Re: webmail and email from command line

On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 4:24 PM loredana wrote: > > Greetings, > > I posted the following message to debian-accessibility and I post it > again as suggested. My mistake. I can't cope with this threading hijacking. As I said in my first post, I do have a serious problem I am trying to solve. I wi

Re: webmail and email from command line

On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 09:01:02PM +0100, Joe wrote: > On Mon, 19 Aug 2019 17:19:58 +0200 > wrote: > > > > > > So for Mr. Hardt, Kerberos doesn't exist. Or he's talking HTTP context > > only. > > > > MS has used Active Directory in some form or other since Win2000, and > AD is basically Kerbe

Re: webmail and email from command line

On Mon, 19 Aug 2019 17:19:58 +0200 wrote: > > So for Mr. Hardt, Kerberos doesn't exist. Or he's talking HTTP context > only. > MS has used Active Directory in some form or other since Win2000, and AD is basically Kerberos plus LDAP. An AD 'domain' is basically a realm. So yes, all their tech

Re: webmail and email from command line

On Mon, 19 Aug 2019 14:20:29 -0400 Celejar wrote: > On Mon, 19 Aug 2019 19:33:55 +0200 > Alessandro Vesely wrote: > > > On Mon 19/Aug/2019 18:05:57 +0200 Celejar wrote: > > > On Mon, 19 Aug 2019 17:21:40 +0200 > > > wrote: > > > > > >> On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 10:06:33AM -0400, Celejar wro

Re: webmail and email from command line

On Mon, 19 Aug 2019 19:33:55 +0200 Alessandro Vesely wrote: > On Mon 19/Aug/2019 18:05:57 +0200 Celejar wrote: > > On Mon, 19 Aug 2019 17:21:40 +0200 > > wrote: > > > >> On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 10:06:33AM -0400, Celejar wrote: > >> > >> [...] > >> > >>> I'd love to run my own mail stack, and I

Re: webmail and email from command line

On Mon 19/Aug/2019 18:05:57 +0200 Celejar wrote: > On Mon, 19 Aug 2019 17:21:40 +0200 > wrote: > >> On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 10:06:33AM -0400, Celejar wrote: >> >> [...] >> >>> I'd love to run my own mail stack, and I think I could handle the >>> software deployment reasonably well, but from every

Why I mistrust bigcorps [was: webmail and email from command line]

[note: veering dangerously off-topic. If anyone kicks us out, I'll accept without protesting] On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 12:03:25PM -0400, Celejar wrote: > On Mon, 19 Aug 2019 17:19:58 +0200 > wrote: [...] > > Edited by D. Hardt, Microsoft. Hmmm. > > Ad hominem. rather ad corporationem. Mr. Hard

Re: webmail and email from command line

On Mon, 19 Aug 2019 17:21:40 +0200 wrote: > On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 10:06:33AM -0400, Celejar wrote: > > [...] > > > I'd love to run my own mail stack, and I think I could handle the > > software deployment reasonably well, but from everything I've read, > > the headaches required to make sure

Re: webmail and email from command line

On Mon, 19 Aug 2019 17:19:58 +0200 wrote: > On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 09:47:55AM -0400, Celejar wrote: > > On Mon, 19 Aug 2019 10:32:31 +0200 > > wrote: > > > > > On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 09:15:45PM -0400, Celejar wrote: > > > > On Sun, 18 Aug 2019 23:43:35 +0200 > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > >

Re: webmail and email from command line

ditional" (i.e. non-Webmail) clients are qualified as "insecure" although they haven't to be. This will softly nudge people towards (Google) webmail. OTOH I don't want to be misunderstood. Google is big, and they actually do a couple of things which benefit us all. Proje

Re: webmail and email from command line

On Mon, 19 Aug 2019, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2019 11:19:58 > From: to...@tuxteam.de > To: debian-user@lists.debian.org > Subject: Re: webmail and email from command line > > On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 09:47:55AM -0400, Celejar wrote: > > On Mon, 19

