On Mon, 19 Dec 2005 17:02:47 +0100 (MET)
Szakacsits Szabolcs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 19 Dec 2005, Andrei Popescu wrote:
>
> > Is NTFS support safe to use for writing?
>
> It depends on what NTFS implementation you use. There are almost a dozen
> different one which people greatl
On Mon, 19 Dec 2005, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> Is NTFS support safe to use for writing?
It depends on what NTFS implementation you use. There are almost a dozen
different one which people greatly confuse and they often credit one's
faults to an unrelated one.
If you use the one from the open sou
On Sat, 17 Dec 2005 21:11:04 +0200 (MET DST)
Szakacsits Szabolcs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (William Ballard) writes:
>
> > You can't mount a [ntfsclone] image that has been saved with
> > --save-image.
>
> If you want a compressed and mountable image then use ntfsclone wi
On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 10:11:19PM -0500, William Ballard wrote:
> I'll find you the reference and quote it.
It's in the readme. However, you're right, it doesn't say "after running any
of these
utilities." It says:
NtfsFix - Attempt to fix an NTFS partition that has been damaged by the old
L
On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 09:11:04PM +0200, Szakacsits Szabolcs wrote:
> This was NEVER in the ntfsfix manual page, your claim is absolutely untrue.
You're right; it's not in the man page. If I had read only that man page I
wouldn't
have made that statement. I never installed ntfsprogs before a
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William Ballard) writes:
> You can't mount a [ntfsclone] image that has been saved with
> --save-image.
If you want a compressed and mountable image then use ntfsclone without the
--save-image option and with a compressed filesystem.
> I tried ntfsclone and it works about as
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William Ballard) writes:
> On Fri, Dec 16, 2005 at 12:48:07AM +0100, Paul Seelig wrote:
> > For ntfs partitions, i prefer the more mature ntfs support of the
> > ntfsprogs and the added benefit of loop mounting an NTFS image file.
>
> You can't mount an image that has been save
On Fri, Dec 16, 2005 at 12:48:07AM +0100, Paul Seelig wrote:
> For ntfs partitions, i prefer the more mature ntfs support of the
> ntfsprogs and the added benefit of loop mounting an NTFS image file.
> BTW, to save an image via network one can use whatever the pipe
> permits. Here are some samples
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Martijn Marsman) writes:
> There is also Ghost4linux (not the real Norton stuff)
>
> and i must say, it works great ! :D
>
> ghost multiple clients on a network, via ftp! try it out!
>
> http://freshmeat.net/projects/g4l/
>
I downloaded it, bootet it and what did i end up wi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ("Joseph H. Fry") writes:
> Can you configure ntfsclone to clone an NTFS partition but not include the
> swap file or other files of your choice?
>
I don't know because i never bothered... ;-)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe".
On Thursday 15 December 2005 11:43 am, Jon Dowland wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 15, 2005 at 11:20:50AM -0500, Joseph H. Fry wrote:
> > I dream of the day that windows will use swap partition instead of a
> > swap file sure it made sense to have a swap file that could adjust
> > on the fly when drives w
On Thu, Dec 15, 2005 at 11:20:50AM -0500, Joseph H. Fry wrote:
> I dream of the day that windows will use swap partition instead of a
> swap file sure it made sense to have a swap file that could adjust
> on the fly when drives were small... but with most machines having
> 40GB + these days I c
On Thursday 15 December 2005 9:01 am, Paul Seelig wrote:
> I largely prefer ntfsclone from the ntfsprogs package over partimage.
> Partimage is nice but the command line based ntfsclone is far more
> flexible. Just check out the man page for some usage examples.
...
> The ntfsprogs package contain
On 12/15/05, Arafangion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thursday 15 December 2005 13:25, William Ballard wrote:
> > I literally would be unable to use Microsoft Windows if I couldn't stay
> > mostly booted in Debian and manage that godawfulness with partimage.
> >
> > Every time I boot into it I re
Erhm well :D
There is also Ghost4linux (not the real Norton stuff)
and i must say, it works great ! :D
ghost multiple clients on a network, via ftp! try it out!
http://freshmeat.net/projects/g4l/
Met vriendelijke groet / With kind regards,
Martijn Marsman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
System Enginee
On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 09:25:35PM -0500, William Ballard wrote:
>
> Are there other tools that work like Ghost but in Linux? Partimage is
> great.
>
I largely prefer ntfsclone from the ntfsprogs package over partimage.
Partimage is nice but the command line based ntfsclone is far more
flexible
Am Mittwoch, den 14.12.2005, 21:25 -0500 schrieb William Ballard:
> Are there other tools that work like Ghost but in Linux? Partimage is
> great.
Maybe ntfsclone (part of the ntfsprogs Package) could be of use.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". T
William Ballard wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 10:22:55PM -0500, Marty wrote:
>
>>*What prompts this remark is an industrial application I heard about, where
>>a large number of identically configured systems used "ghost" (or similar
>>tool)
>>to reinstall a pristine copy of XP each time the sy
On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 10:22:55PM -0500, Marty wrote:
> *What prompts this remark is an industrial application I heard about, where
> a large number of identically configured systems used "ghost" (or similar
> tool)
> to reinstall a pristine copy of XP each time the systems were booted, i.e.
> a
William Ballard wrote:
I literally would be unable to use Microsoft Windows if I couldn't stay
mostly booted in Debian and manage that godawfulness with partimage.
Every time I boot into it I restore a clean partimage of XP, let it puke
all over itself, then restore the cleanness.
It's the o
On Thursday 15 December 2005 13:25, William Ballard wrote:
> I literally would be unable to use Microsoft Windows if I couldn't stay
> mostly booted in Debian and manage that godawfulness with partimage.
>
> Every time I boot into it I restore a clean partimage of XP, let it puke
> all over itself,
I literally would be unable to use Microsoft Windows if I couldn't stay
mostly booted in Debian and manage that godawfulness with partimage.
Every time I boot into it I restore a clean partimage of XP, let it puke
all over itself, then restore the cleanness.
It's the only thing that makes patch
22 matches
Mail list logo