On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 08:15:53PM -0700, Kevin Buhr wrote:
> Bill Moseley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > I'm curious why I'm getting so many of these viruses sent to me. On
> > various technical lists I've read of lots of people that are getting
> > hammered by the mail, too.
>
> At least o
ScruLoose said:
> On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 09:33:56PM -0400, ScruLoose wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 03:54:08PM -0600, Monique Y. Herman wrote:
>> >
>> > I've heard that using html encoding for the @ symbol on webpages will
>> > reduce harvesting ... it still shows up properly in mail clients w
On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 09:33:56PM -0400, ScruLoose wrote:
> I have a mailto using a little Javascript that I got here:
> http://innerpeace.org/escrambler.shtml
> which works beautifully, though only for people who have JavaScript
> enabled on their browser. I have my address published on my webs
On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 09:33:56PM -0400, ScruLoose wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 03:54:08PM -0600, Monique Y. Herman wrote:
> >
> > I've heard that using html encoding for the @ symbol on webpages will
> > reduce harvesting ... it still shows up properly in mail clients when
> > the user clicks
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 03:54:08PM -0600, Monique Y. Herman wrote:
> On Monday, September 22 at 4:42 pm, Jeff Elkins penned the following:
> >
> >Nor has mine. But my wife does not do listservs or webforums. Nor does
> >she publish her email, as I have at http://www.lewrockwell.com
> >
> >It's a
On Monday, September 22 at 4:42 pm, Jeff Elkins penned the following:
Nor has mine. But my wife does not do listservs or webforums. Nor does she
publish her email, as I have at http://www.lewrockwell.com
It's a price you pay for being public...
Jeff
I've heard that using html encoding for the
On Monday 22 September 2003 3:43 pm, Ron Johnson wrote:
>My wife uses Linux, but hasn't (yet?) gotten any swen attachments.
Nor has mine. But my wife does not do listservs or webforums. Nor does she
publish her email, as I have at http://www.lewrockwell.com
It's a price you pay for being public.
El domingo, 21 de septiembre de 2003, a las 21:04, Pigeon escribe:
> Me too. Especially as most spam I get has got my address from
> debian-user or other Linux lists, and I've been getting a lot less
> "ordinary" spam since swen started up.
I am receiving also these emails to an account subscribed
El lunes, 22 de septiembre de 2003, a las 09:44, Elie De Brauwer escribe:
> my girlfriends email accounts gets nothing
Give me your girlfriend's email address, and I will see what I can
do... :o)
Regards, Ismael
--
"Tout fourmille de commentaries; d'autheurs il en est grande cherté"
signature.
On Mon, 2003-09-22 at 05:41, Stefan Waidele jun. wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 10:03:41AM +0100, Clive Menzies wrote:
> >
> >
> >>I've just received one with what looks like all the debian-powerpc list
> >>addresses in the "To" header. So it does look as though th
On Mon, 2003-09-22 at 07:51, Elie De Brauwer wrote:
> On Monday 22 September 2003 12:41, Stefan Waidele jun. wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 10:03:41AM +0100, Clive Menzies wrote:
> > >>I've just received one with what looks like all the debian-powerpc list
> > >>a
On Monday 22 September 2003 12:41, Stefan Waidele jun. wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 10:03:41AM +0100, Clive Menzies wrote:
> >>I've just received one with what looks like all the debian-powerpc list
> >>addresses in the "To" header. So it does look as though they a
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 10:03:41AM +0100, Clive Menzies wrote:
I've just received one with what looks like all the debian-powerpc list
addresses in the "To" header. So it does look as though they are
harvesting the Debian lists.
[...]
To be cynical, a Windows virus would
On Monday 22 September 2003 07:19, cr wrote:
> On Monday 22 September 2003 02:42, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 10:03:41AM +0100, Clive Menzies wrote:
> > > I've just received one with what looks like all the debian-powerpc list
> > > addresses in the "To" header. So it does
On Sun, 2003-09-21 at 09:42, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 10:03:41AM +0100, Clive Menzies wrote:
[snip]
> My wife wants to know *why* people write viruses...
For the same reason punks (not Punks) throw rocks off of highway
overpasses.
--
On Monday 22 September 2003 02:42, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 10:03:41AM +0100, Clive Menzies wrote:
> > I've just received one with what looks like all the debian-powerpc list
> > addresses in the "To" header. So it does look as though they are
> > harvesting the Debian li
Kevin Buhr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> At least one technical description of Swen (which I can no longer
> find) states that [ . . . ]
Found the reference. See:
http://www.f-secure.com/v-descs/swen.shtml
under the heading "Spreading in e-mails and to newsgroups", second
paragraph.