Re: webmail and email from command line

On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 10:06:33AM -0400, Celejar wrote: [...] > I'd love to run my own mail stack, and I think I could handle the > software deployment reasonably well, but from everything I've read, > the headaches required to make sure that major mail operators will > actually accept my mail a

Re: webmail and email from command line

On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 09:47:55AM -0400, Celejar wrote: > On Mon, 19 Aug 2019 10:32:31 +0200 > wrote: > > > On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 09:15:45PM -0400, Celejar wrote: > > > On Sun, 18 Aug 2019 23:43:35 +0200 > > > wrote: > > > > > > > On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 05:19:28PM -0400, Celejar wrote: > >

Re: webmail and email from command line

On Mon, 19 Aug 2019 11:33:52 +0200 Alessandro Vesely wrote: > On Mon 19/Aug/2019 03:15:45 +0200 Celejar wrote: > > I think terming Google's decision to call software that doesn't > > implement OAuth "less secure" "evil" is hyperbole that doesn't help our > > broader cause of opposing its breakin

Re: webmail and email from command line

On Mon, 19 Aug 2019 10:32:31 +0200 wrote: > On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 09:15:45PM -0400, Celejar wrote: > > On Sun, 18 Aug 2019 23:43:35 +0200 > > wrote: > > > > > On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 05:19:28PM -0400, Celejar wrote: > > > > On Fri, 16 Aug 2019 10:10:35 +0200 > > [...] > > > I think terming

Re: webmail and email from command line

On Mon 19/Aug/2019 03:15:45 +0200 Celejar wrote: > I think terming Google's decision to call software that doesn't > implement OAuth "less secure" "evil" is hyperbole that doesn't help our > broader cause of opposing its breaking of standards, imposing various > sorts of lock-in, invasions of priv

Re: webmail and email from command line

On Mon, 19 Aug 2019 10:32:31 +0200 wrote: > On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 09:15:45PM -0400, Celejar wrote: > > On Sun, 18 Aug 2019 23:43:35 +0200 > > wrote: > > > > > On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 05:19:28PM -0400, Celejar wrote: > > > > On Fri, 16 Aug 2019 10:10:35 +0200 > > [...] > > > I think terming

Re: webmail and email from command line

On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 09:15:45PM -0400, Celejar wrote: > On Sun, 18 Aug 2019 23:43:35 +0200 > wrote: > > > On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 05:19:28PM -0400, Celejar wrote: > > > On Fri, 16 Aug 2019 10:10:35 +0200 [...] > I think terming Google's decision to call software that doesn't > implement OAut

Re: webmail and email from command line

On Sun, 18 Aug 2019 23:43:35 +0200 wrote: > On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 05:19:28PM -0400, Celejar wrote: > > On Fri, 16 Aug 2019 10:10:35 +0200 > > wrote: > > [...] > > > > > less secure apps" option, and then configure POP3 / SMTP normally. > > > > > > > > > Google's evil come

Re: webmail and email from command line

On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 05:19:28PM -0400, Celejar wrote: > On Fri, 16 Aug 2019 10:10:35 +0200 > wrote: [...] > > > less secure apps" option, and then configure POP3 / SMTP normally. > > > > > > Google's evil comes through the backdoor, without making any noise, > > like Wormt

Re: webmail and email from command line

On Fri, 16 Aug 2019 10:10:35 +0200 wrote: > On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 10:02:57PM -0400, Celejar wrote: > > On Wed, 14 Aug 2019 16:24:49 + > > loredana wrote: > > > > ... > > > > > secure applications, this is likely not to be a viable solution (it > > > seems that google is going to forbit l

Re: webmail and email from command line

ppy. On Fri, 16 Aug 2019, loredana wrote: > Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2019 11:26:53 > From: loredana > To: Jude DaShiell > Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org > Subject: Re: webmail and email from command line > Resent-Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2019 13:27:39 + (UTC) > Resent-From: debian

