I will reply to both excellent responses. Thank you.
Dan Ritter writes:
> Time to learn the awesome power of Linux.
>
> Three ways to do this:
>
> 1. shell script
>
> Create a text file with the following two lines of code:
>
> #!/bin/sh
> exec microcom -f -p/dev/ttyUSB4 -s9600
>
> Name it s
Hi.
On Tue, Apr 07, 2020 at 08:08:26AM -0500, Martin McCormick wrote:
> Everything seems to work as far as I can tell but what
> does a script look like?
Judging from the source it it should open a text file on your side (i.e.
"x filename") and feed its contents line by line to the
Martin McCormick wrote:
> * x - execute a script
>
> Everything seems to work as far as I can tell but what
> does a script look like?
man runscript
> The unix convention of typing the Up-Arrow and starting
> microcom is very handy since one does not have to type
>
> microcom -f -p
While working with Microcom, I tried the "help" feature while in
command mode and it works but there doesn't seem to be much other
information. Here is a screen shot of a command I sent to a
serially-connected two-way radio followed by the Help screen for
microcom: I put a * in front of the scrip
What do u got in logs ?
Any helpful message ?
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 9:37 AM, Jeff D <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Márcio Luciano Donada wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > Today in the morning when I give a verified in the processes of a given
> > server noticed
Márcio Luciano Donada wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Today in the morning when I give a verified in the processes of a given
server noticed the following procedures for ssh, I found a little
strange as:
root 21274 1.0 0.0 9856 3384 ?Ss 09:14 0:00 sshd:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Today in the morning when I give a verified in the processes of a given
server noticed the following procedures for ssh, I found a little
strange as:
root 21274 1.0 0.0 9856 3384 ?Ss 09:14 0:00 sshd:
unknown [priv]
root 21275
On Sat, Jul 07, 2007 at 12:24:51AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Sun, 17 Jun 2007 13:22:07 -0600, Telly Williams
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> > Florian Kulzer wrote:
> >>
> Did you turn on audit=1 on your grub/lilo command line? If you,
> you should have "avc denied" lines in
On Sun, 17 Jun 2007 13:22:07 -0600, Telly Williams
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Florian Kulzer wrote:
>>
>> I think that depends on how restrictive your SELinux setup is. Can
>> you turn SELinux off and try to install slib again?
>>
>>
> Whoa. I did 'echo 0 >/selinux/enforce' and now everythi
On Sun, Jun 17, 2007 at 13:22:07 -0600, Telly Williams wrote:
> Florian Kulzer wrote:
> >
> >I think that depends on how restrictive your SELinux setup is. Can you
> >turn SELinux off and try to install slib again?
> >
> >
> Whoa. I did 'echo 0 >/selinux/enforce' and now everything works, includ
On 06/17/07 14:22, Telly Williams wrote:
Florian Kulzer wrote:
I think that depends on how restrictive your SELinux setup is. Can you
turn SELinux off and try to install slib again?
Whoa. I did 'echo 0 >/selinux/enforce' and now everything works,
including Open Office. Thanks Florian.
Florian Kulzer wrote:
I think that depends on how restrictive your SELinux setup is. Can you
turn SELinux off and try to install slib again?
Unfortunately, I have to keep SELinux in Permissive Mode in order to use
Open Office. ~Telly
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
Florian Kulzer wrote:
I think that depends on how restrictive your SELinux setup is. Can you
turn SELinux off and try to install slib again?
Whoa. I did 'echo 0 >/selinux/enforce' and now everything works,
including Open Office. Thanks Florian.
I just began using SELinux and trying to u
Christopher Nelson wrote:
I don't see this mentioned in the bug reports.
Are you running stable, testing, or unstable?
What happens if you run an `apt-get -f install`?
Also--I think your openoffice issue is a separate one. What is it
doing? Do you get a splashscreen, then it quits? Does it
On Sun, Jun 17, 2007 at 11:40:38 -0600, Telly Williams wrote:
> Orestes leal wrote:
> >On Sun, 17 Jun 2007 11:21:20 -0600 Telly Williams wrote:
> >
> >your user doesn't have privilegies to do this, do it as root.
