On Tue, 2004-12-14 at 18:49 -0500, Johan Kullstam wrote:
Hanspeter Kunz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi Johan,
I am using the radeon driver supplied with xfree86 4.3 in debian/sid.
I can set the display to 1400x1050 but there is a band about an inch
or so (roughly 100-200 pixels in
On Sun, 2004-12-12 at 17:08 +, Thomas Adam wrote:
--- Johan Kullstam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
for it. Look up debian and ibm thinkpad t42 2378fvu sometime.
I find it more interesting that because of the Xorg/XFree86 issue, more
and more people are saying that they *do* need Xorg,
Hi Johan,
I am using the radeon driver supplied with xfree86 4.3 in debian/sid.
I can set the display to 1400x1050 but there is a band about an inch
or so (roughly 100-200 pixels in width) along the rightmost edge where
the picture is distorted by odd shadings.
On my Sony Z1, radeon card,
Hanspeter Kunz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi Johan,
I am using the radeon driver supplied with xfree86 4.3 in debian/sid.
I can set the display to 1400x1050 but there is a band about an inch
or so (roughly 100-200 pixels in width) along the rightmost edge where
the picture is distorted
Johan Kullstam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(uppercase drivel deleted).
You didn't state that you tested with XFree86 4.4 - which is the appropriate
comparison. Comparing with 4.3 is not.
--
Thomas E. Dickey
http://invisible-island.net
ftp://invisible-island.net
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Mon, 2004-12-13 at 12:59 +, Thomas Dickey wrote:
Johan Kullstam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(uppercase drivel deleted).
Maybe you should spend more time reading such drivel and less time
spewing drivel, eh?
You didn't state that you tested with XFree86 4.4 - which is the appropriate
Steve Lamb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--=-yzVPeN7Rs2DZ/D3emZNd
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Mon, 2004-12-13 at 12:59 +, Thomas Dickey wrote:
Johan Kullstam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(uppercase drivel deleted).
Maybe you should spend more
On Mon, 13 Dec 2004 15:21:00 -, Thomas Dickey
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Steve Lamb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--=-yzVPeN7Rs2DZ/D3emZNd
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Mon, 2004-12-13 at 12:59 +, Thomas Dickey wrote:
Johan Kullstam [EMAIL
At 12 Dec 2004 16:08:07 -0500,
Johan Kullstam wrote:
Thomas Adam [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
--- Johan Kullstam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
for it. Look up debian and ibm thinkpad t42 2378fvu sometime.
I find it more interesting that because of the Xorg/XFree86 issue, more
and more
Micha Feigin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
At 12 Dec 2004 16:08:07 -0500,
Johan Kullstam wrote:
Thomas Adam [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
--- Johan Kullstam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
for it. Look up debian and ibm thinkpad t42 2378fvu sometime.
I find it more interesting that
Jon Dowland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why don't you both take this off-list and save us dusting off our killfiles?
actually I only saw that spew as I was looking for bug reports.
My regards to the slashdotters.
--
Thomas E. Dickey
http://invisible-island.net
ftp://invisible-island.net
--
To
At Mon, 13 Dec 2004 05:53:03 -0800,
Steve Lamb wrote:
[1 text/plain (quoted-printable)]
On Mon, 2004-12-13 at 12:59 +, Thomas Dickey wrote:
Johan Kullstam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(uppercase drivel deleted).
Maybe you should spend more time reading such drivel and less time
On Monday 13 December 2004 05:35 pm, Thomas Dickey wrote:
actually I only saw that spew as I was looking for bug reports.
My regards to the slashdotters.
I hate to ask, but: what spew?
--
Kirk Strauser
pgpi1u2QudRV0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Vin Jacob wrote:
On Sat, Dec 11, 2004 at 08:49:44AM -0800, James Vahn wrote:
I'm wondering if it supports the ATI IGP 340M on my laptop (hp ze5607wm)
because XFree86 has no DRI on that chip. Must be going blind, I can't find
any chipset support info at x.org...
Yes, I have the same card,
--- Johan Kullstam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
for it. Look up debian and ibm thinkpad t42 2378fvu sometime.
I find it more interesting that because of the Xorg/XFree86 issue, more
and more people are saying that they *do* need Xorg, just because it is
available. I bet you, you'd have made do
Thomas Adam [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
--- Johan Kullstam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
for it. Look up debian and ibm thinkpad t42 2378fvu sometime.