Re: webmail and email from command line

Hi Loredana, I agree with other debianers that setting a forward to another email provider for now should be the easiest option. I think it would be a good idea to find an email provider that allows smtp/imap clients, and as far as I know protonmail does it only in Pro version. I know there is po

Re: webmail and email from command line

On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 12:51 PM Jude DaShiell wrote: > Running using 2fa may be possible with non-browser apps if your security > records indicate you ran with what google considers an untrusted app and > google has it listed. You can generate an app-specific password for the > non-browser app

Re: webmail and email from command line

On Fri, 16 Aug 2019, loredana wrote: > Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2019 10:02:17 > From: loredana > To: Celejar > Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org > Subject: Re: webmail and email from command line > Resent-Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2019 12:03:05 + (UTC) > Resent-From: debian-user@lists

Re: webmail and email from command line

ne of them and is going to affect us for sure. I may be able to be more responsive once I find a good way of avoiding webmail. Meanwhile, here is the best I could find toward a possible solution that may help avoid the OAUTH2 authorization issue by complying with it. You need debian buster as a

Re: webmail and email from command line

On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 10:02:57PM -0400, Celejar wrote: > On Wed, 14 Aug 2019 16:24:49 + > loredana wrote: > > ... > > > secure applications, this is likely not to be a viable solution (it > > seems that google is going to forbit less secure application access > > starting November first of

Re: webmail and email from command line

On Wed, 14 Aug 2019 16:24:49 + loredana wrote: ... > secure applications, this is likely not to be a viable solution (it > seems that google is going to forbit less secure application access > starting November first of this year and it is already a pain to use > it now). What is your sourc

Re: webmail and email from command line

On Wed, 14 Aug 2019 18:23:23 +0200 to...@tuxteam.de wrote: ... > Elsewhere, perhaps riseup [1] is an option. It's donation-funded, > so consider throwing some small amount into their hat. > > Cheers > > [1] https://riseup.net/ I think you've mentioned them before, but how seriously should we t

Re: webmail and email from command line

On Wed 14 Aug 2019 at 12:19:01 (-0600), Joe Pfeiffer wrote: > loredana writes: > > > On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 3:00 PM wrote: > > > >> [...] > > > >> Note that what Google calls there "less secure applications" is just > >> marketing mumbo-jumbo to nudge users off their non-browser clients. > > >

Re: webmail and email from command line

ere, perhaps riseup [1] is an option. It's donation-funded, > so consider throwing some small amount into their hat. > > Cheers > > [1] https://riseup.net/ > Just thought I'd chime in here. I've been redirecting all webmail (currently gmail and my ISP) to a Fast

Re: webmail and email from command line

loredana writes: > On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 3:00 PM wrote: > >> [...] > >> Note that what Google calls there "less secure applications" is just >> marketing mumbo-jumbo to nudge users off their non-browser clients. > > I know. But knowing it, and perhaps blaiming it, is not a solution. > >> Is ch

Re: webmail and email from command line

On 14/08/2019 19:02, loredana wrote: > On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 3:00 PM wrote: > >> [...] >> Note that what Google calls there "less secure applications" is just >> marketing mumbo-jumbo to nudge users off their non-browser clients. > I know. But knowing it, and perhaps blaiming it, is not a solu

Re: webmail and email from command line

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 loredana wrote: > On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 3:00 PM wrote: > >> [...] > >> Note that what Google calls there "less secure applications" is just >> marketing mumbo-jumbo to nudge users off their non-browser clients. > > I know. But knowing it, and perh

Re: webmail and email from command line

On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 06:02:01PM +, loredana wrote: > On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 3:00 PM wrote: > > > [...] > > > Note that what Google calls there "less secure applications" is just > > marketing mumbo-jumbo to nudge users off their non-browser clients. > > I know. But knowing it, and perha