> >
> >
> >>Here's what I get:
> >>
> >>[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ su
> >>Password:
> >>ep
On 2007-06-17, Telly Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here's what I get:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ su
> Password:
> ephome:/home/telly# apt-get upgrade
> Reading package lists... Done
> Building dependency tree... Done
> 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
> 3 not ful
On Sunday 17 June 2007 19:21, Telly Williams wrote:
> Here's what I get:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ su
> Password:
> ephome:/home/telly# apt-get upgrade
> Reading package lists... Done
> Building dependency tree... Done
> 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
> 3 not fully in
Orestes leal wrote:
On Sun, 17 Jun 2007 11:21:20 -0600
Telly Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
your user doesn't have privilegies to do this, do it as root.
Here's what I get:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ su
Password:
ephome:/home/telly# apt-get upgrade
Reading package lists... Done
Building dep
On Sun, 17 Jun 2007 11:21:20 -0600
Telly Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
your user doesn't have privilegies to do this, do it as root.
> Here's what I get:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ su
> Password:
> ephome:/home/telly# apt-get upgrade
> Reading package lists... Done
> Building dependency tree
Here's what I get:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ su
Password:
ephome:/home/telly# apt-get upgrade
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
3 not fully installed or removed.
Need to get 0B of archives.
After unpacking 0B o
Kevin Ross wrote:
> I also don't recall having installed gnu-efi. BTW, I do NOT have an
> ia64 system. It's a Pentium 4 2.8 GHz.
Well, it must have been installed somehow. You can check
/var/log/dpkg.log.* to see when it was installed, or look in
/var/log/installer/syslog to check if it was perh
I just did an aptitude update and upgrade today on my Etch system, and
after a few minutes, I get a prompt asking me if I want to automatically
run elilo. Now, the description for elilo is:
Description: Bootloader for systems using EFI-based firmware
This is the Linux bootloader for systems usin
Dnia czwartek, 24 listopada 2005 12:08, Torsten Sadowski napisa¿:
> Hi,
>
> for some time I see several "Ign" when I do apt-get update on my
> Debian testing.
> What does it mean?
> Can I ignore it?
> What can I do about it?
It means that the corresponding Packages is not newer than the one You've
On Thu, Nov 24, 2005 at 12:08:49PM +0100, Torsten Sadowski wrote:
> deb http://non-us.debian.org/debian-non-US stable/non-US main contrib
> non-free
> deb-src http://non-us.debian.org/debian-non-US stable/non-US main
> contrib non-free
These lines are not necessary anymore, as non-us itself isn'
Dnia czwartek, 24 listopada 2005 12:08, Torsten Sadowski napisał:
> Hi,
>
> for some time I see several "Ign" when I do apt-get update on my
> Debian testing.
> What does it mean?
> Can I ignore it?
> What can I do about it?
It means that the corresponding Packages is not newer than the one You've
Hi,
for some time I see several "Ign" when I do apt-get update on my
Debian testing.
What does it mean?
Can I ignore it?
What can I do about it?
Any hints are appreciated.
Torsten
Kapitaen:~# apt-get update
Hole:1 http://non-us.debian.org stable/non-US Release.gpg [197B]
OK http://non-us
On Friday 23 July 2004 04:11 am, Ryo Furue wrote:
> drwx--0 root root0 Jul 17 20:21 autoKVio9R/
> it is. Is it something dangerous? like a symptom of being cracked? I use
> Debian 3.0r2.
I have no idea, but if I ever found something mounted I didn't mount and
didn't k
On Fri, 23 Jul 2004, Tim Connors wrote:
Martin Fluch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said on Fri, 23 Jul 2004 11:41:36 +0300 (EEST):
$ df -k
[...]
/tmp/autol8wP90 37483560 2742148 32837312 8% /tmp/autoKVio9R
$
which I'd never seen before. I'm the sole user and the admin of the machine.
Looks l
Martin Fluch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said on Fri, 23 Jul 2004 11:41:36 +0300 (EEST):
> On Fri, 23 Jul 2004, Ryo Furue wrote:
>
> > Hello all,
> >
> > I recently found the following:
> > $ df -k
> > [...]
> > /tmp/autol8wP90 37483560 2742148 32837312 8% /tmp/autoKVio9R
> > $
> > which I'
Looks like something KDE related. Did you access some mountable media with
Konqueror?
- Martin
On Fri, 23 Jul 2004, Ryo Furue wrote:
Hello all,
I recently found the following:
$ df -k
[...]
/tmp/autol8wP90 37483560 2742148 32837312 8% /tmp/autoKVio9R
$
which I'd never seen before.
Hello all,
I recently found the following:
$ df -k
[...]
/tmp/autol8wP90 37483560 2742148 32837312 8% /tmp/autoKVio9R
$
which I'd never seen before. I'm the sole user and the admin of the machine.