I find it more interesting that because of the Xorg/XFree86 issue, more
and more people are saying that they *do* need Xorg, just because it is
On Sun, Dec 12, 2004 at 10:01:09AM -0800, James Vahn wrote:
Vin Jacob wrote:
On Sat, Dec 11, 2004 at 08:49:44AM -0800, James Vahn wrote:
I'm wondering if it supports the ATI IGP 340M on my laptop (hp ze5607wm)
because XFree86 has no DRI on that chip. Must be going blind, I can't find
any
Vin Jacob wrote:
I am running a custom compiled 2.6.9, with CONFIG_DRM=y and
CONFIG_DRM_RADEON=y that could be why it just worked. The kernel config is
at http://gpoppy.org/config-2.6.9drm and the xorg.conf at
http://gpoppy.org/xorg.conf
Custom 2.6.9 kernel here too. glxgears shows this:
Jon Dowland wrote:
I see a lot of discussion about packaging and which distro it may end up
in but nothing about why you might want to use X.org instead of XFree :)
I'm wondering if it supports the ATI IGP 340M on my laptop (hp ze5607wm)
because XFree86 has no DRI on that chip. Must be going
On Sat, Dec 11, 2004 at 08:49:44AM -0800, James Vahn wrote:
Jon Dowland wrote:
I see a lot of discussion about packaging and which distro it may end up
in but nothing about why you might want to use X.org instead of XFree :)
I'm wondering if it supports the ATI IGP 340M on my laptop (hp
Marc Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 07:51:47PM +0100, Roelof Wobben wrote:
Is X.org better than Xfree ??
No. It's different. Someday it may be better, for some values of
better, but not yet.
Does someone has X.org getting on work with debian Sarge ??
Xorg
On Thu, Dec 09, 2004 at 07:40:53PM +0200, Micha Feigin wrote:
The three points I know of why X.Org is better:
2. X.Org has real transparency support (I think its called
translucency in this context).
Eeww..
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
On Fri, 2004-12-10 at 10:05 +, Jon Dowland wrote:
On Thu, Dec 09, 2004 at 07:40:53PM +0200, Micha Feigin wrote:
The three points I know of why X.Org is better:
2. X.Org has real transparency support (I think its called
translucency in this context).
Eeww..
They aren't
On Fri, 2004-12-10 at 11:27 +, Jon Dowland wrote:
Ron Johnson wrote:
On Fri, 2004-12-10 at 10:05 +, Jon Dowland wrote:
On Thu, Dec 09, 2004 at 07:40:53PM +0200, Micha Feigin wrote:
The three points I know of why X.Org is better:
2. X.Org has real transparency
On Thu, 2004-12-09 at 16:32 -0500, Carl Fink wrote:
On Thu, Dec 09, 2004 at 06:02:41PM +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
... which is annoying since this means that some new machines are
not supported by the official Debian release.
I've already posted my Debian should release far more often
On Thursday 09 December 2004 07:48 am, Raymond A. Meijer wrote:
On Thu 9 December 2004 14:15, Vinu Jacob wrote:
Anxiously awaiting inclusion of xorg to sid. (Hence awaiting a sarge
release as well ;-/)
You could also use the packages from Ubuntu Linux.
I added these lines to
Ron Johnson wrote:
On Fri, 2004-12-10 at 10:05 +, Jon Dowland wrote:
On Thu, Dec 09, 2004 at 07:40:53PM +0200, Micha Feigin wrote:
The three points I know of why X.Org is better:
2. X.Org has real transparency support (I think its called
translucency in this context).
Eeww..
On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 10:42:34PM -0800, Marc Wilson wrote:
Xorg will wait until Sarge+1 (namely, Etch). You don't need it anyway.
Based on precedent, someone will in fact package Xorg for Sarge, but it
won't be part of the official release.
--
Carl Fink [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Carl Fink wrote:
On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 10:42:34PM -0800, Marc Wilson wrote:
Based on precedent, someone will in fact package Xorg for Sarge, but it
won't be part of the official release.
Will? Has. Search for xorg on apt-get.org. ;)
--
Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm
On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 07:51:47PM +0100, Roelof Wobben wrote:
Hello,
I heard a lot about X.org en thatin some distro's X.org wil replace Xfree.
Is X.org better than Xfree ??
Does someone has X.org getting on work with debian Sarge ??
I see a lot of discussion about packaging and which
On Thu, 2004-12-09 at 02:27 -0800, Steve Lamb wrote:
Carl Fink wrote:
On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 10:42:34PM -0800, Marc Wilson wrote:
Based on precedent, someone will in fact package Xorg for Sarge, but it
won't be part of the official release.
Will? Has. Search for xorg on
On Thu, 2004-12-09 at 11:16 +, Jon Dowland wrote:
On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 07:51:47PM +0100, Roelof Wobben wrote:
Hello,
I heard a lot about X.org en thatin some distro's X.org wil replace Xfree.
Is X.org better than Xfree ??