Re: webmail and email from command line

On 8/14/2019 8:02 PM, loredana wrote: > On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 3:00 PM wrote: > >> [...] > >> Note that what Google calls there "less secure applications" is just >> marketing mumbo-jumbo to nudge users off their non-browser clients. > > I know. But knowing it, and perhaps blaiming it, is not a s

Re: webmail and email from command line

On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 3:00 PM wrote: > [...] > Note that what Google calls there "less secure applications" is just > marketing mumbo-jumbo to nudge users off their non-browser clients. I know. But knowing it, and perhaps blaiming it, is not a solution. > Is changing mail provider an option

Re: webmail and email from command line

On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 04:24:49PM +, loredana wrote: > Greetings, > > I posted the following message to debian-accessibility and I post it > again suggested. [...] > 'Though I managed to send mail to my gmail account by allowing less > secure applications, this is likely not to be a viable

webmail and email from command line

Greetings, I posted the following message to debian-accessibility and I post it again suggested. Briefly, I am a "long term" debian user (since debian potato) and I am almost but not completely blind. This happened recently, so I am still adapting to the new situation. Please keep this in mind, a

Re: Webmail?

On 02/07/18 00:53, Michelle Konzack wrote: > Am 2018-07-01 hackte Zenaan Harkness in die Tasten: >> And with your self-issued snake oil certs, > > I use "Let's Encrypt"! > > That link doesn't seem to be a good advertisement for how to set up https ... I get an

Re: Webmail?

On Mon, Jul 02, 2018 at 08:02:33PM +0200, Ulf Volmer wrote: On 02.07.2018 14:22, Greg Wooledge wrote: On Sun, Jul 01, 2018 at 05:29:02PM +0200, Ulf Volmer wrote: there is no php5 in debian stretch. She probably upgraded from jessie, in which case the php5 that she had in jessie remained in

Re: Webmail?

On 02.07.2018 14:22, Greg Wooledge wrote: > On Sun, Jul 01, 2018 at 05:29:02PM +0200, Ulf Volmer wrote: >> there is no php5 in debian stretch. > > She probably upgraded from jessie, in which case the php5 that she had > in jessie remained in place after the upgrade to stretch. Yes, agree. And as

Re: Webmail?

On Sun, Jul 01, 2018 at 05:29:02PM +0200, Ulf Volmer wrote: > On 01.07.2018 11:43, Michelle Konzack wrote: > > Oi, I see, I have installed Stretch last year and PHP5 was there. > > No. > > there is no php5 in debian stretch. She probably upgraded from jessie, in which case the php5 that she had

Re: Webmail?

the cert on each device you want to use to access your > > webmail server, from your home network, so that if you eventually > > tunnel in or otherwise access it 'on the road', you have already > > verified your own snake oil cert and a MITM should stand out like > >

Re: Webmail?

On 01.07.2018 11:43, Michelle Konzack wrote: > Oi, I see, I have installed Stretch last year and PHP5 was there. No. > However, it seems the php5 virtualpackage is still in place, > but not the corresponding real package, > which seems to be removed by the Debian Team. there is no php5 in debian

Re: Webmail?

Am 2018-07-01 hackte Zenaan Harkness in die Tasten: > And with your self-issued snake oil certs, I use "Let's Encrypt"! -- Michelle KonzackMiila ITSystems @ TDnet GNU/Linux Developer 00372-54541400

Re: Webmail?

On 01/07/18 21:57, Zenaan Harkness wrote: >> Oh, use https:// and make sure any security is activated in conf.pl. > And with your self-issued snake oil certs, make sure you check and > confirm the cert on each device you want to use to access your > webmail server, from your home n

Re: Webmail?

uld work out of the box. > > Oh, use https:// and make sure any security is activated in conf.pl. And with your self-issued snake oil certs, make sure you check and confirm the cert on each device you want to use to access your webmail server, from your home network, so that if you eventual

Re: Webmail?