Also,
$ ls -lF /tmp
total 28
drwx--0 root root0 Jul
Folks--
Recently I've been noticing apache log entries like the following:
218.94.83.20 - - [14/Aug/2003:22:47:01 -0400] "GET
http://www.intel.com/ HTTP/1.1" 200 1357
What's going on here? That's a pretty strange file path for my server.
It looks like an attempt to use my server as an HTTP r
F0129254A 3320 Wed Aug 13 01:54:59
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(temporary failure)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
My maile server queue have 355 of this message,but I can not receive these in
my mail-client.
This
i get this daily in my cron reports--and i'm not sure where to
fix it (or if it needs fixing):
/etc/cron.daily/exim:
failed to open DB file /var/spool/exim/db/retry: Invalid argument
failed to open DB file /var/spool/exim/db/wait-remote_smtp: Invalid argument
run-pa
on Wed, Apr 10, 2002, Paul 'Baloo' Johnson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Apr 2002, Karsten M. Self wrote:
>
> > Ricochet: http://vipul.net/ricochet/ Automated spam responder, parses
> > headers for ISP, relays, etc.
>
> Got deb?
No. It's largely a perl script. Download and stow in
On Wed, 10 Apr 2002, Karsten M. Self wrote:
> Ricochet: http://vipul.net/ricochet/ Automated spam responder, parses
> headers for ISP, relays, etc.
Got deb?
--
Baloo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
begin dman quotation:
>
> with razor). It's not a problem, though. Who would ever send you a
> message that had _nothing_ but ms-tnef content? If it is their
Someone using Word as their email editor, perhaps? I can't test this, I
don't use Lookout.
The one time I received mail that the send
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 12:52:18PM -0400, Shawn McMahon wrote:
| begin Karsten M. Self quotation:
| >
| > Ricochet: http://vipul.net/ricochet/ Automated spam responder, parses
| > headers for ISP, relays, etc.
|
| I don't think reporting all ms-tnef email automatically as spam is a
| good idea
on Wed, Apr 10, 2002, Karsten M. Self (kmself@ix.netcom.com) wrote:
> on Wed, Apr 10, 2002, Shawn McMahon ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > begin Karsten M. Self quotation:
> > ...and he forgets and sends it via ms-tnef format, he is NOT sending
> > you unsolicited commercial email, and reporting tha
on Wed, Apr 10, 2002, Shawn McMahon ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> begin Karsten M. Self quotation:
> >
> > If you don't want to fink on your Uncle Louie, then filter separately.
>
> You have a filter that will accommodate every person you know now or
> may meet in the future, even if they don't h
begin Karsten M. Self quotation:
>
> Ricochet: http://vipul.net/ricochet/ Automated spam responder, parses
> headers for ISP, relays, etc.
I don't think reporting all ms-tnef email automatically as spam is a
good idea.
What if it's not spam?
And don't give me the "nobody I want to talk to us
on Tue, Apr 09, 2002, Shawn McMahon ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> begin Paul 'Baloo' Johnson quotation:
> >
> > How do you do this?
>
> This is ugly, but:
>
>
> :0
> * ^Content-Type:.application/ms-tnef*
> * !^X-Loop: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mine's a bit more to the point:
# Microsoft tnef docs
On Tue, 9 Apr 2002, Shawn McMahon wrote:
> Feel free to substitute wording of less or more civility, but remember;
> no amount of profanity will educate someone who thinks Lookout is an
> Internet mailer.
Thank you!
--
Baloo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "u
begin Paul 'Baloo' Johnson quotation:
>
> How do you do this?
This is ugly, but:
:0
* ^Content-Type:.application/ms-tnef*
* !^X-Loop: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| (formail -rk -i "From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]" -A "X-Loop: [EMAIL PROTECTED]";\
echo "Your email was sent in a format that is only readable by Ou
On Mon, 8 Apr 2002, Shawn McMahon wrote:
> My response was to set up a procmail filter to auto-bounce
> "application/ms-tnef".
How do you do this?