Bill Moseley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> I'm curious why I'm getting so many of these viruses sent to me. On
> various technical lists I've read of lots of people that are getting
> hammered by the mail, too.
At least one technical description of Swen (which I can no longer
find) states that,
On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 09:43:01AM -0400, Chad M Stewart wrote:
>
> I also wonder if some of the zombies that spammers use to blast out
> msgs might have been compromised by this virus as well.
Me too. Especially as most spam I get has got my address from
debian-user or other Linux lists, and I'
On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 10:03:41AM +0100, Clive Menzies wrote:
> I've just received one with what looks like all the debian-powerpc list
> addresses in the "To" header. So it does look as though they are
> harvesting the Debian lists.
Mine have had mostly a single To: address.
The virus descrip
I'm finding similar things here. I've had my domain a number of years
and this is the first time I've been affected by an M$ email worm.
Usually I sit back and laugh, but not this time. I'm new to the
debian-* lists and recently posted for the first time. All of the
copies of the virus have
El domingo, 21 de septiembre de 2003, a las 13:50, Colin Watson escribe:
> With the odd exception, virus developers generally don't seem to be
> particularly competent. They usually just tweak other people's recipes
> and add a dash of malice.
This reminds me of my .procmailrc. ;)
Regards, Ismael
On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 11:43:30AM +0200, Ismael Valladolid Torres wrote:
> El s?bado, 20 de septiembre de 2003, a las 21:17, Ron Johnson escribe:
> > Because billg and his minions are Evil, focusing on money to the
> > detriment of technical competence.
>
> Funny that virus developers are so comp
On Sun, 2003-09-21 at 04:43, Ismael Valladolid Torres wrote:
> El sábado, 20 de septiembre de 2003, a las 21:17, Ron Johnson escribe:
> > Because billg and his minions are Evil, focusing on money to the
> > detriment of technical competence.
>
> Funny that virus developers are so competent, using
El sábado, 20 de septiembre de 2003, a las 21:17, Ron Johnson escribe:
> Because billg and his minions are Evil, focusing on money to the
> detriment of technical competence.
Funny that virus developers are so competent, using such an
uncompetent platform.
Regards, Ismael
--
"Tout fourmille de c
On (21/09/03 00:13), Greg Folkert wrote:
> Subject: Re: Why such volume with W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> From: Greg Folkert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: DebianUser list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2003 00:13:46 -0400
>
> On Sat, 2003-09-20 at 21:49, Bill Moseley wrote:
> > I'm curious why I'm
On Sat, Sep 20, 2003 at 06:49:18PM -0700, Bill Moseley wrote:
> I'm curious why I'm getting so many of these viruses sent to me. On
> various technical lists I've read of lots of people that are getting
> hammered by the mail, too.
>
> From the descriptions I've read of W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED] it m
On Sat, 2003-09-20 at 21:49, Bill Moseley wrote:
> I'm curious why I'm getting so many of these viruses sent to me. On
> various technical lists I've read of lots of people that are getting
> hammered by the mail, too.
>
> >From the descriptions I've read of W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED] it mails itself
On Sat, Sep 20, 2003 at 11:11:54PM -0400, Carl Fink wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 20, 2003 at 06:49:18PM -0700, Bill Moseley wrote:
>
> > >From the descriptions I've read of W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED] it mails itself to
> > "recipients extracted from the victim machine", yet I'm seeing so many
> > of these to
On Sat, Sep 20, 2003 at 06:49:18PM -0700, Bill Moseley wrote:
> >From the descriptions I've read of W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED] it mails itself to
> "recipients extracted from the victim machine", yet I'm seeing so many
> of these to my personal email address alone that I can't believe my
> address i
On Sat, 2003-09-20 at 20:49, Bill Moseley wrote:
> I'm curious why I'm getting so many of these viruses sent to me.
Because billg and his minions are Evil, focusing on money to the
detriment of technical competence.
With their lock on OEMs, if MS had focused even a little bit on
security, Linux w
I'm curious why I'm getting so many of these viruses sent to me. On
various technical lists I've read of lots of people that are getting
hammered by the mail, too.
>From the descriptions I've read of W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED] it mails itself to
"recipients extracted from the victim machine", yet I'm
32 matches
Mail list logo