Oi, I see, I have installed Stretch last year and PHP5 was there. PHP7 is MOSTLY incompatible with PHP5! However, it seems the php5 virtualpackage is still in place, but not the corresponding real package, which seems to be removed by the Debian Team. Am 2018-07-01 hackte Joe in die Tasten: > On

Re: Webmail?

On Sun, 1 Jul 2018 10:57:53 +0300 "Michelle Konzack" wrote: > Hi Joe, > > I know, I am a little bit late, but I use Squirrelmail since more > then 15 years now and had no problems from Woody to Stretch with it. > > I use it even to access my GMail account :-) because then I have > not to both

Re: Webmail?

On Sun, 1 Jul 2018 11:22:14 +0300 "Michelle Konzack" wrote: > Am DATE hackte AUTHOR in die Tasten: Joe > > No, stretch doesn't have php5. I've already had to go through loads > > of php, replacing stuff which has been deprecated for a while and > > now no longer exists. > > Ehm what? > > Here

Re: Webmail?

Am DATE hackte AUTHOR in die Tasten: Joe > No, stretch doesn't have php5. I've already had to go through loads of > php, replacing stuff which has been deprecated for a while and now no > longer exists. Ehm what? Here php5 is working properly! I run it on all of my servers. You mean there is no

Re: Webmail?

-29 hackte Joe in die Tasten: > Anyone know of a webmail that works on stretch? > > I've just spent half an afternoon trying first roundcube then prayer. > > Roundcube works (allegedly) with apache. I'm not an expert on apache2, > but as far as I can see, there is

Re: Webmail?

On Sat, Jun 30, 2018 at 08:25:41AM +0100, mick crane wrote: > On 2018-06-29 21:04, Joe wrote: > > Anyone know of a webmail that works on stretch? > > > > I've just spent half an afternoon trying first roundcube then prayer. > > been using dovecot, roundcube, get

Re: Webmail?

On Sat, 30 Jun 2018 09:41:01 +0100 mick crane wrote: > On 2018-06-30 08:42, Joe wrote: > > On Sat, 30 Jun 2018 08:25:41 +0100 > > mick crane wrote: > > > >> On 2018-06-29 21:04, Joe wrote: > >> > Anyone know of a webmail that works on stre

Re: Webmail?

On Sat, 30 Jun 2018 09:56:50 +0100 mick crane wrote: > On 2018-06-30 08:42, Joe wrote: > > On Sat, 30 Jun 2018 08:25:41 +0100 > > mick crane wrote: > > > >> On 2018-06-29 21:04, Joe wrote: > >> > Anyone know of a webmail that works on stre

Re: Webmail?

On 2018-06-30 08:42, Joe wrote: On Sat, 30 Jun 2018 08:25:41 +0100 mick crane wrote: On 2018-06-29 21:04, Joe wrote: > Anyone know of a webmail that works on stretch? > > I've just spent half an afternoon trying first roundcube then > prayer. been using dovecot, roundcube,

Re: Webmail?

On 2018-06-30 08:42, Joe wrote: On Sat, 30 Jun 2018 08:25:41 +0100 mick crane wrote: On 2018-06-29 21:04, Joe wrote: > Anyone know of a webmail that works on stretch? > > I've just spent half an afternoon trying first roundcube then > prayer. been using dovecot, roundcube,

Re: Webmail?

On Fri, 29 Jun 2018 23:59:50 +0200 Dominik George wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 09:04:16PM +0100, Joe wrote: > > Anyone know of a webmail that works on stretch? > > > > I've just spent half an afternoon trying first roundcube then > > praye

Re: Webmail?

On Sat, 30 Jun 2018 08:25:41 +0100 mick crane wrote: > On 2018-06-29 21:04, Joe wrote: > > Anyone know of a webmail that works on stretch? > > > > I've just spent half an afternoon trying first roundcube then > > prayer. > > been using dovecot, roundcub

Re: Webmail?