Does someone has X.org getting on work with debian
On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 07:51:47PM +0100, Roelof Wobben wrote:
Hello,
I heard a lot about X.org en thatin some distro's X.org wil replace Xfree.
Is X.org better than Xfree ??
Does someone has X.org getting on work with debian Sarge ??
Roelof
try
On Thu, 2004-12-09 at 03:23, Ron Johnson wrote:
On Thu, 2004-12-09 at 02:27 -0800, Steve Lamb wrote:
Will? Has. Search for xorg on apt-get.org. ;)
Haven't you heard of past-tense will? grin
Only when Data finally took Picard's statement the other way. ;)
--
Steve Lamb [EMAIL
On Thu 9 December 2004 14:15, Vinu Jacob wrote:
Anxiously awaiting inclusion of xorg to sid. (Hence awaiting a sarge
release as well ;-/)
You could also use the packages from Ubuntu Linux.
I added these lines to /etc/apt/sources.list:
deb http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ hoary main
--- Jon Dowland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I see a lot of discussion about packaging and which distro it may end up
in but nothing about why you might want to use X.org instead of XFree :)
Version Number Syndrome. This all too common condition occurs when the
person involved assumes that highrt
On 2004-12-09 04:55:56 -0500, Carl Fink wrote:
On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 10:42:34PM -0800, Marc Wilson wrote:
Xorg will wait until Sarge+1 (namely, Etch). You don't need it anyway.
Based on precedent, someone will in fact package Xorg for Sarge, but it
won't be part of the official
On Thursday 09 December 2004 05:16, Jon Dowland wrote:
I see a lot of discussion about packaging and which distro it may end up
in but nothing about why you might want to use X.org instead of XFree :)
In a nutshell, X.org was created because the XFree86 people wouldn't accept
patches from
On Thu, Dec 09, 2004 at 11:22:55AM -0600, Kirk Strauser wrote:
On Thursday 09 December 2004 05:16, Jon Dowland wrote:
I see a lot of discussion about packaging and which distro it may end up
in but nothing about why you might want to use X.org instead of XFree :)
So, if you're completely
Kirk Strauser wrote:
On Thursday 09 December 2004 05:16, Jon Dowland wrote:
I see a lot of discussion about packaging and which distro it may end up
in but nothing about why you might want to use X.org instead of XFree :)
In a nutshell, X.org was created because the XFree86 people wouldn't accept
At Thu, 9 Dec 2004 11:16:49 +,
Jon Dowland wrote:
On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 07:51:47PM +0100, Roelof Wobben wrote:
Hello,
I heard a lot about X.org en thatin some distro's X.org wil replace Xfree.
Is X.org better than Xfree ??
Does someone has X.org getting on work with debian
On Thu, Dec 09, 2004 at 11:16:49AM +, Jon Dowland wrote:
I see a lot of discussion about packaging and which distro it may end up
in but nothing about why you might want to use X.org instead of XFree :)
http://necrotic.deadbeast.net/xsf/XFree86/trunk/debian/local/FAQ.xhtml
--
To
On Thu, Dec 09, 2004 at 06:02:41PM +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
... which is annoying since this means that some new machines are
not supported by the official Debian release.
I've already posted my Debian should release far more often rant
here, probably too many times.
--
Carl Fink
Hello,
I heard a lot about X.org en thatin some distro's
X.org wil replace Xfree.
Is X.org better than Xfree ??
Does someone hasX.orggetting on work
with debianSarge ??
Roelof
On Wed, 8 Dec 2004 19:51:47 +0100
Roelof Wobben [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I heard a lot about X.org en thatin some distro's X.org wil replace
Xfree.
Is X.org better than Xfree ??
Does someone has X.org getting on work with debian Sarge ??
Roelof
Not yet, maybe never.
mess-mate
--
On Wednesday 08 December 2004 12:51, Roelof Wobben wrote:
Is X.org better than Xfree ??
Yes.
Does someone has X.org getting on work with debian Sarge ??
If you're asking if X.org will be packaged for Sarge: yes, although it might
take a while.
--
Kirk Strauser
pgphuUTpWAr9X.pgp
On Wed, 2004-12-08 at 14:18 -0600, Kirk Strauser wrote:
On Wednesday 08 December 2004 12:51, Roelof Wobben wrote:
Is X.org better than Xfree ??
Yes.
Does someone has X.org getting on work with debian Sarge ??
If you're asking if X.org will be packaged for Sarge: yes, although it
On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 07:51:47PM +0100, Roelof Wobben wrote:
Is X.org better than Xfree ??
No. It's different. Someday it may be better, for some values of
better, but not yet.
Does someone has X.org getting on work with debian Sarge ??
Xorg will wait until Sarge+1 (namely, Etch). You
48 matches
Mail list logo
