Hi Cinege, You wrote:
Cinege> Hey genius's! *WHY* don't you just put both 3.1 AND 3.2 in,
Cinege> and make your concerns clear in the docs? The 3.1 deb is
Cinege> done, and the 3.2 deb will have to be done anyway, so what's a
Cinege> few more megs out of that CDR ?
Yeah, why not stop fixing bu
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dave Cinege) writes:
>
> Hey genius's! *WHY* don't you just put both 3.1 AND 3.2 in, and make your
> concerns clear in the docs?
That was one of the options that was discussed. To find out all the
reasons why it was ruled out, go read the debian-devel
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bruce Perens) writes:
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Hasler)
>> I agree. What the hell is going on? I intended to upgrade, and install
>> Debian on my old machine as soon as 1.2 came out. Now I think I'll wait.
>
>It's not a big deal. We had some argume
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Hasler)
> I agree. What the hell is going on? I intended to upgrade, and install
> Debian on my old machine as soon as 1.2 came out. Now I think I'll wait.
It's not a big deal. We had some argument about what belonged in the release,
and as a consequence I decided
4 matches
Mail list logo