panda Antivirus has found the following viruses in the message:
Server :YODA
Sent by : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Address : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To :debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject : weird pictures - check it ?!
Date : 22/11/
Panda Antivirus has found the following viruses in the message:
Server :YODA
Sent by : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Address : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To :debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject : Hot music to check ?!
Date : 21/11/2001 2
1 - 100 of 124 matches
Mail list logo
