Re: What is happening with Debian 1.2

1996-12-01 Thread Boris D. Beletsky
Hi Cinege, You wrote: Cinege> Hey genius's! *WHY* don't you just put both 3.1 AND 3.2 in, Cinege> and make your concerns clear in the docs? The 3.1 deb is Cinege> done, and the 3.2 deb will have to be done anyway, so what's a Cinege> few more megs out of that CDR ? Yeah, why not stop fixing bu

Re: What is happening with Debian 1.2

1996-12-01 Thread Wayne Schlitt
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dave Cinege) writes: > > Hey genius's! *WHY* don't you just put both 3.1 AND 3.2 in, and make your > concerns clear in the docs? That was one of the options that was discussed. To find out all the reasons why it was ruled out, go read the debian-devel

Re: What is happening with Debian 1.2

1996-11-30 Thread Dave Cinege
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bruce Perens) writes: >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Hasler) >> I agree. What the hell is going on? I intended to upgrade, and install >> Debian on my old machine as soon as 1.2 came out. Now I think I'll wait. > >It's not a big deal. We had some argume

What is happening with Debian 1.2

1996-11-30 Thread Bruce Perens
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Hasler) > I agree. What the hell is going on? I intended to upgrade, and install > Debian on my old machine as soon as 1.2 came out. Now I think I'll wait. It's not a big deal. We had some argument about what belonged in the release, and as a consequence I decided