--
Baloo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 02:45:08PM -0500, dman wrote:
| I just added this to my filter :
| logwrite "M$ Lookout read receipt =p"
This will fail. Instead use this line :
logwrite "M\\$ Lookout read receipt =p"
-D
--
If we claim to be without sin, we deceive ourselves an
begin quoting what Karsten M. Self said on Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 10:16:07AM
-0700:
>
> My response has been to tell [EMAIL PROTECTED] to fix their
> autoresponder, and to suggest to [EMAIL PROTECTED] that the user be
> unsubscribed from all Debian mailing lists. This post is fair notice to
> any
On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 10:16:07AM -0700, Karsten M. Self wrote:
| on Mon, Apr 08, 2002, Eileen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
|
|
|
| This appears to be an autoresponse generated by MS Exchange. I've seen
| it on several lists in the past week. Must be a new service pack.
|
| Trustworthy computi
on Mon, Apr 08, 2002, Eileen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
This appears to be an autoresponse generated by MS Exchange. I've seen
it on several lists in the past week. Must be a new service pack.
Trustworthy computing. Not.
My response has been to tell [EMAIL PROTECTED] to fix their
autorespo
On Thu, Sep 30, 1999 at 04:01:10PM +0200, Patrik Magnusson wrote:
> This has been popping up for a couple of days now. Anyone know
> what it means?
> Sep 27 15:58:10 pedgr634 identd[26739]: started
> Sep 27 15:58:10 pedgr634 identd[26746]: request_thread: read(10, ..., 1023)
> failed: Connection
This has been popping up for a couple of days now. Anyone know
what it means?
Sep 27 15:58:10 pedgr634 identd[26739]: started
Sep 27 15:58:10 pedgr634 identd[26746]: request_thread: read
wog [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sendt:14. august 1999 23:44
> Til: debian-user list
> Cc: recipient list not shown
> Emne: RE: What's this about E-Mail support
>
>
> On 14-Aug-99 Julian S. Taylor wrote:
> > Salutations,
> >
> > I've been de
On Sat, Aug 14, 1999 at 02:46:45PM +, Julian S. Taylor wrote:
> Pollywog wrote:
>
> > On 14-Aug-99 Julian S. Taylor wrote:
> > > Salutations,
> > >
> > > I've been dead in the water for weeks now. I'm busy and I don't have
> > > time to hack into the Debian drivers. I bought the official Debia
On 14-Aug-99 Julian S. Taylor wrote:
>
> When you buy the full Debian release (through Linux Press I think), one
> of the
> promised services is "30 days of free E-Mail support". It said it in the
> ad and it
> says it on the manual but there's no E-Mail address listed anywhere.
>
Try e-mailing
On Sat, 14 Aug 1999, Julian S. Taylor wrote:
> Pollywog wrote:
>
> > On 14-Aug-99 Julian S. Taylor wrote:
> > > Salutations,
> > > I've been dead in the water for weeks now. I'm busy and I
> > > don't have time to hack into the Debian drivers. I bought the
> > > official Debian release and regi
Pollywog wrote:
> On 14-Aug-99 Julian S. Taylor wrote:
> > Salutations,
> >
> > I've been dead in the water for weeks now. I'm busy and I don't have
> > time to hack into the Debian drivers. I bought the official Debian
> > release and registered it by snail mail. I was expecting to get back an
>
On 14-Aug-99 Julian S. Taylor wrote:
> Salutations,
>
> I've been dead in the water for weeks now. I'm busy and I don't have
> time to hack into the Debian drivers. I bought the official Debian
> release and registered it by snail mail. I was expecting to get back an
> E-Mail address for the prom
Salutations,
I've been dead in the water for weeks now. I'm busy and I don't have
time to hack into the Debian drivers. I bought the official Debian
release and registered it by snail mail. I was expecting to get back an
E-Mail address for the promised 30 days of E-Mail support - never
happened. H
I've found this in my mailbox today:
gusp.infogroup.it : Apr 1 10:10:10 : root : preposterous stampfile date;
TTY=tty12 ; PWD=/home/jnos ; USER=jnos ; COMMAND=/home/jnos/jnos -f
/home/jnos/etc/nos.cfg -C -g2
What does it mean?
What package does generate it?
User jnos is a fictitious user f
Alexander Gieg wrote:
>
> Hi.
>
> Some time ago, I sent a message asking someone what
> are the PEX and XIE extensions for X Windows, but don't
> received any reply. I don't found the answer in X
> documentation, and loading or not these modules doesn't
> seem to make difference in X jobs. What's
Hi.
Some time ago, I sent a message asking someone what
are the PEX and XIE extensions for X Windows, but don't
received any reply. I don't found the answer in X
documentation, and loading or not these modules doesn't
seem to make difference in X jobs. What's the utility for
them?
Thanks in advan
61 matches
Mail list logo