On 2018-06-29 21:04, Joe wrote: Anyone know of a webmail that works on stretch? I've just spent half an afternoon trying first roundcube then prayer. been using dovecot, roundcube, getmail for some time just for home network. getting sieve to work was a chore for me but I'm not ve

Re: Webmail?

On 06/29/2018 04:04 PM, Joe wrote: I've just spent half an afternoon trying first roundcube then prayer. You probably skipped a couple of steps there. Before prayer, I usually go through head banging, hair pulling, troubleshooting, not to mention copious swearing, then maybe some sleep. The s

Re: Webmail?

Hi, On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 09:04:16PM +0100, Joe wrote: > Anyone know of a webmail that works on stretch? > > I've just spent half an afternoon trying first roundcube then prayer. > > Roundcube works (allegedly) with apache. I'm not an expert on apache2, > but as f

Re: Webmail?

o a real > > index.php in the right place. I just get a 404, and I've tried with > > and without a trailing slash and a final index.php. Yes, I've > > restarted apache2, several times, and my other php stuff on the > > server works. > > you disqualify for your

Re: Webmail?

ied with and without a > trailing slash and a final index.php. Yes, I've restarted apache2, > several times, and my other php stuff on the server works. you disqualify for your own question webmail is just an interface and yes you need a web server. It might be not apache, but you must

Webmail?

Anyone know of a webmail that works on stretch? I've just spent half an afternoon trying first roundcube then prayer. Roundcube works (allegedly) with apache. I'm not an expert on apache2, but as far as I can see, there is an apache2.conf existing and enabled for roundcube, and it le

Re: squirrelmail or other webmail?

kept up in more recent Debian >> versions)? Is there some other webmail interface that's being used now? > > #844240 is a primary source for information: > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=844240 Ah, thank you. When I searched the database I didn't t

Re: squirrelmail or other webmail?

recated > > (as one would suspect from it not being kept up in more recent Debian > > versions)? Is there some other webmail interface that's being used now? > > Note that due to some firewall issues over at the client organization I > > can't just use an ldap/smtp ser

Re: squirrelmail or other webmail?

sions)? Is there some other webmail interface that's being used now? > Note that due to some firewall issues over at the client organization I > can't just use an ldap/smtp server and have users use thunderbird or > something; it has to be a webmail interface. Do take a look

Re: squirrelmail or other webmail?

it not being kept up in more recent Debian > > versions)? Is there some other webmail interface that's being used now? > > Squirrelmail is more or less dead. > > The (inofficial) successor would be Roundcube or Rainloop. Roundcube is not bad. Rainloop does not require

Re: squirrelmail or other webmail?

sions)? Is there some other webmail interface that's being used now? #844240 is a primary source for information: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=844240 -- Brian.

Re: squirrelmail or other webmail?

On ter, 30 jan 2018, Joe Pfeiffer wrote: I noticed today that squirrelmail is only in Debian oldstable and oldoldstable. So, I'm curious as to its status -- is it now deprecated (as one would suspect from it not being kept up in more recent Debian versions)? Is there some other we

Re: squirrelmail or other webmail?

Joe Pfeiffer wrote: > I noticed today that squirrelmail is only in Debian oldstable and > oldoldstable. So, I'm curious as to its status -- is it now deprecated > (as one would suspect from it not being kept up in more recent Debian > versions)? Is there some other webmail

Re: squirrelmail or other webmail?

Speaking strictly as a user, I really liked SquirrelMail, when I was on my old ISP (or on the rare occasions when I check my former ISP email), but I utterly despise everything about the "SmarterMail" product that my present ISP uses. (It seems like they chose to emulate almost everything that'

squirrelmail or other webmail?

I noticed today that squirrelmail is only in Debian oldstable and oldoldstable. So, I'm curious as to its status -- is it now deprecated (as one would suspect from it not being kept up in more recent Debian versions)? Is there some other webmail interface that's being used now? Note t

Estimado usuario Webmail

Estimado usuario Webmail Hemos limitado temporalmente el acceso a todas las funciones Susceptibles a todas las cuentas de correo web. Para restaurar su acceso Cuenta, debe responder de inmediato a este correo electrónico con su Nombre de usuario y contraseña. Usuario: Contraseña

Re: Thunderbird's WebMail addon (used together with `-Hotmail' extension of it) download sometimes all the e-mails since some date, even if they have already been retrieved at another period

On Thu,20.May.10, 06:03:13, Phil Requirements wrote: > But then a magical thing happened and Microsoft started having a > POP3 service for hotmail accounts. Was that at about the same time Gmail was launched? >:-) Regards, Andrei -- Offtopic discussions among Debian users and developers: http:

Re: Thunderbird's WebMail addon (used together with `-Hotmail' extension of it) download sometimes all the e-mails since some date, even if they have already been retrieved at another period

On 2010-05-18 22:16:57 +0200, tv.deb...@googlemail.com wrote: > Le 18/05/2010 21:30, Merciadri Luca wrote: > >some add-ons, such as `WebMail'. This add-on lets it fetch your e-mails > >from mail servers only dealing with special protocols (not as POP, IMAP, > >etc

Re: Thunderbird's WebMail addon (used together with `-Hotmail' extension of it) download sometimes all the e-mails since some date, even if they have already been retrieved at another period

tv.deb...@googlemail.com wrote: > Le 18/05/2010 21:30, Merciadri Luca wrote: >> Hi, >> >> As explained in the title, I am using Icedove 2.0.0.22 (20090706) with >> some add-ons, such as `WebMail'. This add-on lets it fetch your e-mails >> from mail servers on

Re: Thunderbird's WebMail addon (used together with `-Hotmail' extension of it) download sometimes all the e-mails since some date, even if they have already been retrieved at another period

Le 18/05/2010 21:30, Merciadri Luca wrote: Hi, As explained in the title, I am using Icedove 2.0.0.22 (20090706) with some add-ons, such as `WebMail'. This add-on lets it fetch your e-mails from mail servers only dealing with special protocols (not as POP, IMAP, etc.). I use it together

Thunderbird's WebMail addon (used together with `-Hotmail' extension of it) download sometimes all the e-mails since some date, even if they have already been retrieved at another period

Hi, As explained in the title, I am using Icedove 2.0.0.22 (20090706) with some add-ons, such as `WebMail'. This add-on lets it fetch your e-mails from mail servers only dealing with special protocols (not as POP, IMAP, etc.). I use it together with `WebMail -Hotmail', that is, t

open source webmail with gnupg support

hello, it seems like none of the better open source webmail interfaces supports gnupg. in particular i like atmail open (www.atmail.org) and roundcube (www.roundcube.net) both have a very nice design. unfortunately only the atmail commercial version has gnupg support, and roundcube is missing

Re: WebMail Interface

On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 07:44:24PM +0800, Rod James Bio wrote: > Weve been using Horde for 2 years now and we are now looking for an > alternative for Horde. Any suggestions? any reason for moving away from horde, I am making the slow move towards horde, especially now that dimp has made it int

RE: WebMail Interface

k at atmail.com, this is a good interface. > > apparently only as a 'teaser' version that lacks pop-, spam- or > maildir-support etc. and does not include a server. [1] > > It's also not included in debian lenny. > > Is it really s much better than what a

Re: WebMail Interface

in debian lenny. Is it really s much better than what apt-cache search webmail spits [2] at you? Johannes [1] http://atmail.org/compare.php [2] like mailreader, prayer, roundcube, squirrelmail, sqwebmail, ... signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: WebMail Interface

Guillaume escribió: Rod James Bio a écrit : Weve been using Horde for 2 years now and we are now looking for an alternative for Horde. Any suggestions? I'm currently using Roundcube. This is a very nice project ! http://roundcube.net/ For me it is a good project too, but I th

Re: WebMail Interface

Rod James Bio a écrit : > Weve been using Horde for 2 years now and we are now looking for an > alternative for Horde. Any suggestions? > > I'm currently using Roundcube. This is a very nice project ! http://roundcube.net/ Guillaume -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subj

Re: WebMail Interface

Nowadays, Atmail is free. look at atmail.com, this is a good interface. 2008/8/20 Rod James Bio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Weve been using Horde for 2 years now and we are now looking for an > alternative for Horde. Any suggestions? > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a > subje

Re: WebMail Interface

Le Mer 20 août 2008 13:44, Rod James Bio a écrit : > Weve been using Horde for 2 years now and we are now looking for an > alternative for Horde. Any suggestions? > Hi, I installed SquirrelMail for my compagny and for myself, it works fine. I might change for RoundCube later, to offer a better in

WebMail Interface

Weve been using Horde for 2 years now and we are now looking for an alternative for Horde. Any suggestions? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Open WebMail Project

On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 07:44:31AM -0800, Account for Debian group mail wrote: > > > Hello, > > Has anyone tried the Open WebMail Project located at: > http://openwebmail.org/ ? > > I'm looking for a new open webmail program to replace the old webmail I'm &g

Re: Open WebMail Project

On Jan 28, 2008, at 7:44 AM, Account for Debian group mail wrote: Has anyone tried the Open WebMail Project located at: http://openwebmail.org/ ? I used it on my personal server for a while. It had a reasonable user interface, and no glaring bugs that I ran into. Attachment handling

Re: Open WebMail Project

Account for Debian group mail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Has anyone tried the Open WebMail Project located at: > http://openwebmail.org/ ? As a user, yes. My old (now defunct) ISP offered it. I thought it was alright. I could stand it when I had to use it, and I imagine Windows

Open WebMail Project

Hello, Has anyone tried the Open WebMail Project located at: http://openwebmail.org/ ? I'm looking for a new open webmail program to replace the old webmail I'm using now on my mail servers. This looks OK from what I have seen on the surface but it does use CGI's instead of PH

Re: thunderbird webmail in etch version issue

On 12/10/2007 07:49 PM, Hugo Wau wrote: > How can I get in Debian my mails from YAHOO into > thunderbird or into a > mailclient, which is compatible with the WIN$$$ > version of thunderbird? I use fetchyahoo to read yahoo mail in icedove (thunderbird) on etch. $ apt-cache show fetchyahoo icedov

thunderbird webmail in etch version issue

I am using ETCH amd64. But I need to get my mails from YAHOO (webmail only) with µ-WIN$$$ thunderbird since the WEBMAIL extension from mozdev.org can not be installed in the thunderbird/maildove/iceape-mailer versions, which are coming with etch. Neither can I update freepops that it delivers

Re: webmail for low-end VPS

John K Masters wrote: > Can anyone recommend a webmail app suitable for a low-end VPS. I already > have Postfix/Courier setup. > > It looks like I have three choices: > 1. Squirrelmail > 2. Roundcube > 3. Imp4/Horde > > I have used squirrelmail before and was not impr

webmail for low-end VPS

Can anyone recommend a webmail app suitable for a low-end VPS. I already have Postfix/Courier setup. It looks like I have three choices: 1. Squirrelmail 2. Roundcube 3. Imp4/Horde I have used squirrelmail before and was not impressed but have heard that Imp4 is resource hungry. That leaves

thunderbird - webmail - hotmail extension permission?

read something about write access, but has not found out where I need it. I first installed the webmail ext. then hotmail and updated. No problem setting it up as root, but as normal user I don't get the option for webmail account when adding new account. Can anyone please help, google was not

Re: Webmail that supports UTF-8

Daniel Nilsson wrote: > Hi All, > > Could anyone recommend a webmail client that works with Cyrus IMAP and > that support both reading and replying to messages in UTF-8? I want > UTF-8 support in both the subject and the body. SqWebMail, fast and reliable component from Courier Ma

  1   2   >